Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well, that's it then. Clear proof of the rubbish cameras. Clear proof of double dipping. G24 won't be getting a penny. Belt & braces, I would write to the address LFI has found, include the evidence of double dipping, and ask Fraser Group to call their dogs off.
    • LOL. after sending Perch capital a CCA request with a stapled £1 PO attached (x2) Their lapdog Legal team TM Legal have sent me two letters today saying "due to a recent payment on the account, your account is open to legal/enforcement action" so i guess they have tried to apply that payment to the account to run the statue bar along. dirty tactics lol.
    • I have initiated the breathing space so ill wait. from re reading everything this what i understand BS gives me 60 days break from the creditors during these 60 days they may contact me and will most likely default I need to wait until after a default notice to see whether the OC will keep the debt or sell it off If kept by the OC then i should attempt a plan or pay some token payment? If sold to DCA then don't pay and after 6 years it will leave my credit report once the DN is registered with a date. DCA may start a CCJ but unlikely, if they do come back here. last question, do you know roughly how long this will all take? in terms of defaults/default notice, potential CCJ? Would you say I have 12 months plus from when the BS ends?
    • Well, it's up to you. Years & years & years ago the forum used to suggest appealing to POPLA, but then AFAIK POPLA's remit was changed and it became much more biased in favour of the PPCs. One of the problems with taking that route is that the onus will fall on you to prove your appeal, while if you do nothing the onus is on MET to start legal action which experience teaches they are very, very reluctant to do. If you go down the POPLA route I would think your ace would be insufficient signage.  Are you able to go back there and get photos of their rubbish, entrapping signs?
    • The first clearly visible sign as you pull in to the car park states “McDonald’s Customers Only 60 minutes” The next clearly visible sign is an almost identical sign outside Starbucks which states “60 minutes free stay for customers only” There are other signs towards the rear of the car park (away from the outlets) that have the terms and conditions on them in very small print.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

British Gas "warrant officer" visit


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5476 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

This morning at 8am I answered the door to someone from British Gas, who said "I'm here to cut off your electricity because of an unpaid bill." We've been with Powergen since we moved in and all our bills with them have been paid. We showed him a recent utilities bill, and he went away, after giving us a card with his name and phone number to show to anyone else from British Gas who calls about this.

 

So I might get more visits like that??! And if I wasn't in, would I now be without electricity?

 

Is it too much to ask that he might ask whether I'm the person he's after before accusing me of not paying bills? Or an assurance that I wouldn't hear again from British Gas about the matter and apologies for troubling the wrong person?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just for safety's sake (stranger things have happened) give Powergen/Eon a ring and ask them to do a MPAN check, which they can do online, to ensure that they are supplying you. Strange things do happen. The meter number that EDF maintain is supplying me is actually supplying a different flat so it's all completely ballsed up!!!

 

 

RM

Link to post
Share on other sites

I phoned British Gas. It seems we're getting one lot of electricity for this flat, but we're getting two lots of bills from British Gas and PowerGen.

 

The meter number BG gave is the one outside our house, and the readings match. BG said we have two supplier numbers tied to our one unique meter number.

 

British Gas have put a hold on the 'account'. The two suppliers can do battle amongst themselves, and see us in court if they want both bills paid.

 

:-x:confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I phoned British Gas. It seems we're getting one lot of electricity for this flat, but we're getting two lots of bills from British Gas and PowerGen.

 

The meter number BG gave is the one outside our house, and the readings match. BG said we have two supplier numbers tied to our one unique meter number.

 

British Gas have put a hold on the 'account'. The two suppliers can do battle amongst themselves, and see us in court if they want both bills paid.

 

:-x:confused:

It is possible that you may what is known in the trade as "related" meters, that is two related MPANs in which case you would be responsible for consumption on both. Thus type of metering normally occurs in older premises which have storage heaters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

BG sorted it. I'm not sure what happened, something about our rental property being refurbished some time before we moved in and some supplier number not being "de-energised" when it should have been. Blame was not apportioned, but BG are deleting the account (including the 'debt') and their supplier number and it will all be sorted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Well, I thought they sorted it.

 

I started receiving phone calls from their debt collection arm asking for the previous tenant by name, two or three times a day. I have variously told them I am not that person, or asked to be put through to the complaints department (they either hang up or tell me they can't transfer me), or explained the situation and received a promise that this number would be deleted.

 

I phoned British Gas complaints, they assured me the phone number was deleted, and it obviously hasn't been.

 

I have emailed customer services, but not had a reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...