Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • An update! I emailed both Andrzej.Tuleja and James_Goldsmith at Whirlpool dot com. I got a phone call from their executive team a couple of days later, and a replacement part dropped on the mat a week after. She was quite apologetic, however, also reiterated the "90 day warranty" period on customer fitted parts, and did not comment when I mentioned that the CRA also applies as I was a consumer buying from them directly. So I now have a spare door switch if the machine decides to eat another in the future! Cheers all!   Note dx100 that the "Hotpoint CEO" you linked to is not related to the hotpoint appliances, but some kind of marketing app.
    • yep, throw that morality card out the window....9/10 you never owe a DCA ANYTHING!! they are NOT BAILIFFS!!
    • (See the link to DVLA’s INF188/6 document I posted above, page 4 as cited) “I have a new medical condition that I have told the DVLA about on my recent application. Can I drive? As soon as the DVLA receives your correct and complete application for a new licence and as long as you meet all the Section 88 criteria, you may drive. It is important that you are satisfied that the medical condition you have declared on your application does not stop you from driving. If you are unsure, check with your doctor or healthcare professional before you make a decision. You can also look up your condition in the ‘Assessing fitness to drive’ guide, which you can find at www.gov.uk/dvla/fitnesstodrive to see whether you meet the medical standards for driving. As this guide is intended for healthcare professionals, it can be complicated. Your doctor or healthcare professional should be able to help you if necessary." It seems that DVLA think that S.88 does apply for applications disclosing a new medical condition after all. Why might this be so, and what of “qualifying application" and "relevant disability"? S. 92(1) imposes on the driver a requirement to disclose a relevant disability. S.92(3) requires the Secretary of State to refuse such an application disclosing a relevant disability ….. EXCEPT S.92(4) requires the Secretary of State to grant such an application if the relevant disability is “adequately controlled”. Hence my belief S.88 can apply for medical conditions (if the driver meets the medical standard of fitness to drive) as the application remains a qualifying application IF the driver meets the medical standard of fitness to drive, until DVLA (on behalf of the Secretary of State) say it doesn’t, provided the driver believes they meet the (medical) standard. Additionally, at (or before) June 2013 (as noted in my previous post) the medical standard for fitness to drive for conditions involving excessive daytime sleepiness was changed from “completely controlled” to "adequately controlled".  
    • CFO Bill Guan allegedly led a team at the news outlet that was behind a global money laundering scheme.View the full article
    • Anyway, I've asked my Booking.com flat-rent-out-bloke what needs to be done on the Booking.com portal to cancel a reservation. I got a late message "I'll let you know tomorrow".
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help struggling with Default removal


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5718 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

 

I have spent many hours searching this brilliant site and using the search function but to no avail.

 

Iv have read that when a Creditor sells a Debt to a DCA then the original Creditor should remove the default notice they applied and the DCA should then apply a default from the original creditors date, is this correct?

 

I am trying to repair my credit and i have multiple defaults for the same credit/debt from Barclays and NatWest who both sold on the original debt(Natwest sold to Lowell to which i settled)!

 

Also i have a number of defaults due to expire under the 6 year rule(industry standard) as follows:

 

Style Finacial defaulted 14/09/02 £336

Clysdale Finance defaulted 06/09/02 £130

 

Will these automatically be removed by Equifax or will they stay on my file as there is still an outstanding balance shown?

 

I also cannot find a Letter Template to request the original creditors to remove the default notice as they have sold the debt on any ideas??

 

Please can someone help me.

Edited by jules79uk
spelling mistakes!
Link to post
Share on other sites

Mutiple defaults for the same debt seems to be very unfair. I think that you shojld query this with the CRAs and also with the IC and let us know what they say.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are no template letters.

 

Just write to them, point out that you notice that your credit file contains several (one, two, etc - give the number) of defaults but which each refer to the same alleged debt. Ask them is this correct that a single debt may attract multiple defaults and if so on what basis. If it is not correct and that in fact a single debt may only be associated with a single default, then what procedure is there for correcting the record? Also you might like to ask them what is the rule about the date from which defaults entries are effective. If, say, a debt has been in existence for three years, is it correct that a default can lodged at that time so that effectively the 6 year life of the default only comes to an end 9 years after the debt fell due - and three years are it became subject to the Limitation Act.

 

Again on the matter of multiple defaults, ask them if it is correct that where the same debt has been asociated with two or more default entries, each beginning, say, at two year intervals, that this would effectively mean that an account can remain defaulted for far longer than the 6 year period.

 

It would be very interesting to know the answer to this question and you shoujld ask the same question of the IC - although I have to say that I have a feeling that the IC will hedge.

 

Give it a go and let us know. You might have to contact me through a mod to remind me, please.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks BankFodder,

 

Please see below frafted letter due to send to Experian, will this do?

Equifax has more than 7 defaults logged against me compared to experians who only have 3 so am still drafting that letter but will also be asking the same questions.

 

********************************************************

Removed

********************************************************

Edited by jules79uk
Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouild send a more general letter asking fro clarification on the principle of multiple defaults for the same debt.

 

I think that your letter here is too particularised.

 

A short letter asking two separate questions which are clear, simple and unambiguously expressed so that they may attract a similarly clear and straightforward answer.

 

Your letter is convoluted and offers an opportunity for anyone wishing to escape the point of your questions to do so.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Urgent help needed - I am in the process of applying for a Mortgage, i have been in alot of communications with a recommended advisor who has looked over all my defaults however doesn't know value of debt.

 

He has some good news which i never expected he can get me a mortage with all my defaults 3XExperian 7xEquifax however they have alimit of £3k.

 

Experian=£1716

Equifax=£4785

however without multiple defaults on file for the same debt

Experian=£1716 intresting that experian have correct info

Equifax=£2238

 

Is it worth calling up Equifax and ask them direct what policy they have for tghe same debt being defaulted as i really could do with this sorted ASAP now!:(

Link to post
Share on other sites

No really. get it in writing

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Right i have an update, Thanks to Bankfodder who drafted a letter for me, I sent letter to both experian and equifax only received a response from Experian, and they missed out the main question about if it is correct that multiple defaults can be applied on you credit file if they all relate to the same alledged debt.

 

On a plus note however if a alledged debt is bought by a DCA then they must use the same dates in respect to when the credit was opened or when it was defaulted.

 

I have subsequently sent a return mail to Experian asking them directly if multiple defaults can be logged in relation to the same debt when sold on to DCA's i will update upon reciept!

 

Still alittle surprised that Equifax couldnt respond especially as i sent by recorded delivery!:mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...