Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi on the notice of disqualification it lists the 2 speed offences and marks offence withdrawn? This is for both offences and then the other 2 is the MS90s which I’m fined for and the additional costs. R
    • Hi,    It has taken a while, but I have received an email from Auxillis -  hello, we are not dealing with this claim all we do is log accident for you isnurance - the claim has been passed to your underwriter markerstudy 0344 873 8183 as they are deal with fault cliams ion behalf of adrian flux. thankyou auxillis   I have made repeated attempts to phone Markerstudy in between working from home, struggling for energy and trying to find a cheap car so that I can keep my job (community support worker). Thankfully I have a supportive team and I am being given phone calls to make but it cant last too long. I had a severe migraine over the weekend and also have quite bad whiplash in my neck and back.    I found this in my insurance policy booklet -    Protection and Recovery If the insured vehicle cannot be driven following an incident leading to a valid claim under this section, we will pay: • the cost of its protection and removal to the nearest approved repairer, competent repairer or nearest place of safety; and • the cost of re-delivery after repairs to your home address; and • the cost of storage of the insured vehicle incurred with our written consent. If the insured vehicle is damaged beyond economical repair we will arrange for it to be stored safely at premises of our choosing. You should remove your personal belongings from the insured vehicle before it is collected from you. In the event of a claim being made under the policy we have the right to remove the insured vehicle to an alternative repairer, place of safety or make our own arrangments for re-delivery at any time in order to keep the cost of the claim to a minimum     I do about 20-25000 miles a year with the work I do, I have been getting quotes and putting that I have now have one accident and no no claims bonus and the cheap quotes from similar companies to markerstudy are more than double what i paid last year at 8-900 and aviva is offering 2600 which is simply out of my price range and more than the car i am looking at.  I am starting to wonder if it is even worth going ahead with the claim as i have no one to claim from. I have had no information from any of the enquiries I have made.  I have a full tank of vpower diesel in the car in the impound, i can strip it for parts and probably make what I will be offered by the insurance payout and get the money quicker.  As I have made contact and started the process can I back out, still keep my NCB and a claim free history? Also what happens with my injuries? I don't think there is any permanent damage but my dr refused to see me and just gave me a boat load of naproxen and codeine. What happens in the future if things don't get better and I cancelled this claim? Can you claim injuries off your own insurance because the other guy ran and you cant find him? I have tried to ask these questions off markerstudy but they keep me waiting for nearly an hour then end the call.     
    • Thanks for the response. Am I able to send you the documents I’ve received or can you message via instant message and I’ll send these? Reece
    • Regretfully it does. Have you actually seen any papers which show what you were charged with (rather than what you were convicted of)? It is unusual not to be “dual charged” but if you were not charged with both, you are where you are. If you had been charged with both offences and providing you were the driver at the time, you could, after performing your SD, have asked the prosecutor to drop the “Fail to Provide” (FtP) charges in exchange for a guilty plea to the speeding charges (you cannot be convicted of speeding unless you plead guilty as they have no evidence you were driving). You will have difficulty defending the FtP charges. In fact, it’s worse than that – you have no chance of successfully defending them at all because the reason you did not respond to the requests is because you did not receive them and that’s entirely your fault. No it’s not correct. Six months from 18/11/23 was 18/5/24 so, unless they were originally charged, the speeding offences are now “timed out.” There is one avenue left open to you. If you perform your SD you must serve it on the court which convicted you. You will then receive a date for a hearing to have the matters heard again. Your only chance of having the matters revert to speeding (and this is only providing you were the driver at the time of those offences) is to plead Not Guilty, attend court. When you get there you can ask the prosecutor (very nicely, explaining what a pillock you know you were for failing to update your  V5C) if (s)he is prepared to raise “out of time” speeding charges, to which you will offer to plead guilty if the FtP charges are dropped.   This is strictly speaking not lawful. Charges have to be raised within six months. Some prosecutors are willing to do it, others are not. But frankly it’s the only avenue open to you. There is a risk with this. I imagine you have been fined £660 (plus surcharge and costs) for each offence. The offence attracts a fine of 1.5 week’s net income and where the court has no information about the defendant’s means a default figure of £440pw is used.  If the prosecutor is not prepared to play ball you can revise your pleas to guilty. A sympathetic court should give you the full discount (one third) for your guilty pleas in these circumstances but they may reduce the discount somewhat. The prosecution may also ask for increased costs (£90 or thereabouts is the figure for a guilty plea). So it may cost you more if you have a decent income (I’ll let you do the sums). But MS90 is an endorsement code which gives insurers a fit of the vapours. One such endorsement will see your premiums double. Two of them will see many insurers refuse to quote you at all meaning you will have to approach "specialist" (aka extortionate) brokers. So you really want to exhaust every possibility of avoiding MS90s if you can. One warning: do not pay solicitors silly money to defend you. Making an SD before a solicitor should attract just a nominal sum (perhaps a tenner). That’s all you should pay for. You have no viable defence against the FtP charges and any solicitor suggesting you have is telling you porkies. The offer to do the deal is easily done by yourself and you can save the solicitor’s fees to put towards a few taxis and increased insurance premiums if you are unsuccessful. In the happy event you find out you were "dual charged", let me know and I'll tell you how to proceed. (Seems a bit odd hoping you were charged with four driving offences rather than two, but it's a funny old world!).    
    • Just the sort of people you despise eh Jugg  You would be much happier among your mates in that room with Rayner begging for votes 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Debt Collectors pretending to be bank


