Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I was advised to ignore the paploc by a solicitors who said it was a fishing excercise and to answer them would be removing a big weapon in defeating that of time and demanding information within certain limits. im no lawyer so dont know if that makes sense or does not.
    • We’ve all ignored and I know people who’ve been back for years longer and always ignored and nothing has ever come of it 
    • I received several letters from J&P which were just ignored, but now I've received the same paploc Eve appears to have. As it stands, I'm looking to complete & reply as per the oft-referenced thread #5. After reading a few comments about ignoring and nothing progressing from J&P side, I'm intrigued whether they were just general 'please contact us type letters' or letters of claim/paplocs?  I realise for some it's a personal decision or based on advice, but given advice on here is not to ignore paplocs, what was the reasoning to ignore? 
    • Afternoon All. I have today received a court order requiring me to send them more details before 16:00 on 8 July. A copy of the order is attached, but the relevant paras seem to be: 2 Send all of the documents that are relevant to your case to the court at the above address, also send them to the other side. Both parties must do this. These documents should be placed in date order and should be numbered in the bottom right hand corner. You should include the following documents if available: •       A copy of the contract/agreement •       Relevant correspondence, including text messages and emails  Photographs Before 4pm 08 July 2024 3 Send to the court and send to the other party your own witness statement and also witness statements from anyone who can give relevant evidence about your case. Both parties must do this. A witness statement must •       have the court case number at the top •       start with the witness’ name and address •       it must contain numbered paragraphs and should be typed and double spaced. If not typed, it must be written clearly in block capitals or printed. •       finish with the words “I believe the facts set out above to be true. I understand that proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes, or causes to be made, a false statement in a document verified by a statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth”, the date of the statement and the person’s signature. The original statement must be sent to the court and copies must be sent to the other side. Before 4pm 08 July 2024 I'm a little confused by para 7 in the order : Because this order has been made by a Legal Adviser without a hearing, you have the right to request that the decision of the Legal Adviser be reconsidered by a District Judge. Any request must be sent to the court to arrive by 4PM 12 June 2024. The request may be made in your online account, by email or on paper. The request must include an explanation of why the reconsideration is sought. Is this normal? Do I have to do anything with this by 12 June? As ever, many thanks    527MC352-claim-direction-order (anonymised).pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

LA charging me £94 for opening a door


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5792 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

My LA are trying to charge me £94 for opening a door. I left my keys back home once and couldn't gain access to my room. I rang the LA and asked if they would open it the next day sometime. I asked if I would be charged as i'd only forgot my keys and did not need a replacement set. They said I wouldn't be charged. 2 days later my keys arrived from back home but now the LA are saying that I have to pay the callout charge of £94.

 

I feel this is unfair and that I shouldn't have to pay. I did not need immediate access to my room and so could of just waited for my keys to arrive if i new I was going to be charged.

 

Where do you think I stand on this? I don't think I should have to pay.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Old_andrew2018

HI Joe,

I think they will chase you for the charge, you can request a break down of these charges, in the end you'll have to pay.

A little off the point, I recall a neighbour hitting a lamp standard out side his property, a public spirited citizen reported this to the police, no action taken I believe,

The county council however charged in excess of £200.00 to replace light bulb, fees were charged for two workmen, the vehicle, the light bulb, I'm not sure if vat was charged.

The point is it will have cost something for people to attend, a cost for the replacement key, I expect that is what you have been charged for.

 

Andy

Edited by old_andrew2007
typo
Link to post
Share on other sites

If they categorically stated on the phone that you would not have to pay, then you should refuse to pay on this basis.

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Old_andrew2018
If they categorically stated on the phone that you would not have to pay, then you should refuse to pay on this basis.After reading some threads I have taken advice in those threads and record everything, without evidence its hard to prove what was said

 

Joe who are the LA, do you have access to a tentants handbook, or terms and conditions.

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

LA are yourstudenthomes. The handbook stated that if keys needed replacing then there would be a charge of £80, if at the weekend then extra charge. Mine was at the weekend so thats why its £94 but I didn't need the keys replacing, just letting in.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Old andrew - agreed. I think that in the first instance the OP should refuse to pay, but yes obviously if it was going to end up as far as court(which it wouldnt) he should probably just bite the bullet and pay. OP, do you have the name of the person you spoke to? Have you asked this specific person why they said you wouldnt be charged and you then were?

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't remember who I spoke to but I told them on the phone first that I did not need replacement keys and just needed my room opening and they said I would not be charged. I have a witness to this phone conversation.

 

I then rang up and was told about this charge. I got the name of the person I was speaking to and he sort of agreed that the charge was a bit unfair but there was nothing he could do and suggested writing a letter to the manager.

 

They told me I was charged because they sent out a locksmith. I told them he wasn't a locksmith because he had a spare key, but they said he still charged as a locksmith.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would simply write to them informing them that you are not paying the charge, as you were informed at the time of arranging that you would not be charged. As such, you expect them to remove the charge with immediate effect.

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

This ok for a letter...

 

 

Dear XXX

 

I contacted yourstudenthomes on Friday, 25 July 2008 and spoke to XXX. He informed me there was a £94 charge on my account for having someone open my room at XXX on Sunday, 27 April 2008.

 

I ask that you remove this charge with immediate effect as I was told when I called that there would be no charge for a callout, only for replacement of keys as stated in the yourstudenthomes information pack and I did not need my keys replaced. Had I known there would be a charge I would not have asked for someone to come and let me in as my keys were being delivered on Monday, 28 April 2008.

 

I look forward to a positive reply within 14 days.

 

Sincerely,

Link to post
Share on other sites

oh as a side note I was planning on sending the LA and LL a LBA and completed N1 form on 1st August if they havn't returned my deposit in full by this date. What should I do about this charge? send it along side the LBA or as a separate issue?

 

Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...