Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • sorry I have been confused by Statute Barred meaning. I thought with Statute Barred the debt cannot be chased 6 years after you have stopped paying.  Originally I set up a payment arrangement with all the companies around 2008 when things went horribly wrong. At that time the payment arrangement was with the original creditors.  I still have one of the original creditors who I pay each month (Cap1). I thought that if you make a payment arrangement you have to stick to that situation throughout. Also, MDR (Moorcroft) have been taking a monthly payment on behalf of M & S Bank for about 5 years. When I sent MDR a CCA request I got a copy of the original agreement sent to me directly by M & S Bank about 5 weeks after my CCA request. Sorry for my ignorance but would you suggest I stop paying all including Cap1 who are the original creditor? TIA
    • London1971 without divulging too much into his mental health he has issues regarding anything to do with government and so is it ok to fill the forms provided and what do I put on there  thanks  
    • Dear all, I am hoping for some advice/guidance on this matter. I received a LoC dated 12/04/24 and replied to this on the 2/05/24 disputing claim with the following reasons: 1: [Inadequate Affordability Assessment]: I contend that your institution failed to conduct a thorough assessment of my financial circumstances prior to approving the loan. As a result, the loan amount and repayment terms were not suitable for my income and financial situation. 2: [Unsustainable Repayments]: The repayment schedule imposed by the loan agreement placed an undue burden on my finances, making it impossible for me to meet my other financial obligations without experiencing significant hardship. 3: [Lack of Transparency]: Your institution did not adequately disclose the risks associated with the loan, including any potential increases in interest rates or fees over the loan term. I also added the following: Under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 and the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) regulations, lenders have a legal obligation to conduct thorough affordability assessments and ensure that loan agreements are suitable for borrowers' circumstances. I hereby request that your institution: 1: Conduct a full investigation into my claim of irresponsible lending. 2: Provide me with copies of all documentation related to the loan application and approval process, including affordability assessments, credit checks, and correspondence. 3: Cease all collection activities related to the loan until this matter is resolved. Yesterday i received the attached reply via email and it included: 1: The Original Loan agreement 2: An account statement 3: A copy of a default notice letter. The email included a link for a direct debit set up page where you enter their reference and your bank account details (looks like a standard D/D set up page) but there is nothing to indicate the amount of the D/D that I might be agreeing to. I also think two days response time is not long enough to appropriately reply. Any thoughts appreciated   Email-compressed.pdf
    • Easy to set one up on Gov.uk , search on Google.
    • Hi London  he doesn’t have government gateway. Should we do it via post?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

How can I remove an arrangement to Pay from my credit file?


sleepless in stoke
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5555 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone, I have read numerous posts on here and found them to be very helpful with several other matters I had, however this is my first post so if i do something wrong...i am sorry and any help would be greatfully received.

 

To be brief I took out a lloyds personal loan in July 2003 at the time i was told by the personal bank manager that because of my previous history with the bank (i had orginally had a student account with them which i wasn't very good at maintaining) that I could only apply for the loan if I took out payment protection. I was a naive 24 year old them so I agreed to go ahead with the loan.

For 12 months i was fine and didn't miss a payment, then in 2004 my wages were reduced at work (bonus related) my reduced salary was crippling me and i started to incur charge after charge for missed DD, going over my overdraft etc etc etc, I did not received any asistance from the branch when i approached them.

 

6 months later and 6 missed loan payments my account was taken away from branch and sent to a colections center in brighton.

i could now only deal with my account over the phone.

After my first contact with them they agreed to set up a payment plan of £100 a month £50 to pay off my overdraft and £50 to pay off my loan.

Over the next year they completely messed up the payment schedule some months taking out double the amount, some months taking out the orginal payment of £183 and also the £100...if I was overdrawn at the time, they wouldn't return the dd insted sent letters insisting i had to pay more money into my account to cover it.

 

i have followed some of the advice on here and also been in to see my bank manager as my account is now back at branch.

 

* I went back to my original £183 payment in August 2007

* In January 2008 I made a final payment of £5979.68 to close the loan.

 

My credit file is showing that the loan is settled but on all the payment months it has an AP assigned to it (arrangement to pay)

This is crippling my credit and I am being refused left right and center.

 

I have the original CCA agreements both my copy and the banks copy they are both unsigned!!! as i dont remember even returning them back to the branch.

