Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • 2 foot of sea level rise   The Thwaites Glacier — dubbed the “Doomsday” glacier because of the grave impacts for global sea level rise if it melts — is breaking down “much faster” than expected, according to a peer-reviewed study published on Monday in the academic journal, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Using satellite imagery, scientists determined that widespread contact between the glacier and warm ocean water is speeding up the melting process. The climate crisis is interrupting natural processes across large parts of the continent, according to the Antarctic and Southern Ocean Coalition. The glacier, roughly the size of the United Kingdom, could cause global sea levels to rise more than two feet if it melts completely, according to the study. “Thwaites is the most unstable place in the Antarctic and contains the equivalent of 60 centimeters of sea level rise,” study co-author Christine Dow said in a statement. “The worry is that we are underestimating the speed that the glacier is changing, which would be devastating for coastal communities around the world,” she continued. Read the full story here.       or here ... from the India civil service currents affairs exam Doomsday glacier Antarctica‘s Thwaites Glacier, roughly the size of Britain, is a fast-moving glacier in West Antarctica. Because of the risk it faces — and poses — Thwaites is often called the Doomsday Glacier. Because of its size (1.9 lakh square km), it contains enough water to raise the sea level by more than half a metre. Thwaites’s melting already contributes 4% to global sea level rise each year. Thwaites are important for Antarctica as it slows the ice behind it from freely flowing into the ocean. Credits: BBC Vigorous melting Salty and relatively warm ocean water is infiltrating beneath Thwaites Glacier, leading to significantly speedy melting. This process, termed as “vigorous melting“, is eroding its stability. However, its potential collapse could lead to a staggering 10-foot rise in sea levels, posing a dire threat to coastal communities worldwide. Previous studies discovered a deep connection to the east through which deep water flows from Pine Island Bay. That study also attributed the melting to the heat transport caused by channels bringing warm water towards the glacier from the north. With melting, glaciers become light and float off the land where they used to be situated. The resulting retreating grounding line exposes more of a glacier’s base to seawater, increasing the risk of melting. Since the late 1990s, the glacier has seen a 14km retreat of its “grounding line.” The grounding line is the point where the ice flowing off the land and along the seabed floats up to form a huge platform.   https://www.pmfias.com/current-affairs-for-upsc-civil-services-exam-may-28-2024/   or here Satellite data reveals Antarctica's Thwaites Glacier is melting faster than we thought | Space WWW.SPACE.COM Seawater rushing miles beneath the glacier makes the ice more vulnerable to melting.  
    • I have notified all parties and will start a new thread.
    • The messaging app's boss has taken to social media to deny Mr Musk's claim it "exports user data."View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Capquest strange letter


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5898 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My wife received a letter this morning 29/03/08 from capquest stating that she owed 309.74 to littlewoods finance and this had been passed on to them for collection.

The letter is dated 27/3/08 and they are saying that they will pass this on to their solicitors to commence legal action on the 1/4/08 if they do not hear from us by the 26/3/08.

Didnt make any sence to me either as all the dates are wrong, but thats how it was written.

Apart from the fact that we have never had any dealings with littlewoods finance and have lived in Scotland for the last 7 years i am not sure what to do about this letter.

Do i contact them and tell them that i have no idea what they are talking about or what?

The letter goes on to say that they will get a warrent of execution and send the bailiffs to us.

Could someone please help as we are worried about this as we live in a remote area and am bothered about comming home and finding our house empty.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi sparkright send them a CCA request, if you are saying this could be over 7 years old then it may be statute barred.

Dont call them or speak to them on the phone they will only upset you or your wife, simply tell them you will only correspond in writing and keep this thread update at all times.

 

 

Follow link and scroll down to letter N

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-bailiffs-advice/20758-creditors-dcas-letter-templates.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to add that they can not simply send the bailiffs round (as you are in Scotland it would be sheriff officers anyway) they would need to get a decree granted against you and then get an exceptional attachment order through you not paying the decree and only then could they remove non essential items (they are heavily restricted in what they can and can't take). However they would not be allowed to force entry. A CCJ would be of no use as this would be ruled as legally incompetent as you reside in Scotland. You would be notified of any court action by the court and give the opportunity to defend. Remember Capquest are simply a debt collection agency - they have no legal powers whatsoever.

 

I would also report this matter to Trading Standards. There appear to have been a spate of DCA's wrongly tracing people at the moment.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Regarding the CCA request there is an alternative. You could simply send a prove it letter (example below). As with all letters to DCA's, dont sign the letter. Send all letters either by recorded delivery or at the very least get proof of posting.

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Account no:

 

You have contacted me/us regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by myself/ourselves.

 

I/we would point out that I/we have no knowledge of any such debt being owed to (insert company name).

