Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi all,        I really need to start my own thread on this Claim with Overdales/Lowell for a Cap One debt. but have already got to this stage .. My initial question for the moment - until replies come in - is that I figure my main stance is that a purchased debt cannot be claimed, debts can only be claimed by the original issuer of the debt .. but mediation is about coming to an agreement. So would I be acting in bad faith if I enter into mediation yet not seeking to come to a financial agreement? Also, I need to reject the scheduled time slot and ask for another as I'm not going to be free during those hours. The wording of the email gives the impression that I am given this one slot and if I reject it, then I am rejecting mediation - there is no mention of rescheduling, only of freeing up the slot for others .. although, I would have thought it would say so, if there were no possibility to reschedule.. Can I ask for another date without issue?   Anyway, if it's more helpful, I am happy to post up my defence and start a proper thread? I had a lot on at the time and had to do things right away due to the time limits, so didn't feel I had time to come here and go back and forth for info, so put my defence together from reading through relevant threads, late at night. CCA request appears to have been fulfilled (I'm still to check the accuracy of the documents). The other thing, asking solicitors about the particulars of the claim, hasn't .. although I forgot to ask for proof of postage and didn't send recorded post either (whereas the CCA I did), so not sure if I can pursue that easily ..?  
    • Looking for a bit of assistance. I moved into a rented flat on 20th April 2024. I viewed it on the 14th April. Before I moved into the flat, the letting agency provided me with an offer sheet, in said offer sheet I made a number of requests and conditions related to me progressing with assuming the tenancy. These were: 1. A professional clean of the flat prior to move in date. 2. The hob, shower glass and bathroom cabinet be replaced prior to move in date. These were all planned actions by the landlord when I viewed it. I could see the boxes for the hob and other items in the flat. I prepared to move in on the 20th April but none of the work mentioned in the offer sheet had been completed. The standard of the clean was abysmal - mouldy food left in the fridge, nothing wiped down, bathroom mouldy etc. The hob, shower glass and bathroom cabinet were also not installed. I decided to not officially move into the flat as it was not in a condition as promised, my partner lives relatively close by so I lived with her initially. It was only on the 24th April that the hob, shower glass and bathroom cabinet were installed. The cleaners visited again 2 weeks after move in date (3rd April) and attempted another clean of the flat. Again, it was a poor job. I resorted to cleaning the flat myself. I have numerous pictures of the things I identified during my clean and have sent this all to the letting agency. Because of the issues faced, I asked the letting agency that the rent be reduced for the initial month. Exactly halved - to represent the 2 weeks that I was not living at the property. The landlord and letting agency have responded by saying that they will be willing to accept 1 weeks rent as a deduction but not 2. My question is, am I in a strong position to insist on the 2 weeks rent returned or have I been fortunate that they have even offered a weeks rent as a deduction? I would like to insist on the 2 weeks. I have paid the 2 weeks only as my rent collection date passed 2 days ago. Thank you for any assistance. Any further relevant details required let me know and I will provide.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

K.M.Investigations Birchwood Warrington.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4805 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

and what to do:

 

Basically I bought a Ford Focus about 3 years ago. I lost my job after having it for about 10 months and couldnt afford to keep it. I spoke to my friend who told me to voluntary terminate the agreement, whereby I give the car back and they sell it at auction and thats it.

 

I did this, and thought no more of it.

 

A few months ago I wanted to apply for credit. I was refused and wanted to know why. I spoke to my friend who works at the place I got the finance with and he said there was no details for me on the system, which was great (it was a default from o2 which is incorrectly placed on my file - thats a different thread though!)

 

I have just had a phone call, on "Private No." by the way, saying that it was regarding a loan with the Royal Bank of Scotland. I denied all knowledge. She said it was for a car. I said I had never had a loan with RBS. She said that they had taken the car from me and sold it at auction. I said oh yeah thats with Capital Bank, who have told me its all settled. She said she would send it back.

