Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Speaking of the reformatory boys, here they are with all of their supporters, some of whom traveled with them from miles away, all carefully crammed together and photographed to look like there were more than about 80 .. rather like Farages last rally with even fewer people crammed around what looked like an ice cream van or mobile tea bar ... Although a number in the crowd apparently thought they were at a vintage car rally as they appeared to be chanting 'crank-her'. A vintage Bentley must be out of view.   Is this all there is? Its less than the Tory candidate. - shut up and smile while they get a camera angle that looks better
    • in order for us to help you we require the following information:- Which Court have you received the claim from ? Canterbury If possible please scan redact and upload a full page copy of page 1 of the claim form. ( Name of the Claimant ? Moneybarn No 1   How many defendant's  joint or self ? One Date of issue – top right hand corner of the claim form – this in order to establish the time line you need to adhere to. 29/05/24 Acknowledged by 14/06/24  Defence by 29/06/24  Particulars of Claim PARTICULARS OF CLAIM   1.  By a Conditional Sale Agreement in writing made on 25th August 2022. Between the Claimant and Defendant, the Claimant let to the Defendant on Conditional Sale. A Ford Ranger 3.2 TDCi (200 P S) 4x4 Wildtrack  Double Cab Pickup 3200cc (Sep.2015) Registration No, ******* Chassis number ***************** (“The Vehicle”).  A copy of the agreement is attached   2.  The price of the goods was £15,995.00.  The Initial Rental was £8500.00.  The total charge for credit was £3575.;17 And the balance of £11,070.17 was payable by 59 equal consecutive monthly instalments of £187 63. payable on the 25th of each month.   3.  The following were expressed conditions of the set agreement,   Clause 8: Our Right to End this Agreement  8.1   Subject to sending you the notice as required by law, any of the following events will entitle us to end this Agreement: 8.1.2  You fail to pay the advance payment (if any) or any of the payments as specified on the front page of this agreement or any other sum payable under this Agreement. 8.1.3 If any of the information you have given us before entering into this Agreement or during the term of this Agreement was false 8.1.4 We consider, acting reasonably, that the goods may be in jeopardy or that our rights in the goods may otherwise be prejudiced. 8.1.5 If you die 8.1.6 If a bankruptcy petition is presented against you; if you petition for your own bankruptcy, or make a live arrangement with your creditors or call a meeting of them. 8. 1.7 If in Scotland, you become insolvent or sequestration or a receiver, judicial factor or trustee to be appointed over any of your estate, or effects or suffer an arrestment, charge attachment or other diligence to be issued or levied on any of your estate or effects or suffer any exercise, or threatened exercise of landlords hype hypothec 8.1.8 If you are a partnership, you are dissolved 8.1.9 If the goods are destroyed, lost, stolen and/or treated by the insurer as a total loss in response to an insurance claim. 8.1.10 If we reasonably believe any payment made to us in respect of this Agreement is a proceed of crime. 8.1.11 If steps are taken by us to terminate any other agreement which you have entered into with us.   Clause 9.  Effect of Us Terminating Agreement   9.1 If this Agreement terminates under clause 8 the following will apply 9.1.1 Subject to the rights given to you by law, you will no longer be entitled to possession of the goods and must return them to us to an address as we may reasonably specify, (removing or commencing the removal of any cherished plates) together with a V5 registration certificate, both sets of keys and a service record book. If you are unable or unwilling to return the goods to us then we shall collect the goods and we'll charge you in accordance with clause 10.3 9.1.2 We will be entitled to immediate payment from you for all payments and all other sums do under this agreement at the date of termination 9.1.3 We will sell the goods or public sale at the earliest opportunity once the goods are in a reasonable condition which includes a return of the items listed in clause 7.1.4 9.1.4 We will be entitled to immediate payment from you of the rest of the Total Amount Payable under this agreement less: ( a) A rebate for early settlement ias required by law which will be calculated and notified to you at the time of payment (b) The proceeds of sale of the goods (if any) after deduction of all costs associated with finding you and/or the goods, recovery, refurbishment and repair. Insurance, storage, sale, agents fees, cherished plate removal, replacement keys, costs associated with obtaining service history for the goods and in relation to obtaining a duplicate V5 registration certificate   4, The following are particulars required by Civil Procedure Rules. Rule 7.9 as set out in 7.1 and 7.2 of the associated Practice Direction entitled Hire Purchase Claims:-   a)     The agreement is dated 25 August 2022. And is between Moneybarn No1 Limited  and xxxxxxxxx under agreement number 756050. b)    The claimant was one of the original parties to the agreement. c)    The agreement is regulated under the Consumer Credit Act 1974. d)    The goods claimed Ford Ranger 3.2 TDCi ( 200 PS) 4x4 Wildtrack Double Cab Pickup 3200 cc (Sep2015} Registration No ^^^^^^^ Chassis number ***************** e)     Thw total price of the goods £19570 f)     The paid up sum £1206 5 g)    The unpaid balance of the total price £7505 (to include charges) h)    A default notice was sent to the defendant on 20th February 2024 by Firrst class post i)      The date when the right to demand delivery of the goods accrued 14 March 2024 j)      The amount if any claimed as an alternative to delivery of the goods 7505 22 include charges ]= 5.  