Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for that nuanced response Bazza. I was hoping to argue that I did turn left into the road and what happens on the road I turned into is a moot point. Best, Chris
    • Hi mitm are you able to DM me? Need some advice and rather just take off here for now. Won’t let me DM you as a new user. 
    • Just a little something for consideration When a card is compromised, the replacements can be set up to automatically allow or manually re-add, old recurring transactions. The card issuer may ask you to confirm legitimate transactions which they would effectively 'migrate' to the new card Some do - some don't. Some staff on some cards seem to be entirely unaware/uncaring about this. Some card issuers expect you to sort it all out manually.   BUT if the leak is an ongoing lyca leakas it seems - as soon as you or your CC supplier give it to lyca/the leak source - compromised again     A note on security DONT use the same email or phone number for your banking as you do for sims etc. Although a bank eg santander leak would compromise this Infp seems to suggest that single/compromised multi factor authentication customers are priority targets, with more robustly secure cards being hit by 0.00 tests first Consider that the email address is one of the OTP recieving options AND one of the OTP security checks prior to sending the OTP - with the phone number being another So if they've got your card and email (same email for banking and end contact) - and you aren't forcing a phone OTP - you are compromised.  
    • Thanks for posting up the back of the NTK. The good news s that as it does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act, it means that you are not liable for the charge as the keeper as I explained in a previous post.  The PC fails for two reasons. The first is that it does not specify the period of parking. All it does is list the arrival and departure times of your car. Obviously that does not include the time taken to drive to the car parking space, manoeuvre the car into the space and later drive from the space to the exit. Nor does their times include things like getting kids disabled people out of and into the car as well as things like returning the trolley whilst still being parked. All of which can add a fair bit of time to the parking period which can then be subtracted from their ANPR times and makes your actual parking time a lot shorter than 118 minutes they seem to think it is. The second reason is that they failed to ask the keeper to pay Schedule 4 Section 9 [2][e]  (e)state that the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver and invite the keeper— (i)to pay the unpaid parking charges You as keeper are now in the clear which is a good reason for you to contact Sainsbury  stating that you are being pursued as the keeper when you are not liable under the Act as well as the oher things I suggested in my previous post. If you don't get it cancelled with Sainsbury this could drag on for months with endless letters unlawfully pushing the price up to scare you into paying.  
    • Brilliant! That's great to hear and honestly pleased I'm wrong, my advice was out of concern. I checked some of your previous posts last night and you've been giving great advice to others at times. Bringing a claim can be serious (counter-claims etc) and it didn't appear you were knowledgeable based on posts so far. Far from an expert myself, just interested and will try to help. I'll sit on the sidelines, best of luck with the claim!
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Hsbc/restons/marlin/phoenix


henrythepug
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5566 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Images to small.

 

Draft order

 

 

IN THE XXXXXXXX COUNTY COURT

 

 

Claim No:

 

 

 

BETWEEN:

 

 

[ ]

 

Claimant

and

 

[ ]

 

Defendant

draft/ORDER

UPON reading the Defendant’s application notice dated […]

 

 

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

 

 

  • The judgment in defaultdated [ ] on therequest ofthe Claimant dated [ ] be set aside.
  • The Claimant do pay the Defendant’s costs of theapplication, to be assessed by the court.
  • The Defendant dofile and serve his Defence to the claim by no later than [ ].
  • The Claimant do have permission tofile and serve a Reply by [ ].

Dispatch, “We have a 911, Armed Robbery in progress, see Surplus Store corner of Peebles Drive and West 24th Street”

Link to post
Share on other sites

then in box 10

 

 

Quote:

the defendant respectfully asks that the court set aside judgment entered by default on xx/xx/ 200 at Nothampton County Court before District Judge XXXXXXXX

 

The defendant being a layman and litigant in person and without the knowledge or assistance of legal advice while under a Debt management plan (edit this bit if not appropriate) wrongly tried to negotiate with the claimant albeit in error and ignorance of the court procedures, however judgment was entered at the request of the claimant. the defendant upon receiving guidance on his case believes that there is a good prospect of success in defending the action for the following reasons

 

the defendant requested that the Claimant, who is the purchaser of delinquent debts, supply a copy of the credit agreement which the claim was based upon. in response to this request no document was supplied, this failed to satisfy the requirements of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 or the requirements of Consumer Credit (Cancellation Notices and Copies of Documents)Regulations 1983 (SI 1983/1557) in particular section 2 which states

 

(1) The lettering in every notice in a Form prescribed by these Regulations and in every copy of an executed agreement, security instrument or other document referred to in the Act and delivered or sent to a debtor, hirer or surety under any provision of the Act shall, apart from any signature, be easily legible and of a colour which is readily distinguishable from the .

 

the defendant asserts that the claimant has or had a duty to supply the agreement in a legible form as evidenced by section 2 of the Consumer Credit (Cancellation Notices and Copies of Documents)Regulations 1983 and complaint with the form and content requirements of the Act and Consumer Credit Agreements Regulations 1983

 

Furthermore the claimant failed also to provide the defendant with a Letter Before Claim as required by the CPR pre action Protocol and their particulars of claim were vague , insufficient and failed to disclose a sufficient statement of facts to allow the defendant to plead even giving allowance for the claim being issued via the Bulk Centre in Northampton

 

In addition , No default notice as required by section 87 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 was received from the claimant and the defendant considers that without a validly served default notice the claimants claim could not progress notwithstanding the fact that the claimants claim is as it stands irredeemably flawed

 

 

based upon these facts and given the large body of case law in respect of Consumer Credit Agreements the defendant is of the belief that he has a good prospect of successfully defending a claim based on these facts and respectfully asks that judgment be set aside

Dispatch, “We have a 911, Armed Robbery in progress, see Surplus Store corner of Peebles Drive and West 24th Street”

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do not wish to appear thick but can you just explain to me the following

I am applying for the exparte order to be set aside , the one where Phoenix are making themselves the Claimant, and at the same time I am asking for the original judgement to be reconsidered. Is that right ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

A Judge has already decided that Phoenix can be the new claimants, so you will be applying to have the CCJ set aside with Phoenix as the claimants.

 

I am not sure there if there is any use trying to argue that Phoenix should not be the new claimants.

Dispatch, “We have a 911, Armed Robbery in progress, see Surplus Store corner of Peebles Drive and West 24th Street”

Link to post
Share on other sites

Henry, sorry not replied earlier I have been working.

 

People claim that to have a set aside it needs to be done very quickly after the CCJ has been obtained. Clearly that is not going to be the case with you, however mine was about two years old. SO GO FOR IT!

 

S

Dispatch, “We have a 911, Armed Robbery in progress, see Surplus Store corner of Peebles Drive and West 24th Street”

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just think it is better to have any advice given out to be on your thread, just in case I or anybody else gives the wrong advice.

 

I am going to PM someone who I think could answer your question about the Ex Parte. I will ask him to look on on this thread.

 

keep in touch.

 

S

Dispatch, “We have a 911, Armed Robbery in progress, see Surplus Store corner of Peebles Drive and West 24th Street”

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Righty then

 

Ex Parte means "proceeding brought by one person in the absence of another " so essentially it is in the absence of a party

 

I think the facts of the case need consideration, there was an admission of the debt so it is difficult i will be honest here

 

i have not had time to read the whole thread and my time is extremely limited so bear with me

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...