Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • 05.05.24 Ever so sorry if I have entered this in the wrong part of this website.   My grandfather is in his 70's and retired.  He asked me to help him find a work pension that he was paying into when he was working. From 1967 - 1982 he worked for a Fabric Dying Company, Celanese, Spondon Derby UK. I have already used the GOV.uk Trace Pension Scheme. It listed a few pension companies : Akzo Nobel (CPS) Pension Scheme formerly Courtaulds Pension Scheme.  I do not fully understand how this works but I think this scheme is administer by a company called Willis Tower Watson. We have called this company, got through to the pension department submitted all my grandfather's details (D.O.B. , N.I. no. etc.) but that agent tells that they have no record of my grandfather and ask what is the name of the pension scheme. Here is the problem, his home was burgalled in 2005 and a briefcase which contained his legal documents was stolen. So he does not know who was the Pension Scheme company. I have a this phone number 01332 681 210 for Celanese but it just rings and never gets answered. So I am asking for help if anyone can tell us where we can try next. I am also hoping for a massive long shot that one of them members on this website, worked for or knows someone who worked for British Celanese Spondon Derby and could tell us of any pension company. Thanks for any help.
    • Well I sent them the letter of claim, the only responses so far was a few emails reopening the claims on the parcels where they asked for information such as proof of value (which I get) but other things like photos of the parcels, which I haven't got as I never took photos of them. It's been well over the 14 days since I sent the letter now anyway, so what do you think I should do now?
    • Know it has already been answered, but? Does not explain why JCI has registered a different default date when they get the information from the original creditor, Virgin
    • Since you were stopped at the time there is no requirement for the police give you anything there and then or to send you anything before they have decided how to deal with the offence.  They have three choices: Offer you a course Offer you a fixed penalty (£100 and three points) Prosecute you in court  The only option that has a formal time limit is (3). They must begin court proceedings within six months of the date of the alleged offence. Options (1) and (2) have no time limit but since the only alternative the police have if you decline those offers is (3) they will not usually offer a course beyond three months from the date of the offence and will not usually offer a fixed penalty beyond four months from that date. This is so as to allow time for the driver to accept and comply with their offer and to give them the time to go to option (3) if he declines or ignores it.  Unless there is a good reason to do otherwise, the action they take will usually be in accordance with the National Police Chiefs' Council's guidance on speeding enforcement. In a 40mph limit this is as follows Up to 45mph - no action. Between 46mph and 53mph - offer a course Between 54mph and 65mph - offer a fixed penalty Over 65mph - prosecution in court So you can see that 54mph should see you offered a fixed penalty. Three weeks is not overly long for a fixed penalty offer to arrive. As well as that, there has been Easter in that period which will have slowed things down a bit. However, I would suggest that if it gets to about two months from the offence date and you have still heard nohing, I would contact the ticket office for the area where you were stopped to see if anything has been sent to you. Of course this raises the danger that you might be "stirring the hornets' nest". But in all honesty, if the police have decided to take no action, you jogging their memory should not really influence them. The bigger danger, IMHO, is that your fixed penalty offer may have been sent but lost and if you do not respond it will lapse. This will see the police revert to option (3) above. Whilst there is a mechanism in these circumstances  to persuade the court to sentence you at the fixed penalty level (rather than in accordance with the normal guidelines which will see a harsher penalty), it relies on them believing you when you say you did not received an offer. In any case it is aggravation you could well do without so for the sake of a phone call, I'd enquire if it was me.  I think I've answered all your questions but if I can help further just let me know. Just a tip - if you are offered a fixed penalty be sure to submit your driving licence details as instructed. I've seen lots of instances where a driver has not done this. There will be no reminder and no second chance; your £100 will be refunded and the police will prosecute you through the courts.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HFO: do I have to pay?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5807 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

I am new to this forum and am looking for advice,Compared to some dept mine may not seem a lot, the worry and harassment is still the same. I am getting constant calls from HFO for a debt that they say my son owes. i will try to make it brief. Three years ago my son got two mobile phones from network 3 one for him one for me. Unfortunately the service was atrocious could not send or receive call as 70% of time no signal complained to network 3 and shop where contract was taken out on several occasions, ended up returning phones. (It was my first and last mobile as I was disheartened by the experience) due to the trouble it all caused, Network three kept demanding monies for a service we were not receiving three to four letters a week eventually we settled by phone on a charge as a final payment which was paid by card (begrudgingly), we never heard from network 3 again.