Mustard
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5348 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

shame no agreement = no money !!!!

 

Its up to them now, I would just wait and see what there next move is, without a agreement they will struggle to take it further than the usual load of threats etc.

 

Notts

As a great man once said " All Men Can Fly But Some Only in One Direction"

 

Notts

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 74
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Update -

 

The DCA just called me and said that "they cannot find a copy of the CCA " the money I sent them for the CCA will not be refunded and that its just as much my responsabilty to keep a copy

 

This actually becoming a farce.

 

Any thoughts and comments welcome

 

Typical slimey DCA behaviour - just ensure that £1 is the last they ever receive off you ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Typical slimey DCA behaviour - just ensure that £1 is the last they ever receive off you ;)

 

No, don't do that! For goodness sake, demand your £1 back - they may sneakily credit it against your 'account' and subsequently claim you made a payment.

 

Play the slimy toerags at their own game.

 

Have they informed you in writing that they don't have it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Have they informed you in writing that they don't have it?

 

Good thinking, I will send them off a letter now

 

I am actually sitting here in disbelief at their response to the lack of a CCA.

 

They said that the fact that I have made payments in the past 'proves' that I am aware that an agreement exists (somewhere) and that the agreement is still valid

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's very tempting just to tell them to s*d off, but as well as covering your own backside, it can be quite amusing watching them squirm. While the legendary Mr Ton is absolutely correct, it's worth doing it all by the book just in case it ever got to court. And every letter you write will cost them a disproportionate amount of time and money to deal with.

 

I'd suggest you request all communications in writing from now on, so you have an audit trail. If you're enjoyng your little chats with the lowlifes, then try to record the calls.

 

And the fact that you made payments is irrelevant, so if you'd had that recorded you could prove they were trying to mislead you.

Edited by DonkeyB
Missed a bit
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Update.

 

3 months on now, and the DCA havent been in contact since they admitted they couldnt produce a CCA. I assume I will have to now sit here and wait to see what if anything they will do next.

 

Without a CCA, does this make the whole debt enforcable / non existant in the eyes of the law?

 

Many thanks for all you guys and girls help. I genuinely cant thank you enough :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, the (alleged) debt doesn't go away, but they won't be able to enforce it through the courts.

