Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The reason for the photos is to show you weren't displaying a permit.  They are supposed to check that the permit hadn't fallen off the dashboard. There is no point in appealing to PPM.  The very people who deliberately set up the site with rubbish signage to catch motorists out are highly unlikely to find against themselves. You've said several times that you think the company who you met with called PPM in so these are the people you need to contact in writing to request they call PPM off.  Until you do so we're going round in circles. If you don't want them to have your e-mail address simply set up a secondary e-address.  
    • Please see attached redacted judgment for further infoVWFS (UK) LTD - Salisbury CC - Judgment - 20240507 V Final _copy redacted.pdf
    • Make sure the WS is sent 14 days before the hearing. You can e-mail the court theirs.  In the subject line put the case number, the names of the parties and "Witness Statement".  Obviously click on "Return Receipt". Send Simple Simon his by 2nd class post - all VCS are worth - and get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office.
    • The outlet is in Camden Town and was set up in 2006, a year after my husband established the business, in addition to selling at exhibitions, online, shows, events, and having licensing agreements in some places overseas.  The only thing I have stopped doing since I got ill is the physical stuff, which I’m working on. The business has not changed name or anything like that either. I’m not sure where the original contract with Camden is but the management must still have it. My husband died in Jan 2017, and until Sept 2018, I would take the stock in every week; after that I was sending it in by post. I went in now and then when possible to re-do the display but that was about it. No one had access to any files until 2020. Moved house in 2020 thought would have to pull it all, Covid had just hit as well. The person in question said he would be interested in taking over and paying the rent etc. so I said I would let him sell the pictures for nothing as long as he would ‘keep it warm’ for me.  Obviously, everywhere was closed for lockdown. During this time I was working out how to go forward.  In May 2022 I told him I couldn’t  give anything away for free anymore, and put in place the wholesale agreement.  I’ve disregarded any discrepancies from before this date. I sent over the jpgs electronically, so I’ve still got them too. He hasn’t got any original files like .psds negatives or memory cards etc, I’ve got proof of all ownership/copyright. A co-op is whereby a small number of neighbours work on a rotational basis so they each of them can have time off, that way everyone doesn’t need to be there at the same time, he had never been an employee of mine.  The only reason I allowed him to have the files in the first place as I didn’t want to lose that side of the business.  It’s a good, constant source of income. However, the rent was becoming crippling as I believed there was something fishy going on well before this as there’s so much cash dealt with there, and I couldn’t go in regularly in person, and I’m sure sales weren’t being recorded properly and cash was being pocketed. My husband was too busy to be doing any stock control properly, he wasn't really into paperwork, and the guy who was ‘helping’ me after my husband's death, was making things very difficult for me to implement a solid stock control system by refusing to co-operate on simple things like using email etc. which I thought was a smokescreen, so I severed ties with him just before I made the agreement in question. I sent about 100 images, jpg files, sent via We Transfer. I’ve got the confirmation of which files were sent with dates. I will have to go through closed bank accounts and previous tax returns to get a proper estimate.   Before I made this agreement, I was selling retail there, this is a wholesale agreement so I’ll have to do some calculations but it is definitely in the thousands.  I haven’t got his his home address, and I don't think he's got any sizeable assets. I’m also worried that he might send the files overseas and start selling them there. I know he’s not stupid enough to sell them online. He knows for sure how serious this is, but he’s been chancing it and thinks I’m stupid, if not soft and stupid. I don’t know if this would work but I am thinking that when he does contact me, I tell him we need to talk, tell him I know what he’s been up to, and strongly urge him not to order any more prints from wherever he is having them printed because it will make things much worse for him if he does. Then when I do tell him about the gravity of the situation, maybe a few days later, I think it will scare him into complying because the consequences definitely trump the few quid he thinks he is saving by getting his own printing done. Tell him an amount that I want back for lost revenue, and make it clear that if he doesn’t destroy the files and if I find out he is still doing it at any point down the line, I will seek prosecution for copyright infringement and fraud, which I will. I don’t know how I can enforce any of this without involving the courts though. I will be able to tell, though, and he will know this. And the only reason I am doing this now rather than before, is that I couldn’t prove anything until now.  It was screamingly obvious from the beginning though, as he wasn’t ordering enough from me to pay the rent, let alone make a profit. If I decided to come down like him lie a ton of bricks straight away, how would I go about a cease and desist, would I have to get one from the court? And what do I do about the stock he currently holds? It has also occurred to me that he might file for bankruptcy or similar if things get heavy, where would that leave me? I could put the feelers out for a brand-new person to take it on, obviously without giving them access to files, that is an option. But that comes with its own set of issues. Also, would there be any implications for me, if I kept quiet for now? Let him order again from me as if nothing has happened, as it will be any day and I want to get all my ducks in a row first ideally….   Thanks again
    • I’ve also just realised their online website they’ve got 12 photographs of my vehicle, including close ups of the inside?? Not sure why that’s relevant.  The time stamp on the first photo is 13:57, the PCN incident time is 14:12. 
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