A the date of service of the notice the instalments were £562.89 in arrears. 6. By reason of the Termination of the Agreement by the notice, defendant became liable to pay the sum of £7502 7. The date of maturity the agreement is 24th August 2027. 8. Further or  alternative by reasons of  the Defendant breaches of the agreement by failing to pay the said instalments, the Defendant evinced an intention no longer to be bound by the Agreement and repudiated it by the said Notice the claimant accepted that repudiation 9. By reason of such repudiation the claimant has suffered loss and damage.   Total amount payable £19570 Less sum paid or in arrears by the date of repudiation £12064 97 Balance £7505 (to include charges.) ( The claimant will give credit if necessary for the value of the vehicle if recovered.)  The claimant therefore claims 1.    An order for delivery up of the vehicle 2.    The MoneyClaim to be adjourned generally with liberty to restore,  Upon restoration of the MoneyClaim following return or loss of the vehicle. the Claimant will ensure the pre action protocol for debt claims is followed. 3.    Pursuant to s 90 (1)  of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. An order that the Claimant and/or its agents may enter any premises in which the vehicle is situated in order to recover the vehicle should it not be returned by the Defendant 4.    further or alternatively damages 5.    costs.   Statement of truth The Claimant believes that the facts stated in these Particulars of Claim are true. The Claimant understands that the proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes or causes to be made a false statement in the document for verified by statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth. I am duly Authorised by the Claimant to sign these Particulars of Claim signed Dated 17th of April 2024   What is the total value of the claim? 7502   Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? No   Never heard of this   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? n/a Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? No   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After  Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? In a garage  Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Yes  Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Original Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? n/a   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? They said sent but nor received   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? None seen   Why did you cease payments? Still Paying,   What was the date of your last payment? Yesterday  31st May 2024   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? Yes on 12 Feb 2024   What you need to do now.   Can't scan, will do via another means as you cant have jpg
    • Now that is an interesting article which adds afew perspective that I hadn't thought significant - but on reflection of the perspectives offered ... Now Starmer is no Blair, however 'blairite he may be perceived, but the Tories aren't tories and aren't even remotely liberal   The fast 'unannounced and unexpected election call from sunack may well be explained by the opinion linked that he hoped reform would be unprepared and effectively call a chunk of Farages largely empty bluster - making him look even more of a prat, leave scope for attacks on shabby reform candidates and mimimise core vote losses to reform - while throwing the 'middle ground' (relative) tories TO THE DOGS - and with the added bonus of likely pacifying his missu' desire to jogg off to sunny cal tout suite somewhat   thumb in the air - I expect about 140ish tory seats, but can hope for under a hundred Reform - got to admit the outside possibility of 1, maybe 2 seats with about 8% of the vote - but unlikely. I think projections of over 10% of the vote for reform is nudged and paid for speculation - but possible with the expected massive drives from Russian, Chinese and far right social media bot and troll prods targeting the gullible.
    • Commentary June 2024 WWW.ELECTORALCALCULUS.CO.UK Interesting article about just how bad it could be for the Tories.  Also Tories could be hoping on Reform not having candidates in many seats, as they were not ready.  
    • Even a Piers Morgan is an improvement and a gutless Farage Piers Morgan calls for second Brexit referendum WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM Piers Morgan and Nigel Farage have faced off over Brexit and a second referendum in a heated reunion on BBC Question Time.   “Why don’t we have another referendum about Brexit?” he questioned. “I seem to remember when 2016 came around we were told there was going to be control of our borders and it was going to be economically beneficial to this country. And eight years later we have lost complete control of our borders… and economically it seems to have been a wilful act of self-harm.”   ... Piers missed off : after all somebody said a 48/52 decision would be "unfinished business" by a long way - was that person just bul lying (again)  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Natwest Keep racking up the interest - PART II


