Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The case against the US-based ride-hailing giant is being brought on behalf of over 10,800 drivers.View the full article
    • I have just read the smaller print on their signs. It says that you can pay at the end of your parking session. given that you have ten minutes grace period the 35 seconds could easily have been taken up with walking back to your car, switching on the engine and then driving out. Even in my younger days when I used to regularly exceed speed limits, I doubt I could have done that in 35 seconds even when I  had a TR5.
    • Makers of insect-based animal feed hope to be able to compete with soybeans on price.View the full article
    • Thank you for posting up the results from the sar. The PCN is not compliant with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. Under Section 9 [2][a] they are supposed to specify the parking time. the photographs show your car in motion both entering and leaving the car park thus not parking. If you have to do a Witness Statement later should they finally take you to Court you will have to continue to state that even though you stayed there for several hours in a small car park and the difference between the ANPR times and the actual parking period may only be a matter of a few minutes  nevertheless the CEL have failed to comply with the Act by failing to specify the parking period. However it looks as if your appeal revealed you were the driver the deficient PCN will not help you as the driver. I suspect that it may have been an appeal from the pub that meant that CEL offered you partly a way out  by allowing you to claim you had made an error in registering your vehicle reg. number . This enabled them to reduce the charge to £20 despite them acknowledging that you hadn't registered at all. We have not seen the signs in the car park yet so we do not what is said on them and all the signs say the same thing. It would be unusual for a pub to have  a Permit Holders Only sign which may discourage casual motorists from stopping there. But if that is the sign then as it prohibits any one who doesn't have a permit, then it cannot form a contract with motorists though it may depend on how the signs are worded.
    • Defence and Counterclaim Claim number XXX Claimant Civil Enforcement Limited Defendant XXXXXXXXXXXXX   How much of the claim do you dispute? I dispute the full amount claimed as shown on the claim form.   Do you dispute this claim because you have already paid it? No, for other reasons.   Defence 1. The Defendant is the recorded keeper of XXXXXXX  2. It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant. 3. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim. 4. In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant. 5. The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer. 6. In a further abuse of the legal process the Claimant is claiming £50 legal representative's costs, even though they have no legal representative. 7. The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety. It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all. Signed I am the Defendant - I believe that the facts stated in this form are true XXXXXXXXXXX 01/05/2024   Defendant's date of birth XXXXXXXXXX   Address to which notices about this claim can be sent to you  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Currys - intermittent fault within warranty (just)


kateandpete
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5615 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

We bought our TV last Boxing Day (Polaroid 20" LCD- £220) from Currys and it has recently started to make a low pitched crackle/hum intermittently when turned on. A firm tap in the back top righthand corner usually then makes it stop the noise. At the moment it is occuring possibly once a week (the TV is in our bedroom and is watched for an hour or two daily) and is very clearly audible in a quiet house especially with the volume on low, and enough to make watching the TV unpleasant when it is making the noise. Whilst 90% of the time the TV works fine as it is within the warranty period we are keen to get the problem resolved.

 

We called Currys and were told to take it to the store for them to verifiy the fault. Therein lies the problem. The Customer Service guy said they will run it in store until they can show the problem. I do not think there is any way they will hear it in a noisy shop and due to the intermittent nature I have no idea whether it will occur over the next week anyway and would really like a working tv in the room over Christmas. If the fault does not occur and I take the TV home if it becomes a more frequent problem when the warranty expires am I likely to get any joy from Currys honouring their warranty or will it be SOGA time? Even then where do I stand with an intermittent problem?

 

As an aside - I was horrified by the attitude of customer services in Currys. I was told that intermittent faults do not occur and they never find them on TVs with reported faults.

 

Would really appreciate any ideas about what we can do to sort this out. I have a horrible feeling we are going to end up with a TV which is destined to become more permanantly faulty outside the warranty period...

