Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • is the home in joint names but this is solely your debt? need far more history to be able to comment if it's paid off and was not just written of by one partly on their books and sold to anther, thus the cra file says £0. dx
    • So, Sunak has managed to get someone to 'volunteer to go to Rwanda hasn't he? .. for just £3000 payment to the person plus 5 years free board and lodging isnt it? - cost to UK taxpayer over £300M+ (300 million quid+) isnt it? - Bargain says Rwanda, especially with all the profit we made privately selling those luxury chalets Bravermann advertised for us   I wonder how many brits would jump at that offer? Thousands? Hundreds of thousands? Lets see, up to 5 years free board and lodging and £3k in my pocket .. I'd go - and like that person - just come back if/when I get bored. First job - off to Botswana for a week to see the elephants.   Of course the paid volunteers going to Botswana are meaningless - Rwanda have REPEATEDLY said they wont take any forcibly trafficked people in breach of international law eh? Have the poops actually got any civil servants to agree to go yet - probably end up as more massive payments to VIPal contractors to go and sit there doing nowt shortly eh?    
    • Hi Wondered if I could get a little advise please. I entered into a commercial lease (3 years) and within a few months I had to leave as the business I was trading with collapsed. I returned the keys to the landlord and explained the situation and no money, also likely to go on benefits but the landlord stuck to their guns. They have now instructed solicitors to send letter before action claiming just over £4000. The lease was mine and so the debt. I know this. I have emailed the solicitors twice to explain I am out of work and that with help from family I could offer a full and final settlement figure of £1500 or £10pw. This was countered by them with an offer to reduce the debt by £400, or pay off the amount over 12 months. I went back with an improved full and final offer of £2500 or £20pw. This has been rejected with the comment 'papers ready to go to court'. I have no hope of paying the £4000 and so it will have to go to court. Pity as I have no debts otherwise but not working is a killer. I wondered if they take me to court, could I ask for mediation? I also think that taking me to court will result in a pretty much nothing per week payment from my benefits. Are companies just pushing ahead with action even if a better offer is on the table? Thanks for your help.
    • Hi all, Many thanks for the advice! Unfortunately, the reply to the email was as expected…   Starbucks UK Customer Care <[email protected]> Hi xxxxxx, We are sorry to read you received a parking charge after using our Stansted Airport - A120 DT store. Unfortunately, the car park here is managed by MET parking. Both Starbucks and EuroGarages who own and operate this site are not able to help and have no authority to overturn any parking charges received. If you have followed the below terms then you would need to send all correspondence to [email protected], who will be able to assist you further. Several signs around the car park clarify the below terms and conditions: • Maximum stay 60 minutes, whilst the store is open. If the store is closed, pay to park applies. • The car park is for Starbucks customers only who make a purchase in our store, a charge will be issued if you left the site. • If you had made a purchase and required additional time, you must have inputted your registration number into the in store iPad which would have extended your stay up to 3 hours • To park in a disabled bay, you must have displayed a valid disabled badge. • If Starbucks was closed, you must have paid for parking as charges still apply, following signage located on site. • If you didn’t use the store, you must have paid for parking, following signage located on site Please ensure all further correspondence is directed to MET parking at the above email address, and accept our apologies that we cannot help you further on this matter.  Kind Regards,  Lora K  Customer Care Team Leader Starbucks Coffee Company, Building 4 Chiswick Park, London, W4 5YE
    • Thanks HB edited and re-uploaded. Thanks for the heads up 👍
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

First Nat/GE Money PPI- Miss-sold?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5411 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all would be grateful for your input.

Have been reading about PPI miss selling and i am concerned about the way PPi has been applied in my case apart from the fact i was retired and have a pension why was i sold it? There are other issues about this this agreement which i will go into later re its un-enforceability.