 

Beware, though, sometimes these numpties go quiet for a while and then come out all guns blazing when another threat monkey picks up the account and thinks it worth another go...

 

Just be on your guard, keep good records and play 'em at their own game! Good luck. Let's hope they've crawled back under their stone for good.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Update.

 

4 months on from my first post on 1st Credit.

 

In yesterdays post I recieved (and I'm not sure why?) copies of all my statements relating to the account from 1st Credit - no covering letter, just a Compliment Slip with their reference number written on?

 

Why have they sent these? I havent asked for them??

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Update. For those who were following this thread

 

No news really, havent heard a thing from them for a good few weeks now. As someone said they may of crawled under their rock or are regrouping.

 

Seems that they were all (empty) threats and with no legal weight to back it all up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update. For those who were following this thread

 

No news really, havent heard a thing from them for a good few weeks now. As someone said they may of crawled under their rock or are regrouping.

 

Seems that they were all (empty) threats and with no legal weight to back it all up.

 

 

Good!

 

This thread is an exemplary example of somebody empowering themselves against a debt collection agency through CAG.

 

1) OP making regular payments to a creditor.

 

2) The creditor becomes greedy and passes it on to the DCA.

 

3) The DCA start their tirade of abusive and deceitful practice.

 

4) Worried OP seeks help and becomes a Cagger

 

5) Cagger receives advice and support from other Caggers.

 

6) Cagger asserts their (newly discovered) legal rights upon DCA

 

7) DCA fails to comply with legislation

 

8) DCA gets nothing, OC gets nothing.

 

9) Cagger sits back knowing that even if by some miracle at some stage in the future the DCA produces a CCA all he has to do is post it on the site and the experts will rip it apart and until such time any threats made by the DCA are empty and unenforceable.

 

 

When will the DCA's learn?

You have the right to food money.

If you don't mind a little investigation, humiliation, and if you cross your fingers rehabilitation..............

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Update.

 

I recieved a letter from LCS Solicitors a couple of days ago (they are the legal division of First Credit) with the standard threats of "We believe you have an interest in the above property. We are looking to secure a CCJ against it" etc etc

 

Bearing in mind that I didnt (and still havent) recieve a CCA from them, can someone advise a draft of a letter I can send to these parasites pointing out of their lack of a CCA for me and hopefully stop them dead in their tracks? ??

 

Regards,

 

Mustard

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear Sirs,

 

I write in response to your letter dated XXXXX

 

Your letter is incorrect and frivolous, you are fully aware of legally valid reasons why no payment has been made on this account, namely that the agreement which underpins this account has not been supplied despite a perfectly valid request and furthermore, it is suggested that notwithstanding the failure to supply a copy, the agreement itself is improperly executed, devoid of all prescribed terms and deficient in respect of detail relating to APR, total charge for credit and statements of rights ,remedies and protections as required by schedules 1,2 and 6 Consumer Credit Agreements Regulations 1983

 

Therefore the agreement as outlined in section 65 (1) Consumer Credit Act must be laid before the court to be granted an enforcement order before any further action can be taken

 

It is my view that the court would not grant such an order due to the deficiencies that I have outlined within the agreement, further more this has already previously been raised with (name of bank/or dca) yet I note they have still assigned the account over to yourselves and the absence of any documents disproving my points itself speaks volumes

 

Therefore, I would indeed welcome the opportunity to place this before the court. furthermore should you proceed with the threats to issue a court claim, I will make an immediate application to have it set aside for the grounds outlined above, also I shall refer the judge to this letter when the matter of costs falls due

 

I trust this outlines my position clearly enough for you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear Sirs,

 

I write in response to your letter dated XXXXX

 

Your letter is incorrect and frivolous, you are fully aware of legally valid reasons why no payment has been made on this account, namely that the agreement which underpins this account has not been supplied despite a perfectly valid request and furthermore, it is suggested that notwithstanding the failure to supply a copy, the agreement itself is improperly executed, devoid of all prescribed terms and deficient in respect of detail relating to APR, total charge for credit and statements of rights ,remedies and protections as required by schedules 1,2 and 6 Consumer Credit Agreements Regulations 1983

