Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Shein has been linked to unethical business practices, including forced labour allegations.View the full article
    • Hi I have to agree with @unclebulgaria67 post#3 For the funding side of moving to a new area and it being private supported accommodation I would also suggest speaking to private supported accommodation provider about funding but also contact the Local Council for that area and have a chat with them about funding because if you are in receipt of Housing Benefit certain Supported Accommodation that meets a certain criteria is treated as ‘exempt accommodation’ for Housing Benefit purposes but you need to confirm this with that relevant Council in your new area especially since it is Private Supported Accommodation as each Council can have slightly different rules on this. If you have a certain medical condition look up the charities and also have a wee chat with them as they may be able to point you to different Grants to assist with moving costs and your question about funding for private supported accommodation as well.
    • Hi Just to be clear a Notice to Quit is only the very start of the Housing Association going down the Eviction route there is a long process to go. Also to be clear if you leave at the Notice to Quit date only and go to the Council claiming you are Homeless they will more than likely class you as Intentionally Homeless therefore you have no right to be given temporary housing by the Council. The only way that works is when the Court has Granted a Possession Order then you can approach the Council as Homeless with the Court Order. As for the Housing Association issuing the Notice to Quit because there investigation has proved it's not your main residence but you have witness statement to prove otherwise. From now on with the Housing Association you need to keep a very good paper trail and ensure to get free proof of posting from the post office with anything you send to them. You now need to make a Formal Complaint to the Housing Association and please amend the following to suit your needs:   Dear Sir/Madam FORMAL COMPLAINT Reference: Notice to Quit Letter Dated XX/XX/2024, Hand Delivered on XX/XX/2024 I note in your letter that you stated that the Housing Association has carried out an investigation into myself and came to the conclusion that I am not using this property as my main residence and have evidence of this and have therefore issued a 'Notice to Quit' by XX/XX/2024. I find the above actions absolutely disgraceful action by the Housing Association. 1. Why have I never been informed nor asked about this matter by my Housing Officer. 2. Why have I never been given the opportunity to defend myself before the Housing Association out of the blue Hand Delivered a Notice to Quit Letter. 3. I have evidence and witnesses/statements that prove this is my Main Residence and more than willing provide this to both the Housing Association and the Court. I now require the following: 1. Copy of your Complaints Policy (not the leaflet) 2. Copy of your Customer Care Charter (not the leaflet) 3. Copies of your Investigation into this not being my main residence.    As well as the above you need to send the Housing Association urgently a Subject Access Request (SAR) requesting 'ALL DATA' that simple phrase covers whatever format they hold that in whether it be letters, email, recorded calls etc. The Housing Association then has 30 calendar days to respond but that time limit only starts once they acknowledge your SAR Request. If they fail to respond within that time limit its then off with a complaint to the Information Commissioners Office (ICO).     
    • Hi Sorry for the delay in getting back to you The email excuse and I do say excuse to add to your account and if court decide LL can't recoup costs will be removed is a joke. So I would Ask them: Ask them to provide you with the exact terms within your Tenancy Agreement that allows them to add these Court Fees to your Account before it has been decided in Court by a Judge. Until the above is answered you require these Court Fees to be removed from your Account (Note: I will all be down to your Tenancy Agreement so have a good look through it to see what if any fees they can add to your account in these circumstances)
    • Thank you for your responses. As requested, some more detail. Please forgive, I'm writing this on my phone which always makes for less than perfect grammar. My Dad tries but English not his 1st language, i'm born and bred in England, a qualified accountant and i often help him with his admin. On this occasion I helped my dad put in his renewal driving licence application around 6 weeks before expiry and with it the disclosure of his sleep apnoea. Once the licence expired I told him to get in touch with his GP, because the DVLA were offering only radio silence at that time (excuses of backlogs When I called to chase up). The GP charged £30 for an opinion letter on his ability to drive based on his medical history- at the time I didn't take a copy of the letter, but I am hoping this will be key evidence that we can rely on as to why s88 applies because in the GP opinion they saw no reason he couldn't drive i need to see the letter again as im going only on memory- we forwarded the letter in a chase up / complaint to the DVLA.  In December, everything went quiet RE the sleep apnoea (i presume his GP had given assurance) but the DVLA noticed there had been a 2nd medical issue in the past, when my father suffered a one off mini stroke 3 years prior. That condition had long been resolved via an operation (on his brain of all places, it was a scary time, but he came through unscathed) and he's never had an issue since. We were able to respond to that query very promptly (within the 14 days) and the next communication was the licence being granted 2 months later. DVLA have been very slow in responding every step of the way.  I realise by not disclosing the mini stroke at the time, and again on renewal (had I known I'd have encouraged it) he was potentially committing an offence, however that is not relevant to the current charge being levied, which is that he was unable to rely on s88 because of a current medical issue (not one that had been resolved). I could be wrong, I'm not a legal expert! The letter is a summons I believe because its a speeding offence (59 in a temp roadworks 50 limit on the A1, ironically whist driving up to visit me). We pleaded guilty to the speeding but not guilty to the s87.  DVLA always confirmed to me on the phone that the licence had not been revoked and that he "May" be able to continue to drive. They also confirmed in writing, but the letter explains the DVLA offer no opinion on the matter and that its up to the driver to seek legal advice. I'll take the advice to contact DVLA medical group. I'm going to contact the GP to make sure they received the SAR request for data, and make it clear we need to see a copy of the opinion letter. In terms of whether to continue to fight this, or to continue with the defence, do we have any idea of the potential consequences of either option? Thanks all
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5576 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Basically if its on your property or directly outside it they can assume it belongs to you.