 

 

http://i684.photobucket.com/albums/vv205/bernardlivesley/doc1.jpg?t=1234099509

 

 

Also have found this relating to the PPI on the above agreement the loan is for 10 years but the PPi looks like it was only in place for 5 years (even tho i didnt want it). Confused i am.

 

http://i684.photobucket.com/albums/vv205/bernardlivesley/sc0008a9bd.jpg?t=1234100525

 

Ok found this which answers part of the above http://www.which.co.uk/advice/how-to-tell-if-youve-been-mis-sold-ppi/quick-check-were-you-mis-sold/index.jsp and no i was not informed about it

 

Thanks AL

Edited by e28bigalbexley

-------------------------

CAPITAL ONE * SETTLED*31st Oct 06

HBOS *SETTLED* 8th Oct 06

WOOLWICH *SETTLED*12thJan2007

Monument (Barclays) *SETTLED*10thMar2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all would be grateful for your input.

Have been reading about PPI miss selling and i am concerned about the way PPi has been applied in my case apart from the fact i was retired and have a pension why was i sold it? There are other issues about this this agreement which i will go into later re its un-enforceability.

 

 

http://i684.photobucket.com/albums/vv205/bernardlivesley/doc1.jpg?t=1234099509

 

 

Also have found this relating to the PPI on the above agreement the loan is for 10 years but the PPi looks like it was only in place for 5 years (even tho i didnt want it). Confused i am.

 

http://i684.photobucket.com/albums/vv205/bernardlivesley/sc0008a9bd.jpg?t=1234100525

 

Ok found this which answers part of the above Quick check: were you mis-sold? - How to tell if you?ve been mis-sold PPI - Your money - Which? Advice and no i was not informed about it

 

Thanks AL

 

Hello E,

 

Looks like a typical case of mis-selling to you. They probably just routinely added it, regardless of whether you were elligable to claim on it.

 

Did you receive the terms and conditions of the policy??????

 

Were you aware of any commission being paid?????????

If any of my posts are helpful, please feel free to click my scales. All information is given as my opinion only, based on my own personal experiences. I have no legal training, but have educated myself in aspects of consumer legislation. My motto "NEVER GIVE IN, NEVER SURRENDER", THERE IS A WAR ON YOU KNOW

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Thanks for the reply HHNF and the answer to both your questions is NO:eek:

Not that i even realized that there was a third party involved.

I was wondering about phoning the Insurance Co and asking about their medical exclusions. Do you think that would wise.

Another point, would the agreement become unenforceable as the charge for ppi and the loan are lumped together, i think i read somewhere that they should be separate items, or am i clutching at straws.

 

Thanks again AL.

Edited by e28bigalbexley

-------------------------

CAPITAL ONE * SETTLED*31st Oct 06

HBOS *SETTLED* 8th Oct 06

WOOLWICH *SETTLED*12thJan2007

Monument (Barclays) *SETTLED*10thMar2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Thanks for the reply HHNF and the answer to both your questions is NO:eek:

Not that i even realized that there was a third party involved.

I was wondering about phoning the Insurance Co and asking about their medical exclusions. Do you think that would wise.

Another point, would the agreement become unenforceable as the charge for ppi and the loan are lumped together, i think i read somewhere that they should be separate items, or am i clutching at straws.

 

Thanks again AL.

 

Hello E,

 

Don't know if you have read this thread regarding multiple agreements very interest and makes you look at things from a different angle:D

 

Multiple agreements falling within section 18 CCA 1974

 

There is also this thread regarding secret commission.

 

secret commisions

 

These cases are rather complex, you have the broker, the lender and the insurance company who all had a bite of the cherry.

 

Personally I would be writing to them all, for there version of events:D

If any of my posts are helpful, please feel free to click my scales. All information is given as my opinion only, based on my own personal experiences. I have no legal training, but have educated myself in aspects of consumer legislation. My motto "NEVER GIVE IN, NEVER SURRENDER", THERE IS A WAR ON YOU KNOW

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi HH

Thanks for the links will read up on them.