 

I spoke to my friend who told me to call collections. Collections tell me they sold my car at auction for £6282 and that I still owe them £8200. I told them this was inaccurate. They told me that when I was sold the car a personal loan was taken out NOT a Hire Purchase agreement. A Hire Purchase agreement would have allowed me to give the car back and walk away. I told them it was a hire purchase agreement and she told me it wasnt. I informed them that there was no physical way I could pay the "outstanding amount" and nor would I be. She told me that the conversation was at Stalemate and that the KM investigation agents wouldnt be sending this back to them. I informed them that they already had and she told me that they would explain to KM what had happened and would give it back to KM.

 

What can/do I do from here. This hardly seems right or just. I mean the first I heard of there being a personal loan was about an hour ago! I was always told and under the impression it was a HP agreement.

 

Also, there is no way I am paying that amount of money back, I may aswell give it to charity.

 

Any advice is welcome - please!!

Me v Barlcays Bank - Claim Stayed

Me v Jaguar Cars 1 - Won £1650

Me v Jaguar Cars 2 - Winning

Me v London Borough of Newham - Won, Warrant of Execution live

Link to post
Share on other sites

1. Stop talking to them on the phone, unless you can record it. You will have no record of what has or has not been said.

 

2. Do you still have a copy of the agreement? If not, ask for a copy. It's letter N in the templates, send a postal order or get someone else to write a cheque for you, do not sign the letter but print your name, and send it 'recorded - signed for'. You wouldn't want someone doing a cut and paste job with your signature.

 

3. When you get the agreement, if you're not sure of anything post a copy on this thread (after removing your personal details) and ask for opinions.

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good advice from RMW above.... send off for a request for your agreement to the original creditor - you need to send this by recorded/guaranteed, enclose a £1 postal order and DONT HAND SIGN....

 

Bear in mind that if they don't provide this in 12+2 working days then they are in default of your request, and that means while they haven't provided it, then the debt is unenforceable...

 

Re: Account no: xxxxxxxx

 

This letter is a formal request pursuant to s.77/78 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. I require you to provide me with a true copy of the credit agreement relating to the above account, together with any other documentation the Act requires you to provide.

 

I expect you to comply fully and properly with this request, within the statutory time limit. You are reminded that should you fail to comply with my request, the provisions of s.77(6) will apply.

 

If it is your view that you are not the creditor, s.175 of the CCA 1974 applies in the case of a simple assignment, and places a duty upon you to pass this request to the creditor. In the case of an absolute assignment, you are a creditor as defined by s.189. If you contend that you purchased the rights but not the duties of any agreement, you are reminded that s.189 of the Act is clear that an assignment is of both rights and duties.

 

Your attention is drawn to ss.5(2), 3(b),6 and 7 of the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 (CPUTR).

 

I enclose a postal order in the sum of £1.00, which is the statutory fee. Note that these funds are not to be used for any other purpose.

 

If you are unable to comply fully and properly with this request, you should confirm this in writing at the earliest opportunity, and certainly within the statutory time limit for compliance, and return the fee.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I actually have a recording of a telephone conversation with a rep from Cap Bank. In it he quotes the reg of my old car and I ask him as far as he is concerned nothing is owed and he says yes nothing is owed. But then he goes in through my post code and tells me he has requested a copy of my agreement which will be sent out by the end of next week.

Me v Barlcays Bank - Claim Stayed

Me v Jaguar Cars 1 - Won £1650

Me v Jaguar Cars 2 - Winning

Me v London Borough of Newham - Won, Warrant of Execution live

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have dont worry. My friend has just rang me to inform me I had PPI on the agreement covering unemployment. This means that when I said I lost my job and told them to come take the car they should have gone down the PPI route for a maximum of 12 months unemployment. I was back in work 4 months later and havent been out of work since. Therefore I should still have the car and all of this should have been avoided.

