Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Good afternoon,    I am writing in reference to the retail dispute number ****, between myself and Newton Autos concerning the sale of a Toyota Avensis which has been found to have serious mechanical faults.    As explained previously the car was found to be faulty just six days after purchase. The car had numerous fault codes that appeared on the dash board and went into limp mode. This required assistance from the AA and this evidence has already been provided. The car continues to exhibit these faults and has been diagnosed as having faults with the fuel injectors which will require major mechanical investigation and repairs.    Newton Autos did not make me aware of any faults upon purchase of the vehicle and sold it as being in good condition.    Newton Autos have also refused to honour their responsibilities under The Consumer Rights Act 2015 which requires them to refund the customer if the goods are found to be faulty and not fit for purpose within 30 days of purchase.    Newton Autos also refused to accept my rejection of the vehicle and refused to refund the car and accept the return of the vehicle.    It is clear to me that the car is not fit for purpose as these mechanical faults occurred so soon after purchase and have been shown to be present by both the AA and an independent mechanic.   Kind regards
    • Commercial Landlords are legally allowed to sue for early cancellation of the lease. You can only surrender your lease if your landlord agrees to your doing so. They are under no obligation even to consider your request and are entitled to refuse. You cannot use this as an excuse not to pay your rent. Your landlord is most likely to agree to your surrendering the lease if they want the property back in order to redevelop it, or if they wants to rent it to what they regards as a better tenant or at a higher rent. There are two types of surrender: Express surrender in writing. This is a written document which sets out the terms of the surrender. Implied surrender by conduct. (applies to your position) You can move out of the property you leased, simply hand your keys back and the lease will come to an end, but only if the landlord agrees to accept your surrender. Many tenants have thought they can simply post the keys through the landlord's letter box and the lease is ended. This is not true and without a document from the landlord, not only do you not know if the landlord has accepted the surrender, you also do not know on what basis they have accepted and could find they sue you for rent arrears, service charge arrears, damage to the property and compensation for your attempt to leave the property without the landlord's agreement. Unless you are absolutely certain that the landlord is agreeable to your departure, you should not attempt to imply a surrender by relying on your and the landlord's conduct.  
    • I had to deal with these last year worst DCA I have ever dealt with. Just wait for the constant threats of CCJ and how you'll lose in court and how they won't do mediation and they want the judge to question you with a load of "BIG" words to boot with the letter. My case was struck out in the end, stupidity on their part as I admitted to owing the debt in the end going through the court process was just a formality as they wouldn't let it drop despite me admitting the debt regardless. They didn't send the last part of the court paper work in so it ended up being struck out     .
    • Well, that's it then. Clear proof of the rubbish cameras. Clear proof of double dipping. G24 won't be getting a penny. Belt & braces, I would write to the address LFI has found, include the evidence of double dipping, and ask Fraser Group to call their dogs off.
    • LOL. after sending Perch capital a CCA request with a stapled £1 PO attached (x2) Their lapdog Legal team TM Legal have sent me two letters today saying "due to a recent payment on the account, your account is open to legal/enforcement action" so i guess they have tried to apply that payment to the account to run the statue bar along. dirty tactics lol.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Letting Contract Dispute


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5590 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My Daughter Has Just Left Her Rented Property At The End Of Her 6 Month Contract The Problems We Have Are

 

1 She Only Gave The Ll 1 Week Notice Although There Is Nothing In The Contract To State How Much Notice She Should Give.

The Ll Is Asking For Another Month Rent As Notice

 

2 Although My Daughter Has And Is In Possesion Of A 6 Month Ast The Ll Is Saying That They Have A 12 Month Ast And They Have A Copy Of This (nither Is Signed By The Ll) At First My Daughter Was Given A 12 Month Contract But She Asked For It To Be Changed To 6 Months And This Was Done By The Letting Agent Signed By Them And By My Daughter. The Ll Is Saying She Will Take Her To Court For The Other 6 Months Rent Do They Have A Case Or Is It The Agent Who Is To Blame.

 

3 The Tenancy Deposit Scheme Certificate Of Tenancy Registration States 6 Months But When You Go On Line And Enter The Code On The Cert It States 12 Months Have We Been Setup:-?

PLEASE HELP AS SHE IS REALLY WORRIED THAT SHE WILL END UP WITH BAD CREDIT AS ONE OF THE REASONS SHE HAS LEFT IS TO GET A DEPOSIT TO BUY A HOUSE. MANY THANKS FOR YOUR HELP IN ADVANCE.