 

I did phone the insurance company today spoke to a very helpful girl who informed me that as i was retired the policy should never had been sold to me

as you can see on GE's copy of the agreement they have me down as semi-retired

 

http://i684.photobucket.com/albums/vv205/bernardlivesley/doc1.jpg?t=1234099509

 

Except on my customer copy :D i have something entirely different:eek:

some scull-duggery is afoot maybe. Just out of interest there appear to be several differences between my customer copy and a GE CCa request copy :-o

 

AL.

-------------------------

CAPITAL ONE * SETTLED*31st Oct 06

HBOS *SETTLED* 8th Oct 06

WOOLWICH *SETTLED*12thJan2007

Monument (Barclays) *SETTLED*10thMar2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

it comes as no surprise you were never given t&c,s from pinnacle.i think this may have been the main swinging point in ge refunding one of our policy,s.you will need to push ge all the way ,we had to file at court .maybe an sar to pinnacle ,include all chat logs ,sounds like an admittance by pinnacle that the policy was not suitable but they were still ok about administering it :-x .might be worth ringing the fos to make that point ,although i don,t think they can help in reclaiming recovery of your ppi

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Lilal

Well Pinnacle were the insurers and GE were the creditors but it was a third party(broker) that issued the loan (thanks HH) so lots of commission flying about no doubt. but Ge issued the loan so im going to bash them, they have taken my money when they should not have. Also the the agreement is flawed

it should be a multiple agreement showing the loan and the ppi seperately not all lumped into one agreement. Im going to get my PPI back then im going to Hit them with an unenforcable agreement.

 

AL

-------------------------

CAPITAL ONE * SETTLED*31st Oct 06

HBOS *SETTLED* 8th Oct 06

WOOLWICH *SETTLED*12thJan2007

Monument (Barclays) *SETTLED*10thMar2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are getting no luck with GE Money you can indeed take your complaint to the FOS and it maybe a better option because if they do not uphold your complaint you still have the court route to use where as if you went to the court first and they did not uphold that it end of your complaint.

 

The only drawback with using the FOS first is as you can imagine they are getting snowed under with complaints and it could take 6 to 12 months to resolve but they are upholding 80% of claims so is worth considering.

 

Should you choose to use the FOS also remember it costs you nothing but will cost GE Money £450 but court route there are fees involved which you will have to pay if your complaint is not upheld.

 

our complaints procedure and how to complain

 

Regards

 

Pompeyfaith

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

unfortunately ge weren,t members of the gisc so the fos aren,t able to help against ge .ge must be given time to address your issues as you know ,then they,ll offer you the fla ,i wasted 3 months waiting for them to make a decision ,only for them to decide that "oh you can go to an independant arbitrator but his say is final ".thanks but no thanks ,i trust the fla as much as i think ge are a trusting company:mad:.

i sent mine to a rupert peacock at harrow ,but was dealt with by another ge employee.i,m sure if you address it to complaints dept it will get looked at.

good luck keep posting

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lilal i understand what your saying and i am in this for the long run and figured it would take court action to get my money back having read a few threads about GE earlier.

So tomorrow i am sending GE a SAR (thanks HHNF) special delivery, to get all the statements ect so i can tot up all the interest they have added, and if i have got this right add 8% and contractual interest, please correct me if i am wrong on the interest bit.

 

AL

-------------------------

CAPITAL ONE * SETTLED*31st Oct 06

HBOS *SETTLED* 8th Oct 06

WOOLWICH *SETTLED*12thJan2007

Monument (Barclays) *SETTLED*10thMar2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya Bexley,

 

That is correct you can claim the contractual rate as that is what they have charged you plus 8% simple interest as this what the court or FOS would award you on top because they have in effect borrowed that money from you to lend to someone else.

