Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Afternoon all Looking for advice before I defend claim for car tax payment that the DVLA claim I owe £68 from an idemity claimback from my bank and unpaid tax  So brief outline. Purchased car Jan 30th ,garage paid the tax for me after I gave them my card details so first payment £68 out in Feb 24  followed by payment of £31 from March due to end Jan 24 Checked one of my vehicle apps and about 7-10 days later car showing as untaxed? No reason why but it looks like DVLA cancelled it ,this could be because I did not have the V5 and the gargae paid on my behalf but not sure did not receive a letter to say car was untaxed.  Fair enough I set up the tax again staight away in Feb 24  and first payment out Mar 31st , and each payment since has come out each month for £31 , this will end Feb/Mar 2025 so slightly longer than the original tax set up so all good. I then claimed the £68 back from my bank as an indemity refund as obviously I had paid but DVLA had cancelled therefore it was a payment for nothing?  Last week recieved a SJP form dated 29th May stating that DVLA were claiming for unpaid tax and a false indemity claimback which of course is the £68. It also stated that I had received two previous letters offering me the oppotunity to pay that £68 but as I had not responded it was now a court claim that I must admit guilt for or defend. My post is held for weeks at a time from Royal Mail ( keepsafe) due to me receiving hospital tretament at weeks at a time that said I did not receive any previous letters from DVLA. So I am happy to defend this and go to court but wondering what CAG members think? In summary I paid an initial amount of £68 and then a DD of £31 , tax cancelled so I set up a new DD at £31 a month all in the month of Feb 2024, I claimed the £68 back from my bank. DD has been coming out each month without issue and I have paperwork to show the breakdown for both DD setup's plus bank statements showing the payments coming out . The second DD set up has extended payments up to Feb/Mar 2025. DVLA claiming the £68 was ilegally claimed back despite the fact they cancelled the original DD for reasons unknown. Is this defendable ? I will post up documents including the original DD conformations 
    • That doesn't look like clacton ... Former Brexit Party leader Nigel Farage buys coastal home in Lydd-on-Sea WWW.KENTONLINE.CO.UK Former Brexit Party leader Nigel Farage bought a coastal home in the county, it has been reported.  
    • It's not a private road.  It's a small public street (with Resi houses) that leads into and from public road/ highway. The garages have land in front of the doors.  Then there's a yellow line. So there's a clear marker on what is private and what is public.  These people keep parking on the private land side
    • Do you also own land the garages on and the private road? Or is it shared freehold with right of access to all freeholders or why?  Dx  
    • I may try cheap plastic bollards (traffic cones) first just to see if they get moved.  I will look into the cost of fixed bollards.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Health and Safety at Work


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5728 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hiya! This is a very long thread, sorry. But please read if you think you can offer advice as I badly need some!

 

I joined my company two years ago and was immediately placed in a job below my grade. It was not the job I had applied for, the reason I was given for being placed here was staff shortages and increased workload. The type of work exacerbated my back problem, which my employers were aware of from the medical questionnaire I completed when I applied for the position. Although I had always had a back problem, for the first time in my life my GP began to prescribe painkillers as my work was worsening my condition and I was regularly in pain. I was sent for an Occupational Health Assessment (OH) and my employers chose to completely ignore the recommendations from the OH nurse. They also failed to perform the desk assessment which is supposed to be performed by an OH physio. This led to a workplace injury which had me off work for 3 months. I had physiotherapy and instead of sending my sick certificates in, I chose to take them in myself, this way I could report on my progress etc. (The injury was to an upper limb).

 

During the time I was sick, I was constantly harassed and had my story questioned over and over again, brought into the office to sign statements of the incident, and it was never reported to RIDDOR. However, I was not kept informed of any developments whilst absent. Despite all of this I was keen to return to work and returned on part time medical grounds. (I suggested this myself) My employers were not happy when my GP chose to keep me on part time medical grounds for a total of 6 weeks and tried to see if they could "force" me to return full time. It might also be worth mentioning that the workplace flexible time rules changed during the time I was absent, a vote was held. I was not told of this and lost my right to vote. I would have voted against it.

 

After the 6 weeks I returned full time and was referred again to Occupational Health. My manager put half truths on the referral form, she kept insinuating that my injury could have been as a result of a job I previously did (ten years ago!!) and I refused to sign it until it was rectified. I also got a letter from my GP stating that I had never presented with this type of injury prior to the date of injury. I had to fight for injury leave and was threatened with dismissal as I had been absent for longer than the statutory period of one week! If I didn’t get injury leave I would have been dismissed. Thankfully I received the injury leave.

