Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yes, I don't think there is any downside to doing this. If they decline then you can say that in your witness statement
    • Ok! Do you still want me to work on that letter you discussed above in post #26?
    • Thank you for posting up the required details and well done for apparently not revealing the identity of the driver. I am assuming you are the keeper? The depth of ignorance of the parking companies is absolutely amazing. The Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 is the law relating to private parking and allows those rogues to be able to transfer the charge from the driver [whose name they do not know] to the keeper after 28 days . This is dependent on them complying with the Act. So many of the don't and Alliance is no different. It would help if we could see what you appeal was and to post the back of the PCN as it is lacking so much of the wording necessary to make it compliant so that in your case only the driver is liable to pay the charge. And of course just entering the ANPR arrival times means that they have failed to specify the parking time which is a requirement..  Because the car park was so busy you had to drive around for quite a while before finally finding a place to park which is when the parking period may  actually begin. The poor dears at Alliance have not grasped that particular part of the legislation as yet. To be fair the Act has only been in place for 12 years so one must make allowances for their stupidity . We shouldn't really mock them- but it is fun. You weren't to know but the chances of winning an appeal against Alliance and the IPC is around 5%-and that is high for them. If they allow you to cancel they lose the chance of making money and they would have had a field day when you were there with so many people being caught overstaying because of the chaos in trying to find a parking space then trying to pay.  Your snotty letter could go something like this- Dear Cretins, Yes I mean you Alliance. After 12 years one would have thought that even you could produce a compliant PCN. Did you really think I would pay you a penny extra considering the time I wasted trying  to pay with  long queues at the parking machine, then trying to get a signal to call Just Park. On top of that you then had the cheek to ask for an additional £70 for what dubious unspecified pleasure? You must have made a killing that day charging all those motorists for overstaying because the queues to pay were do long and even walking to pay from the over flow parking fields takes time. And yes I did take photos of the non existent signs in the fields so please don't give me the usual rubbish about your signs being clearly visible. Oh yes that £70. Please tell me and the Court whether that charge included VAT and if it did, why am I being charged to pay your vat? I am sure the Judge would look carefully at that as well as the Inland Revenue. The truth is you had no reasonable cause to ask the DVLA for my data given the chaos at your car park and I believe that you therefore breached my GDPR...................... I expect others will give their views as well.          
    • opps this is going to get messy then if they don't refund. you should never keep util accounts in credit.
    • https://www.rac.co.uk/drive/news/motoring-news/new-private-parking-code-to-launch-in-the-uk-later-this-year/ The newly created gov petition 'Immediately Reintroduce Private Parking Code of Practice' is from Stanley Luckhurst, the 85-year-old old Excel Parking took to court. Excel lost the case and the pensioner's been campaigning for regulation of PPCs since this unpleasant experience. https://www.bucksfreepress.co.uk/news/24085471.gerrards-cross-pensioner-takes-nightmarish-private-parking/ I would urge anyone on this forum who supports the petition statement "We believe the private parking industry is trending toward anarchy and must be brought to order by re-launching the Government Code immediately" to sign and share it. 168 signings at 4pm today https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/660922 If the gov new parking code is not launched before parliament dissolves (for the general election) then the legislation is at great risk of being shelved. And we'll be stuck with ATAs new joint code which does not address motorists issues such as a cap on parking charges, debt recovery or an independent appeal process.  https://www.parliament.uk/site-information/glossary/wash-up/
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5569 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

After sending the template letters that someone kindly gave me here last week. I have recieved a reply letter from the council recovery dept.

 

For information i told them i would not be paying the baliff a penny and would pay the council direct £100 a month from a bill of £1385.. (Which i think is fair)

 

The council reply:

 

Dear Mr and Mrs *****

 

Thank you for your letter and financial statement dated 7th Jan 2009

 

I have looked at the financial statement and considered your payment offer of £100 per month.

 

Unfortunately we will only be prepared to accept an arrangement through Newlyn PLC spread between now and the end of the financial year.

 

I would again advise that you seek free independant advice from an agency such as the CAB, I would also suggest you consider applying for Housing and Council Tax Benefit or as your rent takes up a large proportion of your weekly expenses, consider a property with lower rent.

 

Please contact Ben Smith of Newlyn PLC to agree payments to finish no later than 31st March 2009

 

Yours sincerely

 

******* *****

Revenues service

 

 

Well he plainly did not read the letter sent as i did state i would not be paying the baliff a penny but would continue to pay the council as stated.

 

Also the words " I would again advise you seek advice from the CAB"

 

He has never advised once that I seek advice. So where he gets "again" from is a mystery.

 

Does anyone suggest my next move is to send him a letter stating that i would be paying that £100 a month direct to them and if they wish they can take me to court again.

 

I still have had no reply from Newlyns asking for a statement, to include the added charges (added overcharges!!!) which i also sent on the 7th giving them 7 days to reply.

 

any advice would be helpfull. but I do think we are on the right track.

