Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'll take a look in the loft - bear in mind it's 10-12 years ago, and we've had an extension built up there recently so hopefully I can find the folders they're in! 
    • Okay. Very scientific – but I think you have zero chance of getting if you take it to court. I think you will have to show actual loss and the court will think that you are trying to make a money grab. There could be a chance if you play very carefully to get 900 quid instead of the service – but that would be the maximum. If you bring a County Court action then I'm certain that you will win but the entire dispute will have done to a question of how much you are entitled to receive by way of compensation. It's up to you. If you want to see for £1900 then we will help you. However, you have to pay a claim fee based on the £1900 claim and then hearing fee based on the same amount if you go to trial. If I am right that you are awarded less then any costs you might be awarded will be based on the amount wanted to you – and not the value of your claim. I think you should be a bit more careful and realistic about what you want to claim – but it's up to you.
    • My story starts with being issued a windscreen PCN on 8/3/24 which was almost immediately removed and a second  PCN was then  sent by post on 13/3/24  [deemed delivered 15/3/24] which I did not receive and had to send an sar to have that particular mess revealed later  but that is not the reason for my complaint. UKPC then sent a Keeper Liability Notice dated 12/4/24 warning me that as 28 days have now elapsed, I as keeper am now liable for the charge.  This is in direct contravention of PoFA since the keeper does not become liable to pay until the day after the original PCN is deemed to have been given which would have been 13/4/24 -a Saturday ]. Not only does it not comply with PoFA but it fails to adhere to your Code of Practice and is in breach of their agreement with the DVLA.  I have included copies of both Notices for information. You will realise the seriousness of this situation if this is standard practice from the UKPCM to all motorists or just those where windscreen tickets are involved since the Law regarding PoFA is being abused and it is unfair to misguide motorists. I await your  response which I understand will usually be within a week.
    • It probably deletes after a certain time. What a shame you did not check at the time. However I have no doubt that there was a PCN envelope under your windscreen wiper  as shown quite clearly on one of the photographs. . It would seem strange that it was placed there empty hence the reason I stated a second Notice was issued [though not necessarily sent. As I said in that letter to IPC that was not what the complaint was about and probably  IPC will ask about that at the same time if they accept you  going direct to IPC for the other matter. It is immaterial how many original PCNs were issued or not issued. You are able to show the two that you have from their sar one of which coincides with the one you received in the post and that is the one that does not agree with the date times of PoFA. Thus breaching not only the Act, but also the IPC  Code of Conduct and the ability of UKPCM to obtain data from the DVLA. So leave that part of the letter as good to go. However as it is as Dave [Thank you Dave!} pointed out that it is UKPCM and not UKPCI have amended the letter and posted it below.
    • Just under half of young savers put away at least 20% of their monthly income, compared to just 12% of 45- to 54-year-olds.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

what do I do next-Barclaycard/Cohen Court date


corbeta
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5537 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

31 request, I agree that the LBA is not a huge point, but it is a point that should be made, given that they issued county court proceedings even before they had sent me a notice of assignment, despite the fact that barclays were in breach of a CCA request whn they sold this on.

 

whats the worst bit is that i never said i wouldnt pay, just couldnt pay what they wanted at the time :-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 81
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

should i also draw the judges attention to the fact that what they have sent me is not a signed executed credit agreement as he stated in his first order, but merely a poor quality copy of an application form?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry I was amending my previous post when you replied. Never had to deal with an adjournment hearing before so can't advise.

 

Exactly like the rest of us. Catostrophic event in our lives resulting in no or reduced income; want to pay but just can't afford the contractual rate. Just want the banks to behave reasonbly in these circumstances.:x

A couple of hundred years ago Meyer Amshel, (1743-1812), founder of the Rothschild dynasty is reported to have told his five sons, “Let me control a nation’s money and I care not who writes its laws”.

 

PLEASE NOTE - I am not a legal expert, what I have written is my own opinion garnered from reading this forum and consumer legislation, and my own experience of the judicial process.

 

If I have been helpful, please feel free to tickle my scales!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

should i also draw the judges attention to the fact that what they have sent me is not a signed executed credit agreement as he stated in his first order, but merely a poor quality copy of an application form?

 

Yep, certainly add that.

A couple of hundred years ago Meyer Amshel, (1743-1812), founder of the Rothschild dynasty is reported to have told his five sons, “Let me control a nation’s money and I care not who writes its laws”.

 

PLEASE NOTE - I am not a legal expert, what I have written is my own opinion garnered from reading this forum and consumer legislation, and my own experience of the judicial process.

 

If I have been helpful, please feel free to tickle my scales!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

well after all this nonsense i am thinking about doing a qualification in consumer law!!

 

interestingly enough though, they are asking for a further month before exchange of witness statements and May for final hearing. if the adjournment is granted i may use the time to ask the court for an unless order in respect of the CPR request and the executed agreement-if there is no ajournment I will be busy Friday drafting witness statement, skelenton argument and siting caselaw for my submissions!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would be inclined to go for your 'unless order' sooner rather than later, afterall you really want some resolution from this nonsense. Whether the judge will allow it is another question whilst the case is stayed/adjourned. Might be a question to put to him during your conference call tomorrow.

 

If they don't get their adjournment then just shout if you need any assistance with your defence etc, you'll get plenty of help from the good people on here.

A couple of hundred years ago Meyer Amshel, (1743-1812), founder of the Rothschild dynasty is reported to have told his five sons, “Let me control a nation’s money and I care not who writes its laws”.

