Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You will probably get a couple more reminders followed by further demands fro unregulated debt collectors with even increasing amounts to pay. They are all designed to scare you into paying.  Don't. It's a scam site and they do not know who was driving and they know the keeper is not liable to pay the PCN. Also the shop was closed so they have no legitimate interest in keeping the car park clear. So to charge £100 is a penalty as there is no legitimate interest which means that the case would be thrown out if it went to Court.  Keep your money in your wallet and be prepared to ignore all their letters and threats. Doubtful they would go to Court since a lot more people would not pay when they heard  MET lost in Court. However they may just send you a Letter of Claim to test your resolve.  If yoy get one of those, come back to us and we will advise a snotty letter to send them.  You probably already have, but take a look through some of our past Met PCNs to see how they are doing.
    • Hello, been a while since I posted on here, really hoping for the same support an advice I received last time :-) Long, long story for us, but basically through bad choices, bad luck and bad advice ended up in an IVA in 2016. The accounts involved all defaulted, to be expected. In 2018, I got contacted by an 'independent advisor' advising me that I shouldn't be in an IVA, that it wasn't the solution for our circumstances and that they would guide us through the process of leaving the IVA and finding a better solution. I feel very stupid for taking this persons advice, and feel they prey on vulnerable people for their own financial gain (it ended with us paying our IVA monthly contribution to them)-long and short of it our IVA failed in 2018. At the same time the IVA failed we also had our shared ownership property voluntarily repossessed (to say this was an incredibly stressful time would be an understatement!) When we moved to our new (rented) property in August 2018, I was aware that creditors would start contacting us from the IVA failure. I got advice from another help website and started sending off SARs and CCAs request letters. I was advised not to bury my head and update our address etc and tackle each company as they came along. Initially there was quite a lot of correspondence, and I still get a daily missed call from PRA group (and the occasional letter from them), but not much else. However, yesterday i had a letter through from Lowell (and one from Capital One) advising that they had bought my debt and would like to speak with me regarding the account. There will be several.of these through our door i suspect, as we did have several accounts with Capital One. Capital One have written to us with regular statements over the last 5 years, and my last communication with them was to advise of of our new address (June 2019), I also note that all of these accounts received a small payment in Jan2019 (i'm assuming the funds from the failed IVA pot). Really sorry for the long long post, but just thought id give (some of) the background for context.... I guess my question at the moment is.....how do I respond to Lowell...do I wait for the inevitable other letters to arrive then deal with them all together or individually...? Do I send them a CCA?  Many thanks
    • hi all just got the reminder letter, I have attached it and also the 2nd side of the original 1st pcn (i just saw the edit above) Look forward to your advice Thanks   PCN final reminder.pdf pcn original side 2.pdf
    • The airline said it was offering to pay $10,000 to those who sustained minor injuries.View the full article
    • The Senate Finance Committee wants answers from BMW over its use of banned Chinese components by 21 June.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Urgent Help reg: Lowell financial ltd !!!!!!???


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5606 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I have been receiving the letters from Lowell regarding the debt from 3G phone. Actually, i had bought 3 phone contract for my friend from dialaphone via online website. I then contacted dialaphone to change the account details on his name and he started paying the bills via direct debit from his own bank account. the dial a phone agent said that, he can not change a name but can change the bank details. Then i left that place in may 2005 and lost touch with that friend. in 2008, i went to get mortgage but refused saying bad credit history. when i checked this on experian, i came to know about this unpaid debt of 290 GBP on my name since 2006. I dont know whether he did not paid bills or he did not cancel the contract and it continued to increase the debt. that time i also had another mobile contract and had it for upto 2008 from 3. but they never mentioned abt that debt of 290 gbp. After i came to knew abt this debt wrote letter to 3G phone and asking the details. in that letter i wrote current account numbers and name but they stated that i do not have any debt. Then onwards, i sat relaxed and did nothing. neary end of the 2008 i started getting letters from Lowell finance asking to repay the debts. I kept ignoring and once i wrote email explaining the situations on provided email address on their letters but the email did not go through. Last, i received letter from HAMPTON LEGAL threatning with legal action if i do not reply in 7 days.