Three years later I am now getting constant calls from HFO saying they were sold a debt by 3 and we owe to date £243.52 .

i have requested them to send me an invoice from 3 stating I owe this dept and have asked why 3 didn't send an invoice in the last three years if we owed this amount?

They said they can not discuss 3 and I cannot speak to 3 as i no longer have a contract with them, if I do not pay they will take me to court and the charges will increase and my house could be under threat, I keep telling them it was my son who took the contract out and we settled with 3, plus the phones did not work in the first place, I am sure 3 should have something to answer for?? As it was over three years ago and nothing has been heard from 3 we no longer have any paperwork.

Today I received a letter from their solicitorsTurnbull Rutherford saying My son has 14 days to pay ( he no longer lives at home as the phone in question was for me I feel responsible) or they will sue for for £243.52 together with court costs, solicitors cost, and accrued interest.

I no it is not a large amount owing, it is the principal can people just say you owe them money??

Ouote: "When we get a County Court Judgement against you, we will seek to enforce this against your income assets and property. You should advice from your solicitor if you are in any doubt as tothe seriousness of your situation."

I am finding this very worrying as I have always paid my bills and have never been in debt in my life. I am of the old school save and buy or do without.

Any advice would be greatly appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Lab

 

Unfortunately I an unable to advise on the legalities side of things, but I am going through exact same with HFO for an alleged 3G debt.

 

I have been told all the same as you have, threats and all the lies. So you are not alone on this.

 

I am sure someone will be along to advise you, but I hope you can take some comfort in the fact you not alone and you will get help on here.

 

Keep smiling as it only takes a smile to make a dark day bright.

 

Kal

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send them this but DO NOT sign it, only print name at bottom, only send by Postal Order DO NOT send cheques

 

[your address]

 

 

 

[their address]

 

 

[DATE]

 

 

 

 

Data Protection Act 1998

Subject Access Request

 

 

 

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

 

ACCOUNT NUMBER: xxxxxxxxx (or multiple numbers if more than one account)

 

 

Please supply me with a complete list of transactions and charges relating to my banking history with your organisation. Alternatively, a complete set of statements for that period will be acceptable.

 

Additionally, where there has been any event in my account history over this period which has required manual intervention by any member of your staff, or any other person, I require disclosure of any indication or notes which have either caused or resulted in that manual intervention, or other evidence of that manual intervention in relation to my banking business with you.

 

If you are unable to supply this data because there has been no such manual intervention, then please be so kind as to confirm this in your response.

 

I enclose the statutory maximum fee of £10. You have 40 days in which to comply. Furthermore, if I discover that you have levied disproportionate penalties against me, then I shall be reclaiming them, and also reclaiming the enclosed £10 Data Protection Act subject access request fee.

 

If there is specific information which you require in order to satisfy yourself as to my identity, please let me know by return. However, please note that the above address is the one which you normally use to communicate my private business to me and which you have hitherto found to be acceptable.

I would be happy to collect the Data from my local branch.

 

 

Yours faithfully,

 

 

[signature]

 

 

[name]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

I am new to this forum and am looking for advice,Compared to some dept mine may not seem a lot, the worry and harassment is still the same. I am getting constant calls from HFO for a debt that they say my son owes. i will try to make it brief. Three years ago my son got two mobile phones from network 3 one for him one for me. Unfortunately the service was atrocious could not send or receive call as 70% of time no signal complained to network 3 and shop where contract was taken out on several occasions, ended up returning phones. (It was my first and last mobile as I was disheartened by the experience) due to the trouble it all caused, Network three kept demanding monies for a service we were not receiving three to four letters a week eventually we settled by phone on a charge as a final payment which was paid by card (begrudgingly), we never heard from network 3 again. Did you receive anything in writing in support of this settlement?

Three years later I am now getting constant calls from HFO saying they were sold a debt by 3 and we owe to date £243.52 .

i have requested them to send me an invoice from 3 stating I owe this dept and have asked why 3 didn't send an invoice in the last three years if we owed this amount?

