Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Speaking of the reformatory boys, here they are with all of their supporters, some of whom traveled with them from miles away, all carefully crammed together and photographed to look like there were more than about 80 .. rather like Farages last rally with even fewer people crammed around what looked like an ice cream van or mobile tea bar ... Although a number in the crowd apparently thought they were at a vintage car rally as they appeared to be chanting 'crank-her'. A vintage Bentley must be out of view.   Is this all there is? Its less than the Tory candidate. - shut up and smile while they get a camera angle that looks better
    • in order for us to help you we require the following information:- Which Court have you received the claim from ? Canterbury If possible please scan redact and upload a full page copy of page 1 of the claim form. ( Name of the Claimant ? Moneybarn No 1   How many defendant's  joint or self ? One Date of issue – top right hand corner of the claim form – this in order to establish the time line you need to adhere to. 29/05/24 Acknowledged by 14/06/24  Defence by 29/06/24  Particulars of Claim PARTICULARS OF CLAIM   1.  By a Conditional Sale Agreement in writing made on 25th August 2022. Between the Claimant and Defendant, the Claimant let to the Defendant on Conditional Sale. A Ford Ranger 3.2 TDCi (200 P S) 4x4 Wildtrack  Double Cab Pickup 3200cc (Sep.2015) Registration No, ******* Chassis number ***************** (“The Vehicle”).  A copy of the agreement is attached   2.  The price of the goods was £15,995.00.  The Initial Rental was £8500.00.  The total charge for credit was £3575.;17 And the balance of £11,070.17 was payable by 59 equal consecutive monthly instalments of £187 63. payable on the 25th of each month.   3.  The following were expressed conditions of the set agreement,   Clause 8: Our Right to End this Agreement  8.1   Subject to sending you the notice as required by law, any of the following events will entitle us to end this Agreement: 8.1.2  You fail to pay the advance payment (if any) or any of the payments as specified on the front page of this agreement or any other sum payable under this Agreement. 8.1.3 If any of the information you have given us before entering into this Agreement or during the term of this Agreement was false 8.1.4 We consider, acting reasonably, that the goods may be in jeopardy or that our rights in the goods may otherwise be prejudiced. 8.1.5 If you die 8.1.6 If a bankruptcy petition is presented against you; if you petition for your own bankruptcy, or make a live arrangement with your creditors or call a meeting of them. 8. 1.7 If in Scotland, you become insolvent or sequestration or a receiver, judicial factor or trustee to be appointed over any of your estate, or effects or suffer an arrestment, charge attachment or other diligence to be issued or levied on any of your estate or effects or suffer any exercise, or threatened exercise of landlords hype hypothec 8.1.8 If you are a partnership, you are dissolved 8.1.9 If the goods are destroyed, lost, stolen and/or treated by the insurer as a total loss in response to an insurance claim. 8.1.10 If we reasonably believe any payment made to us in respect of this Agreement is a proceed of crime. 8.1.11 If steps are taken by us to terminate any other agreement which you have entered into with us.   Clause 9.  Effect of Us Terminating Agreement   9.1 If this Agreement terminates under clause 8 the following will apply 9.1.1 Subject to the rights given to you by law, you will no longer be entitled to possession of the goods and must return them to us to an address as we may reasonably specify, (removing or commencing the removal of any cherished plates) together with a V5 registration certificate, both sets of keys and a service record book. If you are unable or unwilling to return the goods to us then we shall collect the goods and we'll charge you in accordance with clause 10.3 9.1.2 We will be entitled to immediate payment from you for all payments and all other sums do under this agreement at the date of termination 9.1.3 We will sell the goods or public sale at the earliest opportunity once the goods are in a reasonable condition which includes a return of the items listed in clause 7.1.4 9.1.4 We will be entitled to immediate payment from you of the rest of the Total Amount Payable under this agreement less: ( a) A rebate for early settlement ias required by law which will be calculated and notified to you at the time of payment (b) The proceeds of sale of the goods (if any) after deduction of all costs associated with finding you and/or the goods, recovery, refurbishment and repair. Insurance, storage, sale, agents fees, cherished plate removal, replacement keys, costs associated with obtaining service history for the goods and in relation to obtaining a duplicate V5 registration certificate   4, The following are particulars required by Civil Procedure Rules. Rule 7.9 as set out in 7.1 and 7.2 of the associated Practice Direction entitled Hire Purchase Claims:-   a)     The agreement is dated 25 August 2022. And is between Moneybarn No1 Limited  and xxxxxxxxx under agreement number 756050. b)    The claimant was one of the original parties to the agreement. c)    The agreement is regulated under the Consumer Credit Act 1974. d)    The goods claimed Ford Ranger 3.2 TDCi ( 200 PS) 4x4 Wildtrack Double Cab Pickup 3200 cc (Sep2015} Registration No ^^^^^^^ Chassis number ***************** e)     Thw total price of the goods £19570 f)     The paid up sum £1206 5 g)    The unpaid balance of the total price £7505 (to include charges) h)    A default notice was sent to the defendant on 20th February 2024 by Firrst class post i)      The date when the right to demand delivery of the goods accrued 14 March 2024 j)      The amount if any claimed as an alternative to delivery of the goods 7505 22 include charges ]= 5.  