Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello, welcome to CAG. Can you tell us more about what happened please? Who stopped you and which shop? Best, HB
    • You don't mention what the debts are, which is important, as it really depends on the details in deciding best course of action. So list types of debt e.g credit card, type of loan, utility bill; current owner bank or dca; approximate amount for each debt.  And do you own any property assets. There is no blanket advice regarding all types of debts. Whoever you contact regarding debt advice would want to know all of the information. The debt buying businesses deal with multi billions worth of debts. They can't issue Court claims for most debts as the cost of pursuing would be ruinous and don't have staff resources. Instead they rely on credit records being impacted and therefore people need to resolve the debts. And they rely on anxious debtors paying amounts after receiving threatening communications. If you know you are likely to be made redundant, start looking for other employment soon. Due to longer recruitment processes being followed by employers, it can take about 3 months between applying and starting a new job.
    • Hi I was caught shoplifting 4 items £20 worth, I’m petrified the Police will come to my house now please can you help. What can I do I worried about my job. 
    • I heard nothing more from J&P but have now had an email from the bank saying they have instructed IDR to act on their behalf?  so are they just passing it back? Selling it on again? I don’t know if this is a good or bad thing 
    • I posted a couple of years ago about our debt situation and have been trying to pay off our debt as best we can. It is a possibility I maybe made redundant in a few months time, so I am trying to find out everything I can about what happens in today’s world when you can’t pay. I keep finding conflicting advice on various sites so I wanted to post this quote to get thoughts. It claims basically that the dca will likely get enforceable documents these days and therefore it’s likely you will have to pay dca at some point during the 6 year process.    on here I read a lot of comments assuming the exact opposite of this. A lot of the threads on here state the beginning of the process but I never see conclusive stuff about what happened from start to finish to get insight into whether debts post 2015 have been enforced etc. I hear a lot here not to pay dca companies but most my debts are post 2015 debts I am all up to date on our debts but if I lose my job it is likely I’ll end up where I tried to avoid in the first place. Which is destroying our files and dealing with DCA. I’ll post it below so you can see what I mean.   It is likely that any debts incurred after 2007 will end up with all the documentation being provided and being enforceable. Therefore you should use the time while awaiting responses going through your Income & Expenditure and considering any possiblity of making a full and final settlement. It can take a number of months to reach the stage of a hearing date and exchange of witness statements and normally you would be able to settle or come to an arrangement to pay before the court hearing, once documents have been provided, although this isn’t guaranteed.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CapQuest advice


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5736 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Deaqr All,

I was wondering if someone could lend me a hand....

 

Some 7 years ago I bought a set of motorcycle leathers (around £800) on credit with a bike company called Carnells. This company went under and the "debt" was passed onto a company called Clydesdale Financial services. I did not have to do anything and my direct debits continued to be taken by this company. When I moved house around 3.5 years ago, besides making sure all my changes of adress went out early, I contacted Clydesdale to enquire how much I owed. It was just over £100 so I sent of a cheque for the amount and cancelled the direct debit. I then set up a mail forwarding service for 6 months, just in case. I never heard a peep from them.

 

Now, I am getting threatening letters from a company called CapQuest Debt Recovery. Infact, they wanted £1300. I called them to tell them that there must be some kind of mistake. Besides getting many of my details wrong and teling me to confirm my date of birth and address in writing (which I became suspecious of so did not complie) I have received a seconf letter saying they will cut me a deal, I owe them £839.14 and that if I pay it off monthly, they will pay the equivalent of 30% back themselves....so, I pay £50, they par £15. I have NEVER heard of something so crazy.

 

What should I do now? I don't owe the money, they have incorrect details about me and I am really not too impressed with the bully boy tactics!

 

Cheers in advance,

Garioch

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and Welcome, Garioch.

 

Send Capquest this 'Prove it' letter.......

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Account no:

 

You have contacted me/us regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by myself/ourselves.