 

Regards

 

Pompeyfaith

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya Bexley,

 

That is correct you can claim the contractual rate as that is what they have charged you plus 8% simple interest as this what the court or FOS would award you on top because they have in effect borrowed that money from you to lend to someone else.

 

Regards

 

Pompeyfaith

 

Thanks Pompey you have put a big :D on my face for that bit of info.

-------------------------

CAPITAL ONE * SETTLED*31st Oct 06

HBOS *SETTLED* 8th Oct 06

WOOLWICH *SETTLED*12thJan2007

Monument (Barclays) *SETTLED*10thMar2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are more than welcome

 

Regards

 

Pompeyfaith

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi all

Ok GE have sent some not all Data so have written them a letterif anyone would like to add any comments to please feel free.

 

 

Re DATA PROTECTION ACT 1998 SUBJECT ACCESS REQUEST

 

Dear Ms Blundell,

Thank you for the data you have so far supplied.

Unfortunately there does appear to be some information missing.

 

1.Full copies of all contracts, which relate myself, and your organization. Including true copies of any documents you hold in support of the same.

 

2.Full copies or transcripts of any correspondence in postal, email or any other format which you have entered into with any individual, organization or third party which contains any personal or financial information which pertains to me. IE. Payment Protection Insurance and Credit Reference Agencies.

 

3.You have included a description of Standard Abbreviations Thank You. I would ask you to forward either your Special or Non Standard Abbreviation List, which includes descriptions of abbreviations such as, MVC, ACD, RDR to list but a few.

 

4.Could you also explain this statement.

’Information not held within a relevant filing system has not been provided under this Subject Access Request’. It goes on to say, ‘There maybe additional accounts with us that relate to your client. If you require information regarding these accounts or if there is any other information, which you may think we hold please write to us with the following to assist us in locating it:

 

The relevant reference number

A brief description of the document

The date of the document (if you have this)

 

We may be in a better position to disclose this information to you’.

 

May I ask how would you find any Data on myself unless it is contained in a relevant filing system.

 

5.As you are aware it is your responsibility to ensure my Data is kept secure at all times . Although sent by Special Delivery the totally inappropriate envelope the Data was contained in was damaged in transit and had to be re- packaged by Royal Mail. I find this totally inexcusable and I will be writing to the Information Commissioner to inform them of this.

 

You have until March the 30th to fulfil my request

 

 

Thanks AL

Edited by e28bigalbexley

-------------------------

CAPITAL ONE * SETTLED*31st Oct 06

HBOS *SETTLED* 8th Oct 06

WOOLWICH *SETTLED*12thJan2007

Monument (Barclays) *SETTLED*10thMar2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all

Ok have revised above post and devised this one

Letter sent today special delivery regarding GE's lack of common sense.

 

 

sc0004f735-1.jpg picture by bernardlivesley - Photobucket

 

ge2-1.jpg picture by bernardlivesley - Photobucket

 

Also added a checklist just to help them:D

Poor little darlings.

 

 

AL

-------------------------

CAPITAL ONE * SETTLED*31st Oct 06

HBOS *SETTLED* 8th Oct 06

WOOLWICH *SETTLED*12thJan2007

Monument (Barclays) *SETTLED*10thMar2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just had the FOS adjudicator rule in my favour with respect to PPI on my loan with GE Money (arranged by Loans.co.uk). The actually found LCUK at fault. LCUK is refusing to accept the adjudicator's opinion so my case is now going to the Ombudsman for a final ruling. The FOS are excellent and very helpful. They are slow but I say go to them the minute you get rejected by GE Money (and your complaint is certain to be rejected by GE Money and the third party arranger).

Link to post
Share on other sites

FCO can i ask what was the date you first took this to the FOS,just trying to gauge what their time scale is at the moment.