A the date of service of the notice the instalments were £562.89 in arrears. 6. By reason of the Termination of the Agreement by the notice, defendant became liable to pay the sum of £7502 7. The date of maturity the agreement is 24th August 2027. 8. Further or  alternative by reasons of  the Defendant breaches of the agreement by failing to pay the said instalments, the Defendant evinced an intention no longer to be bound by the Agreement and repudiated it by the said Notice the claimant accepted that repudiation 9. By reason of such repudiation the claimant has suffered loss and damage.   Total amount payable £19570 Less sum paid or in arrears by the date of repudiation £12064 97 Balance £7505 (to include charges.) ( The claimant will give credit if necessary for the value of the vehicle if recovered.)  The claimant therefore claims 1.    An order for delivery up of the vehicle 2.    The MoneyClaim to be adjourned generally with liberty to restore,  Upon restoration of the MoneyClaim following return or loss of the vehicle. the Claimant will ensure the pre action protocol for debt claims is followed. 3.    Pursuant to s 90 (1)  of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. An order that the Claimant and/or its agents may enter any premises in which the vehicle is situated in order to recover the vehicle should it not be returned by the Defendant 4.    further or alternatively damages 5.    costs.   Statement of truth The Claimant believes that the facts stated in these Particulars of Claim are true. The Claimant understands that the proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes or causes to be made a false statement in the document for verified by statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth. I am duly Authorised by the Claimant to sign these Particulars of Claim signed Dated 17th of April 2024   What is the total value of the claim? 7502   Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? No   Never heard of this   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? n/a Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? No   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After  Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? In a garage  Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Yes  Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Original Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? n/a   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? They said sent but nor received   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? None seen   Why did you cease payments? Still Paying,   What was the date of your last payment? Yesterday  31st May 2024   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? Yes on 12 Feb 2024   What you need to do now.   Can't scan, will do via another means as you cant have jpg
    • Now that is an interesting article which adds afew perspective that I hadn't thought significant - but on reflection of the perspectives offered ... Now Starmer is no Blair, however 'blairite he may be perceived, but the Tories aren't tories and aren't even remotely liberal   The fast 'unannounced and unexpected election call from sunack may well be explained by the opinion linked that he hoped reform would be unprepared and effectively call a chunk of Farages largely empty bluster - making him look even more of a prat, leave scope for attacks on shabby reform candidates and mimimise core vote losses to reform - while throwing the 'middle ground' (relative) tories TO THE DOGS - and with the added bonus of likely pacifying his missu' desire to jogg off to sunny cal tout suite somewhat   thumb in the air - I expect about 140ish tory seats, but can hope for under a hundred Reform - got to admit the outside possibility of 1, maybe 2 seats with about 8% of the vote - but unlikely. I think projections of over 10% of the vote for reform is nudged and paid for speculation - but possible with the expected massive drives from Russian, Chinese and far right social media bot and troll prods targeting the gullible.
    • Commentary June 2024 WWW.ELECTORALCALCULUS.CO.UK Interesting article about just how bad it could be for the Tories.  Also Tories could be hoping on Reform not having candidates in many seats, as they were not ready.  
    • Even a Piers Morgan is an improvement and a gutless Farage Piers Morgan calls for second Brexit referendum WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM Piers Morgan and Nigel Farage have faced off over Brexit and a second referendum in a heated reunion on BBC Question Time.   “Why don’t we have another referendum about Brexit?” he questioned. “I seem to remember when 2016 came around we were told there was going to be control of our borders and it was going to be economically beneficial to this country. And eight years later we have lost complete control of our borders… and economically it seems to have been a wilful act of self-harm.”   ... Piers missed off : after all somebody said a 48/52 decision would be "unfinished business" by a long way - was that person just bul lying (again)  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Taz11 v MBNA Enforceable ??