housing benefit and bank statement


binkhus
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4300 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi everyone

i just started work again after being on income support and i only work 16 hours a week so was told to claim some housing benefit and council tax benefit. i took in all my working tax credit awards forms and child tax credits forms and wage slips everything thyat proves what money im getting in. the lady said i still had to bring in a recent bank staement to prove i hadnt won the lottery or something. now i havent won the lottery or owt but still a bit peeved that everyone in benefit office will see not only what money iv got coming in but what iv spent money on too. they will see what iv spent on shopping what iv spent at chemist ect what if i was a keen ann summers fan or liked to buy sex films ( i would like to point out that they wont see anything like that). i would like to marker out all the money going out and just leave the incoming income and final ballance. i think its awful they are allowd to see what is really a very private thing. any comments?

Link to post
Share on other sites

All information you pass to the council is treated in a confidential manner.

 

They just need to confirm that your pay advice corresponds to your bank account. This is used as a fraud check and also as part of an identity check.

 

You may find it very difficult getting your award with them seeing the statement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

iv handed everything in now but was looking at the european conventions on human rights and it rights to privacy. now dont get me wrong i know im prob just p****D off over nowt but i provided them with every detail of my income, wage slips, tax credits forms ect and they still wanted to see what i would consider to be a very private thing on the off chance i had won the lottery and still wanted to claim £45 a week housing benefit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually, I very much agree with you. I think that what happens in your finances (bank account) is a private as what happens in your bedroom.

Cheers

Lefty

If the left side of the brain controls your right, and the right side controls your left, then left-handed people are always in their right mind!

 

Please help to support this site with a small donation... every little helps...

 

CAG- The Nation's Weekly Info Store!

;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know I am now late with this advice but you can always blank out the payee with a black marker pen if you don't want your local council to know where you have been spending your money, it is the amounts coming in that they will be concerned with.

.....of course I may be wrong!:?

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanx frost thats what i thought about doing but couldnt be bothered with the hassle really. it just makes me angry that because im on a low wage and need some help they get to seee my bank statements.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i felt the same although the claim is in my Oh name , he had to sign the docs', he does not have a bank account but they demanded to see my bank statments!!

 

I was well miffed.

 

Then they could see i was paying my council tax late each month :rolleyes:

 

Idax

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Sorry couldnt resist to comment on this.

 

Whilst I agree you may see it as an invasion, you need to understand that a lot of fraudulent activity goes on when people are claiming benefits.

 

They ask to see your bank account statements to prove that all of the income you say you receive, you are receiving and you are not receiving anything you havent declared.

 

Benefit Officers wont give a hoot about what you spend your money on but there is quite a lot of information that can be checked on a bank statement to prove you are not committing fraud.

 

I wouldnt suggest blacking out your outgoings as there are certain fraudulent checks needed on outgoings too.

 

I for one, would prefer to provide information needed to help them combat the fraud that costs us taxpayers.

 

This post was just to try and explain why they ask for it and hopefully you now understand thats it's not due to intrusion.