 

Thanks

"Nobody ever knocks on your door to tell you, you have won the lottery"

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks F.

 

 

You can't blame the council officer for what he's written, that's what he's supposed to say.

 

It's a marathon, not a sprint - and you'll have to keep writing.

 

I think he has read your letter

 

Any response should be polite.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks F.

 

 

You can't blame the council officer for what he's written, that's what he's supposed to say.

 

It's a marathon, not a sprint - and you'll have to keep writing.

 

I think he has read your letter

 

Any response should be polite.

 

Thanks and sorry... will keep any future updates in here..

"Nobody ever knocks on your door to tell you, you have won the lottery"

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

UPDATE !

 

After writing to the council again stating that I would only be paying the Council and NOT Newlyns. I recieved this reply.

 

Dear Mr *****

 

I have spoken to Newlyn PLC who inform me they are responding to your enquiry regarding fees.

 

I also refer you to my letter dated 16th January which states the debt is being handled by Newlyn PLC who may be prepared to offer an arrangement for weekly payments with the debt being fully paid in full by March 31st 2009.

 

So in effect they seem to be completly ignoring my letters and sticking to their guns about dealing with Newlyns and the time I have to pay this by.

 

Any ideas on my next step ?

 

Whilst I am almost sure what i have been advised here is correct. I am worried that Newlyns will just keep coming back until they get in.

"Nobody ever knocks on your door to tell you, you have won the lottery"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Keep paying the council rich Don't give up no matter what they say

 

I have sent the same letter twice to the same bailiffs firm and both times they have passed back to the council. you dont by law have to pay the bailiffs But you do have to pay the council tax, your not breaking any law by paying direct

 

 

kEEP going

Link to post
Share on other sites

Keep paying the council rich Don't give up no matter what they say

 

I have sent the same letter twice to the same bailiffs firm and both times they have passed back to the council. you dont by law have to pay the bailiffs But you do have to pay the council tax, your not breaking any law by paying direct

 

 

kEEP going

 

I am sending them (Newlyns) a copy of a form 4 complaint that i intend to lodge with the court on Friday. regarding the excessive fees and their bullying tactics.

 

I have not had any response to two letters asking for a statement of charges.

 

Am I risking P***ing them off ? and making them more determined to get into our home ?

"Nobody ever knocks on your door to tell you, you have won the lottery"

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I have done all the relevent letters etc ... the council are completely refusing to take back the debt even though I have been paying them regularly.

 

I wrote to Newlyns on 7th Jan asking for a statement as they had added charges excessively and threatened them with a form 4 complaint.

 

I heard nothing back for 2 weeks so i faxed them a copy of the form 4 complaint i intended to file. Again nothing back in the time frame given..

 

yesterday I filed that form 4 with the relevent court.

 

Today I get this letter from Newlyns.

 

Thank you for your recent letter the contents of which have been noted. We are also in reciept of the copy of the form 4 complaint and are awaiting further instruction from the court in this matter. We would advise it is our intention to vigourously defend any complaint made against our bailiff or the company.

We would assure that we take complaints of this nature very seriously and the matter has been investigated in accordance with company procedure. The bailiff has produced a full written report and has been interviewed by his manager. We would comment that Mr Smith is an experienced bailiff and complaints against him are very rare.

Please see a breakdown of debt and fees listed below for your information.

Council debt: £2140.90

Visit fee 1: £24.50

Visit fee 2: £18.00

Attendance fee: £100.00

Card Surcharges: £25.16

TOTAL Debt: £2308.56

Paid: £963.92

Balance £1244.64

(now the best bit)

Following a review of the file we have removed the £100 attendance charge incurred on Jan 6th. We do curreently have a levy noted against a Gold Rover BK******* which has been confirmed by the DVLA to be registered to you and your address. However as no levy fee was applied, The associated attendance fee has been removed.

I have spoken with the council today and they have instructed we re-attend the property ini order to enforce the outstanding debt against you. We remind you that we are acting as per their instruction and the authority granted by the magistrates liability order.

The council have advised you the minimum arrangement is until the end of March 2009 and therefore unable to accept the offered £100 per month. We would request you contact this office as soon as possible to discuss payment. If no response is recieved from you within 7 working days our bailiff action will resume without further notice..

 

A few things strike me here, maybe someone could enlighten me.

 

1, Have they just admitted to the excessive charge ?

 

2, The bailiff only came to our house and left a notice ONCE, and now they are saying that he in fact came twice, therfore adding that £18.00

The amount addded brought my total up to over £1500 according to his first notice, their numbers just do not add up ..

 

Does this letter constitute a proper statement. no dates have been given for payments .

