Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Campaign to the OFT against unfair CRA practices.


finlander
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5417 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have today received my response!!! which was what I had expected:(

 

 

 

Thank you for your email to the Office of Fair Trading (OFT). Your complaint has been logged for our records and will add to our understanding of this UK market.

 

 

 

The Office of Fair Trading (OFT) cannot usually take action on cases brought to us by individual consumers. Our primary duties include the enforcement of competition law, the regulation of the consumer credit market through a licensing system and the application of consumer protection legislation in respect of matters that adversely affect the collective interests of UK consumers.

 

 

 

The OFT can also investigate markets that do not appear to be working well for consumers and complaints or information received may be forwarded to one of our market investigation teams for their further consideration.

 

 

 

For more information on the work we carry out, please feel free to visit our website at The Office of Fair Trading: making markets work well for consumers

 

 

 

You may wish to contact The Information Commissioner’s Office. The Information Commissioner enforces and oversees the Data Protection Act 1998 and the Freedom of Information Act 2000. The Information Commissioner's Office also handles queries on information held by credit reference agencies. They can be contacted at:

 

 

 

The Information Commissioner's Office

Wycliffe House

Water Lane

Wilmslow

Cheshire SK9 5AF

 

Tel: 01625 545 745

Fax: 01625 524 510

 

 

 

I hope this information proves helpful to you.

 

 

 

AC

 

What an absolute shambles and a disgrace. Your letter was completely relevant to their objectives, if consumers across the board are effected by these issues. There's nothing worse than getting the "read this leaflet" response. :-x

 

If they won't listen to individuals, perhaps a petition would have been better.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Replies 153
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

If we all send the letters to our mp's to, we should also find out who are in the opposition seats, and send the same to them as well, get

enough and all parties will be promising to do something :D

It isnt to difficult to find out who are opposing, quick google search usually does it.

question everything!

Link to post
Share on other sites

What an absolute shambles and a disgrace. Your letter was completely relevant to their objectives, if consumers across the board are effected by these issues. There's nothing worse than getting the "read this leaflet" response. :-x

 

If they won't listen to individuals, perhaps a petition would have been better.

these issues are stored and the bulk of claims reported is how they take regulatory action since they do not take action based on one single complaint.

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi mfpa - this has bugged me for a while. I understand that if you sign an agreement with the section on sharing your data with the CRA's etc - ok, I get that.

 

What I don't get is where the hell did the CRA's get any permission to then use that data for marketing, profiling, selling and all the other interesting things they use my data for? When I sign up to see my credit file there may very well be a clause in their T&C's stating this (though I cannot find it) - but what about BEFORE i ask to see my file?

 

They hold a credit file on you - which is all you agree to on your loan or whatever agreement - when is all the rest that they make a fortune from agreed?

 

I have to ask this again as I cannot get this settled in my head - blonde as I may be but:

 

When the CRA's take all the data they hold on me and process it, chop it up and package it and sell it as mailing lists, direct marketing tool, use it for reports, analysis etc all for a fee..........where did they get my permission for that?

 

Surely without my permission for such activities they should not be using or selling my data for profit? There seems to be an assumed right to profit in anyway they like from the data they hold for their CRA activities, but when did they ask me if they could do that?

 

Anyone?

Dipply75

 

I am in no way a legal advisor and only speak from my own experiences and the helpful advice of those in the same boat! :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...