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5124 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 237
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Steven

 

A belated thanks:p

 

Been going over and over the paperwortk on this........

 

Still have a nagging concern w.r.t. the final q from Shoos when they last wrote

"Please particularise the details of your account closure in xx xxxx, including details of when the accounbt was closed, evidence that our client (bank) was informed of the closure"

 

 

  1. What is the significance of this question???
  2. If the bank had sent a correctly detailed Default Notice, then surely this would have served as the notice of termination ????
  3. Is this an attempt by the solicitors to trip me up and have me say "oh but your client terminated this agreement, and did so in the Default Notice received by me on....." ???????

 

They have been unable to produce a default notice thus far, and i'm getting excited.

 

As always, Thanks, Vex

If my advice or input has helped, by all means tip my scales

Link to post
Share on other sites

They seem to be implying that you closed the account. I would write back and say that the account was close by their client in around whatever but you don't know exactly because you weren't sent a default notice.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Vex,

 

Just re-read your thread, and don't know whether or not I have missed something. Have you had a court date yet????????

If any of my posts are helpful, please feel free to click my scales. All information is given as my opinion only, based on my own personal experiences. I have no legal training, but have educated myself in aspects of consumer legislation. My motto "NEVER GIVE IN, NEVER SURRENDER", THERE IS A WAR ON YOU KNOW

Link to post
Share on other sites

They seem to be implying that you closed the account. I would write back and say that the account was close by their client in around whatever but you don't know exactly because you weren't sent a default notice.

 

 

i'll pop that into the CPR 31.14 request that i am ashamed to admit has (is) taken me a week to draft!!

If my advice or input has helped, by all means tip my scales

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Vex,

 

Just re-read your thread, and don't know whether or not I have missed something. Have you had a court date yet????????

 

 

Hello HHNF.

 

You haven't missed anything. I do not have a court date yet, although of course we are technically 'in court'. No hearing date, no date indicating when i will be required to turn up in person.

 

I mean if we all keep waiting i might as well not bother to contend it, as equity in house is fast dissapearing, and bankrupcy appears to offer a path of lesser resistance:p.

 

Vex

If my advice or input has helped, by all means tip my scales

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Court Correspondence - "Notice of Allocation to the Multi-track"

 

Hi All

 

I have received letter from the court, and would appreciate some plain english guidance as to what i am required to do - Please:)

 

here is copy of letter, word for word

 

District Judge XXXXXXX has considered the statements of case and AQ's filed and allocated the claim to the multi-track.

 

1. Each party by xx xx 09 to give standard disclosure to every party by list. Any requests for inspection or copies of disclosed documents shall be made within 7 days after service of the list.

 

2. Each party by xx xx 09 by simultaneous exchange serve on every other party the witness statements of the evidence on which that party intends to rely in relation to any issues of fact to be decided at the trial, and any notices of intention to rely on hearsay evidence.

 

3. No expert evidence being necessary, no party has permission to call or rely on expert evidence.

 

4. Pre-trial checklists to be sent to the parties by xx xx 09 and the completed Pre-Trial checklists shall be filed by xx xx 09. The claimant must file with the checklists;-

 

a) Copies of all statements of case (including schedules), witness statements and experts reports, which have not already been filed

b) a case summary not exceeding 500 words and draft listing directions which must include or attach a proposed trial timetable, allowing for all stages of trial including the judges reading time, and consideration and delivery of judgement. These document must be agreed with the other party if possible. If not the claimant must explain.