They said they can not discuss 3 and I cannot speak to 3 as i no longer have a contract with them, Complete Rubbish, if you owe Three money, then how would you be expected to settle with them? They are worried that they wont get their commission if you deal directly with Three if I do not pay they will take me to court and the charges will increase and my house could be under threat, Again, utter twaddle, I keep telling them it was my son who took the contract out and we settled with 3, plus the phones did not work in the first place, I am sure 3 should have something to answer for?? As it was over three years ago and nothing has been heard from 3 we no longer have any paperwork.

Today I received a letter from their solicitorsTurnbull Rutherford saying My son has 14 days to pay ( he no longer lives at home as the phone in question was for me I feel responsible) or they will sue for for £243.52 together with court costs, solicitors cost, and accrued interest.

I no it is not a large amount owing, it is the principal can people just say you owe them money??

Ouote: "When we get a County Court Judgement against you, we will seek to enforce this against your income assets and property. You should advice from your solicitor if you are in any doubt as tothe seriousness of your situation."

I am finding this very worrying as I have always paid my bills and have never been in debt in my life. I am of the old school save and buy or do without.

Any advice would be greatly appreciated

 

What you have received is a standard threatening letter from a Debt Collector, if you do not instantly pay them, they will pass it on to their "solicitors" who is really just the next desk along and keep trying to scare you into paying them something. Don't pay them at all

 

If the phones were taken out in your sons name, then they can make no demands of you whatsoever, I would complain to Trading Standards as they are clearly asking you to settle a debt that is not yours, also making threats against a debtor is against the OFT guidelines and could be construed as harrassment.

 

 

You can either send them a "prove it" letter, they are in the same situation of me walking up to you in the street and telling you that "you owe me £xxx - pay me"

 

Complain to Trading Standards that you are being harrassed for a debt which is not yours

 

Do not speak to these "people on the telephone, they tell lies and threaten, insist that all communications are made in writing, retain copies of all communication and if you write to them ensure you send it recorded and obtain a prrof of delivery.

 

If you believe that the debt is genuine, take it up with Three, ignore the DCA completely and if possible obtain written confirmation from Three that the debt has been settled

 

but complain to TS asap

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi lab,

 

Can I ask some questions first?

 

Hi

I am getting constant calls from HFO for a debt that they say my son owes.

 

Can I ask, was your name on the contract or did you act as guarantor or is the contract just in your son's name?

 

eventually we settled by phone on a charge as a final payment which was paid by card (begrudgingly),

 

Did you get this in writing at all?

 

Three years later I am now getting constant calls from HFO saying they were sold a debt by 3 and we owe to date £243.52 .

i have requested them to send me an invoice from 3 stating I owe this dept and have asked why 3 didn't send an invoice in the last three years if we owed this amount?

 

Are they phoning to speak to you or are they asking for your son?

 

 

Ok,

 

The first thing to remember is that anybody can come up to you and ask you to pay them some money. Whether you should or not is another matter. If I came up to you in the street and said "I'm from your mobile company give me £100" would you do it? I hope not!

 

The first thing that they must do is to prove that they own the debt. If you send this letter to the debt collection agency:-

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Account no:

You have contacted me regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by myself.

 

I would point out that I have no knowledge of any such debt being owed to (insert company name).

 

I am familiar with the Office of Fair Trading Debt Collection Guidance which states that it unfair to send demands for payment to an individual when it is uncertain that they are the debtor in question.

 

I would also point out that the OFT say under the Guidance that it is unfair to pursue third parties for payment when they are not liable. In not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt you are using deceptive/and or unfair methods.

 

Furthermore ignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment amounts to physical/psychological harassment.

 

I would ask that no further contact be made concerning the above account unless you can provide evidence as to my liability for the debt in question.

 

I await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed. Otherwise I will have no option but to make a complaint to the trading standards department and consider informing the OFT of your actions.

 

I look forward to your reply.

 

Yours faithfully

 

(Your Name) Print do not sign

 

 

 

The letter that kalley posted should be sent to three along with payment of £10. This will get you all the information that Three have on your account to see what has happened.

 

Don't worry about threats of court, they will try anything to get you to pay.