Edited by dodger010
TO SAY THANKS
Link to post
Share on other sites

Before I go on.... sort the capital letters out!!! it makes your post difficult to read.

 

If your daughter has a six month contract, then she has a six month contract end of storey. If the landlady is under the impression she has a 12 month contract, then that is something for her and her agent to discuss and sort out between them as there has obviously been a break down in communication between them at somepoint.

 

A weeks notice is plenty if your daughter left the peoperty on or before the last day of the 6 month fixed term. There is actually no requirement to give notice at the end of the fixed term, your daughter could have simply turned up at the landladys/agents address and handed the keys over without any notice! - let your landlady take you to court if she likes, you are in the right.

 

I suggest you now begin the claims process for your particular TDS scheme in order to get the deposit back if you havent already done so, the fact that it says online its protected for 12 months shouldnt be a problem as your landlady/agents have obviously made a mistake when entering the details.

 

Gaurd that 6 month AST you have like gold!! as it looks like you will have to prove your position either in court or to TDS at somepoint!

 

I suggest a polite but firm letter to the landlady, copying in the agents, stating the above (no requirement for notice and 6 month agreement - include a copy of it in your letter) and that you have requested the deposit be returned to you. In terms of rent tell her you look forward to discussing the matter in county court!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Planner and sorry about the caps my fault, I hope your right and will be taking your advice and getting the letters off today to both the LL and LA. Just one point the 6 month ast and the 12 month the LL has have both been signed by my daughter but the one she asked for and was given was for 6 months just to make this clear as not sure if it will make any differance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Planner and sorry about the caps my fault, I hope your right and will be taking your advice and getting the letters off today to both the LL and LA. Just one point the 6 month ast and the 12 month the LL has have both been signed by my daughter but the one she asked for and was given was for 6 months just to make this clear as not sure if it will make any differance.

 

Which is dated later? the 12 month or the 6 month?

 

If the 6 month was the one that was signed last, then I think you have a perfecltley reasonable argument that after signing the 12 month contract you changed your mind and they allowed a 6 month contract to be signed instead, before the tenancy started, that supersceeded the previous agreement.

 

If they had wanted to enforce the 12 month agreement, they could have done so, and should not waived that right by allowing a 6 month agreement to be signed. Again this is confusion between the landlady and her agents and is not your daughters fault.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You mean they both start the same date or the dates next to the signatures are the same?

 

If its the later, then you are in a less strong position as the former landlady could argue that its in fact the 12 month contract that superscedes the 6 month contract.

 

If it ever comes to county court/tds arbutration then the court will just have to make a decision based on the balance of probabilities. If you have any written/emailed communication from the agents stating that the 6 months ast replaces the 12 months ast rather than vice-versa then that would strongly help your case.

 

Best of luck, and get applying to TDS straight away to have that depsoit returned!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks will do, they both start the same day and the dates next to the sigs are the same date guess we will just have to fight it out. What about the fact niether of the contracts are signed by the LL she says she gave the LA writen permission to sign on her behalf but although they have initialed each page and signed as witness to my daughters signature they have not signed either contract where it states landlords signature. Sorry to be a pain.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks will do, they both start the same day and the dates next to the sigs are the same date guess we will just have to fight it out. What about the fact niether of the contracts are signed by the LL she says she gave the LA writen permission to sign on her behalf but although they have initialed each page and signed as witness to my daughters signature they have not signed either contract where it states landlords signature. Sorry to be a pain.

 

The lack of signature wont make any difference.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to let you know i have been on to TDS and they say there records show it is a 6 month contract and it must be an admin error that it has been entered on the site as 12 months. Thanks for all your help will keep you informed as to how we are getting on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to let you know i have been on to TDS and they say there records show it is a 6 month contract and it must be an admin error that it has been entered on the site as 12 months. Thanks for all your help will keep you informed as to how we are getting on.

 

See if you can get TDS to confirm the six month thing in writting, so you have some additional 'proof' that the 6 month ast should take precedent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like its all in your favour from here on in. As Planner says, tell them you look forward to court, the judge is very likely to laugh them out of court. Metaphorically( yes I know its spelt wrong) speaking. x

Please note, my advice is only my opinion.

If you have found my advice helpful, please tip my scales, thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys but guess what TDS are now saying that the registration was changed after the one was given to my daughter to a 12 month registration dont know if this is good or bad but they have refused to give us any more information.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...