Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Swift Advances. Secured Loan Charges reclaim


overdone
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4916 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Trouble is will the FOS be able to investigate an unregulated agreement?

 

Ours was taken out in 2006 and settled in 2007.

 

I have a feeling the FOS won't be able to help with this:confused:

 

I've had an answer to my question from the FOS - they cannot investigate my complaint because it relates to an agreement signed prior to 6th April 2007, which is when the CCA came under their jurisdiction:(

LTSB PPI on various loans (current/settled) - Refunded inc 8%

 

MBNA 1 Charges - Refunded inc CI

 

MBNA 1 PPI - Refunded

 

MBNA 2 Charges - Refunded inc 8%

 

MBNA 2 PPI - Refunded

 

MBNA 2 Accident Ins - Refunded

 

Swift Advances (settled) Mortgage Charges -Partially refunded

 

Swift Advances (settled) Mortgage PPI - Refunded inc CI & 8%

 

Sainsburys (settled) Loan PPI - Refunded inc CI +8%

 

Sainsburys (closed) Card Charges - Refunded inc CI + 8%

 

M&S Money (closed) Card Charges - Refunded inc CI

 

M&S Money (closed) Card PPI - Refunded inc 8%

 

Direct Line (settled) Loan PPI - Refunded inc CI + 8%

 

Debenhams Card (closed) PPI - Refunded inc 8%

 

Swift Mortgage Charges -Refunded

 

Hitachi Finance (closed) Charges - Refunded

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 3.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Hi Doc

I don't actually know is the honest answer. Perhaps someone with legal knowledge reading this would be able to advise?

My personal view is that if the OFT issue guidelines on a subject, they are there to be adhered to, otherwise there would be no point in their publishing them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Got an annual statement finally. As they say in attached info they have to send these now because of reforms to Consumer Credit Act. They also say they will "provide information going back to an earlier period then we would be happy to provide that for you, free of charge"!!! Yes "free of charge" - that must be a first for Swift. Not at all happy amout the closing balance of course - going up every year no suprise there with interest rate currently 13.24% . . . Passing all on to FOS for info.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sweetjane

Hope you are OK. We are still waiting for our statement, I wrote them a letter spelling out in words of one syllable what I required, and that a statement of transactions wasn't it.

We have decided to go ahead with taking this further because their attitude is really winding me up. :-x It costs £299.00 but it will be worth it. Better still, if we don't have a case, we get our money back! Sounds good to me.

Has anyone else done anything about Swift yet?

Will keep you posted

Regards

Mallymoo

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Doc2527!

It's a charge the company makes for their solicitor and forensic accountant to go through the consumer credit agreement with a fine toothcomb, and hopefully find fault with it. If they can't you get your money back. If you go onto the internet and type in "unfair relationships, it leads you to the companies who can deal with irritating companies like Swift. Some of them who don't take money up front will take 25% of "the winnings". With the one I've chosen, you pay £299.00 up front, and if the case goes ahead, they do nor make any further charges.

Regards

Mallymoo

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mallymoo!

 

Thanks for your reply,how would this work, as it appears to me, a lot of Swift customers have very similar worded agreements.

 

If your claims people discovered that forensically there are issues/problems with your agreement being unenforceable and it was taken to court for this and you won, would this mean that there would be a precedent set for the rest of us with similar agreements?

 

Or am I being too simplistic??:-|

 

Doc

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Doc!

I don't actually know, but I'm going to give it a go, I just can't put up with Swift any longer. They are ripping their customers off, and not one of the "officiasl regulating bodies" seems to care, so I'm going to deal with them myself. I will report back once we've sent the papers in.

Regards

Mallymoo

Link to post
Share on other sites

I really do wish we dop get justice. But from my expieance compnaies like swift can get away with what they like.

Custermers need to be warned about such organisations.

Over a five and a half year pierod I have repaid swift £86,890 for a £49,000 loan.

Still come on here awaiting what develops.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Swift Eater (what an appropriate name!)

Don't worry, it will happen one day, they cannot carry on ripping their customers off like they do. Unfortunately for Swift, they picked on the wrong person when they picked on me because I intend to do everything in my power to stop these greedy vultures stealing, because that's what it amounts to, from people who have at some stage had some bad luck financially.

I am seeing our local MP on Friday, and intend to push her on doing something about Swift, as I have already written to her on the subject several times.

Regards

Mallymoo

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Swifteater

 

Good to see you back on the forum!

 

How did you get on with the FLA regarding your complaint?

What did they say?

Could you pop up on here what you sent to them as I might write to them also, a form of words from another who has been there is always helpful, no point in re inventing the wheel?

