Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I disagree with the charge and also the statements sent. Firstly I have not received any correspondence from DVLA especially a statutory notice dated 2/5/2024 or a notice 16/5/2024 voiding my licence if I had I would have responded within this timeframe. The only letter received was the single justice procedure notice dated the 29.5.2024 this was received on 4.6.2024. I also disagree with the statement that tax was dishonoured through invalid indemnity claim. I disagree that the licence be voided I purchased the vehicle in Jan 2024 from RDA car sales Pontefract with agreement to collect the car on the 28.1.2024. The garage taxed the vehicle on the 25.1.24 for eleven payments on direct debit  using my debit card on my behalf. £62.18 was the initial payment on 8.2.24  and £31 per month thereafter the second payment was 1.3.24.This would run from Jan 24 to Dec 24 and a total of £372.75, therefore the car was clearly taxed before  I took the car away After checking one of my vehicle apps  I could see the vehicle was showing as untaxed it later transpired that DVLA had cancelled my tax , without reason and I did not receive any correspondence from DVLA to state why it was cancelled or when. The original payment of £62.18 had gone through and verified by my bank Lloyds so this payment was not declined. I then set up the direct debit again straight away at my local post office branch on 15.2.2024 the first payment was £31 on 1.3.2024 and subsequent payments up to Feb 2025 with a total of £372.75 which was the same total as the original DD that was set up in Jan, Therefore I claimed the £62.18 back from my bank as an indemnity claim as this payment was from the original cancelled tax from DVLA and had been cancelled . I have checked my bank account at Lloyds and every payment since Jan 24  up to date has been taken with none rejected as follows: 8.2.24 - £62.15 1.3.24 - £31.09 2.4.24 - £31.06 1.5.24 - £31.06 3.6.23-£31.06 I have paper copies of the original DD set up conformation plus a breakdown of payments per month , and a paper copy of the second DD setup with breakdown of payments plus a receipt from the post office.I can also provide bank statements showing each payment to DVLA I also ask that my licence be reinstated due to the above  
    • You know hes had it when they call out those willing to say anything even claiming tories have reduced taxes on live tv AS Salmonella says: The Conservative Party must embrace Nigel Farage to “unite the right”, Suella Braverman has urged, following a disastrous few days for Rishi Sunak. The former home secretary told The Times there was “not much difference” between the new Reform UK leader’s policies and those of the Tories, as senior Conservatives start debating the future of the party. hers.   AND Goves replacement gets caught booking in an airbnb to claim he lives locally .. as of yesterday you can rent it yourself in late July - as he'll either be gone or claiming taxpayer funded expenses for a house Alongside pictures of himself entering a house, Mr McGuinness said Surrey Heath residents “rightly expect their MP to be a part of their community”. - So whens farage getting around to renting (and subletting) a clacton beach hut?   Gove’s replacement caught out on constituency house claim as home found on Airbnb WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Social media users quickly pointed out house Ed McGuinness had posted photos in was available to rent     As Douglas Ross says he'll stand down in scotland - if he wins a Westminster seat - such devotion.
    • I've completed a draft copy to defend and will post up here for review.  Looking over the dates and payments this all stemmed from DVLA cancelling in Feb , whereby I set up a new DD in Feb hence the overlap, why they cancelled when I paid originally in Jan I have no idea. Anyway now stuck with pending court action and a suspended licence . I am also firing off a letter to DVLa recorded disputing the licence revoke
    • Thank you both for your expert knowledge and understanding. You're fighting the good fight by standing up for people like me and others with limited knowledge of this stuff. I thank you. I know all my DVLA details are good. I recently (last year) renewed my license, and my car's V5 is current with the correct details; the same is valid for my partner. I'll continue to ignore the love letters 😂 and won't let it bother either me or my partner.  I'll revisit this post if/when I get a letter of claim.  F**k ém.
    • Please check back later on today for a fuller response and some edits
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

What court do i use if i want to take a holiday firm to court for misrepresentation?


tezzah
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5906 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

It relates to Thomsons, we booked our holiday with them and the villa we booked isn't the one we thought we booked. We checked over and over again on their website and the links we used all work and show the villa we thought we booked. They have sent me a single page document showing the villa we are getting claiming it's the one we booked. The link they sent isn't the link we booked our holiday through. I've downloaded, saved and printed pages to show them they are wrong however they will not budge and told us the to take it through a third party if we wanted as they were not going to change their minds. I've asked 3 other people to visit the site and they all agree that the villa Thomsons are trying to fob us off with is not mentioned anywhere on the links we used.

 

Thomsons have two versions of their site, however the two sites are different. We booked via one site and they are ignoring this.