 

PLEASE NOTE - I am not a legal expert, what I have written is my own opinion garnered from reading this forum and consumer legislation, and my own experience of the judicial process.

 

If I have been helpful, please feel free to tickle my scales!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

im sure i will need all the help i can get as i will need to submit a witness statement, work out a defence and find all the relevant case law over the weekend. ill want to serve it on monday as it may give the judge chance to look at it before Tuesday.

 

what do you think should be my stance on this conference call tomorrow?

 

does anyone know if the courts are likely to grant this adjournment, or do they tend to say no?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, having just re-read your thread to refresh my memory, if you feel comfortable agreeing to the adjournment then go with that. As I've said previously you should ask permission of the court for an order of the court for the claimant to comply fully with your CPR request i.e. the application form sent is illegible, no true copy of DN etc. You should also seek his permission to submit an amended defence.

 

The adjournment just may work in your favour, with all that you need to do in preparation for the case.

A couple of hundred years ago Meyer Amshel, (1743-1812), founder of the Rothschild dynasty is reported to have told his five sons, “Let me control a nation’s money and I care not who writes its laws”.

 

PLEASE NOTE - I am not a legal expert, what I have written is my own opinion garnered from reading this forum and consumer legislation, and my own experience of the judicial process.

 

If I have been helpful, please feel free to tickle my scales!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

well, should know tomorrow by about 10.30 either way! keeping my fingers crossed that the Honourable judge is glad its friday and already has a busy tuesday so doesnt mind bumping it!

 

how will it fare that cohens aint produced a witness statement?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well you've already made a start on it, and now you've got a month to complete it and fine tune it.

 

If you haven't done so already, I suggest that you use your time wisely and do lots of reading. The CAG statutes library probably has all the information your likely to need. I suggest that you print off the ones that you're basing your defence on so that you have them to refer to easily. You might find it helpful to use a highlighter on the sections that you're referring to. You'll also need them for your court bundle, so if you do 3 sets now, you'll save yourself some sleepless nights later.;)

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's what we're here for. :)

A couple of hundred years ago Meyer Amshel, (1743-1812), founder of the Rothschild dynasty is reported to have told his five sons, “Let me control a nation’s money and I care not who writes its laws”.

 

PLEASE NOTE - I am not a legal expert, what I have written is my own opinion garnered from reading this forum and consumer legislation, and my own experience of the judicial process.

 

If I have been helpful, please feel free to tickle my scales!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

hi guys

 

have to fill in a listing questionaire by 17th March and serve on claimnt and court. So many things wrong that i need answers too, including the fact that statements they sent me show a nil balance from late 2007 to mid 2008.

 

does anyone know whether i can ask for a new set of directions when i complete the listing questionaire, and should i ask Cohen's why my statements show a nil balance?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Not familiar with multi track procedure I'm afraid. What have you got so far?

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

its Fast track not multi track

 

original hearing was vacated at request of cohens as they could not do W/S in time

 

no have to fill in lnew listing questionaire by monday after agreeing another extention of witness statements for them.

 

but since looking more closely at the stuff they sent me in case judge wouldnt vacate i have found the following:

 

CCA is virtually illegible at best and i dont think that it can be classed as enforceable as its an application that doesnt contain prescribed terms within the body of the agreement, although they have sent an undated copy of terms and comditions that are completely seperate

 

DN is non-compliant as it only gives 14 days from date of writing to comply-so unless they served it on the same day it is defective

 

statements that they have sent me show different accoun numbers and a nil balance from late 2007 to mid 2008-how should i address this?

 

cohen cramer wont reply to my complaint about no letter before action, the CCA request i made to barclays that they ignored and the debt became unenforceable before the debt was sold on, or the fact that they have failed to copmly with my CPR 31 request fully.

 

im thinking i should be submitting an ammended defense with the listing questionaire as my initial defence was no credit agreement so cant ascertain enforceability etc, as well as some proposed directions for proof of service of default notice and also production of a valid credit agreement as what they provided is illegible and does not contain whats necessary for it to become a valid agreement?

 

what does anyone out there think?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi corbeta,

 

I've not had much experience with listing questionnaires, but this might help you:

 

PRACTICE DIRECTION – DISCLOSURE AND INSPECTION

A couple of hundred years ago Meyer Amshel, (1743-1812), founder of the Rothschild dynasty is reported to have told his five sons, “Let me control a nation’s money and I care not who writes its laws”.

 

PLEASE NOTE - I am not a legal expert, what I have written is my own opinion garnered from reading this forum and consumer legislation, and my own experience of the judicial process.

 

If I have been helpful, please feel free to tickle my scales!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

corbeta

 

In your "no CCA" defence, did you also request leave to amend the defence if the other side came up with something? If so, you could just put in an amended "iegible CCA" defence. Otherwise you could include it in your witness statement

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Didnt reserve the right to ammend my defence, hadnt found this site then so i think it will have to be included in the witness statement- the bit i really need to know about though is what to do about the different account numbers and zero balance at the end of the ststements they sent me

 

any ideas anyone?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all those who have given me assistance over the past few months!

 

i had a notice of discontinuance today by email from Cohen Cramar barrister who has been dealing with my claim

 

is there anything i need to do now to stop a second go or someone else coming after me?

 

once again thanks for all the help-feel ready to fight the world!!

 

ps-what can i now do about the details on my credit file?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...