Taz11
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5463 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Thanks Dave, sorry I missed your post 20, just read it. Its interesting what you say with regards to the documents being shredded soon after. I would also be interested in knowing if they go to court that they MUST PRODUCE THE ORIGINAL to enforce the debt, and as cosalt says they are trying to bluff us into thinking they have it, hoping we won't go that far. Is that a fair assumption Dave?, because if it is, I'm quite willing to fight it (similar to RBOS) to force them to produce the original.

 

If these companies shred their originals, and originals are required in court, surely they don't have a leg to stand on ???

 

thanks Taz11

 

whoops!!, you wrote post 25 whilst I waas typing this.........lol

Taz11 v NatWest/Triton: Unenforceable :D

Taz11 v BOS: Unenforceable :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 155
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Believe it or not a copy WILL do !! I did some research into this and was suprised by what I found.

 

Take for example CCTV..most of it is stored digitally, to view it you would have to transfer it in memory...so you are in fact viewing a copy.....its really mind blowing stuff...I had a headache for ages :)

 

mind you it not as bad as contract law.........arggghhhh

 

 

Dave

 

Thanks for clearing that up, so it would be up to us to prove / persuade the judge that the original signed agreemet differed from that they had produced.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for clearing that up, so it would be up to us to prove / persuade the judge that the original signed agreemet differed from that they had produced.

 

AGAIN....you have learnt well glasshopper :)

 

Failing 100% unenforceability You NEED to be able to introduce DOUBT as to the validity and compliance of the agreement with the Act.

 

Dave

** We would not seek a battle as we are, yet as we are, we say we will not shun it. (Henry V) **

 

see you stand like greyhounds in the slips,

Straining upon the start. The game's afoot:

Follow your spirit; and, upon this charge

Cry 'God for Harry! England and Saint George!'

:D If you think I have helped, informed, or amused you do the clickey scaley thing !! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Blimey !!, I'm pretty lost now. All the time reading through all the posts I've been working on the basis that they must produce the original, signed copy etc....., and it now seems they can send you what they like, as long as they feel they have complied with your cca request, which in turn brings the agreement back out of default.

 

So in the event that companies "think" they have complied, what should our answers be (letter template), if we are not happy with what they have sent and would like to contest it.

 

If they can obviously produce a copy in court, what is the point of SAR or CPR. I really need to get my head around this, especially with this MBNA one, as I fear its on the edge, but not really sure how to answer them to contest what they have sent me.