Morgan Stanley

**Won 31.01.07 with CCI**

Capital One

**Won 19.04.07 with CCI**

Halifax current & Joint

Verbal S.A.R 11.01.07, stats recd 18.01.07

Halifax Visa prelim sent 26.01.07. Reply 31.01.07 Filed N1 on 20.03.07 - Judgement granted, sent in the bailiffs

GE Capital

Frazercard Prelim sent with CCI 27.01.07

Burtons Prelim sent with CCI 22.01.07

 

RBOS Visa S.A.R sent 12.01.07

Partners JJB card (Creation) *Won* with part interest - 15.02.07

 

 

Partners LLOYDS Account S.A.R 13.12.06 - stats recd 30.01.07. Prelim sent with CCI 01.02.07

 

Partners BOS Mastercard Offered all charges except £12. Refused. N1 filed 20.03.07 - Judgement granted, sent in the bailiffs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry couldnt resist to comment on this.

Whilst I agree you may see it as an invasion, you need to understand that a lot of fraudulent activity goes on when people are claiming benefits.

They ask to see your bank account statements to prove that all of the income you say you receive, you are receiving and you are not receiving anything you havent declared.

Benefit Officers wont give a hoot about what you spend your money on but there is quite a lot of information that can be checked on a bank statement to prove you are not committing fraud.

I wouldnt suggest blacking out your outgoings as there are certain fraudulent checks needed on outgoings too.

I for one, would prefer to provide information needed to help them combat the fraud that costs us taxpayers.

This post was just to try and explain why they ask for it and hopefully you now understand thats it's not due to intrusion.

Innocent until proven guilty, eh? Unless, of course, you're a benefit claimant! :mad:

Oh, and by the way...

"...costs us taxpayers?" Benefit claimants are tax payers, too.

With respect

Lefty

If the left side of the brain controls your right, and the right side controls your left, then left-handed people are always in their right mind!

 

Please help to support this site with a small donation... every little helps...

 

CAG- The Nation's Weekly Info Store!

;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry couldnt resist to comment on this.

 

Whilst I agree you may see it as an invasion, you need to understand that a lot of fraudulent activity goes on when people are claiming benefits.

 

They ask to see your bank account statements to prove that all of the income you say you receive, you are receiving and you are not receiving anything you havent declared.

 

Benefit Officers wont give a hoot about what you spend your money on but there is quite a lot of information that can be checked on a bank statement to prove you are not committing fraud.

 

I wouldnt suggest blacking out your outgoings as there are certain fraudulent checks needed on outgoings too.

 

I for one, would prefer to provide information needed to help them combat the fraud that costs us taxpayers.

 

This post was just to try and explain why they ask for it and hopefully you now understand thats it's not due to intrusion.

Sorry, have to disagree. The council have no need whatsoever to see exactly what you decide to spend your money on, even if the information is treated confidentially. All they need to see in deciding your claim is simply your current balance, plus the total money in/out of the account: That would be sufficient to see if there was any fraud going on.

 

My bank provides statements which contain a "summary" page which shows the opening and closing balance, total in plus total out. I gave the summary to my council and refused to give them my fully itemised statements. They accepted this and paid HB in full.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh dear...didnt intend to start a debate on this, I just wanted to try and explain why they ask for it.

 

I meant "us" as in everyone other than fraudsters.

 

Also, they arent looking at what you spend your money on, they are looking for transactions that you havent declared.....unfortunately I cant say what as it would give to much information away.

 

Im very surprised the benefit department allowed you to just give summary pages. They are breaking a regulation by doing that. Usually they would refuse benefit if you dont supply the relevant information.

