Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm at work now but promise to look in later. Can you confirm how you paid the first invoice?  It wasn't your fault if the signal was so poor and there was no alternative way to pay.  There must be a chance of reversing the charge with your bank.  There are no guarantees but Kev  https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/09766749/officers  has never had the backbone to do court so far.  Not even in one case,  
    • OK  so you may not have outed yourself if you said "we". No matter either way you paid. Snotty letter I am surprised that they were so quick off the mark threatening Court. They usually take months to go that far. No doubt that as you paid the first one they decided to strike quickly and scare you into paying. Dear Chuckleheads  aka Alliance,  I am replying to your LOCs You may have caught me the first time but that is  the end. What a nasty organisation you are. You do realise that you now have now no reason to continue to pursue me after reading my appeal since you know that my car was not cloned. Any further pursuit will end up with a complaint to the ICO that you are breaching my GDPR.  Please confirm that you have removed my details from your records. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I haven't gone for a snotty letter this time as they know that you paid for your car in another car park. So using a shot across their bows .  If it doesn't deter them and they send in the debt collectors or the Court you will then be able to get more money back from them for  breachi.ng your data protection than they will get should they win in Court-and they have no chance of that as you have paid. So go in with guns blazing and they might see sense.  Although never underestimate how stupid they are. Or greedy.
    • Thank you. Such a good point. They did issue all 3 before I paid though. I only paid one because I didn’t have proof of parking that time, only for two others.    Unfortunately no proof of my appeal as it was just submitted through a form on their website and no copy was sent to me. I only have the reply. I believe I just put something like “we made the honest mistake of using the incorrect parking area on the app” and that’s it. Thanks again for your help. 
    • They are absolute chuckleheads. You paid but because you entered a different car park site also belonging to them they are pursuing you despite them knowing what you had done. It would be very obvious to everyone, including Alliance that your car could not have been in two places at the same time. Thank you for posting the PCN so quickly making it a pity that you appealed since there are so many things wrong with it that you as keeper are not liable to pay the charge. They rarely accept appeals since that would mean they lose money but they have virtually no chance of beating you in Court. Very unlikely that they will take you to Court given the circumstances. Just in case you didn't out yourself as the driver could you please post up your appeal.
    • Jasowter I hope that common sense prevails with Iceland and the whole matter can be successfully ended. I would perhaps not have used a spell checker just to prove the dyslexia 🙂 though it may have made it more difficult to read. I noticed that you haven't uploaded the original PCN .Might not be necessary if the nes from Iceland is good. Otherwise perhaps you could get your son to do it by following the upload instructions so that we can appeal again with the extra ammunition provided by the PCN. Most of them rarely manage to get the wording right which means that you as the keeper are not liable to pay the charge-only the driver is and they do not know the name and address of the driver. So that would put you both in the clear if the PCN is non compliant.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Contract - termination of employment


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5773 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all, was wondering if you could give me some advice please as my CAB has gone awol :D Sorry if this is long.

 

I've been at my job now since November 2006. I applied for a student job which was part-time obviously. In the whole time I've been there I've never had a contract, none of the staff have. My boss told us they've all been waiting for a contract for the past three years and then we recently just got one a few weeks ago.

 

I've read the contract and it states under 'Termination of Employment' that four weeks notice by either party is required to terminate your employment. Now here's my problem, I haven't signed this contract yet because I had a job interview a few weeks ago and I got the job so I told the lady who interviewed me that I would start August 18th but as that is only under 2 weeks away, if I sign the contract then I've agreed to giving four weeks notice (which I can't do anyway) but if I've not signed it, and refuse to do so, can they take any action against me? I've never had any problems with this company (it's a family based, independent retailer's), I've always got along with them but they've been known to get a bit funny when it comes to things like this and I have a feeling they won't let me go on one weeks notice but I figure since it's only a student job that one weeks notice is plenty? They can't force me to sign the contract, can they? Obviously since I have this new job I'm safe in that sense but I'd hate to leave on a bad note as I really like these people despite their daft ways of dealing with this sort of thing. They've been chasing me about the contract and want it on Friday but instead of my contract they'll be getting my weeks notice hehe.