 

Thanks

 

PF

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear PF

 

I filed my complaint in January 2008. For 10 months, I kept getting letters saying that "due to the number of new complaints, it has not been able to assign your complaint to a caseworker but we hope to be able to do so within the next four weeks"! In November I got mad and wrote my MP. Within two weeks, I heard from an adjudicator and was told that he was handling my complaint! Less than a month later, I received a letter upholding my complaint.

 

I have since learnt that if you have severe financial difficulties, you can ask for expedited consideration. If this is the case for you, make certain you mention it.

 

Once my case was allocated, I found the FOS very helpful and very fast.

Link to post
Share on other sites

One thing to note: you cannot complain to the FOS until you receive a letter from your lender saying that they have made a final decision. They usually say something like "we will not enter into any further communication about this matter". When you get this obnoxious letter, you can go to the FOS.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that FCO mycomplaint is already with the FOS has been since 11/08 and its a tidy sum relating to mis-sold PPI on 8 loans although it should be 9 loans as the co-op said they could not locate the agreement for the 9th loan which is in fact the first one i had with them.

 

Since they told me that i sent a letter telling them the complaint is now with the fos and i quoted the fos ref number and low and behold that agreement turned up .

 

I am indeed in financial diffeculty due to having to give up work because of a stroke i had in 1990.

 

I went back to work for 18 yrs but my doctor laid me off work due to the symtoms of that stroke getting worse i.e. curvature in my back,claw right hand drop right foot, hypertension, pain in left hip due to the left carrying the weight over the yrs plus enlarged prostate gland.

 

So all this has made my income very limited.

 

Regards

 

PF

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Hi All

Right, have written to GE asking for my PPI + contractual interest back and they have said that they feel as they were not present at the time the loan was sold they are not responsible for PPI being added and i should get in touch with the Holiday company that sold me the loan. They added it is their final response. So i will write to the holiday company and ask the same questions. But i believe it is GE who are at fault as the loan supplier. Any Comments...

-------------------------

CAPITAL ONE * SETTLED*31st Oct 06

HBOS *SETTLED* 8th Oct 06

WOOLWICH *SETTLED*12thJan2007

Monument (Barclays) *SETTLED*10thMar2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya Bexley,

 

To be honest I would not bother with the holiday company, nor with ge money as they have had there chance of putting this right.

 

As they have quoted the letter as their final response its time to get your complaint in at the FOS.

 

Full details below:

 

our complaints procedure and how to complain

 

Regards

 

PF

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

One thing to note: you cannot complain to the FOS until you receive a letter from your lender saying that they have made a final decision. They usually say something like "we will not enter into any further communication about this matter". When you get this obnoxious letter, you can go to the FOS.

 

Not totally true, you can go to the FOS if the 8 week deadline passes with no response to your PPI claim.

 

aa

I have no legal training and the advice I offer is a matter of support. Before you commit to any Legal action you are advised to contact a qualified legal practitioner.

------------------------------------------------

Bank charge successes:

Halifax - Full settlement incl interest.

HSBC - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 75% of claim.

RBS - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 70% of claim.

2 ongoing claims for bank charges with HSBC with more to come. (Supreme Court ruling could have upset these claims) They did :mad:

PPI Successes

PPI 4 settlements on 9 loans. FOS involvement on 7 added on the 8 % Statutory interest another 30% to both.

2 claims settled in full with LV without FOS involvement.

2 claims settled in full with HSBC without FOS involvement

 

PPI Claims ongoing with:

Cap one Now with the FOS

Barclays. Paid up today 24/04/10 cheque received for over £4,500 and in the bank.

LTSB still have to decide on this as their SAR production was abysmal. Papers data mixed up documents missing etc

 

1 Complaint not upheld by FOS they said it was ICO issue. Complaint upheld by ICO. See this..

Post 290 from

***RBS PPI Claim Long fight but, WON***

 

Please do not PM me for advice as it may be sometime before I can respond.

 

Keep at them. Do not give way and do not accept all they tell you, they will delay and stall for as long as they can to prevent repaying you your mis-sold PPI.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...