 

5. The trial shall take place between xx xx 09 and xx xx 09. Time allowed - 1 day.

 

6. If the claim or part of the claim is settled the parties must inform the court

 

7. IMPORTANT NOTICE. The parties attention is drawn to their duty under CPR1.3 to help the court further the overriding objective which includes ensuring that the case is dealt with expeditiously.

 

The parties may agree to vary the timetable, but NOT so as to alter the date for return of Pre-Trial checklists, a pre trial review, a case management conference or the trial date or trial window.

 

Any failure to attend of to file the pre-trials checklist, is likely to result without further warning in a sanction which may under CPR3.4 , include striking out of the defaulting party's case

 

So... I am looking for some guidance, as i am now VERY much in uncharted territory :confused:

 

Thanks, Vex

If my advice or input has helped, by all means tip my scales

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Vex - translation (in red)

Court Correspondence - "Notice of Allocation to the Multi-track"

 

Hi All

 

I have received letter from the court, and would appreciate some plain english guidance as to what i am required to do - Please:)

 

here is copy of letter, word for word

 

District Judge XXXXXXX has considered the statements of case and AQ's filed and allocated the claim to the multi-track. straightforward - the case is alloceted to multi-track

 

1. Each party by xx xx 09 to give standard disclosure to every party by list. Any requests for inspection or copies of disclosed documents shall be made within 7 days after service of the list. You have to send the othe side a list of all the documents you intend to use in the case byteh date shown and they have to do the ame to you. You have 7 days after that to ask to go and see any of the documents on their list.

 

2. Each party by xx xx 09 by simultaneous exchange serve on every other party the witness statements of the evidence on which that party intends to rely in relation to any issues of fact to be decided at the trial, and any notices of intention to rely on hearsay evidence. You have to submit a statemnt of evidence - basically an outline of the argument you intend to use with the bits of relevant statutes pointed out and any relevant case law - they have to do the same.

 

3. No expert evidence being necessary, no party has permission to call or rely on expert evidence. You can't call any expert witnesses

 

4. Pre-trial checklists to be sent to the parties by xx xx 09 and the completed Pre-Trial checklists shall be filed by xx xx 09. The claimant must file with the checklists;-

 

a) Copies of all statements of case (including schedules), witness statements and experts reports, which have not already been filed

b) a case summary not exceeding 500 words and draft listing directions which must include or attach a proposed trial timetable, allowing for all stages of trial including the judges reading time, and consideration and delivery of judgement. These document must be agreed with the other party if possible. If not the claimant must explain.You have to complete a pre-trial checklist - see CPR rule 29.6 - PART 29 - THE MULTI-TRACK and you must include this information as well

5. The trial shall take place between xx xx 09 and xx xx 09. Time allowed - 1 day. Trial dates

 

6. If the claim or part of the claim is settled the parties must inform the court Fairly obvious

 

7. IMPORTANT NOTICE. The parties attention is drawn to their duty under CPR1.3 to help the court further the overriding objective which includes ensuring that the case is dealt with expeditiously. This is a warning particularly to the bank not to mess about and try to delay or obfuscate

The parties may agree to vary the timetable, but NOT so as to alter the date for return of Pre-Trial checklists, a pre trial review, a case management conference or the trial date or trial window. Fairly obvious

 

Any failure to attend of to file the pre-trials checklist, is likely to result without further warning in a sanction which may under CPR3.4 , include striking out of the defaulting party's case Obey the instructions or have your case dimissed

 

So... I am looking for some guidance, as i am now VERY much in uncharted territory :confused:

 

Thanks, Vex

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Steven. Thanks for that.

 

Just looking for some additional answers (i have two questions). The correspondence has come in one big chunk in past few days. :eek:

 

So. In respect of the court letter. I WILL NOT seek any additional details for that letter yet, save the one that i have to respond to first.