 

I just have a funny feeling they'll hold my wages back or maybe even tell me to leave on Friday when I hand in my notice which I'd rather they didn't because I really need to work up until August 15th as I'll be going from weekly pay to monthly pay and need to keep myself until my first wage. So in short: Is there anything they can do? It's not a case that I'm refusing to sign the contract just to be funny, they've just not been very loyal and yet I have so I just don't feel like I owe them any favours. So advice would be massively appreciated, thank you :D

Edited by leslety
forgot to add important info
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi leslety,

 

Whatever you or your employer say about signing a contract, you were both governed by the "Employment Rights Act" the moment you started working for the company. The ERA gives statutory periods of notice for both sides.

 

This link will help with more detail,

Contracts of employment: introduction : Directgov - Employment

 

For your length of service a statutory minimum notice period of 1 week is enough in writing.

 

Beau

  • Haha 1

Please note: I am not a lawyer and as such any advice I give is purely from a laymans point of view;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi leslety,

 

Whatever you or your employer say about signing a contract, you were both governed by the "Employment Rights Act" the moment you started working for the company. The ERA gives statutory periods of notice for both sides.

 

This link will help with more detail,

Contracts of employment: introduction : Directgov - Employment

 

For your length of service a statutory minimum notice period of 1 week is enough in writing.

 

Beau

 

Ah thank you for that link!

 

I've had a read about and it says, "Give your employer the right amount of notice. By law, you must give one week's notice if you've worked for your employer for a month or more. Your contract may demand longer."

 

My contract does demand that I give four weeks notice but if I haven't signed the contract, and don't sign it at all, does this mean that the one week is plenty of notice? And they can't take any action against me for not signing it?

 

Thank you:p

Link to post
Share on other sites

My contract does demand that I give four weeks notice but if I haven't signed the contract

 

You worked there from Nov 06 under implied contract of employment. New contrcats came and you never signed them. I would argue the new contract is a unilateral change to your T & C's which was never accepted by you and is therefore not binding.

 

the only weakness in your case is that having been given the new contract you continued to work there for 'a few weeks' If i represented your employer i would argue that having been given the new contract you either had to, reject it and resign or continue working, but making it clear this was under protest. Having done neither of these you have accepted by your actions.

 

All things considered I think you have a stronger case than your employer.

...................................................................... [FONT=Comic Sans MS]Please post on a thread before sending a PM. My opinion's are not expressed as agent or representative of The Consumer Action Group. Always seek professional advice from a qualified legal adviser before acting. If I have helped you please feel free to click on the black star.[/FONT] [FONT=Comic Sans MS] I am sorry that work means I don't get into the Employment Forum as often as I would like these days, but nonetheless I'll try to pop in when I can.[/FONT] [FONT=Arial Black][FONT=Comic Sans MS][COLOR=Red]'Venceremos' :wink:[/COLOR][/FONT][/FONT]

Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand what you're saying, I didn't think of that. Mind you, it states on this website I'm on that I should have been given my Employee Contract and Written Particulars of Employment after 2 months of working there but that's me just roughly about 21/22 months in the job and only just receiving it so if they could use what you're saying against me, surely I could use that against them?? I dunno, it's probable that nothing will come of it and they'll be fine with one weeks notice, I'm just preparing myself for a fight just incase. Thanks for your help!

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is from an earlier post of mine:

 

You should within 8 weeks of commencing employment have received a written statement of particulars that should include information including:

remuneration and the intervals at which it is to be paid; hours of work; any many other items.

 

If you attempt to enforce the terms of this agreement e.g. pay, and are dimissed for doing so, you can claim unfair dismissal without needing the normal one year service qualification.

 

Thus yes you are right you could use this against them. I forget the precise sanction for this head of claim right now ... it could be 8 weeks wages... ?