 

Lastly and more worryingly. On the day the bailiff turned up I was out in that car. Our house is completely inaccessable there are high fences all round and the cars are 100% always garaged, there are no windows that he could have looked in to get that numberplate. How did he levy the vehicle. and If he did, legally, I am sure they would be back strong arming their way in to get that car. but the letter says they have removed the levy... Sounds very odd

 

Before i make my next move can anyone enlighten me please. As i am now worried about their next move

 

Many Many Thanks, in advance8)

"Nobody ever knocks on your door to tell you, you have won the lottery"

Link to post
Share on other sites

as far as I know this is also a NO NO

 

Card Surcharges: £25.16

 

i am sure someone will confirm this

 

 

 

Yes that would be nice to know too :(

"Nobody ever knocks on your door to tell you, you have won the lottery"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Council debt: £2140.90

Visit fee 1: £24.50

Visit fee 2: £18.00

 

That's correct for the two visits

 

 

Attendance fee: £100.00

 

Can't charge that if they didn't levy.

 

 

Card Surcharges: £25.16

 

Credit Card charges are unlawful there's been a ruling on that.

 

Did you pay them by credit card?

 

 

We do curreently have a levy noted against a Gold Rover BK******* which has been confirmed by the DVLA to be registered to you and your address. However as no levy fee was applied, The associated attendance fee has been removed

 

Is there any paperwork? Yes they can do that, they are entitled to climb over your walls, and even put a ladder up to an upstairs window.

 

Of course, DVLA registration isn't proof of ownership, so if you'd already sold it to a family member or anyone, the levy would be invalid.

 

 

Time you wrote back to them copies to all who should be concerned, naturally8-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's correct for the two visits

 

 

 

 

Can't charge that if they didn't levy.

 

 

 

 

Credit Card charges are unlawful there's been a ruling on that.

 

Did you pay them by credit card?

 

 

 

 

Is there any paperwork? Yes they can do that, they are entitled to climb over your walls, and even put a ladder up to an upstairs window.

 

Of course, DVLA registration isn't proof of ownership, so if you'd already sold it to a family member or anyone, the levy would be invalid.

 

 

Time you wrote back to them copies to all who should be concerned, naturally8-)

 

They have only made one visit that I know of. Nothing was put in our letterbox to say he had come back.

 

they have taken off the £100 now.. but is that an addmission of guilt i can send the court to add to the form 4 ?

 

I paid by credit and debit card. have all reciepts

 

Regarding the car.. There is no way he could get a ladder to see in the window to the garage. and even if he could there is no way he would see the reg number. Can he get details of any cars you might have from the DVLA.. Oh and the car is my daughters.. just registered in my name. can i get round this if needed..

 

Also they have taken the levy OFF the car which i found odd ??:confused:

 

 

letters going off now

"Nobody ever knocks on your door to tell you, you have won the lottery"

Link to post
Share on other sites

the car is my daughters.. just registered in my name. can i get round this if needed..

 

yes, have your daughter claim it back off them, statutory declaration should do it.

 

DVLA registration is not proof of ownership, nor is an insurance document, although you would be advised to have informed the insurance co. of your daughters interest in the car - just a thought.:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

We would assure that we take complaints of this nature very seriously and the matter has been investigated in accordance with company procedure. The bailiff has produced a full written report and has been interviewed by his manager. We would comment that Mr Smith is an experienced bailiff and complaints against him are very rare.

 

 

By lips are sealed but this statement is very interesting......... !!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

We would assure that we take complaints of this nature very seriously and the matter has been investigated in accordance with company procedure. The bailiff has produced a full written report and has been interviewed by his manager. We would comment that Mr Smith is an experienced bailiff and complaints against him are very rare.

 

 

By lips are sealed but this statement is very interesting......... !!!!!

 

Confidentiality ??? or can you actually say in a PM ?

 

Or should I just presume there are actually lots of "compliants" against this bailiff?

"Nobody ever knocks on your door to tell you, you have won the lottery"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to let anyone who has been readig this know.

 

And to reassure anyone going through the same thing.

 

We got a letter from our council after we did everything suggested on this forum.

 

Without typing the whole letter . they have agreed to take our debt back from Newlyns provided we offer them a reasonable settlement to pay the arrears.

 

They however, do not accept any error on the part of the bailiff.. !!!

 

But we are pressing on with our form 4 complaint in the bailiffs registered court..

 

The letter did contain a couple of barbs.

 

They noted that we had taken advice from this forum.. (I didnt tell them !!)

They suggested that I should take advice only from the CAB and cautioned against taking advice from here as it would be totally unreliable... :eek:

 

They also stated that should we not come up with a suitable proposal. then they will request the Magistrates court to commit us to prison..:lol:

 

Every single letter i have sent to either Newlyns or the council have stated that at no time was I refusing to pay.

 

 

Anyway..

 

should anyone want any help please do not hesitate to ask..

 

 

I am more than happy to pass on our experience in thsi as we are sick of hearing the same tactics used over and over by these ****.:-x

 

I have written to our local paper who are interested in running a story on how these people act. I hope they do and we can help others who do not have access to this site..:-x

 

 

good luck all.

"Nobody ever knocks on your door to tell you, you have won the lottery"

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...