Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi Sorry for uploading them wrong. Im not technical at all and self taught so bear with me as im trying my best. Thank you for all the info regarding the signs, this was my thoughts as well. Yes they have changed teh signs since this happened Ill ahve to have a look back through and see if when I took the pictures they were already the new ones or I have the old ones. I cant remember off hand. With regards to Europarks running the site now, Just to make you aware there is another small retail park just across the road and Im sure they are Europarks. The shops within that park are just Aldi and B & M. The site that we received the NTK has a few more shops, Home bargains, The food Warehouse, M & S food and a few others. I put these for identififcation purposes just in case it is the other site that you were looking at. The main entrance sign is on the bend on the left as you drive in the entrance so when you drive in from the right and turn in you can see it in front of you but if you drive in from the other way as we do then you dont see it unless you know its there and as you say you would have to stop to read it al anywayl. The main thing that always jumped out at us was FREE PARKING FOR CUSTOMERS ONLY in large letters. Please find the notice of hearing date attached and an offer letter I received from the vultures DCBLegal this morning,    notice of allocation group nexus.pdf vulture offer letter re group nexus.pdf
    • Good Afternoon Stu,  Many thanks for your reply. I will do as you suggest and email them for the exact terms. I shall have a look through the Tenancy Agreement too  myself  
    • You need a back up plan. If you believe that redundancy is very likely, start looking at other employment options.  Don't leave it until you have been made redundant before looking for new employment. I regularly speak to people who have been made redundant and about mental health. Those who have a positive plan, get into employment quickly following redundancy and manage to maintain their finances. Those who don't have a plan, decide to accept redundancy and a period of unemployment. They end up in a downward spiral, with redundancy money spent, debts accumulated, mental health decline and difficulty finding new employment.  
    • Interested observer here as I'm in a similar situation. People become conditioned into seeking and maintaining a perfect credit score/file, but if your situation is that you're unlikely to obtain further credit for the foreseeable future anyway due to your other outstanding debts, then tanking your credit file now won't make a difference other than you've took back control of your finances.
    • Firstly, I would like to thank everyone for their help in this matter. Since my last post I have received a reply from Plymouth Council Insurance Team concerning my wife’s accident (please see enclosed letter and photo of the offending Badminton post) which they deny any responsibility for the said accident. I feel that the Council is in breach of their statutory duties under the following acts: The Leisure Centre was negligent in its duty of care and therefore, in breach of the statutory duty owed under section 2 of the Occupiers’ Liability Act 1957. Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 (the Act) to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare at work of all their employees, and others who might be affected by its undertaking, e.g. members of the public visiting the Leisure Centre to use the facilities. The Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 that requires employers to assess risks (including slip and trip risks) and, where necessary, take action to address them. The Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations (PUWER) require the risk to people’s health and safety from equipment that is used at a Leisure Centre be prevented or controlled. I would like some advice to see if my assumptions are correct and my approach to obtaining satisfactory outcome to this matter are accurate. Many thanks   PLM23000150 - Copy Correspondence.pdf post docx.docx
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Swift Advances. Secured Loan Charges reclaim


overdone
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4947 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Freedom of Information Act only applies to government offfices.....it does not apply to private firms and companies.

 

sparkie

Not quite. A PLC is more open.

If my post helped you feel better, click my scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 3.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

.Freedom of Information Act

The basics

 

The Freedom of Information Act deals with access to official information and gives individuals or organisations the right to request information from any public authority.

Your right to know

 

The Freedom of Information Act gives you the right to request information held by public authorities, companies wholly owned by public authorities in England, Wales and Northern Ireland and non-devolved public bodies in Scotland.

Your legal obligations

 

All public authorities and companies wholly owned by public authorities have obligations under the Freedom of Information Act. When responding to requests, they have to follow a number of set procedures.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have it on record in court documents that the cost of Swifts funding is governed by LIBOR................and we can all see from their companies accounts that they borrowed at a FIXED rate of interest ....what this means is if they borrowed £400.000.000 pounds it does not matter if LIBOR goes up or down their rate of interest stays the same........therefore the cost of their funding on that particulare loan NEVER increases.