 

The OH physio came about my upper limb injury. I explained to him that I still had not had the desk assessment for my back. He was great, did the two assessments in one, and measured my desk etc, noted it was unsuitable as was the chair. At this point I was due to transfer to another area within the workplace. Having never worked in that area I had no idea what the work entailed so the physio spoke to my manager and the manager of the new area. Having spoken to them, the physio said the work was not suitable to my condition (repetitive and static work, risk of strain) so management had to consider a position which would be suitable. They could think of only one role which would be suited to my position, which is the role I am in now. (And the role I originally applied for)

 

I began in my current role. I received my new chair but the adjustable desk that was recommended never materialised. I have been in my current position for roughly 7 months, during which I've hardly needed medication at all; in fact I have never had a prescription since about a month into new position. I still have the occasional twinge in my back and my upper limb will never fully recover and can be painful at times but it's managable. My new manager has asked on more than one occasion if my “problem” is “official” – I told him yes, it has been done through their own Occupational Health Team and the paperwork for it should be in my personnel file and if it’s not, I have a copy in my desk.

Today I was told completely out of the blue that I'm to be moved to another role. One which will undoubtedly affect my condition.

 

I raised my concerns and my manager’s boss disagreed, stating she thought it to be the best place for me. (She has no medical qualification as far as I am aware). I relayed things to her that were written in my OH report and she doesn't seem to think it matters because the report does not specifically state which job I can or cannot do, it states the type of work and she refuses to acknowledge that this is exactly the type of work which will aggravate my condition. (She has obviously never read the report as she had to ask me what it said). She insists that the position is not static but it is as many of my colleagues who work there often complain about how restrictive it is, the term of phrase “chained to the desk” gets used a lot and it has been said that anyone out of their seat is questioned. Because of my condition I need to be able to alternate sitting with being mobile, I cannot be sat down for a period longer than 50 minutes, at a push. The work also involves extreme repetitive typing (constant for the whole day, no other task) which again is a big no-no. I have been told by manager’s boss that allowances will be made but I don’t believe a word of it as I have seen them do this before to many colleagues.

 

They did a similar thing to a colleague a year ago and she now can never work again. She had to fight for medical retirement. They will only reassess me through OH once my condition worsens. By then it's too damn late!!

 

I informed her that I would be looking for another job as the type of work she is placing me in is detrimental to my health, it is also similar to the type of work in a higher grade and I did not apply for promotion because of my condition, if I thought I was capable medically I would have applied for that job. A manager asked at the time why I did not apply and I outright said because it would worsen my condition. She more or less said that if I want to leave, it's up to me. I asked for the reason I am being moved and it's because new recruits are coming in and they will be placed in my role. This is despite the fact that since I arrived on this team I have improved greatly the processes. Nice to know I'm valued, eh?

If anyone needs to ask questions to get a clearer picture, ask away, I really need some advice on this one!

Edited by Bagafun
Edited to paragraph in order to make the thread more readable.
Link to post
Share on other sites

This certainly seems to be discrimination at first look.

Discrimination can be either direct or indirect. Direct discrimination occurs when a person is treated less favourably at work because of their sex, race, religion, age, sexuality or DISABILITY.

Some people don’t realise that impairments such as back pain can count as a disability if the adverse effect on the individual is substantial and long-term.

In the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 Code of Practice on Employment and Occupation there are case studies to help.

Disability-related discrimination is when a disabled person is treated less favourably for a disability-related reason and the treatment cannot be justified.

 

Making reasonable adjustments

 

Employers are required to make 'reasonable adjustments' to jobs and workplaces for disabled workers. This is to ensure disabled people have equal opportunities in applying for and staying in work.

Reasonable adjustments may include:

 

  • adjustments to the workplace to improve access or layout;
  • giving some of the disabled person’s duties to another person, eg employing a temp;
  • transferring the disabled person to fill a vacancy;
  • changing the working hours, eg flexi-time, job-share, starting later or finishing earlier;
  • time off, eg for treatment, assessment, rehabilitation;
  • training for disabled workers and their colleagues;
  • getting new or adapting existing equipment, eg chairs, desks, computers, vehicles;
  • modifying instructions or procedures, eg by providing written material in bigger text or in Braille;
  • improving communication, eg providing a reader or interpreter, having visual as well as audible alarms;
  • providing alternative work (this should usually be a last resort).

I would certainly go down this road first and see what the outcome is.

 

Try acas.org.uk for further help.

Good luck.

Please note that although my advice is offered, you should consult your legal representative before taking ANY action.

 

 

have a nice day !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...