 

Therefore the agreement as outlined in section 65 (1) Consumer Credit Act must be laid before the court to be granted an enforcement order before any further action can be taken

 

It is my view that the court would not grant such an order due to the deficiencies that I have outlined within the agreement, further more this has already previously been raised with (name of bank/or dca) yet I note they have still assigned the account over to yourselves and the absence of any documents disproving my points itself speaks volumes

 

Therefore, I would indeed welcome the opportunity to place this before the court. furthermore should you proceed with the threats to issue a court claim, I will make an immediate application to have it set aside for the grounds outlined above, also I shall refer the judge to this letter when the matter of costs falls due

 

I trust this outlines my position clearly enough for you

 

Many thanks for taking the time to respond :)

 

I should point out I have been making £1 per month payments on the account still. Does that hold me in admission of 'guilt' ????

Link to post
Share on other sites

The following are deemed to be at the very least UNFAIR practices.

 

a) Section 2, 2 b, leaving out or presenting information, in such a way that it creates a false or misleading impression .or exploits debtors’ lack of knowledge.

 

NOT MENTIONING CCA IS BEYOND BELIEF.

 

b) Psychological harassment, as described in Section 2.6 g, making threatening statements or gestures, or taking actions suggesting harm. Threatening charging order.

 

REPORT THEM!!!!! REPORT THEM!!!!!

We live in an unmoderated country why should the net be any different?

Bring back free speech we miss it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks for taking the time to respond :)

 

I should point out I have been making £1 per month payments on the account still. Does that hold me in admission of 'guilt' ????

 

 

It's your choice when you continue to pay £1 per month, but personally I wouldn't pay them another penny. They can't find your agreeement, so you're legally entitled to withold payment till they produce a compliant copy.

Continuing to pay them gives them the impression you're not sure of your position leaving you open to their continued threats, they think if they up the pressure with legal looking letters you'll cave in.

 

Incidentally LCS solicitors sit at the next desk to all their other phone monkeys, just look at their address. If they were going to take you to court and they won't without any agreeement they would be using Connaught or one of their other vultures.

 

You also really need to report them to Trading Standards .1stCredit openly admit in letters to other people they know a debt is unenforceable in court until they produce an agreement. so they're just taking the **** here. The OFT will rap them for breaking CPUTR 2008 regulations and you'll be helping some other poor soul who hasn't found CAG and doesn't know any of his rights.

 

Please , please report them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Here we go again.....

 

Sent the letter as per post # 64 in this thread and got the following response...

 

"Dear Sir / Madam.

 

We refer to your recent communication requesting a copy of the relevant agreement.

 

The document is retained by our client. We will therefore advise them of your request and arrange for the document to be sent to you as soon as possible......

 

etc etc etc..."

 

BUT surely as they have already missed their chance to send me the CCA as per the start of this thread in January they just cant send it to me now and that makes the whole process back to their side again?

Link to post
Share on other sites

BUT surely as they have already missed their chance to send me the CCA as per the start of this thread in January they just cant send it to me now and that makes the whole process back to their side again?

 

If they were to come up with an agreement that was enforceable - the debt would then be enforceable.

 

It's bullsh*t though - ifthey could get one you would know about it by now!:-D

 

David

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they were to come up with an agreement that was enforceable - the debt would then be enforceable.

 

It's bullsh*t though - ifthey could get one you would know about it by now!:-D

 

David

 

Hi David.

 

Understood. But surely as I requested it back in January and it never appeared, they cant just produce it now as its now not only 12 + 2 days past the request date its nigh on 9 months?!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't worry about the letter!

 

IF they produce an agreement, post it on here & let those that know pick through it to see if it's enforceable.

 

Save your energy for running your company :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...