Morgan Stanley

**Won 31.01.07 with CCI**

Capital One

**Won 19.04.07 with CCI**

Halifax current & Joint

Verbal S.A.R 11.01.07, stats recd 18.01.07

Halifax Visa prelim sent 26.01.07. Reply 31.01.07 Filed N1 on 20.03.07 - Judgement granted, sent in the bailiffs

GE Capital

Frazercard Prelim sent with CCI 27.01.07

Burtons Prelim sent with CCI 22.01.07

 

RBOS Visa S.A.R sent 12.01.07

Partners JJB card (Creation) *Won* with part interest - 15.02.07

 

 

Partners LLOYDS Account S.A.R 13.12.06 - stats recd 30.01.07. Prelim sent with CCI 01.02.07

 

Partners BOS Mastercard Offered all charges except £12. Refused. N1 filed 20.03.07 - Judgement granted, sent in the bailiffs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh dear...didnt intend to start a debate on this, I just wanted to try and explain why they ask for it.

 

I meant "us" as in everyone other than fraudsters.

 

Also, they arent looking at what you spend your money on, they are looking for transactions that you havent declared.....unfortunately I cant say what as it would give to much information away.

 

Im very surprised the benefit department allowed you to just give summary pages. They are breaking a regulation by doing that. Usually they would refuse benefit if you dont supply the relevant information.

 

I am puzzled now. You say they aren't looking at what you spend your money on, but that they are looking for transactions you haven't declared. Surely, transactions are what you have spent your money on? (as well as credits, of course)

 

As you know, I could have up to £6000 in my account without any effect on HB or CTB. If I decide to spend, say £5000 on a holiday or a new car, then what business is that of the council?

 

Out of interest, please can you tell me what regulation applies to this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Robin

 

They arent looking at what you spend you money on. Transactions consist of debit, credits and transfers.

 

If you spent £5000 on a car or a holiday then that is no problem....especially when you are below the capital threshold anyway.

 

If you had say...15k in your account and within a week spent 9k then that would raise questions as some claimants purposely have a diminuation of capital just so they can claim full benefit.

 

Off the top of my head I cant remember the exact regulation (it's late lol) but it falls under the Verification Framework rules set up...it's something like section 19.....from my memory.

Morgan Stanley

**Won 31.01.07 with CCI**

Capital One

**Won 19.04.07 with CCI**

Halifax current & Joint

Verbal S.A.R 11.01.07, stats recd 18.01.07

Halifax Visa prelim sent 26.01.07. Reply 31.01.07 Filed N1 on 20.03.07 - Judgement granted, sent in the bailiffs

GE Capital

Frazercard Prelim sent with CCI 27.01.07

Burtons Prelim sent with CCI 22.01.07

 

RBOS Visa S.A.R sent 12.01.07

Partners JJB card (Creation) *Won* with part interest - 15.02.07

 

 

Partners LLOYDS Account S.A.R 13.12.06 - stats recd 30.01.07. Prelim sent with CCI 01.02.07

 

Partners BOS Mastercard Offered all charges except £12. Refused. N1 filed 20.03.07 - Judgement granted, sent in the bailiffs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Robin

 

They arent looking at what you spend you money on. Transactions consist of debit, credits and transfers.

 

If you spent £5000 on a car or a holiday then that is no problem....especially when you are below the capital threshold anyway.

 

If you had say...15k in your account and within a week spent 9k then that would raise questions as some claimants purposely have a diminuation of capital just so they can claim full benefit.

 

Off the top of my head I cant remember the exact regulation (it's late lol) but it falls under the Verification Framework rules set up...it's something like section 19.....from my memory.

 

Yes, I quite agree that this would raise questions. However, this kind of expenditure would show up in the account summary, without the council having to know how much I spent in Tesco last week! The claimant would then be asked to justify the figures.

 

Don't get me wrong, I'm all for fraud prevention, but I just see it as further snooping by an already oversurveilled big brother society.

 

As you have mentioned deprivation of capital and as I have previously been affected by this, I thought I would post the following which I found very interesting and may be useful to others.