 

By increasing borrowers rates from funds that were obtained from that particular funding is deception in telling borrowers their costs of funding has gone up when the LIBOR rate went up is a lie ......because their costs were/are fixed, and the LIBOR rate does not affect does not affect their borrowing.

This definately falls into the unfair relationship of the CCA 2006

 

Granted if they borrow more money at a different fixed rate and lend that out then the rate they lend at would be different......but in my opinion if their rate is fixed its fixed.

 

sparkie

Hi All,

 

Sparkie, can you post that document on here? - I am compiling a case to the OFT regarding this and this sort of evidence would be brilliant.

One other thought about these very high rates - if you are on a variable rate loan the settlement figure would be racked right up as well if the rates are high, as this figure is partly based on interest due to be paid over the term of the loan - thats like not only sticking the knife in but giving it a twist for good measure.

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI Marky1701,

 

Ihave had that stated under oath by Mr Mark White the Risk Manager of Swift for over 15 years and a record of it in my Judgement summary.can't get better evidence than that can we?

I can send you the relevant page by E-mail if you send me your email address .................... send it by PM

 

sparkie

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Folks

Does anyone know when the cases are taking place in N Ireland High Court I though one was this week sometime?

would love to have gone over to it, I hear the TV crew were wanting to cover it,

pick up a penquin two systems for the price of one:?:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Folks

Does anyone know when the cases are taking place in N Ireland High Court I though one was this week sometime?

would love to have gone over to it, I hear the TV crew were wanting to cover it,

 

I heard the same that it might be spotlight or watch dog

 

sparkie

Link to post
Share on other sites

yep Spotlight but Panorama as well this guy has inside contacts with them in fact has been on himself in the past, I believe they are fighting to hold them back from blowing the full story before the high court

pick up a penquin two systems for the price of one:?:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Folks

I just got a wee pm from our inside friend saying the case is not on in N Ireland we have been waiting for, never got the reason but not sure if its true or not, has anyone heard anything I have lost my contact with those guys I actually thought one of them was abroad living now?

pick up a penquin two systems for the price of one:?:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I see 9 cases up on Friday in the Court of Judicature of Northern Ireland. Swift 1st - 3, Swift Advances - 6 - If any one is reading this - good luck we're all supporting you.

hi can you pm the site where this is on, I cant find it anywhere?:evil:

pick up a penquin two systems for the price of one:?:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I count 40 Swift cases appearing before the Master from 15th Oct to 22nd Oct. 2009

 

This is obscene....I don't know what monies are involved in the claims.....but this is 40 peoples lives that are being put through hell.

 

And this is only in a 7 day period....how many are being put through in a month a year....and this is only in Northern Ireland....what the heck are the figures across the UK???:mad:

Edited by Doc2527
Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest blackie

I have not been on the site for a while, but it seems to me that things are starting to move, good Luck to everyone who is involved with these monsters Swift. I was recently in court Swift trying to repossess my house. I was lucky I got a decent judge so have a suspended order. But again their solicitor went on about the cost of borrowing when the judge questioned him about their high interest rates. I feel as if I am on a stay of execution, Swift will eventually get me. But I don't want to go down without a fight, so any information anyone has would be really appreciated.:-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have not been on the site for a while, but it seems to me that things are starting to move, good Luck to everyone who is involved with these monsters Swift. I was recently in court Swift trying to repossess my house. I was lucky I got a decent judge so have a suspended order. But again their solicitor went on about the cost of borrowing when the judge questioned him about their high interest rates. I feel as if I am on a stay of execution, Swift will eventually get me. But I don't want to go down without a fight, so any information anyone has would be really appreciated.:-x

 

Hi Blackie,

The fact of the matter is all the way through their accounts Swift say that they borrowed money at a fixed capped rate of interest, and I have it on oath .........at last .........that the cost of their funds is depenadnt on one thing only ...The LIBOR rate of interest....no matter what they try to and say from now on ...that is fact ...if they try to say different their Witness is in bigger trouble than he is now:cool: anyone who wants the page that confirms this just ask.

