Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Unity Homeloans to Kensington mortgages - Suspended Possession - HELP


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5023 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

A colleague of mine has asked me to ask this question.

 

He has mortgage arrears of £5k (7 months) due to period of unemployment and other family issues. he is now working full time and is earning £500 a week. He has a court date for a possession hearing and wanted to know what he should offer over and above the monthly payment that will stop his house from being reposessed?

 

Hope that makes sense???

In the poop without a scoop....

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 108
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Try and clear the arrears in a reasonable time (usually 2 years is what the judges are looking for).

 

In the case of Cheltenham & Gloucester V Norgan it was decided that a reasonable period of time could be the rest of the mortgage term.

 

Whatever they decide to offer make sure that the payments are realistic and affordable, a second suspended possession order is much more difficult to obtain. Make sure your friend takes in a copy of their budget to show the court.

 

I wish them the best of luck!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Thought I would post this on this here for better advice :)

 

I have a suspended possession order on my house which was issued 4 months ago. I have been paying the normal monthly payments plus and extra £450 to clear the arrears.

 

This month I have paid the mortgage amount and £200 of the £450. I have sent the mortgage company a cheque today for the balance of the £450 (£250) however I am aware that they may not bank this until tue/ wed of next week.

 

My question is, will they class this as payment accepted within the month or will they class it as defaulting on the arrangement and take it to court again?

In the poop without a scoop....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Hedgehog, I don't know if they will class this as payment within this month or not. I would ring them now to say you have sent a cheque so they can note this on your file. Most companies will accept this and not take any further action in regarding repossession. They tend to get a bit cheesed off when you don't pay and don't let them know what's happening. SO RING NOW.:) I'm sure you'll be fine.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My understanding has always been....

 

If you move into a property on a certain date of the month... then the mortgage becomes due on the same date the following month. If you were to pay before this date, there shouldn't be a problem.... but if you were to pay after this date, then you would incur further interest on the account.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a quick question. With mortgage payments, is the payment acceptable regardless of which day of the month it is paid on just so long as it is paid within that particular calendar month in which it is due?

 

 

It does vary from lender to lender, however, always talk to the lender and they will usually not mind if the date is changed on agreement. Don't stop dd's etc and not talk to them. Paymnets made the same month should not effect your credit file, if they do query with them as it is updated monthly...

 

 

Hope that helps,

 

Penfold

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

We have a suspended possession warrant on our house which was granted to the mortgage company 4 months ago. We have paid the payments as ordered with the exception of this month. We are only able to afford the normal mortgage payment and not the extra for the arrears as I am self employed and due to the christmas holiday period have lost out on 2 weeks pay.

 

Question is will the mortgage company accept my normal payment only or will they apply to enforce the warrant?

In the poop without a scoop....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there,

 

You should make the normal payment and contact the mortgage company to advise them of the situation - they should be understanding provided you can come to some arrangement to pay the missing arrears payment.

 

Who is the Mortgage company?

 

Kind Regards

 

Ell-enn

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, you should definitely contact them to advise of the situation. Sub-prime lenders like Kensington are usually fairly quick off the mark with missed payments under suspended possession. If you can make the normal payment as soon as possible it will help your case.

 

Even if they do go for possession, you can apply to the court to further suspend as you can make the agreed payments going forward. If there is only the additional arrears payment for this month missing, you should be able to come to an arrangement with them to clear that at a later date. Any arrangement you make with them you should get the name of the person you speak to and ask for the address to write to them. Then confirm in writing referring to your conversation with Mr/Msxxxx on xxdate and detailing what you have agreed to pay - send by recorded delivery and keep a copy for yourself.

 

Please don't avoid contacting them or making a payment - the sooner you do so the better it will be in the long run.

 

Kind Regards

 

Ell-enn

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

From CAG's mortgage FAQ's

My mortgage provider is seeking repossession what can I do?

 

Seek legal advice! Where your home is at risk this is beyond the scope of a self help forum, although some pointers to be aware of:

 

A mortgage provider can not evict you without a possession order from the court. If you leave without having received a possession order they need not obtain a possession order and can go straight for a sale order.

 

If they apply to court for possession you can rely on s.36 (2)(b) of the Administration of Justice Act 1970 which allows the court to suspend the possession order for such a term as the court considers reasonable. If the debtor can repay with in the reasonable time no possession order is granted.

 

Under s8 AJA 1973 in exercising the powers under s.36(2)(b) the court only has to consider the sums payable in arrears not any term which may render the full amount repayable.

