Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Even a Piers Morgan is an improvement and a gutless Farage Piers Morgan calls for second Brexit referendum WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM Piers Morgan and Nigel Farage have faced off over Brexit and a second referendum in a heated reunion on BBC Question Time.   “Why don’t we have another referendum about Brexit?” he questioned. “I seem to remember when 2016 came around we were told there was going to be control of our borders and it was going to be economically beneficial to this country. And eight years later we have lost complete control of our borders… and economically it seems to have been a wilful act of self-harm.”   ... Piers missed off : after all somebody said a 48/52 decision would be "unfinished business" by a long way - was that person just bul lying (again)  
    • when did they (who) inform you there was a 'police case' and when was this attained? i will guess the debt is now SB'd as it's UAE 15yrs. have you informed the bsnk ever by email/letter of your correct and current address? you can always ignore anyone else accept the bank,  Block and bounce back all emails. Block any text messages  Ignore any letters unless it's: - a Statutory Demand - a Letter Of Claim - a Court Claimform via Northants bulk.  
    • I left Dubai 8 years ago and intended to return. However a job prospect fell through. I’d been there for 15 years. I decided to pay my credit card and the bank had frozen my account. There is no means to pay the CC so completely unable to pay when I wanted to other than the bank advising me to ask a friend in the UAE to pay it on my behalf!  fast forward bank informs there is a police case against me for non payment. Years later IDR chased me and after months/ years they stopped. Now Judge & Priestley are trying their luck. Now I have received an email in English and Arabic from JP saying the bank has authorised them to collect debts. Is this the same as IDR although I didn’t receive anything like this from them. Just says they are authorised?
    • The neighbour's house is built right on the boundary so the side of their house is effectively the 'wall' in our garden separating the two properties. It's a three storey house and so the mortar poses a potential danger to us. Because of the danger, we have put up an interior fence in our garden to ensure we don't risk mortar dropping on us. That reduces the garden by 25% which is not only an inconvenience, but it's the part of the garden where we had lined up contractors to install a patio and gazebo which we will use for our wedding reception in less than 2 months. We have spoken to the neighbour's caretaker who is on the case, has spoken with a roofer and possibly a scaffolding company, but there are several issues. They don't seem to understand the urgency. As long as there is a risk of falling mortar, we can't carry out any work in the garden, and unless they hurry up, we're looking at cancelling our wedding as it's not viable to book a venue because we can't use our own garden! Also, they want to put the scaffolding up in our garden which would be ok with us if it was a matter of a few days and they hurried up, but there is a tree (most likely protected by the conservation area), so most likely they can only reach part of the roof with the scaffolding if they put it up in our garden. We suggested a roofer with a cherry picker but they seem to want to use a company they've used before. Any and all comments, suggestions, advice is more than welcome.  PS. does it make any difference that the neighbour is a business (ltd) and not a private dwelling?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Should garage pay my petrol costs?


sophes
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5702 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Dear All,

 

My local Nissan Dealership in Chorley recently acquired a Fiat Dealership in Blackpool - 30 miles away. I bought my Fiat car through them (it was brought to Chorley for me to view/puchase) in July 2008.

 

In August 2008 I discovered the spare key they had given me with the car doesn't actually work on my car. They are completely different when compared so it's quite obvious (if you check!) that it doesn't fit my car.

 

I rang them and told them that the car being incorrect had caused major problems one day when I had left the spare with my parents so they could borrow my car to visit some relatives, and I went out for the day (wth the original key).

 

The service desk weren't too bright and couldn't understand me, so I drove to the garage (2 minutes from my house) and showed them the key. They took it off me and said they'd get back to me, because they couldn't cut me a key in the Chorley branch. Chorley is Nissan, Blackpool has all the Fiat gear.

 

They called me a week later and told me they'd need to take the car up to Blackpool to code the new key to the car as they couldn't find the TRUE Spare which should have been given to me when I bought the car.

 

I took it in this morning to Chorley so they can take it up to Blackpool, and they have given me a courtesy car. I asked them if my petrol level will be the same when they return it to me and they said they don't normally do that.

 

I told them the problem has been caused by them so I shouldn't have to incur a petrol cost.

 

The service desk lady said she'd speak to her manager.

 

I am due to pick the car up at 5pm today. I have a feeling they won't have put any petrol in it. I noted the mileage, the miles left on the electronic petrol gauge, and the MPG,

 

Does anyone have any tips what I can say to them at the garage when I pick it up if it's not had petrol put in? Or should I just come home and write a letter of complaint?

 

Thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In the Utopian world where everything is run by Trading Standards compliance officers (Now there's an oxymoron!!) I suppose some people would like to think they can recover petrol costs.

 

In the real world, i might offer you a discount voucher for your next service. If i had to re-emburse everyone their petrol costs, me and a lot of other traders just wouldn't be here. Which might sound like a good thing but then where would buy your cars from and where you you get them fixed?