 

I/we would point out that I/we have no knowledge of any such debt being owed to (insert company name).

 

I am/we are familiar with the Office of Fair Trading Debt Collection Guidance which states that it unfair to send demands for payment to an individual when it is uncertain that they are the debtor in question.

 

I/we would also point out that the OFT say under the Guidance that it is unfair to pursue third parties for payment when they are not liable. In not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt you are using deceptive/and or unfair methods.

 

Furthermore ignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment amounts to physical/psychological harassment.

 

I/we would ask that no further contact be made concerning the above account unless you can provide evidence as to my/our liability for the debt in question.

 

I/we await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed. Otherwise I will have no option but to make a complaint to the trading standards department and consider informing the OFT of your actions.

 

I/we look forward to your reply.

 

**Edit to suit**

 

Remember, don’t sign the letter.

 

 

See what they come back with.

 

Or as Bigmac suggests, send letter 'N' in the Templates Library, with a £1 Postal Order and again don't sign it, also send it recorded.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt-issues/20758-creditors-dcas-letter-templates.html

 

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you chaps..appreciated!

 

I am a very reasonable chap, but the second letter, which basically stated they would come and remove things from my house really got to me. I would like to see them try though..its a fully furnished rented house..none of the stuff is mine except a scappy cat and 4 chickens!! :)

 

Thanks again..will get the letter in the post tonight.

 

ps. Why should I not sign the letter?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Update:-

 

I won!! They have finally admitted they have no evidence of the debt..after over a year of letters and threats from them!

 

I followed the advice on here and another forum and CapQuest finally sent me a letter saying that they could not provide proof and they where sorry for the inconvineince!!!

 

I am sooooo tempted to sue them..they used threats against me, told me they where going to clamp my car (clamping is illegal in Scotland!), where going to force entry into my house (I rent the property so they would need permission from the landlord, again, scottish law) and various other things.

 

I cannot believe the way this company opperates and then just turns round as if they have been as good as gold and make it sound that it my fault that they could not prove anything!

 

Anyway, a big thanks to those who gave advice :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great news, Garioch :)

 

Congratulations

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

If someone does make a threat that they will come to your house and take things when you do not owe anything. If they do appear - would if be reasonable to presume they intended to follow out their threat, and as they are effectively then just burglars, could you use reasonable force against them? :-)

Edited by Czechoslovakia
Link to post
Share on other sites

Update:-

 

I won!! They have finally admitted they have no evidence of the debt..after over a year of letters and threats from them!

 

I followed the advice on here and another forum and CapQuest finally sent me a letter saying that they could not provide proof and they where sorry for the inconvineince!!!

 

I am sooooo tempted to sue them..they used threats against me, told me they where going to clamp my car (clamping is illegal in Scotland!), where going to force entry into my house (I rent the property so they would need permission from the landlord, again, scottish law) and various other things.

 

I cannot believe the way this company opperates and then just turns round as if they have been as good as gold and make it sound that it my fault that they could not prove anything!

 

Anyway, a big thanks to those who gave advice :)

 

I don't know if this applies or would help you decide.

 

 

Protection from Harassment Act 1997

 

You will need to do a search on the sites I was intending to post - as I have insufficient posts to let me post sites.

 

 

 

The definition of harassment seems to be something that would annoy a normal person - and happens twice. How many threats did they make?

 

Also I know the police will take nothing to do with it - but when is a threat not a threat?

 

There is a massive fine for false invoicing - but I cannot remember the act off the top of my head. But I dont see it doing any harm mentioning they were sending you false invoices and you intend to report it unless they are very apologetic in a very financial way.

 

Attempting to obtain money with menaces.

 

Lastly - call the council - and ask about getting an ASBO against them - as you cannot get less social - and I am sure I read somewhere they could be directed at non natural persons (companies).

 

If I am wrong - slag me off - but tell me why.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...