 

I'd like to see what Swift sent you regarding the breakdown of charges if you're paying them back early, I'd like to see how it compares to my settlement figures:idea:

 

Regards

 

Doc

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Swifteater

I tried the FLA and they weren't interested either. You can fill the complaint form in on line by going to their site, but you will be wasting your time because they will tell you they can't do anything about Swift.

I also complained to the Office of Fair Trading, who though they took details of my complaint, weren't particularly interested either as they cannot deal with individual cases. I did get the feeling, however, that they were already aware of Swift Advances.

Good, isn't it? I really don't know why these "regulators" exist.

Regards

Mallymoo

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mallymoo:)

 

Sorry to hear you had no joy with the FLA - I was about to try them also, but it's obviously not worth bothering from what you have said. Our agreement was for over £50k and was settled when we sold our house a while ago. I previously contacted the FOS but because this agreement dates from prior to 6th April 2007 and consumer credit was not under their jurisdiction at that time they cannot investigate either.

 

Did the FLA give their reasons for why they cannot do anything about Swift if you don't mind me asking?

 

Like yourself, I am not going to be defeated by this setback and still intend to fight tooth and claw to get our money back:-x

 

Regards,

 

Landy x

LTSB PPI on various loans (current/settled) - Refunded inc 8%

 

MBNA 1 Charges - Refunded inc CI

 

MBNA 1 PPI - Refunded

 

MBNA 2 Charges - Refunded inc 8%

 

MBNA 2 PPI - Refunded

 

MBNA 2 Accident Ins - Refunded

 

Swift Advances (settled) Mortgage Charges -Partially refunded

 

Swift Advances (settled) Mortgage PPI - Refunded inc CI & 8%

 

Sainsburys (settled) Loan PPI - Refunded inc CI +8%

 

Sainsburys (closed) Card Charges - Refunded inc CI + 8%

 

M&S Money (closed) Card Charges - Refunded inc CI

 

M&S Money (closed) Card PPI - Refunded inc 8%

 

Direct Line (settled) Loan PPI - Refunded inc CI + 8%

 

Debenhams Card (closed) PPI - Refunded inc 8%

 

Swift Mortgage Charges -Refunded

 

Hitachi Finance (closed) Charges - Refunded

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Doc & Mallymoo

 

I will post the breakdown figures here when I get the chance, will be in the next few days or the weekend.

 

FLA and OFT are not bothered, swift did respond to FLA with similar quotes that they have said before and FLA simply believes what ever swift tells them.

 

Was a waste of time with a useless out come.

 

Indeed one day justice will be served, however swift are very cleaver and will winedown the opperation so that no one recieves compnasation.

 

Evil Ba*****s

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Landy x

Yes, they passed the buck by telling me to contact the Financial Ombudsman who also told me they couldn't help me. It's just a farce. As I've said previously, I am going to see my local MP on Friday to find out why none of these alleged regulatory bodies can help you when you have a problem with a company like Swift. Will post what she says on Friday night.

Don't give up!.

Regards

Mallymoo

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Swifteater

When you are a limited company it is possible to close the business down whenever you wish, but I think there may be a legal issue if you do it because you know you owe people money.

Can anyone with legal knowledge comment on this please

Thanks

Mallymoo

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Landy x

Yes, they passed the buck by telling me to contact the Financial Ombudsman who also told me they couldn't help me. It's just a farce. As I've said previously, I am going to see my local MP on Friday to find out why none of these alleged regulatory bodies can help you when you have a problem with a company like Swift. Will post what she says on Friday night.

Don't give up!.

Regards

Mallymoo

 

Hi Mallymoo:)

 

I agree, it's absolutely unfair that there is no-one prepared or able to assist us with this fight against Swift. I do hope you have some success with your MP!

 

I won't give up and fully intend to take Swift to court over this - there's no way they are going to get away with what they have done!

 

Regards,

 

Landy x

LTSB PPI on various loans (current/settled) - Refunded inc 8%

 

MBNA 1 Charges - Refunded inc CI

 

MBNA 1 PPI - Refunded

 

MBNA 2 Charges - Refunded inc 8%

 

MBNA 2 PPI - Refunded

 

MBNA 2 Accident Ins - Refunded

 

Swift Advances (settled) Mortgage Charges -Partially refunded

 

Swift Advances (settled) Mortgage PPI - Refunded inc CI & 8%

 

Sainsburys (settled) Loan PPI - Refunded inc CI +8%

 

Sainsburys (closed) Card Charges - Refunded inc CI + 8%

 

M&S Money (closed) Card Charges - Refunded inc CI

 

M&S Money (closed) Card PPI - Refunded inc 8%

 

Direct Line (settled) Loan PPI - Refunded inc CI + 8%

 

Debenhams Card (closed) PPI - Refunded inc 8%

 

Swift Mortgage Charges -Refunded

 

Hitachi Finance (closed) Charges - Refunded

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4916 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...