Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You can counter a Judges's question on why you didn't respond by pointing out that any company that charges you with stopping at a zebra crossing is likely to be of a criminal mentality and so unlikely to cancel the PCN plus you didn't want to give away any knowledge you had at that time that could allow them to counteract your claim if it went to Court. There are many ways in which you can see off their stupid claim-you will see them in other threads  where our members have been caught by Met at other airports as well as Bristol.  Time and again they take motorists to Court for "NO Stopping" apparently completely forgetting that the have lost doing that because no stopping is prohibitory and cannot form a contract. Yet they keep on issuing PCNs because so many people just pay up . Crazy . You can see what chuckleheads they are when you read their Claim form which is pursuing you as the driver or the keeper. they don't seem to understand that on airport land because of the Bye laws, the keeper is never liable.   
    • The video-sharing app told the BBC that a "very limited" number of accounts had been compromised.View the full article
    • The King is the second monarch to appear on Bank of England notes which will be fed gradually into the system.View the full article
    • The King is the second monarch to appear on Bank of England notes which will be fed gradually into the system.View the full article
    • luckily like this thread VCS/DCB(L) PCN spycar capture - PAPLOC Now claimform - no Stopping in Restricted Zone - Bristol Airport ***Claim Dismissed*** - Page 4 - Private Land Parking Enforcement - Consumer Action Group although no on the crossing, same applies to you so WS time. there are numerous threads here on pedestrian crossing claimforms by VCS at Bristol and at other airports so use our enhanced google searchbox and find them. really a bad idea to vanish for SIX months and not been have reading up here.....................  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cabot/Morgan Solicitors-Court Action (ex Goldfish account)


barns66
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4063 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

That's pretty much it, but we always encourage you to file a defence in good time so they can't try for summary judgment.

 

Really need to wait on a response from then before we go further, I'm afraid.

 

Hi DonkeyB thank you for your kind help again.I will keep the thread up-dated when and if i receive anything from Morgan.If i do not receive anything back by the 4th July i will post on the thread also.

 

barns66

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 631
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

You have 33 days from the date on the claim to file your defence, (assuming you have "acknowledged service")

Aim to do so a couple of days in advance, if you fail to do so the claimant WILL file judgement against you, i am making this clear as much for anyone else reading this thread as for you.

 

To be clear, if you have not had the info you have requested from the claimant in good time to make your defence, the, you must file a embarrassed defence

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have 33 days from the date on the claim to file your defence, (assuming you have "acknowledged service")

Aim to do so a couple of days in advance, if you fail to do so the claimant WILL file judgement against you, i am making this clear as much for anyone else reading this thread as for you.

 

To be clear, if you have not had the info you have requested from the claimant in good time to make your defence, the, you must file a embarrassed defence

 

Thank you credit for the info,i have acknowledged the service.I will see now what Morgans send me i know they received my request.I think i have untill the 4th July to put in my defence.I will put up anything Morgan sends me.

 

barns66

Edited by barns66
adding
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi

I received a reply from Morgans and guess what read letter they send i will post the the other letter about assiginement.I received many pages about asignment,many of them blanked out. Should i be putting in defence yet based on this letter.Thanks for any help in constructing a defence.

 

http://i169.photobucket.com/albums/u230/barns66/april%204/MORGREPLY.jpg[/img

http://i169.photobucket.com/albums/u230/barns66/MORG2.jpg

[/img]

http://i169.photobucket.com/albums/u230/barns66/MORG3.jpg[/img]

 

barn66

Edited by barns66
adding
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just as predicted in post 46! That old chestnut... if the account hasn't been terminated, then they need absolute assignment as it comes under CCA 1974 etc. However, I bet they are claiming to have merely the benefits, not the duties...

 

However... they are claiming the account was not terminated and that a DN was not sent. Well, you have the actual DN, You did not comply and the DN stated termination would follow.

