Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi everyone, Thanks for the responses. Just a few follow up questions in light of what's been said:   If I dont appeal to PPM, who can I appeal to?   Why should the PCN been attached to the windscreen? Is this written in law?   I assumed the document I had received was the NTK, if this is not the case, what does a NTK look like?   Regarding the compliance with the Protection of Freedoms Act, could the "period" of parking not be argued either way? The legislation doesnt state it must have a start/end time of parking, which I assumed an ANPR camera would pick up if it had one. Is 4 minutes not technically enough to show the vehicle was parked?    Thanks !
    • I see jenrick has stuck his head up with them, and I'm sure this wont faze their nasty rhetoric one wit-less UK growth since 2010 has been lacklustre and largely driven by immigration, says report UK growth since 2010 has been lacklustre and largely driven by immigration, says report | Economic growth (GDP) | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Resolution Foundation report suggests parties are dodging the economic challenges facing the country   Net migration is more than two and a half times the 2010 figure despite a string of Tory pledges to reduce it Immigration: how 14 years of Tory rule have changed Britain – in charts | General election 2024 | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Net migration is more than two and a half times the 2010 figure despite a string of Tory pledges to reduce it    
    • Will get them done asap My job changes week to week so at the time I didn’t know. 
    • You will probably get a couple more reminders followed by further demands fro unregulated debt collectors with even increasing amounts to pay. They are all designed to scare you into paying.  Don't. It's a scam site and they do not know who was driving and they know the keeper is not liable to pay the PCN. Also the shop was closed so they have no legitimate interest in keeping the car park clear. So to charge £100 is a penalty as there is no legitimate interest which means that the case would be thrown out if it went to Court.  Keep your money in your wallet and be prepared to ignore all their letters and threats. Doubtful they would go to Court since a lot more people would not pay when they heard  MET lost in Court. However they may just send you a Letter of Claim to test your resolve.  If yoy get one of those, come back to us and we will advise a snotty letter to send them.  You probably already have, but take a look through some of our past Met PCNs to see how they are doing.
    • Hello, been a while since I posted on here, really hoping for the same support an advice I received last time :-) Long, long story for us, but basically through bad choices, bad luck and bad advice ended up in an IVA in 2016. The accounts involved all defaulted, to be expected. In 2018, I got contacted by an 'independent advisor' advising me that I shouldn't be in an IVA, that it wasn't the solution for our circumstances and that they would guide us through the process of leaving the IVA and finding a better solution. I feel very stupid for taking this persons advice, and feel they prey on vulnerable people for their own financial gain (it ended with us paying our IVA monthly contribution to them)-long and short of it our IVA failed in 2018. At the same time the IVA failed we also had our shared ownership property voluntarily repossessed (to say this was an incredibly stressful time would be an understatement!) When we moved to our new (rented) property in August 2018, I was aware that creditors would start contacting us from the IVA failure. I got advice from another help website and started sending off SARs and CCAs request letters. I was advised not to bury my head and update our address etc and tackle each company as they came along. Initially there was quite a lot of correspondence, and I still get a daily missed call from PRA group (and the occasional letter from them), but not much else. However, yesterday i had a letter through from Lowell (and one from Capital One) advising that they had bought my debt and would like to speak with me regarding the account. There will be several.of these through our door i suspect, as we did have several accounts with Capital One. Capital One have written to us with regular statements over the last 5 years, and my last communication with them was to advise of of our new address (June 2019), I also note that all of these accounts received a small payment in Jan2019 (i'm assuming the funds from the failed IVA pot). Really sorry for the long long post, but just thought id give (some of) the background for context.... I guess my question at the moment is.....how do I respond to Lowell...do I wait for the inevitable other letters to arrive then deal with them all together or individually...? Do I send them a CCA?  Many thanks
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Capquest/Bank of Scotland. SD For Bankruptcy **WON + COSTS**


gilly5001
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4619 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I believe that this demand is frivolous and unlawful as it was delivered by 2nd class post, (according to the Insolvency Service minimum service is by registered post - unless substituted service has been granted which it appears has not been.) and feel that the Insolvency service is being used as a debt collection tool when the account is disputed entirely.

 

I quote - Judge Boggis QC - RE AWAN - [2000] BPIR 241

 

'In my judgment, bankruptcy is one of the most serious forms of execution that can be brought against a debtor. In any bankruptcy proceedings it is, in my view, absolutely clear that the provisions as to service must be followed exactly..' - JUDGE BOGGIS QC - SITTING AS A JUDGE OF THE HIGH COURT

In light of the above information, I request the judge sets aside the demand and gracefully request he/she order payment of my costs by the alleged creditor.

 

As a lone parent/low income family with limited finances I approached a solicitor by phone and asked for an estimate on how much it would cost. I was given an estimate of 3 to 6 hours at £170 per hour to prepare the Application (£510-£1020) plus extra for attending the court.

