Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Please see my comments on your post in red
    • Thanks for your reply, I have another 3 weeks before the notice ends. I'm also concerned because the property has detoriated since I've been here due to mould, damp and rusting (which I've never seen in a property before) rusty hinges and other damage to the front door caused by damp and mould, I'm concerned they could try and charge me for damages? As long as you've documented and reported this previously you'll have a right to challenge any costs. There was no inventory when I moved in, I also didn't have to pay a deposit. Do an inventory when you move out as proof of the property's condition as you leave it. I've also been told that if I leave before a possession order is given I would be deemed intentionally homeless, is this true? If you leave, yes. However, Your local council has a legal obligation to ensure you won't be left homeless as soon as you get the notice. As stated before, you don't have to leave when the notice expires if you haven't got somewhere else to go. Just keep paying your rent as normal. Your tenancy doesn't legally end until a possession warrant is executed against you or you leave and hand the keys back. My daughter doesn't live with me, I'd likely have medical priority as I have health issues and I'm on pip etc. Contact the council and make them aware then.      
    • extension? you mean enforcement. after 6yrs its very rare for a judge to allow enforcement. it wont have been sold on, just passed around the various differing trading names the claimant uses.    
    • You believe you have cast iron evidence. However, all they’d have to do to oppose a request for summary judgment is to say “we will be putting forward our own evidence and the evidence from both parties needs to be heard and assessed by a judge” : the bar for summary judgment is set quite high! You believe they don't have evidence but that on its own doesn't mean they wouldn't try! so, its a high risk strategy that leaves you on the hook for their costs if it doesn't work. Let the usual process play out.
    • Ok, I don't necessarily want to re-open my old thread but I've seen a number of such threads with regards to CCJ's and want to ask a fairly general consensus on the subject. My original CCJ is 7 years old now and has had 2/3 owners for the debt over the years since with varying level of contact.  Up to last summer they had attempted a charging order on a shared mortgage I'm named on which I defended that action and tried to negotiate with them to the point they withdrew the charging order application pending negotiations which we never came to an agreement over.  However, after a number of communication I heard nothing back since last Autumn barring an annual generic statement early this year despite multiple messages to them since at the time.  at a loss as to why the sudden loss of response from them. Then something came through from this site at random yesterday whilst out that I can't find now with regards to CCJ's to read over again.  Now here is the thing, I get how CCJ's don't expire as such, but I've been reading through threads and Google since this morning and a little confused.  CCJ's don't expire but can be effectively statute barred after 6 years (when in my case was just before I last heard of the creditor) if they are neither enforced in that time or they apply to the court within the 6 years of issue to extend the CCJ and that after 6 years they can't really without great difficulty or explanation apply for a CCJ extension after of the original CCJ?.  Is this actually correct as I've read various sources on Google and threads that suggest there is something to this?.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Link financial-help please.


sheba29
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5967 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, I'm new to this, so before I begin, hello!

 

I'm having some trouble with a company called Link Financial.I had a credit card with MBNA that I stupidly failed to keep up the repayments with. I have missed quite a few payments, as I just couldn't keep up with the repayments. I'm not sure how much I owe as I haven't had a statement for a while, but i'm sure it's over a thousand. Link financial have now taken the debt on, and as their systems were down today, I am going to speak to them tomorrow to try and arrange a payment plan(if possible)It sounds like this company are going to be really tough to deal with and i'm worrying myself sick. What i'm worried about is if they demand the money back straightaway and won't accept my offer of paying back £40 per month.Can they do this??

I would really appreciate any advice any of you have. Thanks in advance!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome to the site.

I am going to move your thread to the debt forums,where you will get answers to your questions.There is a process which you need to go down.

First of all have you got ANY statements ? were you levied with charges by MBNA in the past ?

Try not to deal on the telephone, keep everything in writing.

You need to send a S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) for copies of statements if you dont have them.You can continue with payments that you agree with but wait for further advice here before you commit yourself. Debt collection agencies are regulated and restricted to what they can do.I am not advocating evasure of debts that are legitimately due...simply suggesting that you are able to determine how much debt you are responsible for in this matter.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

First of all welcome to the site, you've come to the right place for help and don't worry we're all here to help you.

 

Secondly, never talk to these people, they will bully and intimidate you into paying more than you can afford and then never leave you alone. You have to find out if they have the legal right to collect this debt so you need to write and ask them for a copy of the properly executed credit agreement. I'll try and find a link to a sample letter for you. Send the letter by recorded delivery. By doing this you officially put the debt into dispute and Link cannot pursue payment. They have 12 working days to respond and after a further month they have technically committed an offence under the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

Even if they come up with the right documents, and you must check this out on the site, they cannot force you into paying more than you can afford, they have no legal powers whatsoever. You'll soon learn to treat these organisations with the contempt they deserve.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I have tried speaking to Link today, and I know I have been advised not to speak to them on the phone, but I thought I would at least try to speak to them first. I spoke to a really rude woman who said that under no circumstance will they accept monthly installments.I advised her that there is no way I can give them £1,100 now and that is the only way I can afford to repay this. If they won't accept my offer of installments, and I can't give them the money now, what other option do I have??

I'm so upset, and I just don't see a way out of this.I need to request my credit agreement by writing, does anyone have a template for this??

 

Please help me x

Link to post
Share on other sites

the trouble with talking to them on the telephone is; they can provoke you, abuse you, insult you and make you extremely angry - then deny it all.

 

If you are prepared to enter into dialogue with them, it must be in a manner that makes them accountable and can be presented before a court should it come to that position.

 

I would suggest either going down the route of sending them a CCA, placing the account in default and making them aware that you know what you're doing (it does make a difference)

 

If they have no paperwork, game over, they cant enforce anything

 

If they come up with something, then fine, submit income and expenditure forms and make an offer to repay by amounts you can reasonably afford. all in writing. if they then take you to court, you can say that you tried to resolve things correctly. without the written communications, you cant prove a thing, and they will deny that you ever called. Should it ever go that far, a judge will always favour the person who at least made a genuine attempt to resolve their debt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do not acknowledge ANY debt to your company. I require you to supply the following documentation before I will correspond further on this matter.

 

1. You must supply me with a true copy of the alleged agreement you refer to. This is my right under your obligation to supply a copy of the agreement under the legislation contained within s.78 (1) Consumer Credit Act 1974 (s.77 (1) for fixed sum credit) - your obligation also extends to providing a statement of account. I enclose a £1 postal order in payment of the statutory fee, PO Serial Number xxxxx.

 

2. A signed true copy of the deed of assignment of the above referenced agreement that you allege exists.

 

3. You are notified that you are obliged to supply these documents, whether you are the original creditor or not under S189 of the CCA 1974.

 

Non-compliance with my request is a criminal offence under the above Act and will result in a report being submitted to the relevant statutory authorities.

 

As you are aware, a credit agreement that is not properly documented and signed by the customer is totally unenforceable under the CCA and therefore is a complete defence to any court claim that is issued.

 

Take note at this stage, that any legal action you may contemplate will be both vigorously defended and contested.

 

 

DO NOT SIGN 'PRINT'

Send at least recorded delivery and use postal order not cheque

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...