Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yeah I figured, unlikely I'll need credit anyway mortgage all paid off etc so I'll take that on the chin and learn from the experience. Probably would've beaten that too had I remembered the protocol, first time ever going through the process though sob it wasn't familiar to me  Oh well  
    • This is my slightly amended WS taking on board your previous comments, any suggestions for amendments would be most appreciated.  Thank you for you time.   1.        I am the Defendant in this matter. 2.        The facts in this statement come from my personal knowledge. 3.        I became aware of original Judgement following a routine credit check on or around 14th September 2020. 4.        The alleged Letter of Claim dated 7 January 2020 was served to a previous address which I moved out of in 2018, no effort was made to ascertain my correct address. 5.        The Judgement debt was not familiar to me so I began investigations to ascertain what the debt related to and how such a figure had been equated in any event. 6.        I made immediate contact with the Court, the Claimant Solicitors and the Claimants thereafter, asking them to provide me with a copy of the original loan agreement but this was not provided to me.  7.        I sent a Data Subject access Request to Barclays but no agreement was provided – See appendix 1 which details the timeline of communication between myself and Barclaycard as well as copies of correspondence between us. 8.        I do not admit to entering an agreement with Barclaycard in 2000. 9.       The claimant has failed to comply with the additional directions ordered by District Judge Davis and therefore this claim should be automatically struck out.  10.    The claimants have failed to disclose a true executed copy of the original agreement they refer to within the particulars of this claim. They are not entitled to enforce the agreement pursuant to section 78.6 (a) of the Credit Consumer Act 1974 12.   The reconstituted standard Barclaycard agreement that the claimant has included in the court bundle does not satisfy any CCA request and so the claimant is and remains in default of my CCA request and therefore unable to enforce the alleged agreement. 13.  The claimants have failed to provide proof the assignment, such as a deed of assignment. 14.  The claimant has failed to provide a statement of account setting out how the alleged debt accrued under that agreement 15.   Despite numerous requests to the claimant, I have still not seen any evidence, such as an original agreement or deed of assignment, that substantiates the claimant’s assertion that I owe the debt to the claimant, nor evidence of how the debt was accrued. 16.   As per CPR 1.4(2)(a) the court encourages parties to cooperate with each other in the conduct of proceedings in order to try and save time and costs for the parties and to also save the time and resources of the court however, despite vast attempts at mediation the claimants have been most unreasonable and have remained unwilling to mediate. I believe that the facts stated in this Witness Statement are true.  I understand that proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes, or causes to be made, a false statement in a document verified by a statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth.
    • A set aside application costs £275 which is more than the judgement so not worth it. Not that they would grant a set aside anyway.  Set asides are granted, for example, to people who moved and didn't get the court papers, so have a genuine reason for not defending.  Forgetting doesn't count. Your only choices are to pay up within 30 days, or defy the court and not pay.  If the latter, we've never seen a PPC enforce judgement for a single ticket, ever, you would get away without paying - but you would have a CCJ and a knackered credit file for six years.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

First post and need help - please!


nettii
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5741 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

This is my first post on the forum, so hi to everyone.

 

I've had a look through lots of posts about debt and debt management companies.

 

My husband and myself have several debts which we have been dealing with by a debt management plan set up by a local debt management charity. The charity is being closed down (lottery funding has not been renewed) so we have contacted the cccs and are arranging an appointment with them which will be in 3-4 weeks time.

 

3 credit card companies (HSBC (£800), Barclays (£490) and Sainsburys (£1980) have accepted a reduced payment and stopped interest.

 

We also have two loans with Alliance & Leicester (£8000 and £4000) and a credit card with Intelligent Finance (£6400). They have not accepted the reduced payments and said they are referring them to Debt Management companies (a&l - Global Debt Managent, IF- Blair, Oliver, Scott). I have today received my first correspondence with Global who have said they will take us to court, send an agent round etc etc. From what I've read on this site that's just normal scare tactics.

 

I think my next step should be to send out a request for CCA.

 

I also think I need to tell them that I can't come to any agreement on payment until the cccs have completed a debt management plan. Should I wait until I receive the CCA before getting into this type of correspondence?

 

I want to make sure I do this correctly. My mind is in a total muddle at the moment and I'm at serious risk of getting this completely wrong.

 

Many many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi if you send CCA request put heading this account in dispute, this should give you time for CCCS to sort out income expenditure etc. Don't expect the letters and calls to stop straight away you will have to wait while CCCS negotiate with your creditors. If you have charges on the Credit cards or loans then as and when you can afford it send each company an S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) if you have more than one account with a company then ask for info on all account they hold with you the fee is £10 for each company not each account.