 

They need to prove the debt exists first - they can't do anything without that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are disputing the debt as not being yours, then you shouldn't use the SAR letter, if it's not your debt, then they won't have any information of value as mobile phones are not covered by the CCA and it would be a waste of £10

 

If you are going to contact them at all, it should be to ask them to prove it, using the letter above if they attempt to show documentary proof that the debt is yours, then perhaps send the SAR letter.

 

However, if the debt is not yours and they are calling you repeatedly and they take a threatening tone during these calls, Contact either Trading Standards or consumer direct and make a complaint.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow.

 

We are in exactly the same boat!

 

Well... except for a couple of things...

 

My girlfriend had a 3 mobile a few years ago and had the same problem as you. It spent longer being repaired than it did working. She took them to court and it was settled out of court.

 

My g/f went bankrupt in 2006

 

Now, HFO are chasing her for the £53 whatever pence debt she owes!

 

And like you Lab, my g/f can no longer get her hands on the original cases documentation.

 

She recieved the same letter as you a couple of days back.

 

Can you believe it though, we have the guy tape recorded telling her that if she doesnt pay within 24 hours they will be sending a court appointed baliff!!! He also seems to think that Bankrupcy doesnt matter.

 

Lab, who's name is the debt in? How did you settle the debt when you paid it off? You might be able to get the bank to back you up.

 

Have they called you yet? Either get a tape recorder (and tell them you are taping the call) or refuse to speak to anyone other than in writing.

 

Send them a CCA request and a SAR request too. They cant deny you this and it will tell you what details they have about you.

 

Also, forgive me if Im wrong, but arent they breaking the law by threatening this guys home?

 

These guys are total barstards.

 

We're going to push for the maximum damages possible when we sue them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your replies, I find it reassuring that I am not alone.

My son lived with us when he took the contract out so it is my address and telephone number they have. I have told them I do not know where he is.

I did not get a receipt for final payment it was all done on phone, even if I had I may well of discarded it by now as after Three years you do not expect this to happen.

I wish I had taken 3 to court as the phone never worked, we did pay monthly payments we only disputed the end charges because the service was bordering on being useless and all complaints fell on deaf ears and hours hanging on phone trying to get through to complain.

I will do what has been recommended and see what develops.

I will keep you posted. Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

If your son took out the contract then you don't owe HFO anything. Providing you are not a party to a contract you cannot be said to owe anything under the contract.

If I've helped feel free to add to my reputation.

 

I am not a Practising Lawyer. My comments are my opinion only. You should not rely upon those comments and should always take your own professional advice from a practising Solicitor or Barrister

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lab - How did you pay over the phone?

 

The reason I ask is that it sounds like you used your credit card or debit card.

 

If you used either then you should be able to confirm this with the bank which would back up your defense.

 

I think HFO and all DCA's must get ligitimate debtors trying to find loopholes in consumer law, but it sounds like they have totally disconnected with people who really have no debt with them and that is totally unjustified.

 

As it stands, it sounds like they have an unenforcable debt against you.

 

I dont think HFO will ever stop unless their victims tear them apart in court and counter sue for lots of damages.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Burnt toast I think that you're right about HFO you have to beat them in court...and get costs against them BUT don't forget complain to Trading standards and the OFT - lets try to get their credit licence revoked

If I've helped feel free to add to my reputation.

 

I am not a Practising Lawyer. My comments are my opinion only. You should not rely upon those comments and should always take your own professional advice from a practising Solicitor or Barrister

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi the so called dept is in my sons name ,like I said I feel responsable as the phone was for me, I was there when he paid the last payment on the phone and heard the transaction that pased between 3 and himself. HFO have said they can see the last payment paid but do not except this as the final one??

Low and behold just picked up my messages another call from Sonny at HFO.

We should all get together and sue, as I do not know how to go about doing so, it all seems most daunting to me, I suppose that is the reaction they love and that is how the get away with bully boy tactics as they work on people who do not know any better

I am off to get my postal order wish me luck!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

To go back to my earlier point if the account is in your son's name then you aint liable. Tell HFO to go forth and multiply - you could point out that as you are not the account holder that its' a breach of the Data Protection Act for them to talk to you about it. Your son needs to complain to the Information Commissioner.

If I've helped feel free to add to my reputation.

 

I am not a Practising Lawyer. My comments are my opinion only. You should not rely upon those comments and should always take your own professional advice from a practising Solicitor or Barrister

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...