Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello I hope someone can give me some advice here, as I am at a bit of a loss on how to proceed. This relates to alleged offences under the RTA. Yesterday I received a notification from the local police of intention to prosecute for the following offences: 1 driving without due care and attention 2 failing to stop at a road traffic accident 3 failing to report a road traffic accident At this stage they have only asked me to say whether I was the driver at the time or not and provided a blank sheet of paper to give information about the incident. Going by the location (just round the corner from where I live) I can only imagine this relating to one recent incident, which wasn't actually an accident but more of a road rage event. I was driving past someone unloading or working next to his lorry which had stopped in the road. I wasn't going fast or anything, while I went by lorry man turned around and punched and kicked my car whilst going past him. I stopped and got out and wanted to know what he thought he was doing punching and kicking my car. He then hurled some verbal abuse at me, swearing and he was quite aggressive. I still didn't know what his problem was and said I would report him to his company for threatening behaviour and vandalism for punching my car. I got my phone and tried to take a photo of his lorry and number plate but at that moment he came right at me, still shouting and swearing, so I was worried he may hit me next, as he already punched my car. I thought if the guy hits me I will come off second best, so I decided to retreat. I quickly got back into my car and left. When I checked my phone later the photo I tried to take was blurred and useless, so I thought it was pointless to report the incident to the police, as the guy would not be traceable. Over that I forgot about it until I got the letter yesterday in the post. This is the only thing I believe this can relate to, but I have no idea based on what the three above allegations come from There was no road traffic accident, more of a road rage incident. So I am at a loss what to do. I have 28 days to respond. Should I just say yes I was the driver and was there and see what happens next, or should I already make a written statement on the attached piece of paper they sent me and send that with it ? Is there anyone here who would have a rough idea what to do next ? I tried my legal advice line through my Union, but they have sent me from pillar to post, now say it needs to go to a different department again and that would be chargeable as the RTA comes under Criminal Law. So any advice would be appreciated Many Thanks
    • So a quick update got bounced around two different departments and managed to speak to a DVLA bod , explained the situation and they could see the overlap and that DD payments had been made from Feb , also no formal remiders prior , they gave me a number for the legal dept who I am calling this morning to see what they can do in terms of the SJP notice , still have time to submit this online.  Will update after my chat this morning 
    • filed the defence at same time as suggested @dx100uk
    • Also, I am trying to understand how invoicing a large sum in a 6m period becomes tax fraud?   Is it because if he had invoiced over the £85k threshold he should have been obligated to charge vat?  Which would have meant hmrc would have benefited from the vat amount? So by not charging it Hmrc have lost out on £s revenue?  Is that what makes it tax fraud? So as a self-employed contractor, let's say he invoiced one Co for 200k.  Should he have charged vat on the full 200k (£40k)? Or just on the sum above the threshold (£23k)?  And that by not charging vat, he has knowingly withheld tax £s from Hmrc? And is the payer complicit ?
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Redundancy after 20 years


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5973 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I need some advice as I am being made redundant after 20 years and have been offered the bog standard government payment and 3 months notice - nothing else - I have 2 more meetings - I obviously want more money any help appreciated -can provide more info if needed

Link to post
Share on other sites

i might be in your position soon

royal mail wants another 40000 staff to lose theire job

you have my concearns

out of intrest may i ask what is the goverment payment for every year worked

this is for my own benefit

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am in the same position as well (Oh the irony of it all...!).

 

Unfortunately, there is no obligation on any organisation to pay more than the statutory redundancy amount (£330 for every completed year's service for ages 22-40) plus your notice permitted by your T&Cs unless there is a specific clause in your contract. There is an incremental muliplier of 1.5 weeks for completed years after the age of 41. You may be able to negotiate a loyalty bonus I suppose, but I would imagine that Government schemes are required to be pretty transparent.

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sure the union will be aware of the facts, have you tryed discussing your concerns with your local rep, The union will be discussing terms and money with the company, in such cases the unions normally fight for what the employees are entitled, there wont sell you low/out, have a chat to them, you will/should get all the answers you need...

 

Postggi........ Royal mail cutting 40,000 postions ?? where you heard that, my brother has worked for RM for going on 16 years and my neighbour has just been employed by RM as a postman....Both know nothing about the possible 40,000 job losses you mentioned....