 

I am in a difficult situation. how to explain all this mess and improve credit history. How to deal with Hampton's last letter. Should i contact or should i ignore them ? how to use 3G letter sent to me confirming no debt (if i could find that) and if i had cancelled my one 3G phone why they did not cancelled the another contract, which i imagine should be interlinked account. or if my friend paid upto the first term of contract and he did not bothered to pay after that. can any expert advice on this as i can not afford to pay this money as recently i had burglers and lost two grand worth things and had no insurance. please help... your help wil be highly appreciated. Thank you very much in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

Lowells have been buying some duff 3 accounts lately so my immediate thought is to send a prove it letter.

Don't worry about Hamptons. They are just the pseudo legal team across the room from the Leeds losers.

 

fox

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

Lowells have been buying some duff 3 accounts lately so my immediate thought is to send a prove it letter.

Don't worry about Hamptons. They are just the pseudo legal team across the room from the Leeds losers.

 

fox

 

 

How to write a letter? i mean what to write...any proper format related to my problems. Thanks Fox

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm afraid that it is bad news.

You are responsible for the account and will have to deal with it.

Doesn't seem fair - but frankly from the stories we hear, it is not a good idea to do people these kinds of favours.

I don't want to stick up for the industry but it boils down to this:

You gave credit to a friend becaus the Industry wouldn't give him credit - for whatever reason.

Maybe you are now finding out why the industry thought that he wasn't a good risk

Link to post
Share on other sites

lowells have indeed been buying duff debts i think fox may mean a cca letter (where you ask for a true copy of your credit agreement) without this they cannot collect on the debt. i stress the debt doesnt get swallowed it just isnt collectable) not sure how it affects ur credit rating tho as im only a newbie myself . as i say im only new and have NO LEGAL TRAINING SO PLEASE FEEL FREE TO INVESTIGATE FURTHER BEFORE COMMITING YOURSELF TO ANY ACTION

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm afraid that it is bad news.

You are responsible for the account and will have to deal with it.

Doesn't seem fair - but frankly from the stories we hear, it is not a good idea to do people these kinds of favours.

I don't want to stick up for the industry but it boils down to this:

You gave credit to a friend becaus the Industry wouldn't give him credit - for whatever reason.

Maybe you are now finding out why the industry thought that he wasn't a good risk

 

I would not like to speculate any thing as i and you are not sure what happend with this account. Money was being paid. 3G never contacted me eventhough i had another account with them. if i had received any communications from them quickly i would have resolved. i am sorry but your approach is wrong to me. i would advise you to understand the facts first. all i m asking is, how to get in touch with them. how to prove my point. whether they are charging me any interest or not. please help me if you can or let other people do that. Thanks nothing is personal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

lowells have indeed been buying duff debts i think fox may mean a cca letter (where you ask for a true copy of your credit agreement) without this they cannot collect on the debt. i stress the debt doesnt get swallowed it just isnt collectable) not sure how it affects ur credit rating tho as im only a newbie myself . as i say im only new and have NO LEGAL TRAINING SO PLEASE FEEL FREE TO INVESTIGATE FURTHER BEFORE COMMITING YOURSELF TO ANY ACTION

 

but would it not be an admitance of the debt ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can't CCA a mobile account (it's not covered)

 

Contact 3 to make sure they and you know what the situation is.

 

Until you know which account this debt relates to, you can't be expected to be able to be in a position to pay it, That's why I said send the prove it letter.This is the one to send:

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Account no:

 

You have contacted me/us regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by myself/ourselves.

 

I/we would point out that I/we have no knowledge of any such debt being owed to (insert company name).

 

I am/we are familiar with the Office of Fair Trading Debt Collection Guidance which states that it unfair to send demands for payment to an individual when it is uncertain that they are the debtor in question.

 

I/we would also point out that the OFT say under the Guidance that it is unfair to pursue third parties for payment when they are not liable. In not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt you are using deceptive/and or unfair methods.

 

Furthermore ignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment amounts to physical/psychological harassment.

 

I/we would ask that no further contact be made concerning the above account unless you can provide evidence as to my/our liability for the debt in question.

 

I/we await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed. Otherwise I will have no option but to make a complaint to the trading standards department and consider informing the OFT of your actions.

 

I/we look forward to your reply.

 

**Edit to suit**

 

Remember, don’t sign the letter.

 

 

 

fox

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had dealings with Lowell regarding an old 3 account, from what I have seen they cannot provide any sort of proof for any of the 3 accounts that they bought.

 

They backed down straight away after receiving a letter asking them to prove it, this is not usual for lowell, and after the appearance on watchdog regarding the 3 accounts, I doubt they want any more bad publicity.

 

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/164250-alex-delarge-lowell-3-a.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...