 

If you are not sure of letter have a look at the following link to letters.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/consumer-forums-website-questions/53182-cant-find-what-youre.html

 

post up when need further info there a loads of people how will help you we all started at the same point as you

 

all the best dpick:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks dpick.

 

Sorry but I've another question. Maybe I'm thinking a little too hard about this and getting myself in a confused mess (not unusual there)!

 

These debts are current debts, not old ones. Isn't it likely that if I ask for the CCA now they are probably going to be able to produce it straight away? There won't be much of a paper trail for it to get lost in.

 

Am I better to just tell them I'm contacting the cccs and will come back to them with an offer of repayment. Then I can save asking for the CCA at some point in the future when I'm desperate for some time ie if they are appying to courts?

 

I'm so worried that I'm going to do something wrong

Link to post
Share on other sites

Netti....you are quite within your rights to request a CCA, bear in mind they have to produce it within the prescribed time, also it HAS to contain the prescribed terms and has to be properly executed. By sending the CCA request you have put the debt into dispute which means they are not legally able to enforce the debt (let alone your argument for claiming back excessive charges on the accounts too).....send off for the CCA's and see what comes back...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have the IF and A&L sent you a 'Notice of assignment'?? if the debts have been sold.

If you offer reduced payments after talking to the CCCS,then there would seem to be little point in asking for the CCA(although you would still be entitled to),as you have basically said,yes they have the Agreements,which is why I am paying.

A CCA indicates that the solicitors/DCA's have the RIGHT to collect from you,and that IMO would be the first step.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have the IF and A&L sent you a 'Notice of assignment'?? if the debts have been sold.

If you offer reduced payments after talking to the CCCS,then there would seem to be little point in asking for the CCA(although you would still be entitled to),as you have basically said,yes they have the Agreements,which is why I am paying.

A CCA indicates that the solicitors/DCA's have the RIGHT to collect from you,and that IMO would be the first step.

 

No you ask for a s77-79 CCA request so you can see that solicitors/DCA or the original creditor is legally entitled to collect the debt. As in my case I had been paying two credit cards and two catalogue debts for over two years, that the OC either had no agreement for or the agreements provided from CCA request were irredeemably unenforceable as S127(3) of the CCA 1974

They have all disappeared apart from one that has been issued with a court order to produce a properly executed credit agreement and all documents pertaining to the inception of the agreement for inspection by the court.

 

Even if the agreements are recent CAG has shown that many are still unenforceable.

 

all the best dpick:-)

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

Hi all

 

This is only my second post on here. Much has happened since my first post. My husband and I separated (too much stress was tearing us apart, although we're still on friendly terms - we have two small children) and we split our debts so I took everything with my name on it (about 40% of the debts) and am also paying our mortgage. He took the rest of the debts (60%).

 

I'm managing to continue paying my debts but my husband is in a comlete mess. Soon after we separated he was attacked in the street by a gang of drunken thugs - he suffered a fractured skull, broken jaw, broken ribs - all fixable but it's left him mentally in a complete state. He's self employed so didn't get paid anything for two months and now he's struggling to work at all because he's sunk in to a deep depression and is receiving psychaitic care. The constant harrassment from debtors has made it so much worse.

 

I've taken all his paperwork off him and am trying to sort out what's what. It seems some debts have had three DCA's dealing and it's difficult to know who to correspond with. Is my best course of action to request CCA's from all the original creditors along with asking for confirmation of which DCA I have authority to deal with? Also should I write to all the DCA's telling them that's what I've done and asking them to hold action, also telling them that there should be no more telephone calls.

 

Any advise would be much appreciated.

 

Netti

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest forgottenone
Is my best course of action to request CCA's from all the original creditors along with asking for confirmation of which DCA I have authority to deal with?

 

You mean you haven't done so, already? Just read back through this thread and seems that was the advice given a while ago. It's good advice you were given BTW.

 

You CCA whichever DCA has the accounts now, not original creditor. No, there is no need to write to any of the creditors explaining what you have done. They won't take notice, and it's not necessary anyway. As the others explained at the time of your original post ... requesting your CCA - at any time, new or old accounts - is to ensure the DCA's can legally chase you for this debt. If, then, they cannot ... it's your discretion whether to continue paying or not.

 

I would CCA them now. Send the request to each DCA in question, by recorded delivery, enclosing a £1 postal order - do not send them cheques, as they will have your signature on it but also your bank account details; yes, they have been known to use those to set up direct debits so it's not just scaremongering; thing you must realize is that this industry makes it's wealth on unscrupulous approaches to debtors - and then wait until they supply you with a document.

