Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree with DX, Sadly, from the pics, it looks like you're bang to rights😪 The rules are very explicit. Before entering the box, you must ensure that you are able to completely exit. It looks like the car in front may have moved a couple of feet and tempted you to set off, but when you did that, there still wasn't enough room to completely exit the box. By all means ask to see the video evidence, but saying you had to stop because the vehicle in front stopped, isn't a valid defence.
    • Hello, welcome to CAG. I imagine the letter that the security guards talked about will be a letter from a company or lawyers who specialise in trying to extract money from shoplifters. I think Sainsbury's use DWF solicitors, otherwise it could be a company like RLP. It won't be a 'fine', only the police can do that. Look at this as a parallel 'justice' system that doesn't involve the plice. If you read around the forum for other cases of shoplifting, you'll get the idea of how this all works. If you think your behaviour has become compulsive, we suggest having a chat with your GP who should get you help for this. Best, HB
    • despite our wettest 18 months on record,  Low levels of rain and snow have cut Canada’s hydropower production, forcing it to increase electricity imports from the U.S.   - NYT
    • Hi all…. i was wondering if someone could help me. I am ashamed I have been caught shoplifting from Sainsbury’s by two undercover security guards who I suspect have been following me for a week now… I have been impulsively shoplifting due to what I think could have become an addiction of some kind. I am ashamed of what I had been doing and I do believe being caught has been for the greater good. i was taken to a room and asked to empty my bag, the guards were slightly rude but I complied with them politely as I know they are just doing their job and I am in the wrong. They retrieved my address, name, birthdate and took a photo of me, they asked me how many times I had shoplifted and I said twice and I didn’t want to be foolish and say just once. They issued me a letter of ban from the store and if I was caught in the store again the police would be called. They told me I would be paying 2x what I had stolen today as the goods had been damage which I am guessing is stole around £65 worth roughly. I did offer to pay for the items I had stolen on the day but they declined. They did not call the police but let me leave after claiming I was a lucky person. They told me to expect a letter in the post and that I “would be smart not to ignore it”  what should I be expecting in the post from them? I am aware from reading a lot online about security costs.. people mentioned to ignore these costs however as I had damaged the labelling on the goods should I still comply and pay the fines ?  kind regards awful shoplifter
    • If you're sat there wondering how to attract and retain young talent, look no further. Find out what young people want from employers.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Restricted Street During prescribed hours


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5607 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

A friend of mine received a fine for 'Parked in a Restricted Street During Prescribed Hours-Blue Badge Holder'.

 

Can I ask, is not loading and unloading permitted for upto 15 mins??

 

Alos, it was outside a hospital, they parked on a single yellow I believe, to unload some very important medicines and other stuff...basically their wife was told she would die and luckily she has recovered fully. He has a letter from the hospital to say she was admitted that day.....

 

Please your advice and help is appreciated, I think he has a couple of days left.

 

Much appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

Usual regs are

"Private vehicles can stop to load or unload for a maximum of 20 minutes, but only if the items are too bulky or heavy to be carried from the nearest available parking space."

Was your friend the blue badge holder or were they in a blue badge bay?

Why aren't we revolting?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

No they were on a single yellow line as far as I know.

 

They had a disabled badge displayed it is his wifes badge, she was in the hospital, he had to unload some important medicines and other things the docs needed and her clothes and other stuff.

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

No they were on a single yellow line as far as I know.

 

They had a disabled badge displayed it is his wifes badge, she was in the hospital, he had to unload some important medicines and other things the docs needed and her clothes and other stuff.

 

thanks

 

That is abuse of the blue badge which in addition to the PCN is a criminal offence. A blue badge can only be used by another driver to park to pick up or drop off the holder not to do errands for them. If the holder was in hospital as confirmed by a letter then the driver is admitting he is guilty of a criminal offence by using the badge to park on a SYL.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well he had to park there as it was closest to the hospital and then took her insideand took her stuff down for her and when he returned to remove the car and park it in a car park which was further away but was cheaper for the whole day.. he had a ticket. But he had to park there to drop her off and her stuff...so that isn't wrong.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well he had to park there as it was closest to the hospital and then took her insideand took her stuff down for her and when he returned to remove the car and park it in a car park which was further away but was cheaper for the whole day.. he had a ticket. But he had to park there to drop her off and her stuff...so that isn't wrong.

 

If he droppeed her off yes.....but thats not what you said, you said he was taking medicine to the hospital! If he was dropping her off then its not loading or unloading (which would not cover the medicine either) its alighting which is permitted. A Blue Badge can park on a single yellow anyway so I'm curious why it was issued? Usually it would be because the car is obstructing or its parked over 3 hours or the badge is not being used correctly ie clock not set or being abused.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know I said medicines as I didnt think dropping of the actual blue bad ge holder was classed as loading/unloading I thought saying he was dropping of the medicines is classed as loading/unlaoding. But he dropped her off and lots of other stuff of hers.