 

If a claimant has in excess of £16000, there are various legitimate ways of "spending" it which shouldn't affect HB or CTB entitlement:

 

P1.703 A claimant should still be regarded as having deprived themself of a capital resource if they have disposed themself of it by way of a gift to a third party. However, they should not be regarded as depriving themself of it if they did it to

HB(SPC) Reg 47; CTB(SPC) Reg 37

  • reduce or pay off a debt they owe
  • purchase goods or services the Decision Maker considers reasonable, given their circumstances, eg
    • payments to reduce/pay off a debt, eg paying a credit card account or mortgage early
    • for day to day expenses
    • to improve their quality of life, eg buying a new kitchen or car
    • for medical treatment
    • for home repairs
    • for a holiday

Link to post
Share on other sites

With deprivation of Capital...as long as you can prove what you have spent your money on and it is reasonable then there should be no problem.

 

If anyone is ever in this situation, I would advise to try and keep receipts where possible too.

Morgan Stanley

**Won 31.01.07 with CCI**

Capital One

**Won 19.04.07 with CCI**

Halifax current & Joint

Verbal S.A.R 11.01.07, stats recd 18.01.07

Halifax Visa prelim sent 26.01.07. Reply 31.01.07 Filed N1 on 20.03.07 - Judgement granted, sent in the bailiffs

GE Capital

Frazercard Prelim sent with CCI 27.01.07

Burtons Prelim sent with CCI 22.01.07

 

RBOS Visa S.A.R sent 12.01.07

Partners JJB card (Creation) *Won* with part interest - 15.02.07

 

 

Partners LLOYDS Account S.A.R 13.12.06 - stats recd 30.01.07. Prelim sent with CCI 01.02.07

 

Partners BOS Mastercard Offered all charges except £12. Refused. N1 filed 20.03.07 - Judgement granted, sent in the bailiffs

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

Hi All,

 

My 72yr old mum is in this situation she cannort afford to pay her full rent & council tax anymore but they are using the deprivation of capital rule

 

It stinks:evil:

 

Simon

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All,

 

My 72yr old mum is in this situation she cannort afford to pay her full rent & council tax anymore but they are using the deprivation of capital rule

 

It stinks:evil:

 

Simon

 

What did she spend the money on? In theory for deprivation to apply the money must be spent with the intention of increasing benefit entitlement, but in practice any large unjustified expenditure may be deemed as such. If she disagrees with the decision she has a right of appeal independent from the council.

Edited by Zamzara

Post by me are intended as a discussion of the issues involved, as these are of general interest to me and others on the forum. Although it is hoped such discussion will be of use to readers, before exposing yourself to risk of loss you should not rely on any principles discussed without confirming the situation with a qualified person.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

We receibved a letter fro the council today stating that she is not entitled to any benefits.

 

I called them to discuss it and they stated that the money she did have going back in 2006 which totaled just over £16.000 plus the £2500 Funeral Bond has now been disregarded but they are still stating that the £25,000 that she gave to me & my family falls under the notional capital rule.

 

They have reduced this fugure now to saying that she has £20,253.70 but as I stated to them she is in there accomodation & is using her overdraft every month to pay her rent & council tax.

 

I now have to go down the road of appeal

 

Any suggestions please,

 

Thanks,

 

Simon

Link to post
Share on other sites

Too be honest, they won't give a monkey what you spend your money on.

 

People who work there who know you might. Saying nobody will give a monkeys isn't true is it.

Edited by pencil
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
People who work there who know you might. Saying nobody will give a monkeys isn't true is it.

 

Hi, I would like to quote on the fact that the council want to see my bank statements, the fact that they have seen my wage slips should be enough, how would they like it if I asked to see their bank statement, I think this is an invasion of privacy. Wouldn't be claiming housing benefit if I had ex amount of pounds in the bank, not worth the hassle. There should be some sort of law against this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 10 months later...

There is no guarantee that these details will be kept confidential at all.

There are two main problems here.

One is someone duping them into giving information to someone in the belief that they are dealing with someone entitled to know. You don't know what is being stored and kept that someone could ring up and con out of someone.

 

You are given good evidence that they are vulnerable to this tactic just because of the reasons given for asking for it. Councils will talk about "Proof" in my experience when they actually mean "Evidence".

Not having a good sense of reasoning like this makes them vulnerable to being conned.

 

Identity checks are worthless against skilled fraudsters. It is important to remember that THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS PROOF OF IDENTITY.