 

 

guess what?, advice again please :(

 

Taz11

Taz11 v NatWest/Triton: Unenforceable :D

Taz11 v BOS: Unenforceable :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the important wording here is "I agree to be bound by the conditions of use"

 

NOT "I agree to be bound by the TERMS and conditions of use"

 

the word conditions has no real legal effect....you dont get prescribed conditions

 

rgds

 

Dave

 

 

Your thoughts on this Dave. If I was to contest this, what would the ideal reply be to MBNA with regards to your statement above. Do I need to make them aware that I think the agreement is "flawed" or would you advise to let them have the ball in their court and let them prove otherwise. I'm not quite sure what course of action I should now take ??

 

thanks again

 

Taz11

Taz11 v NatWest/Triton: Unenforceable :D

Taz11 v BOS: Unenforceable :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Morning,

Have you thought about bluffing them into thinking you will be taking legal action? This thread is very interesting if you haven't seen it:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/173201-why-you-shouldnt-use.html#post1868913

 

Sending a cpr 31.16 request may make them sit up and take notice.

 

fox

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Morning Silverfox,

 

yes, I know that is an option, but that is a request requring an agreement which bears my signature, which by the looks of it, they have provided. I think I've got to prove/show in some kind of statement to them that the agreement they provided is not enforceable/properly executed for whatever reason ???

 

I'm trying to find a fault in the document which would enable me to do this ???

 

I was on till 2 o' clock this morning reading thread after thread on this, and this is what I came up with. I know it may not be correct, but I'd like opinions on the following if possible.

 

thanks Taz11

 

A)

 

85 Duty on issue of new credit-tokens

 

(1) Whenever, in connection with a credit-token agreement, a credit-token (other than the first) is given by the creditor to the debtor, the creditor shall give the debtor a copy of the executed agreement (if any) and of any other document referred to in it.

 

(2) If the creditor fails to comply with this section—

 

(a) he is not entitled, while the default continues, to enforce the agreement; and

 

(b) if the default continues for one month he commits an offence.

 

 

(3) This section does not apply to a small agreement.

 

In other words, MBNA will have defaulted on the agreement by not providing me with an executed copy everytime they have sent a new card ????

 

B)

 

I have read on a thread somewhere by the godmother, that the agreement must provide a right to cancel and information must be provided by the creditor to the debitor where to write/reply. There is nothing on this agreement stating that....simply that it will be sent on?? I have no information with the documentation they sent me that this was provided.

 

 

c)

 

Even in laymans terms, The document they have sent me, merely shows that I have applied for credit on a priority application form.

Taz11 v NatWest/Triton: Unenforceable :D

Taz11 v BOS: Unenforceable :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, I'm really trying to get my head around a letter to send them.

 

Having now read it over and over again, my thought are this;

 

Should there be a statement of some description specifying who the lender is and address of the lender?? In other words, I'm making an agreement with blah, blah,blah

 

I am not convinced that "their" signature was signed at the time of the application. It definately looks like it has been added afterwards, and even if it was, surely it should state, signed on behalf of the creditor or MBNA. Any Joe Bloggs could have scribbled across it.

 

 

It does not, anywhere on the document say, I abide/bound by terms and conditions overleaf, merely "conditions of the card", and as previously pointed out the terms could be from anywhere unless it is shown to prove on the original document that it backed the front.

 

I would first like to know if I have a small but viable case with any of the above and what kind/sort of letter I should reply to them with, or at least show that I am contesting it to show that I am on the ball and just not going to crumble.

 

thanks

 

Taz11

Taz11 v NatWest/Triton: Unenforceable :D

Taz11 v BOS: Unenforceable :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is my opinion.........and only an opinion......(based on what knowledge I have gleaned over the time I have been on this site).

 

That you have a "chance" of avoiding this one.

 

please bear in mind that if it goes to court (which it may not) it depends on the judge on the day.

 

I have seen 100% cases fail....obviously then not 100%.

 

It depends on the quality of argument that you put forward.

 

you NEED to tell the judge the law you NEED to explain that the other side has NOT complied and WHY you think this is so.