 

Ok. I do not know why it was issued anyway.

 

The PCN says ;

 

Parked in a Restricted Street During Prescribed Hours-Blue Badge Holder

 

He did not park in an obstructive manner, didnt stay longer than 3 hours, and clock he said was correctly set and he is the only onw to transport her so always does it right.

 

Could they have issued it as it was before 6.30pm, and he was on the SYL? There is just signs of how to pay by phone for the bays but nothing about SYL's.

 

Thanks for your help!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The contravention is jargon for parking on yellow lines so thats what he is deemed to have done wrong. I would suggest before making a formal appeal you get him to find out why it was issued so he can then construct his defence rather than state something that may not be relevant and could make matters worse.

Link to post
Share on other sites

How does he find out why it was issued, by calling them?

 

If so, what if they try to ask him for his reasons....should he just say Im just caling to know why it was issued and I will do what is necessary..?

Edited by jamees
Link to post
Share on other sites

How does he find out why it was issued, by calling them?

 

If so, what if they try to ask him for his reasons....should he just say Im just caling to know why it was issued and I will do what is necessary..?

 

Just get him to ask why it was issued (by phone if possible its quicker) as his wife thought she could use the badge on SYL. If they refuse to tell you over the phone then you may have to ask in writing but don't appeal until you find out why it was issued. For example theres no point writing an account of the dropping off and the fact that its meant to be permitted when you may need instead to explain why the clock wasn't used.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK.

 

Also, the PCN does not state how long you have to make an appeal. Just states that you have 14 days to pay reduced amount and they will rpely to an appeal within 14 days that is all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am going to scan it in for you to see soon. It is the London Borough of Westminster.

 

He spoke with them they said that on a SYL and in a residents bay parking with a blue badge is not permitted. There are no signs to say so, but apparently there is a document issued by the DOT to say Westminster can ddo that. I am just curious to know is that right??

Link to post
Share on other sites

The City of Westminster, City of London, and London Boroughs of Camden (part) and Kensington & Chelsea have their own rules for blue badge holders which are different from most other parts of UK.

 

In The City of Westminster, visitors with a blue badge are not allowed to park on single or double yellow lines during prescribed hours (except for immediate loading/unloading) or park free at pay and display bays.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Westminster do have their own blue badge rules,

 

view here Directgov Blue Badge map and bottom left hand corner look for city of westminster.

or her Transport and streets:Disabled Blue Badge Scheme

 

They are very restrictive. If you really want to get some good advice you must post a front and back copy of the PCN. ideally also photos of the yellow line and any signage.

 

If the contravention was restricted hours then somewher there would have been signs. Others will tell you whether alighting/boarding exemption may apply.

 

At the very least Westminster may allow cancellation on the grounds of a first occasion, so always worth asking.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh its in London, I wish you had said, lol! :) You really only have one option and that is to claim that the blue badge holder needed assistance getting to the hospital and claim the alighting exemption. Westmister PCNs are usually correct and it was propbably in a CPZ making lack of signage hard to prove. Make sure you appeal within the discount period then you can always choose to cut your loses and pay less if the appeal is rejected.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no signage to say that. It is just writeen somewhere on the net, that is cheeky..

 

Not really trhat cheeky if you get given something that allows you certain benefits its just as much your responsibility to find out what they are. Usually you get given a booklet or pamphlet explaining the rules with the badge how else would you know what the clock was for or where the badge could be used?

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, true well I wouldn't know as I dont have a badge. Something for my friend to know I guess.

 

But anwyay he says he cant scan it and send it for osme reason, so will have to wait till I can do it for him. In the meantime, does it make a difference as to whether or not the PCN mentions the limit on making an informal appeal...?

 

they told me on the phhone that there isn't really one, its right up until an NTO is issued. Is that right? But if you amke an appeal afetr 14 days you loose the right to have the reduced rate... Also does the 14 days include the weekends?

 

Thanks

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

The informal appeal period lasts until you get the NtO, after which it is a 'formal representation'. Even if they reject it, they should hold the 'reduced rate'. You can then also appeal to PATAS, but the reduced rate is unlikely to be offered.

 

Yes, I understand that the 14 days includes weekends, otherwise it should say 14 working days, though how you define a working day any more I'm not sure.

Why aren't we revolting?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would saying the alighting exemption aswell as having to take down some other stuff make a difference?

 

Does alighting exemption just mean having to help someone get down from the car...?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

re: alighting exemption

on the PATAS wesite ( and somewhere in this forum) there is a case where alighting exemption applied for a disabled person to be helped into a nearby bank. i.e. under those specific circumstances longer was allowed than the person just getting out of the car.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...