Kestrel Holdings the owner of the whole lot ...state even clearer that the whole group borrow at a FIXED RATE of interest. so any increase in LIBOR did not affect their costs at all as they woffle on about........ they just took advantage and increased their interest when ever they wished ...but now they have been caught out....anyone facing Swift in the future can use this as an unfair relationship and an unlawful way of squeezing more money out of borrowers by abusing their position of power.

 

 

 

sparkie

Edited by Sparkie1723
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Sparkie,

 

This is a major step forward being able to prove an Unfair Relationship. I am hoping this type of extortion being exposed in this way will instigate Government regulation. More progress has just been made towards regulation of mortgage companies lending irresponsibly. I will chase up the email I mentioned in PM as I'm concerned when I read on posts that one minute there's Court Cases, next there aren't and mysteries within the TV industry. So, I'm getting 'me' shovel to start diggin!

 

P.S Don't know if the 'L' word is ok to use so i'll say when I voiced my concerns a few years back with Swift, concerning interest rates, they were ''incorrect' in their reply informing me Swift have to adjust the interest rate accordingly as the rate they borrow from the Bank (Barclays, as far as I know. maybe they can help with the enquiries!!) increases. I did ask if it works the other way when interest rates decrease. Apparently, it doesn't. I have always argued what is the logic of lending high to those who can least afford it. Madness.

Edited by determindator
Link to post
Share on other sites

I count 40 Swift cases appearing before the Master from 15th Oct to 22nd Oct. 2009

 

This is obscene....I don't know what monies are involved in the claims.....but this is 40 peoples lives that are being put through hell.

 

And this is only in a 7 day period....how many are being put through in a month a year....and this is only in Northern Ireland....what the heck are the figures across the UK???:mad:

 

What about a letter to the Lord chief Justice with a counter copy to Vince Cable and a number of others? HE needs to write to ALL judges stating exactly that these agreements are unlawful in the main and EVERY Swift loan should at least be stayed until they have had a chance to be checked over by a solicitor. This could be Corporate fraud if we are proved right.

 

How many staff in Swift would allow their families to be treated like this?

 

Keep coming forward Swift staff - this could be YOUR mother and father, sister, brother, aunt or uncle - This is NOT just a job - if you have any kind of conscience come forward and offer your support to us like a number of others already have, past and present. DO IT - before one of your own are forced unlawfully from their homes. :x

 

SC

Link to post
Share on other sites

It would be constructive and helpful to the Economic recovery of our Nation, if a National newspaper would investigate and write an expose on the mass extortion by these unscrupulous lenders, which is being allowed under the present rules. Whilst borrowers are laden with unnecessary debt (flick of a switch to a lower interest rate seems the way) they are not contributing to the economy so it's liquid, creating jobs.The wealth stays in the hands of those who brought the world to it's knees in the first place.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Some of the Swift staff have just realised that calculating the average wage and salary from their yearly accounts ....the "AVERAGE" wage and salary of the 123 staff there is sated to be over £800 ........but we know some are nowhere near this figure............... and believe they are not "happy bunnies".....how many make a bakers dozen?.....not many to go now.

 

sparkie

Link to post
Share on other sites

JUst to let folks know I made a complaint to the Bar Council about the conduct and handling of my defence ( the reasons I sacked him) the Bar Council are carrying out a big investigaton into the whole case....I sent the a copy of the Judgement summary and brought their attention to a lot of issues....the Bar Council have now sent for a transcript of the whole proceedings ....something they do not do often.

 

They are sending me a copy of the whole procedings ....in that will be EXactly word for word what was said by Mr Mark White under oath and will be of great benefit to all Swift customers who have had this person give evidence at their harings in the past or present or future...restassured on that people.

Do not give up

 

sparkie

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4947 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...