Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • My car is currently elsewhere. So no.  My issue is that it's private land whether the owner is using the garages or not and they've been asked to stop
    • Are your garages not being used atm? HB
    • Thank you to you all, you guys are amazing!! Yes of course i will be making a donation, i am very grateful to you all. Keep up the good work
    • I'm not quite out of the woods yet. The email they sent me also said that I have £290 of arrears and it has been passed onto their collections department. If anything my account should be £10 in credit.  They haven't taken into account the trainers that were returned back in October. The other items have been credited to my account so it looks like I've still got work to do.  They are not very quick to reply to emails, although I've only sent one trying to find more information, and I have no idea what happens next. Half of me want's to get it sorted properly the other half just wants it over with, if that means a default then so be it. 
    • No. It's a public (council maintained) road with some houses in it.   Some other houses back onto it too and those owners have right of way down the road to access the back of their properties.  Theres a few garages with private osp - so one drives out the garage, over the osp, and onto the public side road and then out on to the public main road.  Irrespective of whether the garages are used - the local businesses parking their cars on the private osp are ostensibly preventing cars from accessing the public roads.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Car taken yesterday


Su76
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5528 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Replies 120
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

My court hearing is today!! I haven't got a solicitor, or had any legal advice!

I need all the luck in the world:rolleyes:....I will post back later with the outcome!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Happy Days!! The judge was not impressed with how VW have handled things, and suspended the rog order upon me making a 1st payment starting yesterday before 4pm. the claimants agent who attended the hearing didnt know where the car was or if it had been sold, the judge said "if the car has been sold then they have to sort something out with us"! the judge also said that the bailiffs acted very badly and its a serious offence and if we wanted to we could make a separate claim for the way we were treated by them!!

 

I phoned the DCA yesterday, to try and make that payment but they wouldn't accept it!! they told me i have to wait for a call from their manager (who wasn't due into the office until 4.30pm) to discuss the matter with him and that he would be able to take a payment from me! I phoned the DCA 6times yesterday only to be told their manager was in a meeting and he would call me before 8pm to which he did NOT!!

 

I was obviously getting suspicious about this, i have just found out from a friend who phoned the auctions were my car was taken too that they have already sold the car back in January!!! At the court hearing on the 5th Jan the judge put a 28 day order on the car that it must not be SOLD!

Edited by Su76
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, I will ;)

 

I would also like to thank Repoman for all his help! we wouldn't have done this without him!!

Edited by Su76
Link to post
Share on other sites

Its been 4days since the hearing and i still haven't got anywhere! The DCA keep ignoring me saying the manager i need to speak to is either in a meeting/on the phone or has stepped out of the office, they keep telling me he will ring me as soon as he is back!! I did briefly speak to him Monday evening and he admitted they had sold the car, he didnt know the exact date the car was sold and that he will be speaking to VW on Tuesday to get that info and will get straight back to me!

 

I phoned the auction's on Tuesday and found out the car was sold on the 16th Jan, so the DCA are in breech of the judges order from the 5th Jan which stated the car was not to be sold within the next 28 days!

 

I have tried to contact the DCA again tonight and surprise surprise the manager is not in the office yet again....13 phone calls later and i have only spoken with the manager once.

 

I am about to seek further legal advice and will keep you posted!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suggest you send a letter to them pointing out that they have gone against the Court order and the manager will not speak to you and that you will issue a summons against them

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well not quite!! I have FINALLY received a call from the DCA with a proposal, either have the remaining balance of £2000 (which is just the interest i owed) outstanding wiped clean, i walk away with no debt & no car (which would mean i have paid £8600 for nothing) Or they replace my car with a £5800 car (the same amount for what they sold my car for) and carry on with the payments as normal Hmmm I think i will look very hard and find a solicitor!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well not quite!! I have FINALLY received a call from the DCA with a proposal, either have the remaining balance of £2000 (which is just the interest i owed) outstanding wiped clean, i walk away with no debt & no car (which would mean i have paid £8600 for nothing) Or they replace my car with a £5800 car (the same amount for what they sold my car for) and carry on with the payments as normal Hmmm I think i will look very hard and find a solicitor!!

 

Very clear cut, they need to pay you £8600 at the very least, and call it quits.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well not quite!! I have FINALLY received a call from the DCA with a proposal, either have the remaining balance of £2000 (which is just the interest i owed) outstanding wiped clean, i walk away with no debt & no car (which would mean i have paid £8600 for nothing) Or they replace my car with a £5800 car (the same amount for what they sold my car for) and carry on with the payments as normal Hmmm I think i will look very hard and find a solicitor!!