 

What amounts to a reasonable period will depend on the circumstances of the case and can include the whole remaining term of the mortgage as occurred in Cheltenham & Gloucester v Norgan. This case also stated the factors the court will take into account when deciding what is reasonable:

 

Ability to make payments now and in the future

Likely duration of financial difficulty

Reason for arrears

The period of agreement remaining

 

So basically if you can show you can pay off the arrears over the remaining period the court will not order possession.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Some case law for you:

Royal Bank of Scotland –v- Elmes April 1998 Legal Action 11, Clerkenwell County Court

Issue – suspended possession order on payments less than current instalments

A district judge suspended a warrant for possession for three months on terms that the defendant pay £250 one month and thereafter £500 per month for two months, thereafter the case would further considered. The defendant had good prospect of obtaining employment within the period. The lender appealed in the basis the court had no power to suspend on terms of payment less than current instalments.

Assistant Recorder Thomas Q.C dismissed the appeal, and held that s.36 of the Administration of Justice Act 1970 enables the court to impose any terms about payment so long as the borrower would, within a reasonable period, be able to clear the arrears and pay the current instalments.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have sent them the payment with the little extra I can afford and a letter explaining my situation along with my proposals to clear the extra arrears payment. Hopefully this will keep them satisfied.

In the poop without a scoop....

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's great - did you sent it recorded delivery? (just in case they say they haven't got it!)

 

Kind Regards

 

Ell-enn

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's great - did you sent it recorded delivery? (just in case they say they haven't got it!)

 

Kind Regards

 

Ell-enn

 

Oh yes and paid £4.30 to make sure it gets there tomorrow before 1pm.

In the poop without a scoop....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great stuff!!

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been under a suspended possession order since June for my mortgage of £700 plus £450 towards the arrears (Current arrears are £5400) .

 

I could only afford to pay the mortgage payment for december and not the arears payment. The mortgage company has now issues notice to enforce the eviction warrant.:eek:

 

How do I approach the court with regards getting the suspended order reinstated? Is it possible? They have asked that the full arrears of £5400 must be paid to stop the warrant.

 

Just to add that I am married with 5 children ages 15 months to 13 years.

In the poop without a scoop....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly I would recommend going to a CAB or law centre for advice, assistance and possibly representation at Court.

However, if you want to do this one your own when you receive a Warrant make an application to suspend it using an N244 (available on the Court Service website: http://www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk/courtfinder/forms/n244_0400.pdf or from the Court office). Explain why you have not maintained payments under the existing order (£450 per month is incredibly high when your mortgage payment is only £700), give details of your new proposal and support this with a financial statement (the BBA/MAT one is particularly good hopefully this will link you to it: BBA - British Bankers' Association - Error - Page Not Found to show you can afford the payments. Make sure your proposal is realistic and don't be pressured into increasing it by the mortgage company it is better to get a low order and overpay than agree to the absolute maximum you can afford.

Bear in mind that the law (through the case of Norgan v C&G) says you have up to the remaining term of the mortgage to repay your arrears. Say your remaining mortgage term was 10 years (120 months) you would need to pay £45 per month on £5400, over 20 years £22.50 etc. That is the minimum the court are likely to accept so I wouldn't propose that little unless it is really all you can afford.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

What are the chances of the court ruling in the favour of the lender though. It would be devestating for me to have to leave my home and I am really worried about this now.

 

I was pressurised at the initial court hearing into offering the £450 extra and in hindsight I tthink £250 would have been more affordable.

In the poop without a scoop....

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it's a first suspension and you can prove your offer is affordable then your chances are very good. Equity in the property is also a positive as it shows the judge the mortgage lender is not at much risk. The Courts don't want to evict people who can repay their arrears in a reasonable period.

Even £250 a month is a lot - you'd be clearing the arrears in less than 2 years. Bear in mind what might happen if you had an unexpected expense and factor this in when making your calculation, the financial statement is quite detailed and should prompt you to think about expenses that don't happen every month like car tax.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please do not keep starting new threads as people often miss what you have said before.

 

On your other thread you stated that you have now made the December payment late together with a smaller portion of the arrears. First and formost you must do all you can to get the mortgage back on track, your best case is to ensure that your mortgage is at the level you had agreed to. If you are up to date with the previous agreement (£700+£450pm) then the judge will be more sympathetic.

 

Do a car boot sale. Make your own meals (no takeaways) and do packed lunches for the children - the food bill can usually be trimmed.

 

As you are self-employed you will have a good idea which months will produce better income. Use these months to get in front with payments, ie use your worst months as your "normal" budget and extras can then go to the mortgage.

 

Check out your entitlements. There is a free website where you do not have to identify yourself, just input income, and it will assess tax credits, council tax etc for you.

 

entitledto

 

Is the house that important. If you are living beyond your means it may be better to win the fight then sell yourself to buy something a little cheaper. After all, it is you and your family that may struggle far more than it is really worth struggling.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...