Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • is the home in joint names but this is solely your debt? need far more history to be able to comment if it's paid off and was not just written of by one partly on their books and sold to anther, thus the cra file says £0. dx
    • So, Sunak has managed to get someone to 'volunteer to go to Rwanda hasn't he? .. for just £3000 payment to the person plus 5 years free board and lodging isnt it? - cost to UK taxpayer over £300M+ (300 million quid+) isnt it? - Bargain says Rwanda, especially with all the profit we made privately selling those luxury chalets Bravermann advertised for us   I wonder how many brits would jump at that offer? Thousands? Hundreds of thousands? Lets see, up to 5 years free board and lodging and £3k in my pocket .. I'd go - and like that person - just come back if/when I get bored. First job - off to Botswana for a week to see the elephants.   Of course the paid volunteers going to Botswana are meaningless - Rwanda have REPEATEDLY said they wont take any forcibly trafficked people in breach of international law eh? Have the poops actually got any civil servants to agree to go yet - probably end up as more massive payments to VIPal contractors to go and sit there doing nowt shortly eh?    
    • Hi Wondered if I could get a little advise please. I entered into a commercial lease (3 years) and within a few months I had to leave as the business I was trading with collapsed. I returned the keys to the landlord and explained the situation and no money, also likely to go on benefits but the landlord stuck to their guns. They have now instructed solicitors to send letter before action claiming just over £4000. The lease was mine and so the debt. I know this. I have emailed the solicitors twice to explain I am out of work and that with help from family I could offer a full and final settlement figure of £1500 or £10pw. This was countered by them with an offer to reduce the debt by £400, or pay off the amount over 12 months. I went back with an improved full and final offer of £2500 or £20pw. This has been rejected with the comment 'papers ready to go to court'. I have no hope of paying the £4000 and so it will have to go to court. Pity as I have no debts otherwise but not working is a killer. I wondered if they take me to court, could I ask for mediation? I also think that taking me to court will result in a pretty much nothing per week payment from my benefits. Are companies just pushing ahead with action even if a better offer is on the table? Thanks for your help.
    • Hi all, Many thanks for the advice! Unfortunately, the reply to the email was as expected…   Starbucks UK Customer Care <[email protected]> Hi xxxxxx, We are sorry to read you received a parking charge after using our Stansted Airport - A120 DT store. Unfortunately, the car park here is managed by MET parking. Both Starbucks and EuroGarages who own and operate this site are not able to help and have no authority to overturn any parking charges received. If you have followed the below terms then you would need to send all correspondence to [email protected], who will be able to assist you further. Several signs around the car park clarify the below terms and conditions: • Maximum stay 60 minutes, whilst the store is open. If the store is closed, pay to park applies. • The car park is for Starbucks customers only who make a purchase in our store, a charge will be issued if you left the site. • If you had made a purchase and required additional time, you must have inputted your registration number into the in store iPad which would have extended your stay up to 3 hours • To park in a disabled bay, you must have displayed a valid disabled badge. • If Starbucks was closed, you must have paid for parking as charges still apply, following signage located on site. • If you didn’t use the store, you must have paid for parking, following signage located on site Please ensure all further correspondence is directed to MET parking at the above email address, and accept our apologies that we cannot help you further on this matter.  Kind Regards,  Lora K  Customer Care Team Leader Starbucks Coffee Company, Building 4 Chiswick Park, London, W4 5YE
    • Thanks HB edited and re-uploaded. Thanks for the heads up 👍
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

PCP Finance and the CCA


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5709 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone, I'm new to this forum so apologies if this is posted in the wrong area or anything.

I have an issue with Jaguar Financial Services. 3 years ago I took out a PCP deal with them for a new car. In March 2006, due to divorce, ensuing court case and a long period of unemployment, I declared myself bankrupt. JFS agreed to let me keep the car so long as I continued making payments. I did this. I was discharged in March 2007. This month the car comes to the end of its contract and the balloon is due. I always intended to take out another deal with JFS for another car. However, they have turned me down for finance. I asked if I could re-finance the balloon (£9,000) with them. They turned me down. I have tried to get credit to pay the balloon and/or buy another car. No-one will touch me. I have tried many, many places. So I am faced with having to hand the car back. This gives me two problems: No car(!) and an excess mileage fee of about £3,000. I don't have £3,000 nor will anyone lend it to me. I was advised by a business manager in the motor trade that I could hand the car back under the auspices of the CCA 1974 and as I have paid more than half the amount back, I can just walk away without paying any more. I have written to JFS stating that I intend to do this. They have written back to me saying I am liable for the excess mileage.

Can anyone tell me where I stand? :-|

 

Many thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bring

Up

My

Post

 

Poppynurse was just 'bumping' your post to get it back to the top of the threads, hoping someone will help you :)

 

Sorry, I can't help with your problem, but will move this thread to a Forum you should get more advice.

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Edited by maroondevo52
Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

If I'm reading this right you are trying to VT the car back to FCE (Jag Finance) as you have paid enough monies under the half and thirds rules.... Well if you wish to do this you must be handing the car back within the terms of the agreement as in mileage stipulations, service record and condition if you fail any of these criteria the finance house is within its rights to ask for compensation. As you have excess mileage on the vehicle you must pay the pence per mile figure over and above the agreed mileage at end of contract.

 

The only way you can get round this is if you settle the finance or pay the balloon figure. It sounds like the only way you could do this is by P/X your car and downsizing or selling private and settling finance of(although you must settle finance off before you release your car). But in current market conditions you are unlikely to do this.

 

All manufacturers are taking a massive hit on their PCP products at the moment as car have devalued approx 15/20% in the last three months for example allegedly BMW have put a half billion provision against their PCP business and bad debtors in Europe.

 

I'm afraid that since you have exceeded your agreed mileage you are caught by the short and curlies........ Good Luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advice. Not what I wanted to hear :(. It's odd that a business manager from the local Porsche dealer (my wife works there) has said we can just return it under the CCA (not under the PCP agreement) and walk away. Looking at the contract, under the heading "TERMINATION: YOUR RIGHTS" it says:

You have a right to end this agreement. To do so, you should write to the person you make your payments to. They will then be entitled to the return of the goods and to half the total amount payable under this agreement, that is £14,856.20. If you have already paid at least half this amount plus any overdue instalments and have taken reasonable care of the goods, you will not have to pay any more.

 

I have paid well over half. I do not have any outstanding overdue payments. I have taken more than reasonable care of the goods. There is still one payment outstanding on the car, so I haven't got to the end of the PCP arrangement. This therefore sounds like I can hand it back and walk away (which is what the business manager from Porsche says I can do). I called the OFT who have passed all the details onto local trading standards. They said someone will call me next week. I am a little concerned about the letter I got from Jag which ignores everything I said about the CCA and the fact that I don't intend to pay any more monies. They are arranging to collect it now - I wanted to really understand my rights before I gave the vehicle back.

 

Do you still think I don't have a leg to stand on?

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...