Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Paint is a free programme on any Windows PC. But don't worry, the choice here is not either perfection or nothing. As you say, use your scanner, save the file ... and then use the "choose files" option when you post to CAG to add the file. We can do all the redacting and converting to the correct file type at this end.  The important thing is just to get the info to us. Why not do an experiment this afternoon and see if the above works?  
    • I see they're trying to round up asylum seekers and lock them up for about three months so they can be put on planes to Rwanda. I'm a bit surprised that this is legal.  
    • thought for the day "Prime ministers need a big strategy that tells you where you’re going, you need a bunch of tactics that get you there, and you need the ability to take everybody else with you."   Now I know you are all thinking 'why is the  UKs destination Rwanda ???
    • Asset Link filed for a default CCJ against me, in relation to an old Barclaycard debt which I apparently signed an agreement for back in 2000.   I did not own a Barclaycard in 2000 so I know this is not true.  The CCJ notice was sent to an old address so I did not receive it.  Years later when I found out about the CCJ when I applied for credit, I put an application in to have the CCJ set aside.   As part of the set aside case, I was asked by the judge to provide a draft defence, should the CCJ be set aside.   The defence I provided was that I did not admit to the debt as I had not been provided with any evidence of an original loan agreement.   I won the case and the CCJ was set aside.   Link then filed to court again to make me pay the debt.   We both filed directions questionnaires and the judge allocated the claim to the small claims track.   As part of the directions, additional directions given were as follows ' Additional Directions in a claim for an Assigned Debt - Because the claim is in respect of an assigned debt the Court makes the following directions for the management of claim.  The claim shall be automatically struck out at 4pm on 3 April 2024 unless, before that time, the Claimant delivers to the Court and to the Defendant the following documents'  It then listed various documents such as an original agreement, deed of assignment, notice of default, statement of account setting out how the alleged debt accrued under that agreement etc.     The Claimant failed to provide these documents within the deadline provided and instead I received a copy of a bundle of documents provided by them in preparation for the court date, this was received weeks after the deadline.    I have called the Court to ask if it has been automatically struck out and they advised that it is not automatic and that I should still send my witness statement by the deadline provided, which is Wednesday.  This does not give me much time to prepare my witness statement.   I have never done anything like this before and I am unclear what my witness statement should include.  My thoughts were that I should keep it simple and stick to the facts, like the fact thy have not provided evidence of the original agreement, or the deed of assignment of the debt.   They have provided a copy of a default notice from Baclaycard dated 2015, this states a figure of £550 but the debt they say I owe is £10k.   I am not sure what makes a valid default notice?   I have previously requested proof of the debt from Barclaycard directly and have evidence of emails between us where they have been unable to provide me with the agreement or any documents at all relating to the debt.   Should I include these as an appendix?  Are there any other documents I should include in my bundle?    I have also tried to mediate with the claimants, to save the court costs and time, on a without prejudice basis, but the claimants solicitors refused to mediate.   Should i state this in my witness statement too to show the judge that I have been reasonable and they haven't? Many thanks   Louise
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Tribunal - Proving employment


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5687 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Well, hello there. This is my first post & I am in a slight pickle!

 

It is quite a long pickle, so if you can read it all the way through & any one could give me some ideas, I would be very grateful indeed.

 

Claimant - Me

1st Respondent - Co A

2nd Respondent - Co B

3rd Respondent - Co C (Same ompany as B, C is name change. In liquidation.)

 

Commenced working for Company B, based in offices of company A. Company B although on paper is owned by 1 director, is actually owned and funded by some way by Company A. In 1st week of work, director of Company B tells me that this is the case.

 

First months salary paid out of Company A's bank account. All requests to Company B are deferred to company A.

 

Work on Company A email, made to sign Company A Employee Handbook etc. Made to fill in forms for Company A, nothing in Company B.

 

In month 8 of employment, an occurrence takes place that changes my status to disabled. In an informal discussion with Director of Company B whilst on sick leave, director says that company A is giving me 2 months to decide what I want to do, stay or go. This is only a very short time after disability, I say that at this point, I don't want stress, but that could change in 2 months time. Director phones Company A on this evening and Company A sends out an email to directors of A & B stating that with immediate effect they are to employ someone in this position, using a 3rd party as an assistant & further employ another as another. No mention of me.