Me v Barlcays Bank - Claim Stayed

Me v Jaguar Cars 1 - Won £1650

Me v Jaguar Cars 2 - Winning

Me v London Borough of Newham - Won, Warrant of Execution live

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

UPDATE

 

Received a copy of my agreement today. It says I had "Creditcare 1" on the agreement which, in the significant features and benefits section states

 

"Unemployment Insurance

We will pay monthly benefit(s) up to a maximum of £1500 per month if you suffer involuntary unemployment. You will be eligible for a monthly benefit to be paid after you have been unemployed for a minimum period of 30 days. Further monthly benefits will become payable for each complete 30 days you are unemployed up to a maximum of 12 payments in respect of any one claim"

 

This means that the insurance I was unaware I had on the policy could have avoided all of this. I spoke to an advisor who said as it had been passed to an "external agency" there were no notes as they had been "archived." But, if I sent £10 in with an S.A.R then they would provide me with every note of every conversation with an advisor within 40 days of the request.

I asked who I could complain to and received contact details over the phone.

 

Shambles this. Any opinions??

Me v Barlcays Bank - Claim Stayed

Me v Jaguar Cars 1 - Won £1650

Me v Jaguar Cars 2 - Winning

Me v London Borough of Newham - Won, Warrant of Execution live

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

icon1.gif Re: K.M.Investigations Warrington

 

Although this is an old thread,I am updating it with further information which anyone searching should find may be useful.

 

Here is some details from their Consumer Credit Licence;

 

Licence Number:0328298

Licence Status:Current

 

Current Applicant / Licensee:

 

Name Kenneth Thomas Dowling

 

Categories:

 

Credit brokerage Debt adjusting/counselling Debt collecting

 

Right To Canvass Off Trade Premises:No

 

 

Trading Name(s) (Current):

 

K M Investigations

 

Trading Name(s) (Historic):

 

K & M Investigations

 

Issued Date: 05-Dec-1991

Expiry Date: 17-Jan-2012

 

 

Legal Formation:

 

Sole Trader

 

Nature of Business:

 

Debt Collection

 

Current Address(es):

 

Address TypeAddress Principal Place Of BusinessSuite 103-104, Lovell House, 412 The Quadrant, Birchwood Park, Birchwood, Warrington, Cheshire, WA3 6FW

 

Historic Address(es):

 

Address TypeAddress Correspondence7, Carrington Close, Locking Stumps, Warrington, Cheshire, WA3 7QA Principal Place Of Business22, Marsh House Lane, Padgate, Warrington, Cheshire, WA1 3QY Principal Place Of Business7, Carrington Close, Locking Stumps, Warrington, Cheshire, WA3 7QA

 

It was formerly in the name of Kenneth Thomas Dowling,but the K.M Investigations was added,as can be seen from historical CCA entries.

 

It appears the K.M is reference to Kenneth and the M -to Maureen both Dowling.

The historical addresses listed showing Locking Stumps and Padgate,are both residential areas.

Birchwood Park is part of the former UKAEA site at Risley,and the Quadrant has evolved offering office space.

 

K.M also reference tracing on their letterheads in the form of [email protected]

They also give 2 local Warrington telephone numbers.

 

Having seen recently one of their demands for repayments sent to a friend of mine,I am concerned very much by the ambiguity of the letterhead.

There is no Vat number,No company number (if it applies)

I am in the process of doing checks on any registration with the Information Commissioner.

Any one with help or questions about this company should post a new thread in the debt collection forums.

This thread will now be closed,should you need further specific help or questions send a report to site team by the black triangle.

Anyone with information they feel should be looked at can also send it to me by pm.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Added;

 

ICO licence is current to July 2011

 

Registration Number: Z5509470

Date Registered: 03 July 2001 Registration Expires: 02 July 2011

 

Data Controller: KEN DOWLING

 

Address:

SUITE 103-104 LOVELL HOUSE

412 THE QUADRANT

BIRCHWOOD PARK

BIRCHWOOD

WARRINGTON

WA3 6FW

Other Names:

KM INVESTIGATIONS

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4805 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...