 

Hammy

 

 

So what level of theft/fraud/con would you condone before admitting that it was wrong?

 

The vehicle was supplied by the Chorley dealer - franchised or not. That dealer is responsible for all the costs of rectifying the problem. That includes the costs of getting it to and from the Fiat dealership.

 

Equally though, the OP needs to return the courtesy car with the same level of fuel as supplied - it cuts both ways.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That dealer is responsible for all the costs of rectifying the problem.

I agree,pat. I think that the crucial point is that the OP was offered a key at the point of purchase that was described as a "spare". Anything that is handed over at the point of sale would have been considered as included in the purchase price of the car. The key clearly isn't a spare, therefore is not as described and the onus is on the dealer to rectify the problem, at their cost. The dealer has shot himself in the foot. He should have just handed over the car with one key and saved himself aggro and expense.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update!

 

I picked my car up and asked if it had petrol replaced. The woman said 'We don't do that'.

I explained the situation, that it wasn't my fault the car had to go to Blackpool, it was their fault which caused the problems and asked if they had spoken to a manager.

The woman said no, but she had spoken to the Sales Man who sold me the car in the first place and he had said no. I asked her to speak to her manager, she said he was very busy. I asked for the address of where to complain, she said "Here". I asked her to write the address down, she gave me a business card. I will follow it up with a letter.

 

Am I right in my pursuit? It's not my fault that the Fiat gear is in Blackpool. They had done a 60 mile round trip and the petrol tank was seriously depleted.

 

Help!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've re-read my post and that of the original OP and i don't see any of us referring to theft/fraud/con........................

 

We have very difficult trading conditions at present and this culture of "blame" and "retribution" bandied around by the educated but not wise, is detrimental to honest business practise.

 

Hammy

 

I interpreted your post as admitting that there are legal problems with the standard of service you provide, but you get away with it because trading standards do not have the resources to prosecute you. If this is not want you meant perhaps you should clarify.

Post by me are intended as a discussion of the issues involved, as these are of general interest to me and others on the forum. Although it is hoped such discussion will be of use to readers, before exposing yourself to risk of loss you should not rely on any principles discussed without confirming the situation with a qualified person.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In the Utopian world
which is what we don't have, that's why sites like cag exist.

 

the garage made a cock-up, so according to

 

honest business practise.
the garage should have put fuel in the car.

 

why should the customer pay for someone else's cock up? This is the sort of crappy customer service that gives the trade a bad name.

Link to post
Share on other sites

she would be expected to bring the car back with the same amount of petrol in it... they should do the same.

 

lets look at this... really how much would it cost the garage to pop a few quids worth of petrol in the car? 60 miles... what's that... one or two gallons at the most?

 

If they had done so, this user would now be telling her pals that although the garage made a mistake (which we all do from time to time) they put it all right, they even filled the tank up.

 

Instead she is here complying about shoddy service... and I for one agree with her.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if a garage were to put a couple of gallons of fuel in every vehicle they had to drive for fault finding etc the costs would be prohibitive, the OP was given a courtesy car even though the vehicle was not undrivable-for the garage to correct the problem. i say that the garage went out of its way to help. They could have just said "you should have checked the keys when you bought the car."

Link to post
Share on other sites

they had to drive for fault finding etc the costs would be prohibitive,
indeed.

 

but this is not fault finding.

the garage cocked up with they keys... fair and square there is no argument about that.

 

They could have just said "you should have checked the keys when you bought the car."

 

or in Currys they could say "you should have checked the telly first". The car was sold with the keys... and lets be honest it costs a small fortune these days to get a car key cut and programmed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Zamzara

 

For the record, there are no issues, legal or otherwise, with the standard of service offered by any company I am connected with and frankly, I take great offence at this suggestion and I respectfully ask that you retract it.

 

How creative your mind must be to reach this interpretation from just 4 lines of text......................

 

Clearly you are one of the educated. However wisdom, in whatever form, has yet to appear.

 

Trading Standards, or whatever they call themselves this week, do not have a resource problem in my area, they have an intellect problem............a lack of it.

 

Plus the fact they need something to investigate and as far as I can tell that has never happened with any business I have connections with.

 

Thank you for the clarification. It was you who made the distinction between your business practice, and one that is acceptable to trading standards officers, so I fail to see where my line of reasoning was wrong.

 

My personal circumstances are irrelevant.

Post by me are intended as a discussion of the issues involved, as these are of general interest to me and others on the forum. Although it is hoped such discussion will be of use to readers, before exposing yourself to risk of loss you should not rely on any principles discussed without confirming the situation with a qualified person.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The way I see it is make an official complaint to the MD of the garage (give them the chance to resolve the complaint)....and see what the response is, if it isn't you your satisfaction, then report them to TS, and if they can't resolve it to your satisfaction then I suppose you could always take them to court....

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5702 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...