 

I am/we are familiar with the Office of Fair Trading Debt Collection Guidance which states that it unfair to send demands for payment to an individual when it is uncertain that they are the debtor in question.

 

I/we would also point out that the OFT say under the Guidance that it is unfair to pursue third parties for payment when they are not liable. In not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt you are using deceptive/and or unfair methods.

 

Furthermore ignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment amounts to physical/psychological harassment.

 

I/we would ask that no further contact be made concerning the above account unless you can provide evidence as to my/our liability for the debt in question.

 

I/we await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed. Otherwise I will have no option but to make a complaint to the trading standards department and consider informing the OFT of your actions.

 

I/we look forward to your reply.

 

Yours faithfully

 

 

 

(Your Name) Print do not sign

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

They must be sending out random letters as I have already read (in the past couple of hours) 4 threads about capquest and littlewoods accounts.

 

My mum received the same letter today 29/03/08 from capquest stating that she owed 100.00 to littlewoods, The letter is dated 27/3/08 and they are saying that they will pass this on to their solicitors to commence legal action, and she must contact them by the 26/3/08.

 

She has never had a Littlewoods account, but after she phoned them (she told me this when I arrived at her home this morning), she was told that it was a debt from 1990, but she didn't even live at this address then.

 

Wikkitt

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

My wife had a letter yesterday sounds like its the same one you have. They are passing on to solicitors on 1/4/08 blah blah blah.I have sent the letter off posted above regarding legal side and will wait to see what occurs. Oh the sum supposedly owed £71.61p from 1993.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Crapquest must have gone through an awful lot of paper and ink on the 27th. That is the date on my letter as well. I bet their solicitor isn't looikng forward to the mountain of work that (may) be coming his way.

Is anyone keeping count of the number of letters concerning Littlewoods accounts. :D :D

HALIFAX: 13/01/07 Sent S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) letter (marked as rec'd 16/01)

Paid in full in March 07

Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly let me thank all of you for your input , it has been a great help.

Neither myself or my wife have ever had an account with Littlewoods so we have no idea what this is about and because of our rural location our doors are never locked so we were concerned about comming home to an empty house.

Link to post
Share on other sites

because of our rural location our doors are never locked so we were concerned about comming home to an empty house.

 

In this day and age I wouldn't recommend anyone leaving their doors unlocked, rural or not. To me, not locking doors is a bad habit to get into. If my house is going to get burgled then they'll have to do it the hard way and hopefully leave clues that will get them caught.

 

Now back on topic. If they do send the baliffs (it won't come to that) they are entitled to gain peaceful entry through an open window or unlocked door.

HALIFAX: 13/01/07 Sent S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) letter (marked as rec'd 16/01)

Paid in full in March 07

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they do send the baliffs (it won't come to that) they are entitled to gain peaceful entry through an open window or unlocked door.

Please note the OP's location. We do not have bailiffs in Scotland nor do we have exactly the same laws regarding entry. As previously stated you can not just send the sheriff officers round.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Let me first of all thank all who replied.

The above letter was sent Monday recorded delivery and a reply received today Thursday and reads as follows:-

Dear mrs.W

I write in responce to your recent letter the contents of which have been noted.

Unfortunately i am unable to comment on the dispute you have raised as this was prior to our involvement and at the time the account was passed to us we were unaware of any existing query. Therefore we are closing the account on our system.

Thank you for taking the time in trying to resolve this matter.

yourse sincerely

Ms J Simms

Quality and Assurance officer

 

Hopefully this is the end of the matter.

Thank you all.

Ken

Link to post
Share on other sites

Typical of Capquest to respond with a standard letter Ken but it's nice to see they have taken their ball home :D

 

They still haven't responded directly to your "Prove It" letter but that's Capquest for you :rolleyes:

 

Don't be surprised if you receive another letter from them in the future. Just make sure you hang on to Ms Simms' letter - just in case ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi

My wife received the same standard letter today. I like the way they ""thank you for trying to resolve this matter". Scuse me what about bailiffs, court enforcement, warrant of execution, impounded goods, etc etc etc.What about all the older frail people who receive this sort of bullying letter? How many people just pay up out of fear and probably dont owe a penny. Sounds like a nice little earner. I honestly thought it was a [problem] at first because of the huge amount of threat involved, so the first thing I did was a check on the company on the web. I did report them to consumer direct and had it logged as a possible criminal offence. If everybody does the same maybe they will pay them a visit. I am going to forward a copy of letter sent to us and explain my disgust in the way this company think they can treat people. :mad: :mad: :mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi

cheers for that. I already have the link for alternative numbers just venting my spleen. On the day we received initial letter my wife visited her mother and her sister and husband were there.He said his mother had received a phone call from cq saying she had 7 hours to pay her phone bill or she would be cut off.She pays by direct debit? What are they up to ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...