...................................................................... [FONT=Comic Sans MS]Please post on a thread before sending a PM. My opinion's are not expressed as agent or representative of The Consumer Action Group. Always seek professional advice from a qualified legal adviser before acting. If I have helped you please feel free to click on the black star.[/FONT] [FONT=Comic Sans MS] I am sorry that work means I don't get into the Employment Forum as often as I would like these days, but nonetheless I'll try to pop in when I can.[/FONT] [FONT=Arial Black][FONT=Comic Sans MS][COLOR=Red]'Venceremos' :wink:[/COLOR][/FONT][/FONT]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, am I entitled to holiday pay for holidays I haven't yet taken this year? I've literally had no more than one weeks holiday so far this year so will I be entitled to the other remaining weeks?

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is from an earlier post of mine:

 

You should within 8 weeks of commencing employment have received a written statement of particulars that should include information including:

remuneration and the intervals at which it is to be paid; hours of work; any many other items.

 

If you attempt to enforce the terms of this agreement e.g. pay, and are dimissed for doing so, you can claim unfair dismissal without needing the normal one year service qualification.

 

Thus yes you are right you could use this against them. I forget the precise sanction for this head of claim right now ... it could be 8 weeks wages... ?

 

Ahhh yes of course. 8 weeks would probably make sense. I'll only be using this against them if they start any crap with me, don't want to cower into a corner, for a change I'd like to stand up for myself if the situation arises. I repeat, thank you!:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, am I entitled to holiday pay for holidays I haven't yet taken this year? I've literally had no more than one weeks holiday so far this year so will I be entitled to the other remaining weeks?

 

IN a word ... yes.

 

5 day a week worker = 4.8 weeks paid holiday each year. Again a stat right that cannot be overidden.

 

Please click the scales if I've helped.:)

  • Haha 1

...................................................................... [FONT=Comic Sans MS]Please post on a thread before sending a PM. My opinion's are not expressed as agent or representative of The Consumer Action Group. Always seek professional advice from a qualified legal adviser before acting. If I have helped you please feel free to click on the black star.[/FONT] [FONT=Comic Sans MS] I am sorry that work means I don't get into the Employment Forum as often as I would like these days, but nonetheless I'll try to pop in when I can.[/FONT] [FONT=Arial Black][FONT=Comic Sans MS][COLOR=Red]'Venceremos' :wink:[/COLOR][/FONT][/FONT]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Clicked the scales :D

 

However, I'm not a 5 day a week worker, only during term holidays do I ever work 5 days a week. I've mostly been a part-timer in my time there so does that make a difference? I had a load of holidays I didn't take last year and they had to end up paying me a lorra lorra cash cos of it so I'm surmising they'll do the same when I leave?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Again from an earlier post:

 

ell I asked someone at work to explain this to me today as I hate trying to work out Holiday Pay (ahh Maths!)

 

The 12 week rolling average is right.

 

To work out time owed apparently is -

 

(No. of hours worked in 12 week period / 100) X 10.17 = No. of hours holiday owed for the 12 weeks worked (figure A).

 

NB The 10.17 assumes 24 days holiday per year this figure is 12.07 for 28

 

Then you work out the average gross pay per hour in this 12 week period

and multiply this by the result at figure A above. This should equal the holiday pay owed to you for the 12 week period in question.

 

If this is wromg then forgive me as I hate working out holiday pay; also for your situation you maybe could do this for a series of 12 week periods if you have the recordsconfused.gif

...................................................................... [FONT=Comic Sans MS]Please post on a thread before sending a PM. My opinion's are not expressed as agent or representative of The Consumer Action Group. Always seek professional advice from a qualified legal adviser before acting. If I have helped you please feel free to click on the black star.[/FONT] [FONT=Comic Sans MS] I am sorry that work means I don't get into the Employment Forum as often as I would like these days, but nonetheless I'll try to pop in when I can.[/FONT] [FONT=Arial Black][FONT=Comic Sans MS][COLOR=Red]'Venceremos' :wink:[/COLOR][/FONT][/FONT]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, I'll try and work that out soon!!

 

So when I hand in my one weeks notice tomorrow, everything should be alright because they can't take any action? I haven't signed their contract therefore haven't agreed to giving four weeks notice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...