Jump to content


Buildings Insurance


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5611 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Can anyone offer advice; I'll be very brief because the overall circumstances are a bit more complex but I will explain further if necessary.

A claim was made with an insurance company (new business) for exterior wall cracks. Their loss adjusters determined the cause was a fractured drain. The cost of the claim to the company was around £3500 after £1000 excess had been paid.

The claim was made only a few weeks into the policy period. At the expiration of the 12 month policy the company renewed it. However, at the expiration of the second policy the company refused to renew, citing the reason as the 'subsidence claim'. No further discussion would be entered into.

The insurance companies' regulatory body and the Financial Services Ombudsman dismiss the refusal as simply a commercial trading decision and therefore outside their jurisdiction.

An article in the Financial section of the Mail on Sunday (28/12/08) states: 'Under industry codes, an insurer must carry on providing cover for problem properties'. I am unable to find these codes and have had no luck with the Mail.

Can anyone help?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Helford,

Thanks, I have checked out both those sites. Unfortunately, both refer only to the procedure to be adopted where the claim situation arises around the cusp of a change of insurance company. I did have the problem of attributing liability at the outset when the new company denied liability and offered no further advice, but I was able to 'point them in the right direction', as it were, because I had already done my homework in respect of ABI's Domestic Subsidence Claim Handling Agreement. The new company reluctantly conceded liability.

The issue I have now is that company's refusal to renew after the second year, together with the Mail on Sunday's assertion that such a company is obliged to carry on providing cover for problem properties.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...