Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The only way to verify whether there is any financial reward for the management is seeing the agreement. That would be required during disclosure IF court proceedings went ahead... Unless you could bring pressure to bear and get a copy?
    • god they've got at you haven't they. told you all the usual utter BS. a CCJ vanishes from your credit file on it's 6th B'Day regardless to being paid off or not or paying or not. same with any debt with a registered defaulted date - it vanishes from your file on the DN's 6th B'day regardless. creditfix are Knightsbridge, (they renamed) there are 100's of threads here on Knightsbridge, if i remember rightly 2 of the directors of a certain very big IVA provider were struck off for embezzling £1m's out of debtors. pers i'd stop paying now.  end of . just ignore them all. 99% of your debts are to utterly powerless DCA's and probably were never owed in the first place only goes to firm up my belief from post one..you got had blind. its very easy to deal with the debts even those with CCJ's. can you copy and paste what you credit file says regarding the IVA please?   
    • The airline says it is investigating reports that customers can view other passengers' personal information.View the full article
    • They are finding new ways to cut back on household spending as China’s economy loses steam.View the full article
    • Sorry I meant credit fix - I really wish I'd known this before - kicking myself right now  If they come back to me asking for more money I'll cancel it and start trying to deal with the debt myself let's see what they say  Feeling tempted to cancel it now but scared that some of the debts will do more CCJ's on me and I'll have to wait 6 years again.  2 of the CCJ come of this year and then I'll only have the iva in credit file - effectively if I'd have not took out the iva in 2021 I'd have clear score by now - but then again would I because I would have been hounded the last 3 years, as bad as it is it's saves me lots of headaches whilst my debt was still within the 6 year mark.  I think most of them are near there but in all honesty no point chasing them if I do cancel iva I'd jjst wait for the ones who contact me and then start the relevant letter process on them.  Of over 6 years easy if not still possible to write off. My true victory would be having the iva wiped off my credit file as mis sold or something that way I Don't have to wait till 2027 Other option is to fight back and ask for them to offer the creditors to accept payments so far and use the following method    Will your IVA firm agree to complete your IVA on the basic of funds paid to date? The Guidance lists a lot of factors to be considered in deciding whether a settlement on the basis of funds paid to date should be proposed. You should read the list. But that may not give you any feel for whether they apply to you or not. The following are my thoughts on when an IVA should be treated as settled, not failed. They assume that you have £75 or less to pay a month: if you would currently qualify for a Debt Relief Order, then your IVA should be settled now  There is no point in making your IVA fail and you have to apply for a DRO – it will not generate another penny for your creditors. If you are renting and owe less than £50,000, check the DRO criteria now and talk to National Debtline on 0808 808 4000 about whether you qualify. You may have been told at the start of your IVA that you aren’t eligible – still check now as the DRO criteria have changed, your situation has got worse, and some people were given incorrect information about DROs at the start. if you have no assets that would be realised in bankruptcy (eg a house with equity, car worth over £2000), then your IVA should be settled now Same as (1), there is no point in making you apply for bankruptcy after your IVA fails. if your only asset is a car that is worth less than £8000, then your IVA should be settled now A car that is worth say £5000 would normally be sold in bankruptcy and you would be given a small amount to buy a cheaper car. But your creditors would not get any benefit from this as the Insolvency Service takes the first £8000 raised to cover its own costs. if you have significant assets, the closer you are to the end of the IVA, the less reasonable it is to fail it If you have been paying your IVA for 4 years, you have done your best over a long period. It isn’t your fault you can no longer continue. The fact you may have had equity to release isn’t relevant as that simply isn’t going to be possible. if your situation will clearly improve soon, then it’s unlikely your IVA will be settled I mean real improvements, not hoping that prices fall. If I can get them to accept payment to date or threaten with cancellation hopefully they may accept it -  Other option is to try and borrow money and pay make a full and final offer  Or I can just ignore and hope for the best which I'm very tempted to do especially if they respond to my review with bullying tactics despite me being skint as a fart with no mortgage as renting  It's so stressful but I've just checked the iva agreement from 2021 and it's Cabot 2 accounts Lowell about 5 accounts and then lots of repeats of the same debt with for example zopa and Cabot same amount listed twice -  also loyyds banks but I'm sure that's older than 6 years and not on credit file anyway  If I can somehow remove the iva from my credit file I'd be happy 
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Swift Advances. Secured Loan Charges reclaim


overdone
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4914 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Freedom of Information Act only applies to government offfices.....it does not apply to private firms and companies.