!2 years Tesco distribution supervisor

7 years Sainsburys Transport Manager

 

4 Years housing officer ( Lettings )

Partner... 23 Years social services depts

 

All advice is given through own opition, also by seeking/searching info on behalf of poster, and own personnel dealings.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can calculate your redundancy payment here:

 

Ready Reckoner for calculating the number of weeks' pay due - BERR

 

Scroll down the page and put the details in the boxes - it will then tell you what you will receive.

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the rules about enhanced redundancy after 41 are now questionable as it has good grounds for age discrimination. my gf who is 24 is shortly being made redundant from nhs and will get 4wks salary for every year plus 3months leiu pay.

when i got made redundant from same place 4 yrs ago at age of 24 i got 1.5wks but anyone over 41 got 4wks so it looks as if nhs has taken age discrimination to mean that everyone is entitled to same benefits as those over 41.... which is very good for us as gf gets a lot more redundancy now:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

The rules regarding redundancy after 41 are there due to the fact that a lot of companies would only make younger people redundant if they didn't pay into a pension pot. I was made redundant at 46 from the NHS after 10 years service and no pension....

 

Also younger people are supposed to be more able to get employment than older ones - which is a load of tosh - I am now in a far better job than most people expected me to do and I am now 50.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

my gf who is 24 is shortly being made redundant from nhs and will get 4wks salary for every year plus 3months leiu pay.

when i got made redundant from same place 4 yrs ago at age of 24 i got 1.5wks but anyone over 41 got 4wks so it looks as if nhs has taken age discrimination to mean that everyone is entitled to same benefits as those over 41.... which is very good for us as gf gets a lot more redundancy now:-)

 

With every respect to your girlfriend, it is no wonder people accuse the government of wasting the huge extra sums of money being put into the NHS by the taxpayer. A civil servant gets 4 weeks money per year served yet your average public sector worker gets 1 week capped at only £330. I am due just over £6000 for over 19 years work or take an alternative position for £10,000 a year less :mad: How on earth does your GF qualify for 12 weeks pay in lieu of notice when she hasn't worked there for 12 years??!!

 

Our local NHS Chief Exec did a crap job, was forced to leave and got a backhander of £1/4 million. Scandalous.

 

Not having a go at you personally - just getting one or two frustrations off my chest! It's been a bad few days....

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have my sympathy Sidewinder, in the past when we have, regrettably, made redundancies due to lack of work caused by price pressure from the Far East, we have only made statutory redundancy payments as the business could not support anything more. It makes me so sad when people with good service walk away with a ridiculously small sum, yet public companies pay enhanced redundancy without batting an eyelid. It should be same rule for all.

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You're welcome Bevo - Sorry if the thread wandered a little! All the best with your negotiations.

 

You have my sympathy Sidewinder, in the past when we have, regrettably, made redundancies due to lack of work caused by price pressure from the Far East, we have only made statutory redundancy payments as the business could not support anything more. It makes me so sad when people with good service walk away with a ridiculously small sum, yet public companies pay enhanced redundancy without batting an eyelid. It should be same rule for all.

 

Thanks Ell-enn. That's exactly the point I was making. Redundancies are usually neccessary in order to preserve the business in some shape or form so there is rarely the money to go around to support good and loyal employees who are forced to leave. It is a little galling when those organisations financed by the public purse are able to make far more generous arrangements on a blanket basis. I don't for one minute begrudge the fact that somebody gets a hefty payout where this reflects the effect that the redundancy may have on that person's employment prospects. In the case above, (hopefully) it will be easier for mcfadwmc's girlfiend at 24 to secure employment even if this means starting a new career. For those of 40+ (:eek: ) as in my case, or worse still approaching 60 as with some of my staff, the effect is greater and it has to be tackled with only a limited payout to tide them over.

 

My company is restructuring under new ownership and relocating 75 miles away. I may yet be lucky, and be offered a viable alternative position, but it is unlikely to be one which uses fully the experience which I have built over the years. I will probably have a decision to make, yet for others the decision is already made - travelling is not an option so all we can do is to offer advice and support.

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...