NatWest Charges: £3708.81. Allocated to fast track 14/10/06. *SETTLED IN FULL* 23/10/06 5% donation made

 

HSBC Default Removal and £186 charges: N1 claim issued 28/11/06 *WON* 28/02/07 5% donation made

 

Egg Charges: £370. N1 claim issued 24/11/06. *SETTLED IN FULL* 12/01/07 5% donation made

 

Natwest Student: £150. N1 claim issued 24/11/06. *SETTLED IN FULL* 10/12/06 5% donation made

Natwest Credit card: £317.01 INCLUDING CONTRACTUAL INTEREST, *WON* 30/11/06 5% Donation Made

 

Ikano Data Protection Act deception and non-complience: N1 claim issued 28/11/06. *SETTLED IN FULL* 12/12/06 5% donation made

I am not a lawyer. All advice is merely my own opinion. Nevertheless, I've won £4675 so far!

Tip my scales if you like my advice :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

We bought our TV last Boxing Day (Polaroid 20" LCD- £220) from Currys and it has recently started to make a low pitched crackle/hum intermittently when turned on. A firm tap in the back top righthand corner usually then makes it stop the noise. At the moment it is occuring possibly once a week (the TV is in our bedroom and is watched for an hour or two daily) and is very clearly audible in a quiet house especially with the volume on low, and enough to make watching the TV unpleasant when it is making the noise. Whilst 90% of the time the TV works fine as it is within the warranty period we are keen to get the problem resolved.

 

We called Currys and were told to take it to the store for them to verifiy the fault. Therein lies the problem. The Customer Service guy said they will run it in store until they can show the problem. I do not think there is any way they will hear it in a noisy shop and due to the intermittent nature I have no idea whether it will occur over the next week anyway and would really like a working tv in the room over Christmas. If the fault does not occur and I take the TV home if it becomes a more frequent problem when the warranty expires am I likely to get any joy from Currys honouring their warranty or will it be SOGA time? Even then where do I stand with an intermittent problem?

 

As an aside - I was horrified by the attitude of customer services in Currys. I was told that intermittent faults do not occur and they never find them on TVs with reported faults.

 

Would really appreciate any ideas about what we can do to sort this out. I have a horrible feeling we are going to end up with a TV which is destined to become more permanantly faulty outside the warranty period...

 

So long as you reported the fault within the first year, your covered under the manufactorers warantee. Even if the fault persists outside the warantee period, by reporting it within the period they can't just fob you off because you've left the store with your TV.

 

And the TV will be left on test in a seperate testing room probably at the rear of the shop. Usualy the room is placed so they get no interfearance from outside stuff like noise or other TV's. This is just to make sure that your TV isn't the one of hundereds per year we get back with signal problems relating to your other equipment. If they send the TV back to polaroid and it's not faulty they will incur charges to the value of twice the price of your product directly off their bottom line.

 

As an employee of the company, I find it hard to believe anyone but the most ignorant customer service staff could outright deny the existance of intermittant faults. They even have an option to specify if a fault is intermittant when booking in for repairs so there really is no excuse besides them trying to fob you off. Just ignore them or report them to head office, (the instore manager won't do anything) providing them with the branch, and staff members name.

 

If when you come to collect it, they say it's fine. Ask for a report of who tested it, and when/where it was tested or checked and what tests or checks were perfomed. If they can't provide this or the TV was left outside the repair bay for testing then they haven't properly tested your TV and ask that it be sent for repair or exchanged. Do not let them leave it on test in store anymore because this is just wasting your time.

 

Although it's a bit sneeky, you could turn up during a busy period such as a satuarday between 11am to 1pm, although you'd be waiting around longer for service, your almost guaranteed to get a result if you kick up a fuss with other customers around and start asking for a manager. I'd tell you to go easy on the customer service bloke who serves you. But if they have the balls to just tell you a straight lie and say intermittent faults don't exist, he really doesn't deserve it.

Edited by Renzokuken
  • Haha 1

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you very much for replying.

 

Our TV was turned on and just left running behind the desk. There was so much noise in the shop there is no hope of the hum being heard and if the TV is running continuously it will almost certainly not start up as it only seems to happen when first turned on. Even if there wasn't all the noise of customers and music I'm not even sure how the acoustics of such a large building would affect the noise - although it's very obvious in a smallish, quiet room.

 

I did say in the store that they would be unlikely to hear it in those conditions, but this is when the guy started implying we were making the whole thing up and showed another us TV which had apparently been running there for 3 days without its alleged fault being observed. All the staff were serving customers with their back to both sets.