 

We are not sure whether to go on holiday (in May) or cancel and sue them for misrep etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Old_andrew2018

Might be usful to complain to ABTA Home

You could also report this to your local T S

 

Sorry I must be honest Thomson are the last travel agent I would ever use, I used them in Jan 2007 what a mistake I made

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm so intrigued by this. What subterfuge on the part on Thomson!

Can you post the links so we can have a look too?

Loubychew

 

I am not a travel lawyer. All info is based on my own experience of working in the travel industry in resort.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest 10110001
What court do i use if i want to take a holiday firm to court for misrepresentation?

 

The answer: The small claims track.

 

ABTA have no legal authority to order Thomson to pay you & probably wont want to get involved in individual disputes. Their job is getting you home if your holiday company goes bust - hence ABTA Bonded - a fund setup to pay for your repatriation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Old_andrew2018
The answer: The small claims track.

 

ABTA have no legal authority to order Thomson to pay you & probably wont want to get involved in individual disputes. Their job is getting you home if your holiday company goes bust - hence ABTA Bonded - a fund setup to pay for your repatriation.

 

I had always believe ABTA would get involved, but there we go,

are you an employee of a travel company if so can you point the way for

tezzah to complain to another organisation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest 10110001
Hi

again look at the ABTA code of conduct via this link http://www.abta.com/download/codeofconduct.pdf

 

Its a voluntary code

 

I had always believe ABTA would get involved, but there we go,

are you an employee of a travel company

 

I work in travel but not a holiday co.

 

if so can you point the way for

tezzah to complain to another organisation.

 

A quasi-regulator has no authority to force a holiday company to give restitution, send a LBA and use a legal channel. You will otherwise end up with lengthy and protracted correspondence. Knock it on the head.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks 1011001, that was my thought, i'll go through the courts however i'm not sure which court to go though. We want the court to order Thomsons to perform the contract, we are not after money, we just want the holiday we paid for.

 

Would the small claims court be the one to go through?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest 10110001

The court is the small claims track, you can file your claim online https://www.moneyclaim.gov.uk/csmco2/index.jsp I think you need someone to do your litigation so I would suggest a visit to a CAB. But for now:

 

Write to Thomson under recorded delivery and tell them very clearly and precisely:

 

1. What they have done wrong - enclose printouts of websites showing their mistake.

 

Then

 

2. What you want them to do about it. Either a) put things right, or b) refund you according to a deadline.

 

and conclude your letter with

 

3. For the avoidance of doubt I will automatically file at court a claim for £XXXX with an application for costs if you do not provide me with the confirmed holiday as described or, refund me the sum paid being £XXXX no later than DATE.

 

Yours Sincerly

 

 

And if you get no joy with Thomson, stick it in the small claims track, a trial date is set and thus, sets a roadmap to a conclusion, good or bad.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks all.

 

I'm going to ask them where they got thier 'web page' print out from and then use that as further evidence of my claim.

 

I'll write to them once more and give them the chance to resolve it. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right, today i gave them one more chance and threatened legal action if they fail to properly investigate my claim. I am stunned that they simply quote the website they use and treat that site as being the correct one regardless of the fact that the site i actually used for the booking is clearly different. Ho hum, let's see how this goes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Old_andrew2018

Hi

I was not too surprised by their actions, may be they

don't think you are ready to escalate your claim.

Do you have a letter before action to send, this might shock them into looking closly at your complaint.

 

Regards

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've included a notice that i will take legal action if they fail to investigate this matter. It really looks like they want this to either go away by continually stating that their website is correct (bearing in mind they are using/referring to a different one to the one we used) or they think we'll cancel which we won't. If this isn't sorted prior to the start of this holiday we will go however we will advise them that going on the holiday is not to be deemed as affirming the contract but that we are not in a position to change the holiday after booking it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Update:

 

I tried speaking to the person who has been writing to me. She left the company. I spoke to another person who basically told me to go away, tough, you'll have to go through a third party such as ABTA if you want to take this further. I've taken legal action via the small claims court, they have 5 days left to respond. They wasn't prepared to even consider what i was saying, never again will i use them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Update: Today i received a call from Thomson's solicitors. They have advised their client that they were wrong and we were right. They cannot give us the villa we wanted as they are booked out fully however they have compensated me (basically half the cost of the holiday) and my legal fees. This could have been avoided had they just listened. :D

 

I feel we could have argued and got the whole cost of the holiday refunded however we are not greedy nor were we in it for the money. I guess the money we get back can count towards our holiday and we still get the holiday we booked in the same resort etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...