 

sparkie

Not quite. A PLC is more open.

If my post helped you feel better, click my scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 3.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

.Freedom of Information Act

The basics

 

The Freedom of Information Act deals with access to official information and gives individuals or organisations the right to request information from any public authority.

Your right to know

 

The Freedom of Information Act gives you the right to request information held by public authorities, companies wholly owned by public authorities in England, Wales and Northern Ireland and non-devolved public bodies in Scotland.

Your legal obligations

 

All public authorities and companies wholly owned by public authorities have obligations under the Freedom of Information Act. When responding to requests, they have to follow a number of set procedures.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have it on record in court documents that the cost of Swifts funding is governed by LIBOR................and we can all see from their companies accounts that they borrowed at a FIXED rate of interest ....what this means is if they borrowed £400.000.000 pounds it does not matter if LIBOR goes up or down their rate of interest stays the same........therefore the cost of their funding on that particulare loan NEVER increases.

 

By increasing borrowers rates from funds that were obtained from that particular funding is deception in telling borrowers their costs of funding has gone up when the LIBOR rate went up is a lie ......because their costs were/are fixed, and the LIBOR rate does not affect does not affect their borrowing.

This definately falls into the unfair relationship of the CCA 2006

 

Granted if they borrow more money at a different fixed rate and lend that out then the rate they lend at would be different......but in my opinion if their rate is fixed its fixed.

 

sparkie

Hi All,

 

Sparkie, can you post that document on here? - I am compiling a case to the OFT regarding this and this sort of evidence would be brilliant.

One other thought about these very high rates - if you are on a variable rate loan the settlement figure would be racked right up as well if the rates are high, as this figure is partly based on interest due to be paid over the term of the loan - thats like not only sticking the knife in but giving it a twist for good measure.

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI Marky1701,

 

Ihave had that stated under oath by Mr Mark White the Risk Manager of Swift for over 15 years and a record of it in my Judgement summary.can't get better evidence than that can we?

I can send you the relevant page by E-mail if you send me your email address .................... send it by PM

 

sparkie

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Folks

Does anyone know when the cases are taking place in N Ireland High Court I though one was this week sometime?

would love to have gone over to it, I hear the TV crew were wanting to cover it,

pick up a penquin two systems for the price of one:?:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Folks

Does anyone know when the cases are taking place in N Ireland High Court I though one was this week sometime?

would love to have gone over to it, I hear the TV crew were wanting to cover it,

 

I heard the same that it might be spotlight or watch dog

 

sparkie

Link to post
Share on other sites

yep Spotlight but Panorama as well this guy has inside contacts with them in fact has been on himself in the past, I believe they are fighting to hold them back from blowing the full story before the high court

pick up a penquin two systems for the price of one:?:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Folks

I just got a wee pm from our inside friend saying the case is not on in N Ireland we have been waiting for, never got the reason but not sure if its true or not, has anyone heard anything I have lost my contact with those guys I actually thought one of them was abroad living now?

pick up a penquin two systems for the price of one:?:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I see 9 cases up on Friday in the Court of Judicature of Northern Ireland. Swift 1st - 3, Swift Advances - 6 - If any one is reading this - good luck we're all supporting you.

hi can you pm the site where this is on, I cant find it anywhere?:evil:

pick up a penquin two systems for the price of one:?:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I count 40 Swift cases appearing before the Master from 15th Oct to 22nd Oct. 2009

 

This is obscene....I don't know what monies are involved in the claims.....but this is 40 peoples lives that are being put through hell.

 

And this is only in a 7 day period....how many are being put through in a month a year....and this is only in Northern Ireland....what the heck are the figures across the UK???:mad:

Edited by Doc2527
Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest blackie

I have not been on the site for a while, but it seems to me that things are starting to move, good Luck to everyone who is involved with these monsters Swift. I was recently in court Swift trying to repossess my house. I was lucky I got a decent judge so have a suspended order. But again their solicitor went on about the cost of borrowing when the judge questioned him about their high interest rates. I feel as if I am on a stay of execution, Swift will eventually get me. But I don't want to go down without a fight, so any information anyone has would be really appreciated.:-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have not been on the site for a while, but it seems to me that things are starting to move, good Luck to everyone who is involved with these monsters Swift. I was recently in court Swift trying to repossess my house. I was lucky I got a decent judge so have a suspended order. But again their solicitor went on about the cost of borrowing when the judge questioned him about their high interest rates. I feel as if I am on a stay of execution, Swift will eventually get me. But I don't want to go down without a fight, so any information anyone has would be really appreciated.:-x

 

Hi Blackie,

The fact of the matter is all the way through their accounts Swift say that they borrowed money at a fixed capped rate of interest, and I have it on oath .........at last .........that the cost of their funds is depenadnt on one thing only ...The LIBOR rate of interest....no matter what they try to and say from now on ...that is fact ...if they try to say different their Witness is in bigger trouble than he is now:cool: anyone who wants the page that confirms this just ask.