It is down to you to prove ownership.

 

This is easy, just show then a copy of the logbook. If they try to remove a car not owned by you just phone the police and tell them the car is being stolen, which technically it is

 

They can levy anything outside the property because they dont need peacfull entry

Link to post
Share on other sites

If its on your property then yes they can levy on it without you having to sign anything.

They will usually clamp it then its down to you to prove you don't own it.

 

Its a disgraceful law that says YOU have to prove ownership not the bailiff.

As Ive said though, cars are the easiest thing to prove who owns.

much easier than proving who own a TV with no receipts

 

If it doesnt belong to you then get whoever owns it to park it away from the house

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest BiG SiD
:|Hello

Can any body confirm to me if a bailiff has to give you notice or any thing signed to check if they have put a levey on your car.

 

Ok two things here - which I think you are asking(?):

 

1) NO a bailiff does not have to give you any prior notice that a levy of distress is to take place.

 

2) IF a bailiff has completed a levy upon your (or what they deemed to be your) goods, they are requiried to leave an Inventory for you/the debtor, itemising what has been seized. Most companies will also leave some sort of additional paperwork with their contact details/perhaps an offered payment plan etc etc. But paperwork to confirm exactly what recovery action they have taken should have been left for your/the attention of the named debtor - but an Inventory is the 'give away' that a levy has been completed - any paperwork where the bailiff has listed goods?

 

Good Luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Doesn't the bailiff have to be able to physically able to touch the goods to include them on the levy? isn't That is one of the reasons a bailiff cant levy goods in someones house by just looking through the window?

Link to post
Share on other sites

no no paper work about taking goods just a letter giving me 24hrs to pay debt Bailiff did come to door I opened door saw bailiff and slammed door so he had to put letter through letter box. Came from the council signed his name as a bailiff odd

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest BiG SiD
If its on your property then yes they can levy on it without you having to sign anything.

They will usually clamp it then its down to you to prove you don't own it.

 

Its a disgraceful law that says YOU have to prove ownership not the bailiff.

As Ive said though, cars are the easiest thing to prove who owns.

 

Just a bit worried that this is sounding like... if the levy completed is NOT on your property (such as on a car in the street etc) - then the bailiff requiries some sort of signature - this is NOT true. They are as free to levy distress on your goods away from your home address (N/A: to distress for Rent - which is more restrictive) as they are in it and do NOT require your written or spoken permission to complete this.

 

As a side note - in practice cars are far from as easy to prove ownership as you might suggest - sure the bailiff will no doubt run a HPI check on the vehicle and in all likelihood check the registered keeper with the DVLA prior to any removal. You are quite correct when you say that the onus is not with the bailiff to prove ownership - but in todays world, with HPI, cars not registered to the owner (not that the registered keeper has to be the owner) - the dangers (for the bailiff) of simply removing a car without having undertaken such checks, would in my experience be too unsafe undertake.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest BiG SiD
Doesn't the bailiff have to be able to physically able to touch the goods to include them on the levy? isn't That is one of the reasons a bailiff cant levy goods in someones house by just looking through the window?

 

As far as I am aware - No they do not have to physicaly touch the goods - the goods have to be deemed removable at the time of the levy. In theory a bailiff might touch a car say behind a locked gate by pushing his hand through the gate etc - but he wouldn't be able to complete a levy of distress upon this, as it wasn't removable - drifting into a grey area here I suspect. Which for the same reason is why they can not levy by simply looking through a window - open the window and climb in Yes - but not by looking from outside.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as I am aware - No they do not have to physicaly touch the goods - the goods have to be deemed removable at the time of the levy. In theory a bailiff might touch a car say behind a locked gate by pushing his hand through the gate etc - but he wouldn't be able to complete a levy of distress upon this, as it wasn't removable - drifting into a grey area here I suspect. Which for the same reason is why they can not levy by simply looking through a window - open the window and climb in Yes - but not by looking from outside.

Yep that was what i was trying to get at.

For them to be able to levy, they acutaly have to be able to physicaly remove the goods hence the reason they cant levy be looking through a window

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a bit worried that this is sounding like... if the levy completed is NOT on your property (such as on a car in the street etc) - then the bailiff requiries some sort of signature - this is NOT true. They are as free to levy distress on your goods away from your home address (N/A: to distress for Rent - which is more restrictive) as they are in it and do NOT require your written or spoken permission to complete this.

 

As a side note - in practice cars are far from as easy to prove ownership as you might suggest - sure the bailiff will no doubt run a HPI check on the vehicle and in all likelihood check the registered keeper with the DVLA prior to any removal. You are quite correct when you say that the onus is not with the bailiff to prove ownership - but in todays world, with HPI, cars not registered to the owner (not that the registered keeper has to be the owner) - the dangers (for the bailiff) of simply removing a car without having undertaken such checks, would in my experience be too unsafe undertake.

Sorry you misunderstood me here.

what i meant was if the car was on their property (ie in their garden)

 

Again when i said car ownership is easy to prove i meant that it is easy for the person to show the bailiff the v5 to prove who owns the car.

 

I have first hand experience of a bailiff trying to remove goods that did not belong to me, despite being in possession of a statutory declaration stating they belonged to someone else the bailiff was still going to seize said goods

Link to post
Share on other sites

well if you have a block of 3 houses cars parked in a row facing all 3 houses how will the bailiff know who the car belongs it could belong to a person living accross the road so I suppose you would have to let a neighbours know by saying oh by the way could you move your car please as maybe the Bailiffs will take it. They must have to ensure the car belongs to you before they remove it.

 

One way to fall out with your neighbours ha ha

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...