Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Items for sale include five rare Ferraris and a pair of Air Jordan sneakers signed by Michael Jordan.View the full article
    • TECHZONE BUXTON LTD overview - Find and update company information - GOV.UK FIND-AND-UPDATE.COMPANY-INFORMATION.SERVICE.GOV.UK TECHZONE BUXTON LTD - Free company information from Companies House including registered office address, filing history, accounts, annual... thread title updated. dx
    • next time dont upload 19 single page pdfs use the sites listed on upload to merge them into one multipage pdf.. we aint got all day to download load single page files 2024-01-15 DBCLegal SAR.pdf
    • If you have not kept the original PCN you can always send an SAR to Excel and they have to send you all the info they have on you within a month. failure to do so can lead to you being able to sue them for their failure.......................................nice irony.
    • Thank you and well done  for posting up all those notices it must have have taken you ages.. The entrance sign is very helpful since the headline states                    FREE PARKING FOR CUSTOMERS ONLY in capitals with not time limit mentioned. Underneath and not in capitals they then give the actual times of parking which would not be possible to read when driving into the car park unless you actually stopped and read them. Very unlikely especially arriving at 5.30 pm with possibly other cars behind. On top of that the Notice goes on to say that the terms and conditions are inside the car park so the entrance sign cannot offer a contract it is merely an offer to treat. Inside the car park the signs are mostly too high up and the font size too small to be able to read much of their signs. DCBL have not shown a single sign that can be read on their SAR. Although as they show photographs which were taken the year after your alleged breach we do not know what the signs were when you were there. For instance the new signs showed the charge was then £100 whereas your PCN was for £85. Who knows, when you were there perhaps the time was for 3 hours. They were asked to produce  planning permission which would have been necessary for the ANPR cameras alone and didn't do so. Nor did they provide a copy of the contract-DCBL  "deeming them disproportionate or not relevant to the substantive issues in the dispute" How arrogant and untruthful is that? The contract and planning permission could be vital to having the claim thrown out. I can find no trace of planning permission for the signs nor the cameras on Tonbridge Council planning portal. and the contract of course is highly relevant since some contracts advise the parking rouges that they cannot take motorists to Court. I understand that Europarks are now running that car park which means that nexus didn't  last long before being thrown out.....................................
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

ccj threat


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5914 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hiya this is a rather complicated thread but i will try to make it sound comprehensible we as a company had insurance last year for our taxis had a lot of agro actually getting paperwork for insurance and numerous other problems involving changing amounts and we then noticed they had illegally signed a dd mandate in my sig but in my bus partners name so we cancelled the insurance due to lack of service and the fact that they are willing to forge a sig we had a lot of toing and froing with letters then they stopped mid last year when my partners bank refunded the dd payments due to false sig today we have rec,d a cc from northampton county court in my partners name but they are hinging there case on a cca and dd form with my sigs on them which incidentely are totally different from his can any one help with this regards jogra4

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Jogra,

 

I'm sure others will be able to advise you better than I can on your best course of defence, but it may help if you can post details of how they have worded their claim (obvioulsy removing any personal details).

 

Also, you mentioned you'd had a lot of writted comminication with the company concerned, do you still have copies of all the letters both sent and received, and do you have proof of posting, or proof of delivery, or correspondance from the company acknowledging receipt of any of the letters which you think might be important as part of your defence?

 

As I said before, I'm sure others will be able to provide better advise than me (and I'm sure you'll have some more replies pretty soon), but it will definately be easier to advise with a little more info.

 

Good Luck

Martin

Link to post
Share on other sites

yeah we kept a comprehensive file of all letters sent and recieved and all proofs of posting they are trying to claim the whole years premuim nearly 3 grand for 3 months worth of cover which incidentaly we believe we wernt actually covered apart from a couple of cover notes

Link to post
Share on other sites

firstly my partners bank did an immediate snatch back of the funds dd'd to this company then when they were furnished with this they went very very quiet until today i believe they are hoping that we have thrown away the paperwork and also they are only pursuing my partner and not me so i think when and if it comes to court they are going to look extremely stupid

Link to post
Share on other sites

apart from contacting the bank do you think we should deny the claim on court papers and use the evidence or let them take it all the way and then hit em with the evidence making them look like the incompitents that they are

Link to post
Share on other sites

As babybear said, I would definately contact the bank to find out what action they have taken if any other than the clawing back of the dd payments.

 

With regard to the court claim, I would say you should provide a detailed defence to the court at this stage, as this gives the insurance company the option of backing off now and avoiding the court case, it is also likely to be looked upon much more favourably by the judge if you have submitted a proper defence at this stage, rather than just introducing everything when you get to court.

 

You may also wish to request that proceedings be moved to your local county court in order to avoid having to travel too far.

 

I assume you did not need to make any claims on this insurance during the period where they may 'allegedly' have actually been providing cover?

 

Also, if you were forced to arrange alternative cover and/or did not actually rely on the cover this company provided given that they had not supplied you with any certificate of insurance, it would probably be worth including evedence of this in you defence too.

 

Again, I'm no lawyer, and I'm sure others here will either back me up or point out if I'm wrong, but this would seem the best common sense approach to me at this stage.

 

Hope this helps...

Link to post
Share on other sites

no there were no claims against this alleged policy we were just getting really skittish over the brokers refusal to issue us our policy in our business we need to be 100% legal what with carrying fare paying passengers so we told em to put up or shut up they didnt so we cancelled our insurance and went with another co thank god we did becuase the week after one of our drivers had a serious accident causing thousands in damage not his fault and no one hurt but if i wasnt insured i could have been looking at prison if i wernt insured

Link to post
Share on other sites

Glad to hear no-one was hurt and fully sympathise with your integrity towards your customers and drivers. IMO this should be a complete embarassment for the company trying to bring, again IMO, a frivilous and vexacious claim in light of serious fraud committed by said company. However, you need your bank's help to prove this was fraud.

 

In addition, as riverstyx says, you have to defend the claim in order to avoid a judgement in default.

Link to post
Share on other sites

oh yeah we are gonna defend against it anyway but i been chatting to my partner and he said we should just get a brief on the firm and sue em seriously between the broker and the finance co they have cocked up on so many issues we was gonna let it go cos we would rather develop our business than play tit for tat with these people but now we are gonna go for the jugular with a vengeance

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...