Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Feeling tempted to cancel it now but scared that some of the debts will do more Ccj on me and I'll have to wait 6 years again.  2 of the Ccj come of this year and then I'll only have the iva in credit file - so effectivly if I'd have not took out the iva I 2021 I'd have clear score by now - but then again would I because I would have been hounded the last 3 years so as bad as it is it's saves me lots of headaches whilst my debt was still within the 6 year mark.  I think most of them are near there but in all honesty no point chasing them if I do cancel iva I'd jjst wait for the ones who contact me and then start the relevant letter process on them.  Of over 6 years easy if not still possible to write off.    My true victory would be having the iva wiped off my credit file as misold or something that way I. Don't have to wait till 2027 Other option is to fight back and ask for them to offer the creditors to accept payments so far and use the following method    Will your IVA firm agree to complete your IVA on the basic of funds paid to date? The Guidance lists a lot of factors to be considered in deciding whether a settlement on the basis of funds paid to date should be proposed. You should read the list. But that may not give you any feel for whether they apply to you or not. The following are my thoughts on when an IVA should be treated as settled, not failed. They assume that you have £75 or less to pay a month: if you would currently qualify for a Debt Relief Order, then your IVA should be settled now  There is no point in making your IVA fail and you have to apply for a DRO – it will not generate another penny for your creditors. If you are renting and owe less than £50,000, check the DRO criteria now and talk to National Debtline on 0808 808 4000 about whether you qualify. You may have been told at the start of your IVA that you aren’t eligible – still check now as the DRO criteria have changed, your situation has got worse, and some people were given incorrect information about DROs at the start. if you have no assets that would be realised in bankruptcy (eg a house with equity, car worth over £2000), then your IVA should be settled now Same as (1), there is no point in making you apply for bankruptcy after your IVA fails. if your only asset is a car that is worth less than £8000, then your IVA should be settled now A car that is worth say £5000 would normally be sold in bankruptcy and you would be given a small amount to buy a cheaper car. But your creditors would not get any benefit from this as the Insolvency Service takes the first £8000 raised to cover its own costs. if you have significant assets, the closer you are to the end of the IVA, the less reasonable it is to fail it If you have been paying your IVA for 4 years, you have done your best over a long period. It isn’t your fault you can no longer continue. The fact you may have had equity to release isn’t relevant as that simply isn’t going to be possible. if your situation will clearly improve soon, then it’s unlikely your IVA will be settled I mean real improvements, not hoping that prices fall. If I can get them to accept payment to date or threaten with cancellation hopefully they may accept it -    Other option is to try and borrow money and pay make a full and final offer    Or I can just ignore and hope for the best which I'm very tempted to do especially if they respond to my review with bullying tactics despite me being skint as a fart with no mortgage as renting    It's so stressful but I've just checked the iva agreement from 2021 and it's Cabot 2 account Lowel about 5 accounts and then lots of repeats of the same debt with for example zopa and Cabot same amount listed twice -  also loyyds banks but I'm sure that's older than 6 years and not on credit file anyway    If I can somehow remove the iva from my creitt file I'd be happy   
    • Sorry I meant credit fix - I really wish I'd known this before - kicking myself right now  If they come back to me asking for more money I'll cancel it and start trying to deal with the debt myself let's see what they say 
    • India has one of the world's fastest growing economies but the benefits are yet to fully reach the poorest.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Solitaire Property Management - Long Post


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3870 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Carlex UK -welcome to the site.

CAG is happy to have official company representitives here,provided they agree to site rules and have a genuine interest in helping members openly and on the site.

Can I please ask that you email Admin with your brief so that your status can be givenn official recognition.

Thanks

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, I have no connection with CAG, save that I post here from time to time

 

I'm curious now though, so hope OK to ask the following...

 

a) The Carlex.org website to which you refer in your own website is offline - and the wayback machine (which is usually quite helpful) is not showing any previous/historic pages there. Link is at http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.carlex.org.

 

Any chance of directing us to the correct page(s)?

 

b) Also, sorry if it sounds a little suspicious, but what link, or connection was there to you calling yourselves CARLEX in the first place?

 

You say that there is no connection with CARL, of course, but I am mindful that CARL is a (relatively) well known campaign against leasehold and leasehold abuses.

