Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • This is what I have said in my email of complaint:   On 29th November 2023 I took out a loan of £5000 with you. Unfortunately very early into 2024 I have found myself in financial difficulty and I contacted you on 13th February 2024 asking if there was any way I could extend the length of my loan to 36 months and I fully explained why I was requesting this and asked for your help. I again contacted you on 7th March 2024 to advise you of a change in my circumstances which resulted in me having to take out a DMP and asking you to confirm that the direct debit had been cancelled. You would have also received confirmation of this DMP from StepChange but you did not acknowledge receipt of my email.  I have now therefore fallen behind on several of my debts, yours included, and as a result you have lodged a Cifas marker against my name for "evasion of payment", which has resulted in me having to change banks, which has been an extremely difficult process because of the Cifas marker. I do not feel you have been fair or given me the opportunity to fully explain my situation to you before you lodged the marker against my name.  I cannot stress to you enough how much this has affected my mental health. I am having trouble sleeping and my existing health condition has been exacerbated by all of this.  What I would like you to do is to please remove the Cifas marker and let me make arrangements to pay the loan back through a DMP. If you fail to resolve my complaint within 8 weeks, or if matters are not settled to my satisfaction, I will have no alternative but to refer my complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service. I look forward to hearing from you. Yours faithfully, Should I send something along those lines to the CEO? 
    • Right... Misuse of Facility is a Cat 6 and is considered the worst out of all of the CIFAS Categories for CIFAS Markers.  However lets see what happens when MCB come back to you. Make sure you refer it to the CEO.    IF YOU DONT HAVE A VALID REASON FOR THE ISSUE WITH PAYMENTS ETC - Then the marker will stay.   
    • That "oh dear" doesn't sound good  
    • Oh dear.. Misuse of facility...  Cat 6... No wonder everything is being nuked from high orbit... More in a bit.. 
    • Thank you fkofilee First question: what do I do if Monzo close my account? I need an account but no one will touch me with this marker against me. Is there anywhere/any other option that I have if Monzo close my account? MCB is My Community Bank?  Yes What Category of Marker do you have? This is what it says on the Cifas SAR: Application date: 07 December 2023 Date recorded: 09 April 2024 Expiry date: 09 April 2030 Cifas Case Identifier: 15435315 Product relating to the application, proposal, account or facility: Personal Loan – Unsecured Facility: Granted Case type: Misuse of facility Reason(s) for filing: Evasion of payment Financial Loss Value of Loss: £5000.00 When did you raise the complaint? Last night via email Do you have Correspondence / Audit Trails of communications showing that you were in severe financial strain due to an event AFTER you took the loan? I can prove that I had to buy a new washing machine, I have my pay slips showing the emergency tax code and a letter from the tax office after I had spoken with them to get it corrected and of course I can get a copy of my vet bill. And all of this was in the first 2-3 months of 2024.  I panicked. Stupid I know and as you say, I have learned the hard way and I am not in any way denying anything that I have done wrong, but it just feels a bit unfair.  It is what it is I guess and if I have to have it on me forever then so be it. I am just so worried about the bank situation 😕    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Welcome/Cohens - case withdrawn ***WOO-HOO ***


Prudence
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4299 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Thanks for that Rebel as have had no luck reaching them on the phone!!! (surprise surprise)

Will try emailing them. It's just a simple question surely ? - how long must a Court keep it's records?

Wonder why I am having such trouble finding the answer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 629
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Just to let you know I am looking at this thread now.

I will have a thorough read of it when I have a bit more time...Was that reply from WF for the LBA??

Any chance you can scan & post it up to have a look?

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Hi

I'll try and keep this short as I have a long agonising history with WF! We had a CCJ from them overturned in 2008 and HowardCohen discontinued in 2009.

On our credit report it was shown as "satisfied" and "debt assigned" at March 2010 (they passed to MKRR/Raven) with no "Default" showing, only months of missed payments. I have now noticed that the last entry in March2010 mentioned above has now changed to "Default"!!!! (The original Default Notice was dated 2007!) What are they playing at.