 

Come back to CAG, post what they have sent you to see if it's enforcebale eg contains the properly prescribed terms and conditions. Then take things from there.

 

The constant harrassment from debtors has made it so much worse.

 

Okay. If these are phone calls. I am afraid the only way to stop them ... and you well within your rights to do this, protect yourself from assault by phoneline which is what it is eg harassment ... is to get BT's Choose to Refuse on your line. To block all calls from them made to you.

 

You can go down the route of sending the telephone harassment letter here on CAG just so you can produce it if needed as proof you instructed them to contact you only in writing and they failed to comply. It will not stop the calls, however. It never does. Hence my CTR suggestion.

 

I think, unless someone advises you otherwise here or offers other alternatives, is you need to request your CCA ASAP. It will also give you some breathing space until they supply it because the account enters a dispute period. During which they are not supposed to - but some will anyway - make demands of payment, contact you until they have provided it.

 

I wouldn't waste your time writing to the DCA's apart from requesting your CCA. They simply will not be interested at all. That is how they operate. They want money from you, nothing else. If you read around CAG you will see the many horrorific posts about what these **** get up to you.

 

Just request the CCA's. You need do nothing else. Others will help with any other matters you raise. The CCA template letter is on CAG.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest forgottenone

Here's the telephone harassment letter. This is very important, NEVER sign any letters to a creditor or DCA ... print or type it:

 

Your Street

Town

City

Postcode

DATE HERE

Company Name

Road

Town

City / County

Postcode

 

 

Dear Sirs

 

 

Harassment by telephone

 

Account Number: XXXXXXX

I am writing in relation to the quantity and frequency of telephone calls that I have received from your company, which I deem to be personally harassing.

 

 

I have verbally requested that these stop, but I am still receiving calls. (Delete if necessary)

I now require all further correspondence from your company to be made in writing only.

 

 

I am of the view that your continued harassment of me by telephone puts you in breach of Section 40 of the Administration of Justice Act 1970, and the Protection from Harassment Act 1997.

 

 

If you continue to harass me by telephone, you will also be in breach of the Communications Act (2003) s.127 and I will report you to OFCOM, Trading Standards and The Office of Fair Trading, meaning that you will be liable to a substantial fine.

 

 

Be advised that any further telephone calls from your company will be recorded. (**Even if you don‘t yet have recording equipment!!**)

 

Yours faithfully,

 

 

[NAME HERE]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest forgottenone

Here's the CCA request letter ...

 

1 High Street,

Newtown,

Kent

R21 4RH

 

June 28, 2006

 

The Loan Company

Company House,

Church Street,

Newtown,

Kent,

R1 7HG

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Re:− Account/Reference Number 4563210025897412

 

With reference to the above agreement, we would be grateful if you would send us a copy of this credit agreement.

 

We understand that under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (Sections 77−79), we are entitled to receive a copy of our credit agreement on request. We enclose a payment of £1.00 which represents the fee payable under the Consumer Credit Act.

 

We understand a copy of our credit agreement should be supplied within 12 working days.

 

We understand that under the Consumer Credit Act creditors are unable to enforce an agreement if they fail to comply with a request for a copy of the agreement under these sections of the Act.

 

We look forward to hearing from you.

 

Yours faithfully

Mr A N Other

Link to post
Share on other sites

Netti.... you CCA whoever is chasing you for payment because until they can produce the original CCA, the accounts are unenforceable. Send all requests by rec. delivery.....

 

Just out of interest, Global Debt Management are the in-house DCAs for A&L. I've dealt with this bunch myself... :rolleyes:... and they cannot take you to court themselves; only A&L can. Nevertheless, if they are currently pursuing you (or hubby) for payment, the CCA needs to go to them.

 

I'm so sorry to read about your husband.... and I only hope that if money trouble is the only reason that's driven you apart... that you may be able to resolve matters between the pair of you and be happy again someday soon.:)

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks forgottenone and priorityone.

 

I know it looks like i've ignored the original advise but it was a little complicated because of my husband and I separating. I sent a CCA request for the loan with Alliance & Leicester but soon after my husband and I separated so I have no evidence that he ever received a reply (he has huge gaps in his paperwork). It's possible that Global sent the CCA to him but as it's now been passed over to another DMC (Rockwell Direct)I'll request it from them - and request CCA from all other debts as well.

 

Thanks again. I'll post back when I here something.

 

Netti

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...