 

They have royally blown their own foot off.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

I received a reply from Morgans and guess whaT read letter they send i will post the the other letter about assiginement

 

http://i169.photobucket.com/albums/u230/barns66/april%204/MORGREPLY.jpg[/img

http://i169.photobucket.com/albums/u230/barns66/MORG2.jpg[/img]

 

barn66

 

 

That is what they have shown to be their statement of case.

 

I suspect they know that the agreement that you have is unenforcable (but they will never admit it).

 

I suspect that that is all they will send you, you will have to submit an embarrassed defence and then after a while they will apply for a Summary Judgment.

 

This gives you time, have you sent them an SAR ? you need to send the OC a similar request to get all the possible information that you can.

 

Cabot will say that they only wish to collect the arrears but - you will need to show the last statement from the OC matches the demand from them which invariably is the full balance.

 

I am going to Court over this issue very shortly having had an appeal granted. The need to keep your paperwork is paramount.

 

For Cabot to initiate proceedings against you they must be the sole owner of the account (Absolute Assignment) which in itself will mean that the agreement has been terminated.

 

If the agreement has been terminated without a DN then like me you will have to show the amount of the claim is not the arrears but is in fact the full balance.

 

If it is common ground that a DN is in existance, does it comply ? if not then that would be an unlawfull termination.

 

There has been a recent case where a District Judge had a cliam from Cabot on the arrears issue thrown out and dismissed - so they are weak on this point and you should try to work on the point.

 

Hope this helps

 

Beau

Please note: I am not a lawyer and as such any advice I give is purely from a laymans point of view;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I really think theres something in the fact that Cabot dont want us to see the sales agreement (as discussed in other threads and delved into deeply by the Cabot Fan Club), these accounts could all be assigned through foreign companies and we need to find a way of this being disclosed. Ive heard there willing to show the judge but the judge doesnt know if the question isnt raised.

 

Hadituptohere

I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 😎

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all thank you to all who have replied since my last post.Would there be anywhere in the paper work that they sent me where i could see if it was a Absolute Assignment or just a assignment.I see looking through the paper work,i note that it contains what i take to be a contract between Goldfish and Cabot Financial (UK) signed 30th November 2007.I then got a letter from Cabot in April 2008 that was supposed to have come from Goldfish informing me.Will a SAR to both companys tell me if it was a Absolute Assignment.

 

barns66

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all thank you to all who have replied since my last post.Would there be anywhere in the paper work that they sent me where i could see if it was a Absolute Assignment or just a assignment.I see looking through the paper work,i note that it contains what i take to be a contract between Goldfish and Cabot Financial (UK) signed 30th November 2007.I then got a letter from Cabot in April 2008 that was supposed to have come from Goldfish informing me.Will a SAR to both companys tell me if it was a Absolute Assignment.

 

barns66

 

You probably will not get anything that says "this is an absolute assigment" although some DCA's do do that, CL Finance for one. So in the absence of the DCA in this case Cabot, telling you that it is absolute you must do your own detective work.

 

By looking into what action the DCA has taken so far, you should be able to work out where they might attack from next.

 

So in your case barns66 :

 

Does the Notice of Assignment say that you must pay only Cabot ?

 

Have Cabot demanded for the full balance of the account ?

 

Most of the time it needs to be assumed that the assignment is "absolute" this is because when the DCA issues a claim through Northampton CCBC they will issue it in their own right (no other joint claimant). Thus the assumption that the assignment is not "Equitable" with another entity joining the claim.

 

You may get information that gives further clues to the type of assignment via an SAR but it will also reveal other information that you will find usefull.

 

Beau

Please note: I am not a lawyer and as such any advice I give is purely from a laymans point of view;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they have already issued in court, a SAR would take 40 + 2 days for a reply so a request under CPR would probably be better as to the assignment, which CPR is to be found amongst the site unless someone more in the know can point this out

 

 

Hadituptohere

Edited by Hadituptohere

I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 😎

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Towers2 just doing some research I see... Glad we can be of use to you guys in cabot..hope the training's going well LOL

I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 😎

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

don't have time to look back through - have we considered CPR 18 to request a copy of the deed of assignment or sale agreement? I think you can demand to go and view it at their premises.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

So in your case barns66 :

 

Does the Notice of Assignment say that you must pay only Cabot ?