 

have a look at the draft POC on my thread post527 I think....

 

it lays out what is wrong ...why...and what I want

 

but that is a long way in the future........

 

lets see what we know

 

1 they have sent you a copy of the agreement bearing your sig

2 they have sent a partial copy of the t&c's that contain the prescribed terms

3 there is NO reference to TERMS overleaf only conditions

4 there seems to be no way of linking the two pages

 

that said I would say you had a reasonable chance........but only you can make that decision though.

 

I would do some MEGA research first.......dont listen to anyone who only puts one point of view across, Ive seen some people pushed towards court by bad advice and a sort of common euphoria...ignoring the obvious facts.

 

I suppose I mean to say that NONE of us are experts here, we make judgements based on a common belief, which is sometimes wrong.

 

YOU need to be sure of the facts and the possible downfalls

 

Sorry for the lecture

 

Do some research and go for it ..........they will in all eventuality give up before court

 

rgds

 

Dave

** We would not seek a battle as we are, yet as we are, we say we will not shun it. (Henry V) **

 

see you stand like greyhounds in the slips,

Straining upon the start. The game's afoot:

Follow your spirit; and, upon this charge

Cry 'God for Harry! England and Saint George!'

:D If you think I have helped, informed, or amused you do the clickey scaley thing !! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Dave,

 

I have looked all over the net, obviously including here for information, and to be honest I have got to try. I am currently filed with CAB because of debt, and if there is the slightest chance I can contest something I will give it a chance. Before starting all this I was dead certain I was going to go the bankrupt route, as I couldn't see an end to the worry, stress, anxiety, constant letters and phone calls.

After viewing this site, I thought i would give myself half a chance and try to at least contest the agreements and maybe reduce some of the debt. If it all goes wrong, I will have to take the bankruptcy route, there is no alternative. I am now unemployed, on benefit and will probably lose the house, so its a time to go down fighting I'm afraid.

 

No worries Dave, its not a lecture, and really appreciate your input, and if I can just find a little something in a letter which may make them think twice, then its a small bonus. If I sit back and accept it, they'll walk all over me. If I can hit them with something back, at least I have put them off for a while. The inevitable may happen, but if I can find the slightest chink in their armour I'll go for it.

 

Sorry for the sob story, just saying it as it is.

 

regards

 

Taz11

Taz11 v NatWest/Triton: Unenforceable :D

Taz11 v BOS: Unenforceable :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

No worries......I was just trying to get the point over that you NEED to know what you are asking them...I seen too many people go off half cock......not knowing the legislation, and not researching...just going off what people have told them....and guess what.....the majority have lost.

 

be a boy scout........be PREPARED.

 

this site is a self help group and there are some extremely knowledgeable people on here, including some solicitors.

 

I think that you have a chance....so go for it :)

 

rgds

 

Dave

** We would not seek a battle as we are, yet as we are, we say we will not shun it. (Henry V) **

 

see you stand like greyhounds in the slips,

Straining upon the start. The game's afoot:

Follow your spirit; and, upon this charge

Cry 'God for Harry! England and Saint George!'

:D If you think I have helped, informed, or amused you do the clickey scaley thing !! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

What I'll do Dave, if its ok with you, is put a letter together and would you mind checking it over, just in case I put something in that might make me look a complete idiot..lol

 

thanks

 

Taz11

Taz11 v NatWest/Triton: Unenforceable :D

Taz11 v BOS: Unenforceable :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

no probs......

 

Dave

** We would not seek a battle as we are, yet as we are, we say we will not shun it. (Henry V) **

 

see you stand like greyhounds in the slips,

Straining upon the start. The game's afoot:

Follow your spirit; and, upon this charge

Cry 'God for Harry! England and Saint George!'