 

I am aware that there is something taking place and mention to medical practitioners that Company A is trying to get rid of me. (Although I am employed by Company B on paper, I am actually employed by Company A)

 

I have access to email of director as we need to share certain documents, an email comes through that mentions all of this, I keep a copy and discuss with director that actually, I want my own job, why are they looking for someone for this role. I return to work to early as I am aware they are doing this, fearful of losing my job.

 

No procedures are followed, no work place risk assessment is done. I am removed off things as I am now a liability. I request amendments to my working, simple, minor things, in fact, just one chang, that wouldn't have cost anything. I am deferred to Company A as they are in charge. For almost 4 months I request this small change.

 

In yet another informal discussion I am told they are looking for this person to take over. No internal advertising or notification has taken place. I request that I be considered for my own position. I am told to contact person at Company A and tell them this. I do, I am never responded to.

 

Eventually, 3 months after the occurence that changes my status I am told that HR Director of Company A wants a meeting with me. They only tell me on the day that this is happening, then it never takes place. In all these months, I make Med Practiioners aware that this is all taking place.

 

Company A director comes in, we meet & for the first time discuss the occurence & it is said that my request has finally been granted. This however is not done. Company A director says that as I may be aware they are replacing me with someone with a degree & that my posistion is secure, in fact, they are now going to change my contract over to Company A with continuation of service.

 

Eventually, after mauch discrimination, failure to follow correct procedure, informal discussions, formal discussions, I give in a grievance. The very next day, Company A decides to put Company B into liquidation & I get the sack. sorry, made redundant with immediate effect. In this meeting, Director of Company B and Director of Company A. I say that I am actually employed by company A and director of company A says, I decide who works in this company and you dont.

 

So. A shortened version of the long pickle. We had a case amangement hearing, in which Company A was represented, they are contesting that I wasn't employed by them. A Pretrial hearing has ben set & a full hearing.

 

The problem is, unless I can prove that I was in effect employed by Company A, I am going to lose.

 

I need to submit my statement soon, as well as any evidentiary documents. I have to request evedentiary documents from them, and in order to get through pretrial in my favour, I somehow have prove this with documents.

 

Any ideas?

 

Thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is one way I thought of - ring the Inland Revenue and find out who paid your NI employer's contributions.

All help is merely my opinion only - please seek legal advice if you need to as I am only qualified in SEN law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should have received a P60 in April - can you ask IR for a copy if the employer has not provided one?

All help is merely my opinion only - please seek legal advice if you need to as I am only qualified in SEN law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I still have a temporary NI number, I have never been able to get through on the registration number. They say they can't give me anything until I get that.

 

That is going to take some time. They sacked me in February, haven't had anything from them since.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What if Company A has said, in a Case Management Hearing that they are merely clients of Company B and that the Directors of Company A have nothing to do with the running of Company B? What if I find that in fact one of the directors of Company A is a member of Company B and that Directors of Company A set up Company B then resigned as Directors of B?

 

Will this be enough to illustrate to Tribunal that Directorships were merely a paper trail and that in effect, I was in fact employed by company A and took instruction and that in fact, having them as first respondent is indeed correct?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, it certainly sounds suspicious to me.

 

You could always phone them and ask for your P45 because you need it for benefit purposes. You are entitled to it by law and they cannot refuse you.

 

Keep trying to get your permanent number - it may well help your case.

All help is merely my opinion only - please seek legal advice if you need to as I am only qualified in SEN law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that. I have the number, I am going to try get it sorted out. I don't want to ask them for anything.

 

What happens if a respondent, in a case management hearing, tells an untruth, and I through some research, can prove that this is an untruth, how does that help my case, and can anything happen to them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I still have a temporary NI number, I have never been able to get through on the registration number. They say they can't give me anything until I get that.

 

That is going to take some time. They sacked me in February, haven't had anything from them since.

A temporary NI number? Are you mistaking that with a BR Tax code? ie emergency tax!

 

I'm struggling to calculate how long your term of employment has been...Do you have a contract of employment?