 

First query:

 

So... in respect of standard disclosure - 1/ What should i expect from the solicitors - and what am i likely to get (will there be a difference?) To date they have not admitted to having a default or termination notice in their posession. If this is not furnished on me at this point, can it come into the proceedings later? 2/ What exaclty am i supposed to serve upon the solicitors???:idea:

 

Second query:

 

I received a response to my CPR 31.14 request:

 

Agreement - Still insisting that they have supplied me with this, although it is not signed, and they are still asserting it does not need to be - Section 180 of CCA '74 and Cancellation notices & regs 1983 section 2(3) (a) & (b)

 

Default Notice and Termination Notice - 1 year has passed since I requested these (ok it was via a Subject Access Request) and almost 10 months since I asked for these specifically. We have been in court since June last year, and they still have not got these. Here is the applicable part of their response to the 31.14 request:

 

"We have requested from our client copies of the DN & TN relating to your account (actually there are TWO accounts!! - Loan & o/d :rolleyes:) and will supply these to you as soon as we have received them. It is highly unlikely that our client will be able to supply this documentation within seven days and we will provide copies of the requested documents as soon as they become available to us"

 

Is this an acceptable answer to a 31.14 request ???? This is a long long time now, and I would have thought that this would have flushed them out. Where can I take that,. Is there any room for strike out application from me?

 

Appreciate any input here in advance

 

Regards, Vex

If my advice or input has helped, by all means tip my scales

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know this impolitely impatient, but i'm not likely to be online for a day or two from tonight, and didn't want to leave this too long so.....

 

BUMP (again - sorry);)

If my advice or input has helped, by all means tip my scales

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Vex

 

Looks like it has gone quiet.

 

My opinion is that you can only work with what they have given you. You should prepare/outline a secondary stance in case they actually turn up the required documents but they are running out of time.

 

As with my case, you can only keep asking for the correct documents, correctly completed, until they can no longer submit them.

 

As for what you should serve on the solicitors, I can only see that you need to serve your witness statement plus the statement of any others you may call (their posty perhaps!) plus copies of letters sent. These letters should be numbered and refered to in your witness statement. Perhaps you could call every person who has sent you a letter as a witness to ask how that particular request was handled and what they did to fulfil it.

 

You must be careful in your statement though as if they have no documents they may be hoping you admit to taking out the loan/account or refer to a contractual relationship in some way. You only need to dis-prove their claim.

 

AT

Link to post
Share on other sites

Steven. Thanks for that.

 

Just looking for some additional answers (i have two questions). The correspondence has come in one big chunk in past few days. :eek:

 

So. In respect of the court letter. I WILL NOT seek any additional details for that letter yet, save the one that i have to respond to first.

 

First query:

 

So... in respect of standard disclosure - 1/ What should i expect from the solicitors - and what am i likely to get (will there be a difference?) To date they have not admitted to having a default or termination notice in their posession. If this is not furnished on me at this point, can it come into the proceedings later? 2/ What exaclty am i supposed to serve upon the solicitors???:idea:

 

Second query:

 

I received a response to my CPR 31.14 request:

 

Agreement - Still insisting that they have supplied me with this, although it is not signed, and they are still asserting it does not need to be - Section 180 of CCA '74 and Cancellation notices & regs 1983 section 2(3) (a) & (b)

 

Default Notice and Termination Notice - 1 year has passed since I requested these (ok it was via a Subject Access Request) and almost 10 months since I asked for these specifically. We have been in court since June last year, and they still have not got these. Here is the applicable part of their response to the 31.14 request:

 

"We have requested from our client copies of the DN & TN relating to your account (actually there are TWO accounts!! - Loan & o/d :rolleyes:) and will supply these to you as soon as we have received them. It is highly unlikely that our client will be able to supply this documentation within seven days and we will provide copies of the requested documents as soon as they become available to us"

 

Is this an acceptable answer to a 31.14 request ???? This is a long long time now, and I would have thought that this would have flushed them out. Where can I take that,. Is there any room for strike out application from me?