 

 

My personal view here would be to go for the second option, but demand damages for the 2 and a bit months that they have had the car off you. For bus / taxi fees, extra time spent travelling, phone costs where they refused to return the vehicle, court costs for the hearings, etc. I'm sure that would come to near enough £2000...

 

Obviously wait for someone with more know than me to give other suggestions though :p

 

Thanks,

H

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Su

 

Sorry been so quiet - it's gone a bit busy work wise.

 

My initial reaction is that the lender will bend over backwards now to accomodate you. They have blatently gone against a court order, which is I believe contempt of court.

 

Have VW Finance put anything in writing to you? I think this matter needs to be sorted in a court - mainly because you have a good case I think and also because VW have acted completely improperly which will somewhat go against them.

 

Have PM'd you.

 

Hope all is well otherwise.

 

RM

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been thinking of how long the whole process of going to court etc and dont fancy it at all, im really desperate for transport now!!

 

I might phone the DCA tomorrow and suggest if the car they are proposing to give me is to the exact same spec mileage/sports/year etc then i will go ahead with it!!

 

Can anybody give any advice??:confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I tried to ring the DCA manager to accept their offer of them replacing my car (but under my terms of same spec car) and they are ignoring me yet again!! i have been waiting on his call for 2 days now :confused:

 

I really dont know were i am going with this:( if i am entitled to every penny back then i would be happy to settle with that!

 

I'm not sure on how demanding i can be with this, i dont want to get too cocky with the DCA :confused:

 

Any advice appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

Give him till end of business tomorrow, and then I would get cocky, in the nicest possible way. At the very least you are entitled to what you are asking, and I'm sure they would not relish explaining to a Court that despite an order to the contrary they flogged the car! If no joy by 5.30 tomorrow drop a line on here - will give me some weekend reading to do!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just called the DCA and again he's not available apparently he's on holiday until Mon and has been for the last 2 days :confused: hmmm.... ive been expecting his calls for the last 2days!!

 

I left a message with his colleague saying

"that i have an appointment with my solicitor on Monday, and stated the fact that my solicitor will probably suggest i take it back to court......and that before i speak with my solicitor i would like to suggest that if i was to receive £8600 back, i would be happy with settling out of court.

 

Is this okay :rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been calling the DCA all week now and the manager is never available or never returns my calls!!

 

I'm banging my head against a brick wall with this one i think, i am sooooo desperate for transport now! and have no idea what my next steps are :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been calling the DCA all week now and the manager is never available or never returns my calls!!

 

I'm banging my head against a brick wall with this one i think, i am sooooo desperate for transport now! and have no idea what my next steps are :(

 

Hi Su

 

I'd seriously try to get hold of his manager, and tell him that you will now escalate the problem back to the Court and let the Judge decide how best to play it unless it is dealt with today.

 

If you need a hand give me a shout.

 

Mark

Link to post
Share on other sites

Su,

 

update your thread with your PM to me.

 

SECTION 90

 

Further restriction of remedies for default

90.—(1) At any time when—

(a) the debtor is in breach of a regulated hire-purchase or a regulated conditional

sale agreement relating to goods, and

(b) the debtor has paid to the creditor one-third or more of the total price of the

goods, and

© the property in the goods remains in the creditor,

the creditor is not entitled to recover possession of the goods from the debtor except

on an order of the court.

(2) Where under a hire-purchase or conditional sale agreement the creditor is required

to carry out any installation and the agreement specifies, as part of the total price, the

amount to be paid in respect of the installation (the " installation charge") the

reference in subsection (l!(b) to one third of the total price shall be construed as a

reference to the aggregate of the installation charge and one third of the remainder of

the total price.

53

(3) In a case where—

(a) subsection (l)(a) is satisfied, but not subsection (l)(b), and

(b) subsection (l)(b) was satisfied on a previous occasion in relation to an

earlier agreement, being a regulated hire-purchase or regulated conditional sale

agreement, between the same parties, and relating to any of the goods

comprised in the later agreement (whether or not other goods were also

included), subsection (1) shall apply to the later agreement with the omission

of paragraph (b).

(4) If the later agreement is a modifying agreement, subsection (3) shall apply

with the substitution, for the second reference to the later agreement, of a reference to

the modifying agreement.

(5) Subsection (1) shall not apply, or shall cease to apply, to an agreement if the debtor

has terminated, or terminates, the agreement.

(6) Where subsection (1) applies to an agreement at the death of the debtor, it

shall continue to apply (in relation to the possessor of the goods) until the grant of

probate or administration, or (in Scotland) confirmation (on which the personal

representative would fall to be treated as the debtor).

(7) Goods falling within this section are in this Act referred to as " protected goods".

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...