Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I had to deal with these last year worst DCA I have ever dealt with. Just wait for the constant threats of CCJ and how you'll lose in court and how they won't do medication and they want the judge to question you with a load of "BIG" words to boot with the letter. My case was struck out in the end, stupidity on their part as I admitted to owing the debt in the end going through the court process was just a formality as they wouldn't let it drop despite me admitting the debt regardless. They didn't send the last part of the court paper work in so it ended up being struck out
    • Well, that's it then. Clear proof of the rubbish cameras. Clear proof of double dipping. G24 won't be getting a penny. Belt & braces, I would write to the address LFI has found, include the evidence of double dipping, and ask Fraser Group to call their dogs off.
    • LOL. after sending Perch capital a CCA request with a stapled £1 PO attached (x2) Their lapdog Legal team TM Legal have sent me two letters today saying "due to a recent payment on the account, your account is open to legal/enforcement action" so i guess they have tried to apply that payment to the account to run the statue bar along. dirty tactics lol.
    • I have initiated the breathing space so ill wait. from re reading everything this what i understand BS gives me 60 days break from the creditors during these 60 days they may contact me and will most likely default I need to wait until after a default notice to see whether the OC will keep the debt or sell it off If kept by the OC then i should attempt a plan or pay some token payment? If sold to DCA then don't pay and after 6 years it will leave my credit report once the DN is registered with a date. DCA may start a CCJ but unlikely, if they do come back here. last question, do you know roughly how long this will all take? in terms of defaults/default notice, potential CCJ? Would you say I have 12 months plus from when the BS ends?
    • Well, it's up to you. Years & years & years ago the forum used to suggest appealing to POPLA, but then AFAIK POPLA's remit was changed and it became much more biased in favour of the PPCs. One of the problems with taking that route is that the onus will fall on you to prove your appeal, while if you do nothing the onus is on MET to start legal action which experience teaches they are very, very reluctant to do. If you go down the POPLA route I would think your ace would be insufficient signage.  Are you able to go back there and get photos of their rubbish, entrapping signs?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Welcome Finance


thelightbrigade
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3252 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

if anyone is interested in actual cost of these phone charges, calculation shows that the true cost is 25p per miniute, that is assuming a salaried person on 25k working a 37.5 hour week, wage cost is 21p per minute and each minute BT cost is 4p. Average call is 2 or 3 minutes = max 75p, the rest is punishment for daring to cross wf. £9.25 is a good profit though! No wonder they love using the telephone, must help the bonus enormously.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 years later...

Received a letter from BW Legal this morning with a statement of all account activity with Welcome Finance.

They are threatening CCJ action in 14 days.

 

The most recent entry on the statement is from December 2012 and states "DEBT WRITTEN OFF".

 

The last payment to the account was 5 years ago when Lewis Group were dealing.

I agreed a settlement balance,

paid a bit over the phone and sent a post dated cheque off for the balance.

This cheque was never presented.

 

I don't have any letter showing the agreement, it was all over the phone.

 

I heard nothing for a couple of years, and I just keep going around in circles.

 

How can a firm chase a debt that is written off? are they chancing their arm?

 

 

I think it will be another year before I can try statute barred.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you scan and post up a redacted copy of that letter please?

 

Bet it doesn't say ''they WILL'' take legal action, or they ''WILL'' get a CCJ within 14 days?

 

Simply put they can't just 'get' a CCJ like that.

 

Have you checked our credit files?

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unless you were told that you did. Not have adebt to be repaid it would still be owed. Written off just means that it was moved from the original account record as it was not being paid.

 

Suggest that you enter into a dispute by sending a letter to BW Legal saying that as far a s you were aware this resolved with the Lewis group back in x year. Ask them to check with their client and for them to make enquiries with Lewis.

 

Send a CCA request to the current debt owner Lowell and mention in the letter to BW legal that you have done this. This is important if you want to try to stop them issuing the court claim. They will issue the court claim if you don,t do this.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Received a judgment against me in the post this morning, this is for the full amount rather than what was agreed years go. Is it too late to dispute? can it be set aide? I didn't send the letters advised as my wife was ill so just too busy looking after her. They want a monthly amount which will take me 2 years to pay even though it is all supposed to be settled.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can late payment and telephone charges etc be reclaimed from Welcome finance. I had an issue with them years ago for slapping £10 telephone charge on for calling me 3 days before the repayment was even due, no idea how many times they did this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So when you received the court summons did you not defend it? Did you even acknowledge it?

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

When I received it I called BW Legal, told them I had an arrangement years ago for a settlement figure, paid x over the phone and sent a post dated cheque for reduced amount because I had noticed erroneous charges for telephone calls. they said they will investigate this nd be in touch, they said they will pause the claim. Next I hear is the judgement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK you need to keep EVERYTHING in writing.

 

As you have found out, discussing financial matters over the phone (unless you're recording them) will go ignored.

 

So you didn't receive a claim form then?

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I received the claim form in January, rang them and they agreed to put hold on it while its being looked into. I didn't acknowledge it or defend it. Today I called BW Legal and they told me to call Welcome and if they will issue a letter saying an agreement was reached and settlement agreed etc they can return it to their client, Lowell, and that it should never have been passed to them, then the CCJ can be quashed. I called Welcome who told me to email a complaint in. I did that to cattles.co.uk email address and received an auto reply saying I should her something in 5 days. Apparently the Lewis Group who I made the agreement with are no longer trading.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you recording these calls?

 

If not STOP entertaining them over the phone, they will do nothing of the sort, it is in their interests to ignore you

and enforce this CCJ, they most certainly do not have your best interests at heart, your easy money to them.

 

They have already got a CCJ by default because they lied to you over the phone.

 

You must get a paper trail of evidence together, keep a diary of events, and everything you send them in the post,

obtain ''proof of posting'' which is free from the PO counter, as a minimum.

 

Can you scan up and post the Judgement, BUT please ensure you remove all identifiers, bar codes, squiggly boxes, ref numbers etc.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...