 

Appreciate any input here in advance

 

Regards, Vex

 

BUMP

Edited by vexlitigant
Larger font on the BUMP

If my advice or input has helped, by all means tip my scales

Link to post
Share on other sites

Second query:

 

I received a response to my CPR 31.14 request:

 

Agreement - Still insisting that they have supplied me with this, although it is not signed, and they are still asserting it does not need to be - Section 180 of CCA '74 and Cancellation notices & regs 1983 section 2(3) (a) & (b)

 

They are hiding behind the 1983 regs. I would write back and make them aware that your request for a copy of the original agreement is made pursuant to CPR 31.14 not section 77 Consumer Credit Act 1974 which does allow them to omitt ones signature.

 

PW

An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. <br />

Winston Churchill

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

First query:

 

So... in respect of standard disclosure - 1/ What should i expect from the solicitors - and what am i likely to get (will there be a difference?) To date they have not admitted to having a default or termination notice in their posession. If this is not furnished on me at this point, can it come into the proceedings later? 2/ What exaclty am i supposed to serve upon the solicitors???:idea:

 

Second query:

 

I received a response to my CPR 31.14 request:

 

Agreement - Still insisting that they have supplied me with this, although it is not signed, and they are still asserting it does not need to be - Section 180 of CCA '74 and Cancellation notices & regs 1983 section 2(3) (a) & (b)

 

Default Notice and Termination Notice - 1 year has passed since I requested these (ok it was via a Subject Access Request) and almost 10 months since I asked for these specifically. We have been in court since June last year, and they still have not got these. Here is the applicable part of their response to the 31.14 request:

 

"We have requested from our client copies of the DN & TN relating to your account (actually there are TWO accounts!! - Loan & o/d :rolleyes:) and will supply these to you as soon as we have received them. It is highly unlikely that our client will be able to supply this documentation within seven days and we will provide copies of the requested documents as soon as they become available to us"

 

Is this an acceptable answer to a 31.14 request ???? This is a long long time now, and I would have thought that this would have flushed them out. Where can I take that,. Is there any room for strike out application from me?

 

Appreciate any input here in advance

 

Regards, Vex

 

Right then

 

Q1

 

Standard disclosure is dealt with by effectivly a list of the documents they hold in their possession and will rely upon at trial. they will not send you the actual documents at this stage just a list of names of the docs they have.

 

you then have to ask them if you wish to inspect a copy of any of the documents they have listed

 

they may send you a list they may not, if they do not by the deadline then you should raise the matter with the court

 

You should also serve upon the other side as directed by the court, a list of documents upon which you are relying upon.

 

heres the standard form you use The requested resource (/HMCSCourtFinder/tiles/Her Majesty's Courts Service -Forms and Guidance) is not available

 

it is a N265

 

Q2

with regards to the second point, a reply to CPR 31.14 should provide you with documents which they have pleaded in their statement of case. it is not unusual for a solicitor to have to wait on their clients to supply this information.

 

however the purpose of CPR 31.14 is normally to allow you to access documents which you have identified as being central to your defence and without them you will be unable to plead.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Second query:

 

I received a response to my CPR 31.14 request:

 

Agreement - Still insisting that they have supplied me with this, although it is not signed, and they are still asserting it does not need to be - Section 180 of CCA '74 and Cancellation notices & regs 1983 section 2(3) (a) & (b)

 

They are hiding behind the 1983 regs. I would write back and make them aware that your request for a copy of the original agreement is made pursuant to CPR 31.14 not section 77 Consumer Credit Act 1974 which does allow them to omitt ones signature.

 

PW

 

Thanks for that Paul.

 

BTW. You still got your thing going on?

If my advice or input has helped, by all means tip my scales

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that Paul.

 

BTW. You still got your thing going on?

 

Yes, we recently exposed RBSs accounting practices in the Sunday Times.

 

Keep up the fight.

 

PW

An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. <br />

Winston Churchill

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right then

 

 

 

it is not unusual for a solicitor to have to wait on their clients to supply this information.

 

 

8 months !!!!!:confused: - to get hold of documents, and then a complete fudge about what they have sent me.

If my advice or input has helped, by all means tip my scales

Link to post
Share on other sites

Still unclear about what I (me)am supposed to offer the other party by way of standard disclosure

 

ALSO. What do i have to do with the Listing questionnaire??

 

Thx

If my advice or input has helped, by all means tip my scales

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...