Evidence exists of course but not proof. If you have a passport can we be assured that the people in the passport office have known you since a child? Of course not. Identity cards will suffer from the same problem.

My local council will idiotically accept utility bills as what they call "Proof of identity". You have to worry seriously about the cognitive abilities of these people.

 

The most obvious reason why bank account details would be useless is that the claimant had accounts they did not declare that were dealt with on a cash only basis and that had no connection to the account in question.

Any fraudster would easily work this out so in effect they are asking for

information of little value.

 

This is all theoretical but the real threat is from dishonest staff. I can guarantee you that there are cases where staff in organisations have used these kinds of things to commit fraud. I know of a case myself, which was not a council but a central government body, but the principle is the same.

 

There is nothing to prevent a dishonest staff member memorising all your details later writing them down and storing them for all sorts of fraudulent purposes later on when you are off benefits.

 

I am given to understand, and I would welcome proper evidence on this matter, which I am checking out myself anyway, that the law no longer requires you to hand over this information. Maybe someone up there actually has a few brain cells to rub together or more likely they have

caught to many people using it for fraud and finally realised it isn't a good idea.

 

Edit: Oh and I like that bedroom point made earlier. It is spot on.

Edited by Ford Prefect
extra line
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

I felt the same when I applied,

They told me that I had to provide my adult childrens pay slips.

I had to explain to my kids all of my private business too.

I dont make a profit from my kids they just pay their way.

Do I have to notify them if my child changes their job?

I only do paper free banking so I just printed out the a mini statement to show them.

I have more money in my account at the end of the month and nothing by the 1st as thats when all my bills come out.

I had to have a home visit from the council tax lady. She told me that they were having to visit every body who was claiming and that it was government legislation.

Its going to take them years. Has any one else had a home visit or is it infact just me?

I suppose if people are doing anything dodgy then a home visit would make you very nervous.

I had wondered if they were picking on me because I have made complaints about the DWP.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

I too have a feeling I am being singled out because I have made a complaint and went all the way to the top man in London. In a previous claim they lied to my local MP, local leaders of other political parties and to the head man himself. They finally had to admit this to the head of HMRC because they didn't have the information they would have needed to write to me!

 

To claim working tax and child tax credit I have been asked to submit originals of the following:-

Mortgage statement

Electricity bills

Gas bills

Telephone bills

Rates demand

Water rates bill

Pay slips

Contract of work hours

Evidence of son's education (he is receipt of EMA therefore must be in full-time education)

 

They claim this is because there exists a bank account linked to my address. This is true and it has been for many years. It is obvious from all my paperwork that they have received that there is no connection between me and this account or my account and anybody else. It is an old friend who used my address because I was the only constant in his life.

 

They accused me of lying about my 17 year-old, son's education because between my application and this week he has not achieved the grades he really needed. He was offered the chance to go back a year but opted instead to do a full time A-level course at a local college. I encouraged this because I don't have the funds to buy him his school uniform or pay for his transport to and from the school, when it moves out of town in November. I have not received child benefit for my son since March of this year.

 

I work18.5 hours a week, in a local gym, cleaning drains, showers, toilets, air conditioning ducts, swimming pool and racking up 25kg weights. I can't imagine anyone doing this, except out of necessity

 

The compliance officer told my daughter that because this friend was of a similar age we might be living together! We are friends...we do not live together....we have been on holiday together...we do not have a sexual relationship. I always thought in the UK it is innocent until proven guilty!!! If I am angry about their intrusion into my life can you imagine how I feel when they question me about my friend and his personal life.

 

Meantime, in May I received £361 to last me for 5 weeks (because June was a 5 week month. In June I received £601 because I worked a 5 week month. In July I received £420 (my working hours were increased from 16hrs to 18.5hrs) which has to do me for 5 weeks because again I have to work a 5 week month!!

 

I am sick with worry about how I am going to cope now that my meagre savings (for my son's driving lessons) have run out!!

I have broken my tooth and cannot go near the dentist because I have no money and cannot prove receipt of benefits.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...