:D If you think I have helped, informed, or amused you do the clickey scaley thing !! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

What do you think Dave, I'm trying to get my point across, that I don't agree that what they have sent complies with my request. I may be wrong and barking up the wrong tree. Please advise me if there is anything blatantly wrong.........I am a novice..lol

 

 

thanks

 

 

Taz11

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Sir,

 

 

Thank you for your letter of xx/xx/xx, the contents of which have been noted.

 

You have failed to respond to my legal request to supply me a true copy of the original Consumer Credit Agreement for the above account.

 

On **DATE** I made a formal request for a true signed agreement for the alleged account under consumer credit Act 1974 s77/8..

 

The document that you are obliged to send me is a true copy of the executed agreement that contained all of the prescribed terms, all other required terms and statutory notices and was signed by both your company and myself as defined in section 61(1) of CCA 74 and subsequent Statutory Instruments. If the executed agreement contained any reference to any other document, you are also obliged to send me a copy of that document.In addition a full statement of this account should have been sent to me detailing all debits and credits to the account.

 

 

 

The document forwarded to me is infact an application form. As I’m sure you are aware from section 61(1) of CCA 74

 

61.--(1) A regulated agreement is not properly executed unless--

 

(a) a document in the prescribed form itself containing all the prescribed terms and conforming to regulations under section 60(1) is signed in the prescribed manner both by the debtor or hirer and by or on behalf of the creditor or owner, and

 

(b) the document embodies all the terms of the agreement, other than implied terms, and

 

© the document is, when presented or sent to the debtor or hirer for signature, in such a state that all its terms are readily legible.

The Application form you enclosed did not contain the prescribed terms neither did it detail the location of the Prescribed Terms within the document. The document stated card conditions overleaf, which cannot be recognized as “prescribed terms” as stated in section 61 (1) of CCA 74.

 

Although your letter stated terms and conditions enclosed, the two independent pages (application form and terms and conditions), although hand written (in different handwriting) with the same numbers, cannot be proven to be one and the same document unless the original is available to view. There are no references or page numbers to justify that they are of one and the same document.

 

Section 61 (1) (a) also states that the document must be signed in the prescribed manner by the debtor and creditor. There is no apparent signatory on behalf of MBNA on the application form, the scribble across the sheet is illegible and cannot be deemed as an authorization on behalf of the creditor. Again, the original Consumer Credit Agreement would be required to show that authorisation has been given by, and on behalf of MBNA

 

 

 

Finally I would like to make you aware of Section 85 of CCA 74, which states the following,

 

85 Duty on issue of new credit-tokens

 

(1) Whenever, in connection with a credit-token agreement, a credit-token (other than the first) is given by the creditor to the debtor, the creditor shall give the debtor a copy of the executed agreement (if any) and of any other document referred to in it.

(2) If the creditor fails to comply with this section—

(a) he is not entitled, while the default continues, to enforce the agreement; and

(b) if the default continues for one month he commits an offence.

 

(3) This section does not apply to a small agreement.

 

Suffice to say in this instance, MBNA have defaulted on any alleged agreement by not complying with Section 85, by witholding a copy of the executed agreement at the time of presenting subsequent new credit tokens (credit cards). Providing or forwarding new terms and conditions with each card cannot be recognized as an executed agreement.

With this in mind, the account is in default, and the application form provided is neither acceptable as an original copy of my CCA request, neither is it properly executed. My request for an original copy of my Consumer Credit Agreement executed correctly, and containing the prescribed terms still stands.

 

 

Yours Faithfully.

Taz11 v NatWest/Triton: Unenforceable :D

Taz11 v BOS: Unenforceable :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Taz

 

its a bit all over the place.........

 

will see what I can do....tomorrow,.....its wine time tonight :) dont want to get it wrong

 

dave

** We would not seek a battle as we are, yet as we are, we say we will not shun it. (Henry V) **

 

see you stand like greyhounds in the slips,

Straining upon the start. The game's afoot:

Follow your spirit; and, upon this charge

Cry 'God for Harry! England and Saint George!'

