Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • HI DX Yes check it every month , after I reinstated the second DD I was checking every week. Also checked my bank statements and each payment has cleared. When responding to the court claim does it need to be in spefic terms ? Or laid out in a certain format? Or is it just a case of putting down in writing how I have expained it on CAG?
    • Come and engage with homelessness   Museum of Homelessness MUSEUMOFHOMELESSNESS.ORG The award-winning Museum of Homelessness (MoH) was founded in 2015 and is run by people with direct experience of homelessness. A very different approach. If you're in London you should go and see them
    • You have of course checked the car is now taxed and the £68 is stated against  the same reg?  If the tax for the same car did over lap, then I can't see you having an issue pleading not guilty Dx
    • The boundary wiill not be the yellow line.  Dx  
    • Afternoon all Looking for advice before I defend claim for car tax payment that the DVLA claim I owe £68 from an idemity claimback from my bank and unpaid tax  brief outline. Purchased car Jan 30th ,garage paid the tax for me after I gave them my card details  first payment £68 out in Feb 24  followed by payment of £31 from March due to end Jan 24 Checked one of my vehicle apps and about 7-10 days later car showing as untaxed? No reason why but it looks like DVLA cancelled it , this could be because I did not have the V5 and the gargae paid on my behalf but not sure did not receive a letter to say car was untaxed.  Fair enough I set up the tax again staight away in Feb 24  and first payment out Mar 31st , and each payment since has come out each month for £31 , this will end Feb/Mar 2025, slightly longer than the original tax set up, all good. I then claimed the £68 back from my bank as an indemity refund as obviously I had paid but DVLA had cancelled therefore it was a payment for nothing?  Last week recieved a SJP form dated 29th May stating that DVLA were claiming for unpaid tax and a false indemity claimback which of course is the £68. It also stated that I had received two previous letters offering me the oppotunity to pay that £68 but as I had not responded it was now a court claim that I must admit guilt for or defend. My post is held for weeks at a time from Royal Mail ( keepsafe) due to me receiving hospital tretament at weeks at a time that said I did not receive any previous letters from DVLA. I am happy to defend this and go to court but wondering what CAG members think? In summary I paid an initial amount of £68 and then a DD of £31 , tax cancelled  I set up a new DD at £31 a month all in the month of Feb 2024, I claimed the £68 back from my bank. DD has been coming out each month without issue and I have paperwork to show the breakdown for both DD setup's plus bank statements showing the payments coming out . The second DD set up has extended payments up to Feb/Mar 2025. DVLA claiming the £68 was ilegally claimed back despite the fact they cancelled the original DD for reasons unknown. Is this defendable ? I will post up documents including the original DD conformations 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Hire Agreements


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5611 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

Looking for some advice on a number of issues.

 

1) Hire Agreements, can you cancel then at any time and return goods and then pay balance off.

2) Misleading information, what section of the consumer credit act would this be under.

3) DATA PROTECTION ACT 1998 SUBJECT ACCESS REQUEST, do i need to send anything before this, or can i just sent it. Also would i need to send 2 for both accounts, or would 1 be enough.

4) Do call centres log all out going and incoming calls.

 

Hopefully i'm not asking toooooo much:-)

 

Thanks in advance

Edited by PainInTheNeck
Link to post
Share on other sites

1) You need to see what is stipulted within the contract

 

2) Misleading information? Pertaining to what? The goods, the hire service, the contract?

 

3) Nothing, just request it - and you need to enclose the fee of £10. This is a maximum, they may charge less or give the information for free, so if you're not in a rush ASK first, and see if they make a charge.

 

4) Usually, it is part of the software used that runs the contact-centre system, but this information is theirs and not yours so whilst you may request it, there is no guarantee you will get it as invariably it will have been 'deleted'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1)

4) Usually, it is part of the software used that runs the contact-centre system, but this information is theirs and not yours so whilst you may request it, there is no guarantee you will get it as invariably it will have been 'deleted'.

 

Any particular software that 'runs the call centre'?

 

The switch, dialler, call logging, voice recording and work flow are all separate systems usually running on separate boxes.

 

If the call relates to selling of a financial package then there is a requirement to record the call and hold the recording for 7 years. However, it can be argued that due to the method of storing/retrieval, the recordings are not held in a relevant filing system and thus exempt from the Data Protection Act 1998.

 

As an aside, there is also an ongoing debate about CVV recording. No company may retain a copy of the CVV when they make a credit card sale, beyond completion of the transaction. Whilst it is easily deleted from databases, etc. it is impossibe to delete from a digital call recording without deleting the whole recording.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any particular software that 'runs the call centre'?.

 

None of them, and possibly all of them. The days of non-integrated systems are long gone, with turnkey software IT packages providing a call centre with everything from VOIP to predictive outbound dialling, It was nice being reminded of how it all used to be, but the answer remains just as valid.

 

The OP also talks of Hiring and 'goods' so I think the mention of financial packages is irrelevant in this regard.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All

Thanks for the reply, reason i ask the questions is as follows, i'm currently in dispute with another company, when i was debating about purchasing the goods, i was told if my business went out of business, i could sell the goods.

 

But when i went ceased trading i asked about selling the goods and i was told i could not, i have found on the contract in small print "This agreement is not cancelable under UK consumer credit legistration".

 

Misleading information i believe, but because it my word against theirs, i emailed the sales account manager and asked the same question, and received the same answer, you can sell the equipment.

 

Not sure how well it will stack up in court, but i now have written proof.

 

Also in 1 telephone conversation i was told i could return the goods and they would close my account with nothing to pay, now they are saying they never said that, hence the question about the 'DATA PROTECTION ACT 1998 SUBJECT ACCESS REQUEST', they may not give me the info, but could a court force them to hand the conversations over, or transripts.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

The misleading information you refer to appears to be verbal - unless you have someone independent who can corroborate the facts that you could sell the goods, the written contract will prevail, unless it also contains a clause which states that the T&C cannot be varied unless by a duly authorised officer of the company (and it usually adds this has to be in writing).

 

Centainly a court could force disclosure of the calls, but be relalistic, no firms is going to ensure they lose by providing information that proves your version of events. They couls easily assert no recording was made, of if there was it has now been routinely erased.

 

What does strike me as unusual, is that in asking the question could you sell the goods if your business went down, the point is any HIRE arrangement will always specifically exclude this by the nature of the arrangement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Busby

 

"Centainly a court could force disclosure of the calls, but be relalistic, no firms is going to ensure they lose by providing information that proves your version of events. They couls easily assert no recording was made, of if there was it has now been routinely erased"

 

I later got a new phone which allowed me to record conversations, in one conversation i recorded the lady i was talking to, she said they had a record of that conversation logged on the system, now if they try and deny it, i'll just play the phone call to the judge with what she said.

 

Regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pity you hadn't recorded the whole thing from the start! The issue remains the same, as the employee could have said that but (a) been mistaken (b) said this to unsettle you © didn't mark it as wanted and it's now been deleted... incompetence is one of the best defences around!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...