Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Russia’s economy has been cut off from the global financial system - but it is still growing. Why?View the full article
    • Well done. Are you able to tell us more about how it went on the day please? HB
    • when mediation call they will ask the same 3 questions that are in their email you had to accept it going forward. simply state 'i do not have enough information from the claimant to make an informed decision upon mediation so i refuse. end of problem.  
    • Food prices, including a $40 chicken, has stoked fury and calls for big foreign supermarket chains to come to Canada.View the full article
    • Which Court have you received the claim from ? Civil National Business CEntre Name of the Claimant ? Lowell Portfolio i Ltd How many defendant's  joint or self ? Self   Date of issue –  15 Feb 2024 Particulars of Claim What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim?  The claim is for the sum of £922 due by the Defendant under and agreement regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974 for a Capital One account with an account reference of [number with 16 digits] The Defendant failed to maintain contractual payments required by the agreement and a Default Notice was served under s.87(1) of the Consumer Credit ACt 1974 which has not been complied with. The debt was legally assigned to the claimant on 16-06-23, notice of which has been given to the defendant. The claim includes statutory interest under S.69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of the issue of these proceedings in the sum of £49.15 The Claimant claims the sum of £972 What is the total value of the claim? £1112 Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? I dont know the details of the PAPDC to know if it was pursuant to paragraph 3, but I did receive a Letter of Claim with a questionaire/form to fill. Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Credit Card When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? no Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? Online Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Yes Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Assigned/purchaser Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? I was aware, I'm not certain I received a 'Notice of Assignment' from Capital One but may have been informed the account had been sold without such a title on the letter? Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Yes Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? Not since the debt purchase, and not from Capital One. Why did you cease payments? I can't remember - it was the tail end of the pandemic and I may not have had enough income to keep up payments - I am self-employed and work in the event industry - at that time. I also had a bank account that didn't allow direct debits and may have just forgotten payments and became annoyed at fines for late payments. What was the date of your last payment? Appears to be 20/4/2022 Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? No Here is my Defence: Defence - 1. The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 2. Paragraph 1 is noted. I have in the past had an agreement with Capital One but do not recognise this specific account number or recollect any outstanding debt and have therefore requested clarification by way of a CPR 31.14 and section 78 request.. 3. Paragraph 2 is denied. I am unaware of having been served with a Default Notice pursuant to the Consumer Credit Act 1974. 4. Paragraph 3 is denied. I am unaware of any legal assignment or Notice of Assignment pursuant to the Law and Property Act 1925 Section 136(1) 5. The Defendant has sent a request by way of a section 78 pursuant to the Consumer Credit Act 1974, for a copy of the agreement, the Claimant has yet to comply and remains in default of said request. 6. A further request has been made via CPR 31.14 to the Claimants solicitor, requesting disclosure of documents on which the Claimant is basing their claim. The Claimant has not complied and to date nothing has been received. 7. It is therefore not accepted with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant and the Claimant is put to strict proof to: a) show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement and; b) show how the Claimant has reached the amount claimed for and; c) show the nature of the breach and evidence by way of a Default Notice pursuant to sec 88 CCA1974 d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim 8. As per Civil Procedure 16.5 it is expected that the claimants prove the allegation that the money is owed 9. On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of section 136 of the Law of Property Act and section 82A of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 10. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief. .................. Please note that I had to write a defence quite quickly as I hit the deadline. At the time of writing the defence, I hadn't been able to find correspondence from Capital One, but had since found default letter etc. I submitted CCA request and CPR 31.14. However, I didn't get any proof of postage or use registered post for the CPR (an oversight) but did with the CCA request. I received a pack which included a letter from Overdales, going over the defence I'd filed, as well as letters of Lowells and reprints of letters from Capital One. But I have no idea if this pack is in response to the CCA request or the CPR ! I would have expected two separate responses ... although I do know they are both the same company. Looking over the pack today, and looking through old emails .. I find some discrepancies in the Capital One default letters (notice of default and Claim of default). They are both dated *before* an email I have stating that a default can be avoided. The one single page of agreement sent (so not the full agreement) has a 16 digit number at the top in small print, next to 'Capital One' which corresponds to a number called 'PURN' printed at the top of each of the 10 pages of ins and outs of the account (they're not official statements, but a list of monthly goings) yet no mention anywhere on either of the account number. I cant really scan them at the moment - I can later tomorrow, but that will be after the mediation call I'm sure. I guess I may be on my own for this mediation ... I am not certain the CCA request has been satisfied .. or if the CPR has been . And then I appear to have evidence that the Default notices provided are fabricated ? Yet, I do have (elsewhere ... not at home) Default letters from Capital One I can check ..
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Just starting


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6560 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

just when i thought it was safe to ignore the idiots regarding the first account.

 

Bearing in mind they paid the full amount give or take a gnats whisker into my account last week or the week before (im drunk on the power of spending)

i recieved via a phone convo with my mum today court papers.. so logged on to moneyclaim

 

halifax

 

XXXXXX

 

Defence

 

You are unable to take any further action online on this claim.

 

The Defendant disputes the whole amount you have claimed. Your claim cannot proceed online and will be transferred to the appropriate court for continuation. You will receive confirmation to where the claim has been transferred to shortly.

 

ok so being they paid me already on what grounds could they file a defence??

 

Gross stupidity, fatcatitis, gratuitous greediness or my favourite, not knowing ones a$$ from ones elbow??