:D If you think I have helped, informed, or amused you do the clickey scaley thing !! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

No probs Dave..............enjoy your wine m8...lol

 

I look forward to your advice with any mistakes I have made. Just got in from a party myself,so slightly annebriated..........lol

 

thanks again

 

TAZ11

Taz11 v NatWest/Triton: Unenforceable :D

Taz11 v BOS: Unenforceable :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the important wording here is "I agree to be bound by the conditions of use"

 

NOT "I agree to be bound by the TERMS and conditions of use"

 

the word conditions has no real legal effect....you dont get prescribed conditions

 

rgds

 

Dave

 

 

This is my thinking as well.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you citizenB, your input is appreciated. I am trying to find some kind of template with which to reply to this, but as of yet been unable to find one that is appropriate/adaptable. Dave was going to draft me one, but haven't seen him on line recently. ( I do understand, people do not sit reading this forum day in day out and have other business....lol)

Would you suggest I reply? , or sit tight and let them sell it on ??

 

any advice greatfully accepted.

 

I would also appreciate it if you wouldn't mind taking a look at my other cca copy on Taz11 v Co-op enforceable cca ??

 

Thanks

 

regards

Taz11

Taz11 v NatWest/Triton: Unenforceable :D

Taz11 v BOS: Unenforceable :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think if it ever got to the court stage you could question the integrity of the documents supplied.

 

There does need to be a link between the two pages for them to be considered "one" which would embody anything.. let alone prescribed terms.

 

The link below gives some idea of what needs to happen when they want to scan documents and then destroy the originals

 

Document Management, Document Imaging, Document Scanning | Archival

  • Haha 1

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think if it ever got to the court stage you could question the integrity of the documents supplied.

 

There does need to be a link between the two pages for them to be considered "one" which would embody anything.. let alone prescribed terms.

 

The link below gives some idea of what needs to happen when they want to scan documents and then destroy the originals

 

Document Management, Document Imaging, Document Scanning | Archival

 

 

That's a great link CB :D

 

Can't imagine MBNA muppets have followed those procedures :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is an excellent read citizenB. I haven't read all, but particularly the "scanning" paragraphs. In effect its very similar to "evidence" held by police hand held speed cameras, where protocol has to be observed with regards to a new sealed memory card being used, being dated, signed etc...and also stored in the prescribed manner.

I know this is slightly a different avenue, but basically the same idea.

So if the "said" company have not followed the correct protocol with regards to the requirements of the scanning process, could it be questioned/argued that they have not fulfilled the necesaary requirements.

 

Excellent information!!. I have bookmarked that and printed it....lol for future reference.

 

Thank you again.

 

Taz11

Taz11 v NatWest/Triton: Unenforceable :D

Taz11 v BOS: Unenforceable :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry Taz, I missed your earlier post requesting help with a letter.. I will have a think on that one for you.. give me a couple of hours. And yes, I will pop along and have a look at your other thread. :)

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks citizenB,

 

A drafted letter would be excellent, thank you. I would adapt it for Co-op aswell.

 

 

Just one more point, is there any point in going down the "new tokens" route, whereas, a new executed agreement should be forwarded in the event of a subsequent new cards being sent, and if this is not complied with then the account is in dispute anyway. I have seen this mentioned on here, but no specific answer to whether it is plausible or not.??

regards

 

Taz11

Taz11 v NatWest/Triton: Unenforceable :D

Taz11 v BOS: Unenforceable :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Taz, I think the "new token" issue has been debated on other threads, but to be honest I didnt really understand it.. If you are going head to head with these guys you do have be pretty sure of what you are saying, therefore I cant comment on that one. :D

 

Page 4 of your documents is without question a current terms and conditions page. There are default charges shown at £12.00 and as these didnt come into force until about 2005/2006 there is no way the page could be historical. That leaves you with just the first 2 pages.. are they linked.