I sent a request to lloyds to ask if they had any copys and sent the £1 fee.

I got a nice letter back quote

 

"Thank you for your letter dated 17th February 2009 requesting a copy of your credit agreement.

I am sorry but we are unable to provide you with copies of your loan agreement documents as they were never forwarded to us from the branch the loan was taken out at: however we can provide you with the information you require:

date loan opened, loan amount" etc etc etc

 

My main objective is to get the ap removed from my credit file I have already had £750 in bank fees refunded in 2005 which is half of what I worked out I had been charged. I acepted as I needed the money at the time,

 

Any ideas on what my next step should be???

Also do I have a case for mis sold ppi?

I am missing something else?

Let me know if you need any more info

 

thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

well i would certainly go for the ppi

as for getting the marker removed.

i doubt it somehow, they are not actually 'wrong'

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dx,

thanks for you reply, I have been thinking...

The times when i went over my overdraft were solely because of the bank charges and overdraft interest charges...which i have since been refunded...it was never more than £35 so if i wasn't paying the ppi then i would never have gone over... it was only in the later months when the bank charges started acruing that things got really messy... i can remember 1 month i had £200 in charges alone. This is when i started missing the loan payments.

do you think this adds any weight to it?

thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

well thats good then

if you can prove [prob by you not touching the a/c in-terms of withdrawals] that their ppi/charges/int were the sole contributor then yep they will have to be removed.

 

sri its been quite a while since i did or heard of that as this stay is getting me brain forgetting thinks!

 

good luck

 

there are plenty of threads about the process though you seem pretty clued up.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Having slept on this one again.... because the bank cannot provide me with the original signed credit agreement and the loan was taken out pre 2006... does this deem it unenforceable? I do realise that because I continued to make payments that by default I have entered into a contract of sorts but surely this simple contract would not abide to the orginal arrangements such as when to pay and amount to pay etc., so as such surely I would not be in breach of contract when payments were missed

Do you think I am clutching at straws???

If not...I am composing a letter today...should I address all of these issues in the same letter or address each one separately

ie:

1. missold ppi, p.s this agreement I have is also unsigned

2. unsigned credit agreement,

3. failings by the bank to treat me fairly

4. Bank charges (which have been refunded) were a sole contributer to the poor state of my account

5. I am also looking into discrimination based on earnings as when all this happened I was on a salary of about £11k per annum...the bank hardly had time for me...now i earn in excess of 6 figures and I have my own personal bank manager who phones me on a regular basis just to see how i am!!!! they cant do enough for me now. BTW I have asked him about these issues and unfortunately he hasn't got a clue.

Link to post
Share on other sites

it prob would mean it is unenforceable, but not because of pre 2006 though, whatever that is?

TBH, yes, i think your are clutching at straws & i wouldn't go down that route, because unltimately i dont think thats what you want to do, shirk you responsibilities.

 

as i said IF you can prove their unfair charges resulted in you getting unkust markers on your CRA, then they would have to be removed, you might have already proved this by them refunding before? so why not ask the question of why were the defaults not removed when they refunded?

 

as for the mis-sold ppi, you have already given enough info here for [in my eyes] a good case.

 

with your current financial situation, i dont thing it will take too much for them to cough esp as they have not proff against it.

how about you produce your copy of the agreement [which every good customer has kept! lucky you] that should prove it.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again for you advice dx...

To clarify i repaid the loan in full in January 2008 and I dont owe them any money...I just need to get the ap removed from my credit file.

The 2006 thing is the updated CCA which states that you dont always need a true signature as applications can be made electronically. As my loan was taken out before that it doesn't apply.

 

I think you have helped me make up my mind on this, I will firstly try a more personal approach see how far that gets me before I start quoting CCA/ data protection/ deformation of charater legislation etc etc etc

 

What makes me really frustrated is that at the time they decided to reshedule my payments they said nothing about it crippling my credit file and the affects it would have on my future...if I had known then what i knew now there is no way I would have agreed to it. If fact thats what all the letters say..."here is your new payment schedule" not here is your arrangement to pay.. i have found this to be the practice of many organisations and I would like to lobby for a more transparent system especially in todays market where you are judged on your credit score and not on your affordibility....but that is another fight

 

thanks again i will keep this post updated

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...