Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Even a Piers Morgan is an improvement and a gutless Farage Piers Morgan calls for second Brexit referendum WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM Piers Morgan and Nigel Farage have faced off over Brexit and a second referendum in a heated reunion on BBC Question Time.   “Why don’t we have another referendum about Brexit?” he questioned. “I seem to remember when 2016 came around we were told there was going to be control of our borders and it was going to be economically beneficial to this country. And eight years later we have lost complete control of our borders… and economically it seems to have been a wilful act of self-harm.”   ... Piers missed off : after all somebody said a 48/52 decision would be "unfinished business" by a long way - was that person just bul lying (again)  
    • when did they (who) inform you there was a 'police case' and when was this attained? i will guess the debt is now SB'd as it's UAE 15yrs. have you informed the bsnk ever by email/letter of your correct and current address? you can always ignore anyone else accept the bank,  Block and bounce back all emails. Block any text messages  Ignore any letters unless it's: - a Statutory Demand - a Letter Of Claim - a Court Claimform via Northants bulk.  
    • I left Dubai 8 years ago and intended to return. However a job prospect fell through. I’d been there for 15 years. I decided to pay my credit card and the bank had frozen my account. There is no means to pay the CC so completely unable to pay when I wanted to other than the bank advising me to ask a friend in the UAE to pay it on my behalf!  fast forward bank informs there is a police case against me for non payment. Years later IDR chased me and after months/ years they stopped. Now Judge & Priestley are trying their luck. Now I have received an email in English and Arabic from JP saying the bank has authorised them to collect debts. Is this the same as IDR although I didn’t receive anything like this from them. Just says they are authorised?
    • The neighbour's house is built right on the boundary so the side of their house is effectively the 'wall' in our garden separating the two properties. It's a three storey house and so the mortar poses a potential danger to us. Because of the danger, we have put up an interior fence in our garden to ensure we don't risk mortar dropping on us. That reduces the garden by 25% which is not only an inconvenience, but it's the part of the garden where we had lined up contractors to install a patio and gazebo which we will use for our wedding reception in less than 2 months. We have spoken to the neighbour's caretaker who is on the case, has spoken with a roofer and possibly a scaffolding company, but there are several issues. They don't seem to understand the urgency. As long as there is a risk of falling mortar, we can't carry out any work in the garden, and unless they hurry up, we're looking at cancelling our wedding as it's not viable to book a venue because we can't use our own garden! Also, they want to put the scaffolding up in our garden which would be ok with us if it was a matter of a few days and they hurried up, but there is a tree (most likely protected by the conservation area), so most likely they can only reach part of the roof with the scaffolding if they put it up in our garden. We suggested a roofer with a cherry picker but they seem to want to use a company they've used before. Any and all comments, suggestions, advice is more than welcome.  PS. does it make any difference that the neighbour is a business (ltd) and not a private dwelling?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5780 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

 

The bailiffs came last wed with a white van.. 2nd visit!! i ignored the door so they left a letter saying that "they will return at their convenience" i called them up to explain i haven't got the money as i am out of work & claiming contribution based job seekers. they told me to get the money 700pound or they will have to return on Monday 4th aug. i m not sure what to do!! i dont have the money, im behind with all my debts & mortgage and i dont want them calling round & getting the kids distressed and making a scene on front of the neighbors, im scared that if i go out they might break in with a locksmith, i know not to answer the door to them or leave any windows or doors unlocked as they can gain entry.

 

I heard that after 3 visits they pass the debt back is this true??

 

Thanks in advance for any advice

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there, what is the debt for?

 

If it is a county court judgement, then they cannot take any goods from your home without having gained entry on a previous occasion and levied on your goods. I think you will find that the letter is meant to scare the living daylights out of you and force you to pay.

 

If it is a county court debt then you can enter a N245 form asking for the judgement to be varied to an amount you can afford each week/month, and we can help you with that.

 

Once we know what sort of debt it is we can advise further.

 

Kind Regards

 

Ell-enn

  • Haha 1

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you been in touch with the council to let them know you are unemployed and receiving benefits?

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rest assured they cant force entry nor use a locksmith on this visit, the only time this could happen is if you have allowed a Walk in pocession agreement and you then breach it. As for it being returned after 3 visits, NO this is NOT correct, you get the commital letters first.