 

For this one, I would suggest sending the CPR letter on Paul's thread, I gave you the link to that on your co-op pages.

 

Now you could use one of the many letters going into great detail on what is wrong with the document they have provided.. MBNA will for sure totally blank you. Once switched on, MBNA keep rolling. Have a look at the many MBNA threads for evidence of that.

 

I recommend you change tactics and hit them with the CPR letter, unless in the meantime Dave returns with a better idea. :D

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would you maybe think this is a bit over the top??. The original cpr requests a signatory agreement, but mine had a signature, so I have omitted this bit and tried to put over the fact that the "application form" and the Terms and Conditions page are not related in any way. I've also included some information regarding the procedures required to store electronic information.

 

Could you advise accordingly if I have made mistakes anywhere............I'm still a noob...lol

 

thanks again.

 

Taz11

 

 

 

 

Dear Sirs

 

Account number

 

I write with regards to the above account with your organisation.

 

I respectfully request that you provide me by return a true copy of the credit agreement. I require this as I have reason to believe that there may be discrepancies within the agreement which may leave it improperly executed. The documentation you have sent me is noticeably absent of prescribed terms relating to the account. The pages you have sent me are not proven to be either connected or related to each other and are missing any recorded data which could in fact relate the documents. I trust the BSI 008 Code of Practice On Legal Admissibility and Evidential Weight of Information Stored Electronically has been followed which states the following,

 

An organisation needs to demonstrate that it complies with the five principles of information management on which the Code is based. These principles are encapsulated into a code of practice - the “Code of Practice for Legal Admissibility and Evidential Weight for Information Stored Electronically” (BIP0008) published by the British Standards Institute. Compliance with BIP0008 will ensure that the organisation manages its information according to best practice, thereby maximising the chance of electronic records being satisfactorily authenticated.

An organisation will need to have in place the following five information management components:

 

• 1. Representation of Information (i.e. an information management policy)

• 2. A Duty of Care

• 3. Business Procedures and Processes

• 4. Enabling Technologies

• 5. Audit Trails

 

 

I bring to your attention Component 3 of the code which specifically states the recommendations of the code are as follows, with regards to scanned documents;

The Scanning Process

The Code requires, for example, that records be kept on the system audit trail of key information concerning imported documents. This information should include as a minimum:

 

• Unique identifier for each batch of documents

• Date and time of scanning

• Identity of the person who performed the scanning

• Type of material scanned (e.g. paper document, microfilm, aperture card, etc.)

• Number of documents and number of pages in each document scanned

• Detail of post-scanning processes (de-skewing, de-speckling, etc.) performed

The Code recommends that records be kept in batches so it is easier to check that:

• All required activity has been performed

• Any anomalies have been noted

• Appropriate quality procedures have been completed

• Records of any exception processing have been made

 

 

 

Obviously if the agreement is improperly executed I would be entitled to ask the court to consider the agreement and make a declaration of the rights of parties to the agreement.

 

I must stress this request is NOT made pursuant to section 78 Consumer Credit Act 1974 but is made pursuant to the Civil Procedure Rules ( Pre action protocols and Part 31.16) and therefore unsigned copy will not suffice, only a copy of the original contract in its unaltered form will suffice in these circumstances.

 

Please confirm if you still hold a copy of my signed agreement, which specifically states within the signatory agreement where the "prescribed terms"can be found or located. I would expect a properly executed agreement to contain the prescribed terms, and information within the original document detailing where the "prescribed terms" are located. I hope that you will provide me with this document.

 

I do not view this as an unreasonable request given that by supplying the document which i have asked for it will allow me to assess if my case has merit and will help to resolve matters possibly without the need to involve the court and will undoubtedly save costs on both sides

 

I look forward to your reply and would ask for a response by 4pm on XXXX Date ( Give 21 days to respond)

 

Regards

Taz11 v NatWest/Triton: Unenforceable :D

Taz11 v BOS: Unenforceable :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...