Can you please advise on this, many thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Prudence.

 

You certainly need to challenge this. A default should reflect a point in time when the credit agreement actually defaulted, in your case this was in 2007. A default can only happen once - usually once a couple of payments have been missed on a credit agreement.

 

The thing to do is to raise a formal complaint with Welcome specifying that you wish to have the default removed. They are certainly in the wrong and you should be able to easily argue that they are incorrectly processing your personal data. You can also contact the credit reference agencies to place a 'notice of correction' on the file outlining what the issue is.

 

If Welcome refuse to amend the mistake you could take a complaint further to the Information Commissioner.

 

Here are some links that you could find useful:

http://www.nationaldebtline.co.uk/england_wales/factsheet.php?page=05_credit_reference_agencies

 

http://www.ico.gov.uk/

 

http://www.experian.co.uk/downloads/consumer/creditRefAgencyExplained.pdf

 

 

We hope you can get the situation sorted!

 

National Debtline.

For Free, Confidential and Independent advice: 0808 808 4000

Monday - Friday 9am to 9pm // Saturday 9.30am to 1pm // 24-hour voicemail. Please leave a message to request an information pack. http://www.nationaldebtline.org // http://www.mymoneysteps.org

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you very much for your reply. I will do that however I have written to Welcome several times and the ICO and FSO and many others re Welcome's incorrect accurate of our data (as the record is incorrect in other aspects too, eg dates, record of payments etc) but no-one seems willing to do anything.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Prudence, sometimes you have to avoid the

normal channels forget customer(dis) service all

correspondence on these matter must be addressed

to the DATA CONTOLLER of the company placing the

default entry, customer service staff are generally not

at all well informed on compliance and data control if

they were they would not be making ridiculous statements

threats etc.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Brigadier! Hope you & yours are well. Thanks for that response. I've had a close look at our credit reports from Noddle and Equifax. Please help me figure out the following and what we should do! FYI our original Default Notice was in 07 - the notice was deemed 'faulty' by the way by us and was one of the items in our Defence getting the judgement overturned. In March 2010 WF assigned to MKRR/Raven.

 

Noddle:

Status: Satisfied (updated April 2010)

Date of Default - **/**/07 (this was the date of the original Default Notice -mentioned above)

On the payment table they have a marker in April 2010 D (Account has Defaulted) and underneath DA (Debt Assigned)

 

Equifax:

Status - Settled Default/Delinquent Balance: Nil

On the payment table they have a marker S (Settled) in June 2007 and no record of any Default

 

Even dates & payments differ on different records!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI PRU,

This appears to me that this has been sold on to a third party.

So another form of pondlife is about to surface claiming to own

or the right to collect the debt.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes well we were contacted by Raven I think fairly recently.

To my way of thinking Equifax's entry should disappear in June 2013 but Noddle - well they have TWO Defaults registered - 2007 and 2010 and also 'Satsified' at the same date in 2010. I will contact them now.

 

I have not been so active on CAG recently. Are Welcome still in business??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome exists to collect the outstanding book debts.

They are no longer offering credit.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

THE date for SB is the date at which a payment was due and no further payment

or written acknowledgment of the debt was made for 6 years (5 in Scotland)

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excuse my ignorance what is SB? And maybe it's late but I don't understand!!

 

Statute Barred 6 clear years no payment or acknowledgment i writting of the debt.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Default date is usually at the very least 1-3 months

after the cause of action so the date of last payment

will be ealier than the default.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi

 

They will give you a regulatory based award as normal but I believe they only pay out 90% of the value of the claim in Welcome's case.

 

So on a loan it is premiums paid plus any contractual interest paid plus 8% on the payments actually made.

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you IMS. So would I use your spreadsheet to calculate using the original interest rate? Then add the 8%? And deduct 10%? Sorry, just want to make sure I am understanding correctly. Any idea why they withhold 10%?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi, I have found a statement for the life of the account suplied by WF a few years back. Can you please tell me which of these charges I can claim?

 

"Disbursal of Fees"

"Fees" (they don't elaborate)

 

Thank you

Pru

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...