 

my advice would be to offer to pay it at a fiver a week this should be accepted as you are on JSA

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Ben 08.

 

Do not have anything to do with the bailiffs EVER.

 

They have no power, and will just try to scare you into paying them.

 

Send them letters 1 & 6 HERE

 

Then do as Ell-enn says ASAP.

  • Haha 1

I Wish you everything you wish yourself.

 

NatWest Claimed £1,639. Accepted £1,344.

Natwest Paid me again as GOGW £1,656. Yes they can have it back if they say please.

Barclays 1 Claimed £1,260. Won by default. Paid in full

Barclays 2 Claimed £2,378. Won by default. Paid in full

Birmingham Midshires. Claimed £2,122. Accepted £2,075.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do NOT answer the door and under NO circumstances should you agree to sign a Walking Possession. Ensure as well that you have moved your car away from the house as the bailiff will put a levy/seizure against that.

 

You should NOT telephone the bailiff company. Instead you should put everything in writing.

 

All councils in the country are pursuing unpaid council tax very quickly and are issuing Liability Orders as soon as somebody gets into arrears. The problem is so bad that just this week we were told by a Magistrates Court that so many people turned up for a Liability Order hearing that the queue went out of the main building door!! Previously, it was rare for anyone to turn up for such hearings. You are not alone.

 

I would suggest adapting the following letter to suit your circumstances and that if the bailiff does come round you either have a copy of it stuck on your door or hand it to him though the window. The letter MUST be sent by registered post and by e-mail to the bailiff company.

 

To: Bailiff Company

Date:

Dear Sirs,

Re: Account reference.

I refer to your letter dated (enter date) informing me that your company have been instructed by (enter local authority) to enforce a liability order against me, in respect of council tax arrears.

In your letter you state that you will be visiting/returning to my home to seize goods unless full payment of (enter amount) is made by return.

The purpose of this letter is to advise your company that I believe that (my/our) circumstances fall within the category as contained within the National Standards for Enforcement Agents of “vulnerable situations”. The reason for this is that (explain your circumstances, and provide some evidence, if possible) see note below).

Accordingly, I would like to request that you do not visit my property as this would cause undue stress and anxiety and would incur me in additional fees that I would be unable to repay. Instead, I would like to request that you (return this case back to the local authority/or accept payment terms as outlined etc)

I would be grateful if you could confirm safe receipt of this letter, and confirmation that (payment terms have been agreed/or case returned to the council)

I am copying this letter to my Local Authority. (ensure that you keep a copy)

Yours Faithfully.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all you're replys

 

When are bailiffs able to attend with a locksmith?

and are the able to take a car that is on hp in my name??

I have noticed in previous letters from the bailiffs it states the cost of a van attending is 110 pound, is this a correct amount they can charge?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

ben.

 

They cant attend with a locksmith EVER, unless they first levy on your goods.

This is why we stress NEVER let them into your home, and NEVER sign anything.

That way they have ABSOLUTELY NO POWERS to do anything except frighten peope.

I personally disagree with Tomtubby that you should never answer the door to them, go outside, front them, tell them you know your rights and that there is nothing they can do.

Watch them squirm.

 

HERES something to read to try and put your mind at rest.

 

Letter 3 HERE is for your vehicle being on HP..They simply cant touch it.

 

Finally,the law states that the maximum that they can charge you is £24.50p for the first visit and £18.00 for the second WITHOUT levying on your goods.

 

Thats the law mate. Not something we make up.

 

Be strong.

I Wish you everything you wish yourself.

 

NatWest Claimed £1,639. Accepted £1,344.

Natwest Paid me again as GOGW £1,656. Yes they can have it back if they say please.

Barclays 1 Claimed £1,260. Won by default. Paid in full

Barclays 2 Claimed £2,378. Won by default. Paid in full

Birmingham Midshires. Claimed £2,122. Accepted £2,075.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to reiterate what TT said in there draft letter, you would appear to fall into the Vunerable category as laid out in the National Standards for Enforcemnet Agents that hasn't been superseded yet. You, I presume, are unemployed and as such it is usual practice to send the writ back to the council advising them of the fact. The local council will be well aware of this guidence as local councils signed up to it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...