 

Have Cabot demanded for the full balance of the account ?

 

Most of the time it needs to be assumed that the assignment is "absolute" this is because when the DCA issues a claim through Northampton CCBC they will issue it in their own right (no other joint claimant). Thus the assumption that the assignment is not "Equitable" with another entity joining the claim.

 

You may get information that gives further clues to the type of assignment via an SAR but it will also reveal other information that you will find usefull.

 

Beau

 

Hi Beau thank you for your help in this matter,i received a Notice of Assignment from Cabot that was supposed to have been sent by Goldfish i never received 1 from them only 1 was from Cabot.it does not contain any account number,just my name and address dated 18th April 2008.It tells me that i have now must direct payments to Cabot Finacial (EUROPE) Limited so i take it that they Absolute Assignment.

 

I did find this among the 48 pages they sent me.

http://i169.photobucket.com/albums/u230/barns66/sign.jpg[/img]

 

barns66

Link to post
Share on other sites

don't have time to look back through - have we considered CPR 18 to request a copy of the deed of assignment or sale agreement? I think you can demand to go and view it at their premises.

 

Hi DonkeyB

Thank you for your help,i think now i will have to start preparing a embarressed defence untill i receive a reply to my SAR.Any help anyone can give me in preparing this would be very welcome.

 

 

barns66

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmm... very technically, that should be signed by two representatives of each company.

 

Hi Thank you DonkeyB it is signed i took the the names out,i did not know if i would be doing anything wrong if i left them in.i can post it again with the names in if it's ok to do that.

 

barns66

Link to post
Share on other sites

No need. My point was that such a document should be signed by two people from Cabot as well as two from Goldfish.

 

Hi,it as been signed by two people from Goldfish and one person from Cabot Financial (UK) Limited.thank you DonkeyB for all the help.

 

barn66

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Thanks for all your help on this matter.Do i send my SAR to Morgans or Cabot,can anyone tell me what the Goldfish address is for SAR,it as belonged to that many banks,i have lost track.I want to get a embarressed defence in by the middle of next week but am stuck on what to put in it,any halp would be much appreciated.

 

barns66

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi barns

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/241827-legal-action-how-start.html

 

This thread says it all really, what Ive been trying to say is the SAR will take to long, If you havent got the documents to complie a defence then you wont be able to offer a suitable defence, CPR is a quicker way of obtaining documentation.

 

Hadituptohere

I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 😎

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi barns

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/241827-legal-action-how-start.html

 

This thread says it all really, what Ive been trying to say is the SAR will take to long, If you havent got the documents to complie a defence then you wont be able to offer a suitable defence, CPR is a quicker way of obtaining documentation.

 

Hadituptohere

 

Hi thanks for kinf reply Hadituptohere.i did send a CPR to them and i have posted some of the documents i received on this thread.Thank you once again Hadit for your help.

 

barns66

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats cool, but if you havent received all the documents required im sure that it doesnt stop you using CPR again and requesting those documents rather than waiting for the SAR, maybe someone else could confirm this

 

Hadituptohere

I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 😎

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi thank you Hadituptohere for your suggestions on this matter,i will try to get what i am looking for from them.I will look around the site and see if i can find any more info on what i should do,i am at a loss now what is the best coourse of actioni should take.Once again Hadituptohere thank you.

 

 

barns66

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry if this is confusing but didn t see Beau's post #81 maybe the embarssed defence may be the way to go giving you time to SAR both the DCA and the OC..

 

 

Hadituptohere

I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 😎

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry if this is confusing but didn t see Beau's post #81 maybe the embarssed defence may be the way to go giving you time to SAR both the DCA and the OC..

 

 

Hadituptohere

 

Hi Hadituptohere,thanks for all your advice on this.I will look around and try get some idea what to put in my embarressed defence.

 

 

barns66

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...