 

i know they disputed about £200 which i agree was a typo.. should i let it go to court or should i ring the court and let them know i have already received payment?

 

Although i cant prove it was them who paid me...

 

anyway i am also having issues with my other account. Further to my phone call requesting an address change..... they have put a block on my account because they have had mail returned... which is exactly what i told matey boy on the phone would happen.. when he told me "you need to fill in a specific form" so i blew my stack today. Turns out i dont need a form a need to send a letter. Which i could of sent during the week. So anyway i have drafted a letter stating that if my daughters nursery fees get bounced due to them finally following the terms and conditions that they so willingly ignore when it suits their own purposes and i get a penalty as a result they will end up in court, and if my three year old daughter gets turned away from nursery because one of their staff failed to inform me that a letter would suffice they will find themself liable for any emotional trama she should suffer.

 

 

Basically its hot im in bridzilla mode dont mess LOL

GEN

 

Some days you're the bug; some days you're the

windshield.

 

If carlsberg made email addresses... they'd be consumer action group email addresses... probably the best email address in the world !!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, I really have no experience in this (yet) and therefore don't know what I'm talking about.

 

But...

 

Could it be that they are trying to confuse you?

 

Could it be that they have left £3 unpaid so that they can still defend this (small) amount.

 

Then if you were to fail to communicate further - thinking you've already won ("why bother anymore with the legal hassel over 3 quid?!"), then they win by default and could request BACK the £2k odd that they have already paid.

 

Wonder what will happen next, I suppose you play along just incase. Let them humour you :), don't let them think they've gotten away with that last £3 - even if it IS a hellofalot closer to the ACTUAL amount of costs they've "incurred" becasue of your misbehaviour. ;)

 

--

 

Oh and P.S.

 

Hello! :) I've just signed up to this site after stumbling accross it (looking for a cheap TV!!!) and reading many many hours worth of the inspirational stories (like yours) on these pages with great interest. Now, I'm looking forward to starting the process and finding out just how much the halitw*ts have taken off me in the last 6 years!!! ...Then my GF's account... Then to spread the word between friends and colleagues... ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi pubjoe and welcome to the site that excites!!

You could be right about that you know, I think they will stop at nothing to prove themselves right.:-?

glelovesben watch your back, they play games.:mad:

Sent Data Protection Act to Halifax 13.6.06

Daughters Data Protection Act sent to NatWest 5.6.06

Natwest sent statements on 24.6.06 Daughter owed £204.00 Preliminary ready to go.

Halifax sent my statements today(26.6.06) Owe me £1702.00

Preliminary sent on 27. 6.06.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do any of the mods have any ideas on this one?? im tempted on one hand to let it ride and go to court and see what happens (whilst in the mean time spending every penny and closing the account) on the other i could just ring the court and say they have paid up so im not sure how they are defending the entire amount.

 

If i havent heard anything from you guys i will ring the court tomorrow and let them know that halifax have paid and so there is no need to proceed.

 

Although it would be funny to turn up in court an say "im not sure why they dragged me here as they paid up weeks ago"

The lack of communication between their depts is scary.

 

 

ps my typing sucks as my bank manager just paid for acrylic nails an i cant get used to them LOL

GEN

 

Some days you're the bug; some days you're the

windshield.

 

If carlsberg made email addresses... they'd be consumer action group email addresses... probably the best email address in the world !!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

oh and i forgot.. they paid in the odd £3 too so they are defending the whole amount that i claimed.. but they wrote to me and said that was wrong and i agreed with their amended sum.. and thats what they paid me.. so Arrgghhh..

 

Basically one dept paid me the correct amount minus interest even though it was mentioned in the money claim form.. you win some you loose some..

 

Another dept is defending the entire claim

 

neither dept has written to me to acknowledge they have or havent paid me

 

i recieved court papers for staines court.

 

i should know life is never simple but it never ceases to amaze me..

 

input gratefully received as always.

GEN

 

Some days you're the bug; some days you're the

windshield.

 

If carlsberg made email addresses... they'd be consumer action group email addresses... probably the best email address in the world !!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Any updates on this?? What did you do with the court papers?

 

Is there anything to defend if you are satisfied and they paid up?

 

Is this a usual thing to happen? I'm very curious about all this.

 

Regards.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update. I Win again.

 

THE HALIFAX ARE PANSY'S

 

I did nothing i decided to wait for a reply to my letter asking for them to pay the interest as i hadnt had an acknowledgement.

 

Today i recieved a letter (via my mother) saying that they were paying £515.33 into my account by way of interest and would i please notify the court that they had settled without liability.

 

I checked my bank account this morning, the interest was paid in, in cash on Monday.

 

My advice to all new commers is: Tell them what you want, Tell them when you want it, Sit back and let them sweat.

 

In my case it worked hopefully it will for you too.

GEN

 

Some days you're the bug; some days you're the

windshield.

 

If carlsberg made email addresses... they'd be consumer action group email addresses... probably the best email address in the world !!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 12 years later...

This topic was closed on 03/06/19.

If you have a problem which is similar to the issues raised in this topic, then please start a new thread and you will get help and support there.

If you would like to post up some information which is relevant to this particular topic then please flag the issue up to the site team and the thread will be reopened.

- Consumer Action Group

GEN

 

Some days you're the bug; some days you're the

windshield.

 

If carlsberg made email addresses... they'd be consumer action group email addresses... probably the best email address in the world !!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6560 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...