Kestrel Holdings the owner of the whole lot ...state even clearer that the whole group borrow at a FIXED RATE of interest. so any increase in LIBOR did not affect their costs at all as they woffle on about........ they just took advantage and increased their interest when ever they wished ...but now they have been caught out....anyone facing Swift in the future can use this as an unfair relationship and an unlawful way of squeezing more money out of borrowers by abusing their position of power.

 

 

 

sparkie

Edited by Sparkie1723
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Sparkie,

 

This is a major step forward being able to prove an Unfair Relationship. I am hoping this type of extortion being exposed in this way will instigate Government regulation. More progress has just been made towards regulation of mortgage companies lending irresponsibly. I will chase up the email I mentioned in PM as I'm concerned when I read on posts that one minute there's Court Cases, next there aren't and mysteries within the TV industry. So, I'm getting 'me' shovel to start diggin!

 

P.S Don't know if the 'L' word is ok to use so i'll say when I voiced my concerns a few years back with Swift, concerning interest rates, they were ''incorrect' in their reply informing me Swift have to adjust the interest rate accordingly as the rate they borrow from the Bank (Barclays, as far as I know. maybe they can help with the enquiries!!) increases. I did ask if it works the other way when interest rates decrease. Apparently, it doesn't. I have always argued what is the logic of lending high to those who can least afford it. Madness.

Edited by determindator
Link to post
Share on other sites

I count 40 Swift cases appearing before the Master from 15th Oct to 22nd Oct. 2009

 

This is obscene....I don't know what monies are involved in the claims.....but this is 40 peoples lives that are being put through hell.

 

And this is only in a 7 day period....how many are being put through in a month a year....and this is only in Northern Ireland....what the heck are the figures across the UK???:mad:

 

What about a letter to the Lord chief Justice with a counter copy to Vince Cable and a number of others? HE needs to write to ALL judges stating exactly that these agreements are unlawful in the main and EVERY Swift loan should at least be stayed until they have had a chance to be checked over by a solicitor. This could be Corporate fraud if we are proved right.

 

How many staff in Swift would allow their families to be treated like this?

 

Keep coming forward Swift staff - this could be YOUR mother and father, sister, brother, aunt or uncle - This is NOT just a job - if you have any kind of conscience come forward and offer your support to us like a number of others already have, past and present. DO IT - before one of your own are forced unlawfully from their homes. :x

 

SC

Link to post
Share on other sites

It would be constructive and helpful to the Economic recovery of our Nation, if a National newspaper would investigate and write an expose on the mass extortion by these unscrupulous lenders, which is being allowed under the present rules. Whilst borrowers are laden with unnecessary debt (flick of a switch to a lower interest rate seems the way) they are not contributing to the economy so it's liquid, creating jobs.The wealth stays in the hands of those who brought the world to it's knees in the first place.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Some of the Swift staff have just realised that calculating the average wage and salary from their yearly accounts ....the "AVERAGE" wage and salary of the 123 staff there is sated to be over £800 ........but we know some are nowhere near this figure............... and believe they are not "happy bunnies".....how many make a bakers dozen?.....not many to go now.

 

sparkie

Link to post
Share on other sites

JUst to let folks know I made a complaint to the Bar Council about the conduct and handling of my defence ( the reasons I sacked him) the Bar Council are carrying out a big investigaton into the whole case....I sent the a copy of the Judgement summary and brought their attention to a lot of issues....the Bar Council have now sent for a transcript of the whole proceedings ....something they do not do often.

 

They are sending me a copy of the whole procedings ....in that will be EXactly word for word what was said by Mr Mark White under oath and will be of great benefit to all Swift customers who have had this person give evidence at their harings in the past or present or future...restassured on that people.

Do not give up

 

sparkie

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4914 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...