 

Wo betide them if they discriminate on grounds of disability!!!

Why the long face Horsey?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Nemesis Drake.

 

Yes, I had to apply for an NI Number being foreign. With the new system, the number stays busy, or you get put on hold for 30 minutes. I go through phases of trying again, but then get caught up in life, work, those things. So, working off that temporary number for now.

 

I was employed by them for exactly 1 year and 17 days.

 

My grievance took into account a number of discrimination issues, which included Disability Discrimination....I was told that I couldn't go on site anymore as I had become a liability to the company, I could get them into a lot of trouble, by falling off a scaffold or down a hole. This was done without a workplace risk assessment or anything.

 

I did have a contract, with Company B which said I was on probation for 3 months, they never updated it, or gave me a letter and neither did they amend it after they decided to breach contract, which I am taking them on as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

According to who, does it affect my ability?

 

On one hand they say it doesn't, on the other hand, they said it did.

 

Indeed common sense prevailing, it goes with the territory, having to relearn things you have been doing your whole life in one way.

 

Work place risk, methods, etc, all would have identified if this was a problem and would also say whether it was necessary to employ someone else in my position as they did.

 

There are risks involved, but no more say than me walking down Oxford Street in the middle of January Sales or on the 26th December. ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

According to who, does it affect my ability?

 

On one hand they say it doesn't, on the other hand, they said it did.

 

Indeed common sense prevailing, it goes with the territory, having to relearn things you have been doing your whole life in one way.

 

Work place risk, methods, etc, all would have identified if this was a problem and would also say whether it was necessary to employ someone else in my position as they did.

 

There are risks involved, but no more say than me walking down Oxford Street in the middle of January Sales or on the 26th December. ;)

 

Are you likely to collapse or veer into the road on Boxing day? Blackouts? Sudden bouts of incapacitating dizziness? Hand eye coordination not so good?

Why the long face Horsey?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you likely to collapse or veer into the road on Boxing day? - Only if I have been drinking! :D

 

Blackouts? - Negative

 

Sudden bouts of incapacitating dizziness? - Negative

Hand eye coordination not so good? - Positive. Problem with leaning down to get something out of my draw, I can't judge the distance.

 

'Allegedly' my sight good enough to see on a 17" monitor & to flip through documents, but not good enough to project manage a refurbishment project, possible failure to see a 7ft wide hole surrounded by herris fencing & signage. It would seem that the ability to walk correctly as I inspected roof works from a scaffold.

 

Apologies for my sarcastic tone, it is not aimed at your comments, rather at the ridiculousness of the situation.

 

All of a sudden, my abilities were brought into question, as was the fact I didn't have a degree. Getting kicked in the teeth is not my favourite of past times, and now they are trying to get out of it, it makes me even more frustrated!

Link to post
Share on other sites

No worries...You'd have to mention me by name for it to be personal :D

 

My thoughts now are why don't/didn't they offer you a different position within the company? Do you think they are using the disability as an excuse?

 

Myself I've been off work for 5 weeks and my boss hasn't helped me at all.......The perils of being a company director :)

Why the long face Horsey?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I reckon you should have a stern word with your boss!

 

As I said, it's quite a long pickle & there are many points and indeed many instances during the course of my employment with them that come to the fore, includng being told that I need to keep my options open, being threatened that I could lose my job if I was averse to moving to a town with not even a bus route because they needed to justify signing a 5 year lease for a project that never worked, being pushed to answer at the very minute I was told.

 

Being constantly undermined because my boss was a man & he had been in the business for 25 years, because I was 'young', being told that I had to be careful who I was open about being gay with. And then constant reference to my new found disability. It all became too much & when they initimated what they intended to do with me & being told the day before I handed in my grievance that I better start looking for a job, well, that day I was told my job was secure & not, I decided the next day to hand in my grievance.

 

The rest as they say is history.....!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, they told you you had to be careful who you were open about being gay with? Why? What the hell has that got to do with anything?

 

If someone had a go at you for being gay, YOU would have a case against them, not the other way around.

 

I think you should post again, giving all of the details, such as comments about being gay, as there may be more help available to you.

All help is merely my opinion only - please seek legal advice if you need to as I am only qualified in SEN law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...