 

I mention all this as I remember quite well the old 'leaseholder/s' .co.uk website - used predominately by unhappy leaseholders and invaluable at the time - which, later, appeared to 'disappear' and subsequently became a website for an Insurance Company... that was itself within the group of companies that leaseholders were allegedly complaining about in the first place... which (irony upon irony) included a group of companies later swallowed up by Erinaceous

 

I am genuinely interested to know more about your own organisation though, so, apologies for any offence caused and happy to stand corrected

 

Happy to be reassured as to your intentions too, so you are welcome to reply openly and/or PM me too if you wish - as well as responding to CAG moderators requests too, of course ;)

As for me, happy to help out. I am not a Landlord, but I have been in the past. I am not an Agent, but I have been in the past. I am, therefore, a has been, so always seek independent and suitably qualified advice elsewhere before relying upon whatever has been posted here :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

There appears to be a few 'carlex' sites out there..

 

 

 

Im sure they do a great job informing retired people with service charge disputes, it just seems odd that a quick 'google' finds three sites.

 

Andy

Edited by MARTIN3030
see post lower.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Andy, hi...

 

That's weird. Firstly, the second of these webpages I'd already had a read through and was looking forward to hearing more about the various carlex organisations - but the posters messages now appear to have been removed.

 

I also recall the carlex poster saying they would PM me (yup, quick check of copied emails shows one of the messages was "I will send you the link to Carlex AG via PM") but I never heard anything.

 

Now I see that that poster (CARLEX UK) and their messages elsewhere on CAG (such as at http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?22067-Property-Management-Debt-collection-Charges) appear to have disappeared completely

 

Andy, you and I have swopped messages before, so hopefully you can vouch for my intentions being to genuinely help where possible - so I'm all for other posters helping out wherever they can too

 

BUT I'm quite curious as to what happened to CARLEX UK now

 

Might be helpful if moderators could advise, for which thanks in advance?

 

Cheers, NewSAHD

Edited by NewSAHD

As for me, happy to help out. I am not a Landlord, but I have been in the past. I am not an Agent, but I have been in the past. I am, therefore, a has been, so always seek independent and suitably qualified advice elsewhere before relying upon whatever has been posted here :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok thank you for your PM.

I am happy to respond.

The position is that as with all members who register and post on the site who are acting in an official capacity for an organisation,CAG asks that these members contact Admin so that we can be clear as to they have brief to post as representitives,and also that there is a clear understanding of what CAG expects in consideration of site rules.

Regular members will be aware that links to external websites need prior approval.

We get hundreds of requests to permit external links as you can imagine-many are not appropriate or fit within the ethos of what we aim to do.

If a member is asked to contact Admin to confirm their brief and acknowledge posting expectations,then we obviously review that and respond.

If a member fails to respond to that request,then it can lead to moderation until its done.

In the case of Carlex,as far as I can see no response has been forthcoming despite the requests.

I hope this answers questions,and again will stress that links to external sites are not permitted without approval.

This is a policy which has existed for some time,and therefore is nothing personal or discriminatory in this instance.

If Carlex has responded already,then it will obviously be looked at.

Edited by MARTIN3030

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

MARTIN3030, thanks for the quick reply, much appreciated.

 

It's a shame the carlex poster hasn't replied, perhaps, as the more leaseholders/tenants that can be made aware of THEIR rights the better. Seen too many Freehold/Agent abuses against them over the years not to want as many others as possible to help out. Fairly, though, come up against enough unreasonable, uncooperative, and ill informed leaseholders/tenants to know it cuts both ways too, sometimes.

 

There was a poster here earlier this year (don't recall the name, but it WILL come back to me later ;) ) who used to reply to CAG posts - then, later, started, or tried to start redirecting posters to his own forum :) Wouldn't have been so bad if the advice he/she was giving hadn't been so, well, a bit off base sometimes. Haven't seen that poster around for awhile, think his/her user name was MZuckerberg or something. If time later will track back later and see how his forum is/isn't going!

 

Thanks for the quick reply though, here's hoping carlex can sort out providing you with some kind of response now.

 

It's perhaps a shame if they can't do so though.

 

Thanks again,

NewSAHD

As for me, happy to help out. I am not a Landlord, but I have been in the past. I am not an Agent, but I have been in the past. I am, therefore, a has been, so always seek independent and suitably qualified advice elsewhere before relying upon whatever has been posted here :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Chiro

 

Dont know how far you have got but we got rid of Solitaire via RTM. I have done a Right to Manage guide which is free from the truth about solitaire. This site truly holds a wealth of information.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Deleted - same message was posted twice!