 

I respectfully request that the court give consideration to awarding these costs on the indemnity basis or, in the alternative, on the standard basis as I believe, in any case, that they have been proportionately and reasonably incurred and/or are of a proportionate and reasonable amount.

 

In support of this request, I would also like to refer the court’s attention to the authority of the High Court in the case of:-

 

Hammonds (a firm) v Pro-Fit USA Ltd [2007] EWHC 1998 (Ch)

 

In this case, Mr Justice Warren confirmed that it was usual for an indemnity award to be made:-

 

27 So far as disputed debts are concerned, the practice of the court is not to allow the insolvency regime to be used as a method of debt collection where there is a bona fide and substantial dispute as to the debt. Save in exceptional cases, the court will dismiss a petition based on such a debt (usually with an indemnity costs order against the petitioner).

 

 

Also if you have tried to call the number on the demand and have failed to get through....then you could also add this -

 

A statutory demand must show a named person or persons from the Creditor or their agent/solicitor whom you can contact directly. This is Rule 6.2 of The insolvency Rules 1986.

This means that if the statutory demand doesn't give the name of a person you can speak to then it is not valid. If you try to contact the named person and they won’t put you through then it is also invalid.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

is it ok to have a statement attached to back of 6.5, can i paste details in or hand write them in, i am such a dunce I know but not used to this sort of thing, the space on the form doesnt see very big. also 6.4

the names and addresses of the persons upon whom this application should be served are: (who do iput here me or them??)

and then the applicants address for service??? thats mine right?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gilly - doubt they will set aside without a hearing. My recent experience of a set aside hearing lasted approx 2 minutes in with the judge (1st Cretins didn't attend), judge asked me a couple of question, I answered, he set aside and awarded me costs, which 1st Cretins kindly paid me today.

 

There is nothing to worry about - good luck :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

ok now i need help,

 

have today recieved letter from court to attend hearing for set aside next thursday at 10am. prob is im working and there is no way whatso ever i can have the time off. i cant even explain it will be really frowned upon. can someone ie hubbie go on behalf or can i write to court etc, im not sure what to do now, had so much tim eoff when could have gone and now working get this.

prob too getting there on time into city centre london even if work would give time which i know there is no way whatsoever on earth i could ask

any advice please!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like im gonna have to make up something. prob is in my work appointments not a good enough excuse to not be in, will have to think of something.

is there anything i need to take, defence etc or do I just make sure i know details of case in case ask questions?? any one any ideas what questions I'll be asked

dont want to mess it up at this last minute. oh and an update capquest have failed to supply the CCA and has now been 29 days, will be 34 by the time hearing on wednesday morning!!

does this put me in a good position??

Gilly

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gilly - I just listed x amount of hours @ £9.50 (I think thats the amount you might need to check) then I listed fuel for x amount of miles at 40p per mile, parking (these for the time i attended to swear affidavit and also to attend for set aside) then disbursements, like postage costs, my costs were very realistic and only came to about £140, I know some people who claim up to £300/£400. You have to head it COSTS AS LITIGENT IN PERSON as well.

 

Good luck :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gilly....

 

Get a piece of paper and type at the top

 

COSTS AS LITIGANT IN PERSON

 

and as an example - 10 hours of research into the Insolvency Laws @ £9.25 per hour

10 hours of research into the Consumer Credit Act @ £9.25 per hour

Parking

Postage

Time off work

Childcare

Mileage @ 40p per mile

 

Fax / Send this to the court 24 hours before the hearing....

 

OR

 

You can use the form X20 has supplied here, but change the title to Litigant In person Costs

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/156641-capquest-statutory-demand-help-4.html#post1765170

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, I have just faxed costs to the court and capital One. what should i take to court on wednesday? should I take the defence I have already submitted (it was about 4 pages)? is there anything else, research on cca etc.

dont want to screw it up at the final hurdle. still havent decided how Im gonna get off work wednesday morning, even if it is only for half an hour!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi there

well what a day!

Still no CCA from capquest, so went to court this morning. They did not show.

the district judge called me in and showed me a letter she had rec'd from capquest stating that I had no grounds and therefore they would be showing up.

There was a witness statement which they hadn't signed. they had advised they had bought the debt but there w\s no notice of assignment and there was a copy of the credit agreement, which the judge noted there was only one side of. I explained to judge how I havent rec'd such agreement when I have asked for it!!

She then explained that they hadn't supplied the evidence they needed due to the claims I had made.

They also suggested that I didnt have my own defence merely a copy of one from this website and they had sent a photocopy of a defence posted on here. I again explained that whilst I had sought advice and help from here I understood what I had submitted. The judge replied that it is fine to get legal advice from the website!!

anyway, set aside awarded and costs !! yippee

 

Then got home and found letter similar to one capquest sent to court ONLY they had signed the witness statement on mine LOL!

So my question now is, whay are they withholding the credit agreeement if they have one?? I asked for it 34 days ago!!

thansk for everyones help on here

Gilly

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...