 

I'll go back at a busy time and see how I get on. To be honest even if I need to take it home and let them test it after Christmas I'd be happier (may have picked up a new TV in the sales too so be better able to cope without it for a while!) but was worried about the warranty ending.

 

Thanks again

Edited by kateandpete
typo!

NatWest Charges: £3708.81. Allocated to fast track 14/10/06. *SETTLED IN FULL* 23/10/06 5% donation made

 

HSBC Default Removal and £186 charges: N1 claim issued 28/11/06 *WON* 28/02/07 5% donation made

 

Egg Charges: £370. N1 claim issued 24/11/06. *SETTLED IN FULL* 12/01/07 5% donation made

 

Natwest Student: £150. N1 claim issued 24/11/06. *SETTLED IN FULL* 10/12/06 5% donation made

Natwest Credit card: £317.01 INCLUDING CONTRACTUAL INTEREST, *WON* 30/11/06 5% Donation Made

 

Ikano Data Protection Act deception and non-complience: N1 claim issued 28/11/06. *SETTLED IN FULL* 12/12/06 5% donation made

I am not a lawyer. All advice is merely my own opinion. Nevertheless, I've won £4675 so far!

Tip my scales if you like my advice :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you very much for replying.

 

Our TV was turned on and just left running behind the desk. There was so much noise in the shop there is no hope of the hum being heard and if the TV is running continuously it will almost certainly not start up as it only seems to happen when first turned on. Even if there wasn't all the noise of customers and music I'm not even sure how the acoustics of such a large building would affect the noise - although it's very obvious in a smallish, quiet room.

 

I did say in the store that they would be unlikely to hear it in those conditions, but this is when the guy started implying we were making the whole thing up and showed another us TV which had apparently been running there for 3 days without its alleged fault being observed. All the staff were serving customers with their back to both sets.

 

I'll go back at a busy time and see how I get on. To be honest even if I need to take it home and let them test it after Christmas I'd be happier (may have picked up a new TV in the sales too so be better able to cope withoutffor a while!) but was worried about the warranty ending.

 

Thanks again

 

I wouldn't wait until after christmas, because it's time they could spend fixing your TV. Once sent off for repair, under their own policy they have 28 days to repair it or replace it.

 

Just tell them that you warned them that the shop was too noisy and the fault was unlikely to be found in such loud conditions. And no action was taken, tell them that you'll be issuing a complaint to head office in hemel hempsted and trading standards unless your TV is immediatly booked in for repair, to be collected from the store sent to thetechguys or the manufactorer. Or is replaced with the same or similar specification or refunded. Ask for a manager if the staff member on the desk isn't willing to do anything.

 

If the manager still refuses to do anything, tell him that legaly he is obligated to prove that your television is not faulty and his testing in poor conditions proves nothing. Theirfore the company is legaly obligated to book your TV in for repair and failing to do so is breaking the law and leaving them open to legal action.

 

Which failing that threat is where you go all "SOGA" on them and start with letters and legal proceedings.

 

A couple of things:

Don't let them send you directly to the manufactorer

And insist on collection from the store.

Never let them keep your recept

Insist on a copy of the service docket, they'll print once booked in, for you to sign.

Edited by Renzokuken

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great - I'm off work on Friday and will let you know how I get on!

NatWest Charges: £3708.81. Allocated to fast track 14/10/06. *SETTLED IN FULL* 23/10/06 5% donation made

 

HSBC Default Removal and £186 charges: N1 claim issued 28/11/06 *WON* 28/02/07 5% donation made

 

Egg Charges: £370. N1 claim issued 24/11/06. *SETTLED IN FULL* 12/01/07 5% donation made

 

Natwest Student: £150. N1 claim issued 24/11/06. *SETTLED IN FULL* 10/12/06 5% donation made

Natwest Credit card: £317.01 INCLUDING CONTRACTUAL INTEREST, *WON* 30/11/06 5% Donation Made

 

Ikano Data Protection Act deception and non-complience: N1 claim issued 28/11/06. *SETTLED IN FULL* 12/12/06 5% donation made

I am not a lawyer. All advice is merely my own opinion. Nevertheless, I've won £4675 so far!

Tip my scales if you like my advice :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...