Edited by NewSAHD

As for me, happy to help out. I am not a Landlord, but I have been in the past. I am not an Agent, but I have been in the past. I am, therefore, a has been, so always seek independent and suitably qualified advice elsewhere before relying upon whatever has been posted here :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

The TAS website makes for some 'interesting' reading and have followed it for a little while now.

 

Interestingly, there is a post re CARLEX from the 24th November with one poster there, in particular, stating

 

"I am always slightly suspicous of things. Dear Don Heady, God rest him, created CarlexAG.org – it is a great “resource”. It seems he took the passwords with him …

On the links page on carlex’ web site this appears:

“Age UK provides an impartial advisory service for people living or working in private retirement or sheltered housing.”

PLEASE be aware that Age Uk is a PEVEREL funded charity – but it costs Peverel nothing – they get the cash back via HMRC.

I know that there was a considerable difference of opinion between Don and Melissa. I think Melissa should explain who is paying for her site and its maintenance … and so clear the air"

 

I do hope whatever suspicions that are there can be allayed, as sites such as CAG, TAS, the old 'leaseholder' forum (long gone) and others can all provide an invaluable service

 

So, CARLEX AG, whoever you were posting on CAG, please do reassure us all

 

NewSAHD

 

PS I have no links whatsoever of which I am aware with TAS, CARLEX :) etc!

 

 

===

 

No time to edit the post, above, but there IS further info on the TAS website.. at... /2010/10/01/clarification-on-carlex-carlexag/

Edited by NewSAHD

As for me, happy to help out. I am not a Landlord, but I have been in the past. I am not an Agent, but I have been in the past. I am, therefore, a has been, so always seek independent and suitably qualified advice elsewhere before relying upon whatever has been posted here :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Useful update on CARLEX at thetruthaboutsolitaire.co.uk/2010/11/30/carlex-org-uk/comment-page-1/#comment-31869

As for me, happy to help out. I am not a Landlord, but I have been in the past. I am not an Agent, but I have been in the past. I am, therefore, a has been, so always seek independent and suitably qualified advice elsewhere before relying upon whatever has been posted here :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
Hi, I have been reading through members post's and just wanted to offer some advice. I own my own property management company & I am currently assisting a development terminate the services of Solitaire. The land owner/freeholder is also Estates & Management Limited, therefore it has been a long process however Solitaire should be removed in the next couple of months. Should you need any advice or help in removing Solitaire, please let me know as I would be more than happy to assist.

can you give me a ring on 01202570970 regards alan

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Hi, nice thread!!! I think people are looking for these kinds of management tips to get them a good property for their business. I also bought a small land in my downtown with the help of retail Management Company. I think before making big deal it’s good to consult with p

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Here's a general query in relation to this thread. What would be the situation if all the Leaseholders clubbed together by forming their own Ltd Co. registered as not for profit. Then write to the likes of these Management Co's stating "we have no need of your services". Surely with both sides being Co's, could you then charge the otherside for all correspondence out to them...? It would be a bit like putting the balance back in - charges like for like? Any thoughts anyone.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's a general query in relation to this thread. What would be the situation if all the Leaseholders clubbed together by forming their own Ltd Co. registered as not for profit. Then write to the likes of these Management Co's stating "we have no need of your services". Surely with both sides being Co's, could you then charge the otherside for all correspondence out to them...? It would be a bit like putting the balance back in - charges like for like? Any thoughts anyone.

 

Welcome to the forums bellijayne.

 

This thread was started in 2010 and it's over a year since the last post in this thread,have a look at the below link !

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/content.php?114-How-do-I-post-my-story-on-the-Consumer-Action-Group-forum

Please use the quote system, So everyone will know what your referring too, thank you ...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's a general query in relation to this thread. What would be the situation if all the Leaseholders clubbed together by forming their own Ltd Co. registered as not for profit. Then write to the likes of these Management Co's stating "we have no need of your services". Surely with both sides being Co's, could you then charge the otherside for all correspondence out to them...? It would be a bit like putting the balance back in - charges like for like? Any thoughts anyone.

It sounds like you are describing a rtm or right to manage agreement, try googling it and its best to start a new thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It sounds like you are describing a rtm or right to manage agreement, try googling it and its best to start a new thread.

 

Yes I am but without using the term RTM. I'm curious as to how others have achieved the same result in that due to the wording of their Leases in that they can carry out the work/repairs, then they managed to negate the RTM. They literally formed their own Co. & took it from there. From what I can gather they've gotten away with it too. I only wish I could remember where I saw this as I'd happily post this up. Thing is have you ever heard of this, as it appears those on this site are actually more clued up than solicitors. Thanks for responding.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...