Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi If you have went via a Mutual Exchange and this is to do with Social Housing/Housing Association then both parties need to firstly be approved by each parties Housing Association and accepted by them. Once this is done the relevant Housing Association for each will then get each party to sign a New Tenancy Agreement with the relevant Housing Association. So what we really need to know is: Does the other party to this Mutual Exchange know you have changed your mind on exchanging properties? Have they just signed an Agreement in principle to exchange properties? or Have they actually signed a New Tenancy Agreement for that Property? If they have signed a New Tenancy Agreement then this will make not now wanting to continue the mutual exchange difficult due to the New Tenancy Agreement being Signed. We really need to know what stage this is at to give correct advice
    • From unhackable communication networks to powerful computers, quantum technology promises huge advances.View the full article
    • going nowhere then. well if you've not been simply doing it to look the big cheese to your mates, you need to address why you are doing it. if its to impress your mates then simply stop being an idiot eh? , learn from it and go live your life . dx
    • Yes only with dwf. The first letter I received was explaining that I have not responded to the first letter they sent which I did not receive at all  then the second letter came, they said again saying we have not heard from you we are extending this another 14 days but at that point a couple of days before I called them on the phone saying I have received this and supposedly i owe money for stolen goods and that I need to see the breakdown which they then emailed to me dwf said this was what we were trying to send to you at first and I told them we have not received your first letter only one asking for demand of payment. On my second call to them I asked can you list the things that I have supposedly stole to which they replied “we normally have this on file but I can’t seem to find this on your file”   
    • oh well, at least your eign of terror is over now. so no contact directly since from/to sainsbury's. everything since has only been with DWF?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Essex boy v's HSBC


Essex boy
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6003 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi boys and girls.

 

I am wondering whether anyone can tell me whether those claims stayed pending the outcome of OFT legal proceedings can now be re-instigated?

 

I was at the point where a court date had been set (back in September) but received a letter from DG Solicitors on behalf of HSBC. It stated that due to the OFT action, all claims would be stayed awaiting the outcome. Does anyone therefore know if this has been concluded and what the outcome was?

 

Also, the amount I originally claimed will now be greater as the interest will have increased and I have also received more charges (foolish I know). Is it therefore possible for me to claim a revised amount and do I have to start the process again or can I go straight for the jugular and set the court date again?

 

Any advices anyone can give to the above and how I should proceed would be greatly appreciated.

 

Thanks for reading :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi mate I've been outta this game for ages now and have lost trackof it all, last I heard was from Barclays saying they were freezing everything etc.

Reading your post just now, makes me wonder if I have missed a turing point in this issue?

Have I missed something?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Essex boy. The test case is not due to start until the middle of January. Did you receive anything from the court to say that your claim was stayed? Unfortunately DG (on behalf of HSBC) sent these letters out stating that the claims are stayed, but really it is not down to them, it is down to the court that is dealing with your claim.

 

Yes the amount would have increased due to the daily interest being added to your claim every day.

 

If you had a court date set, and you received nothing from the courts to say that the claim was stayed, I would give them a quick ring and ask them what is happening with regard to your claim.

 

As for your extra charges, you can start a new claim for these. Adjusting your original claim will depend on how far down the court process you are at.

  • Haha 1

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]If you think my post was helpful, please feel free to click my scales

 

 

A prudent question is one-half of wisdom.

 

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to add to what Jo said, if you start a new claim for the new charges the court fees will be recoverable with the claim but if you amend your existing claim to include these the fee wont be recoverable because the court will view an amendment as a mistake.

 

best to go with the new claim :)

 

pete

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks all for the info. I did receive a letter from the Court to the effect that all claims were being stayed (in fact I think I received this first) and so I guess I'll have to wait to see the outcome of this. Bit of extra cash before christmas would have been nice though.

 

P.S. what do you think likely outcome of the test case will be and what are the chances that I will just receive a cheque from HSBC following the result?

Link to post
Share on other sites

IMHO....no one knows for sure as to what the outcome will be, but personally I am hoping for a win on the OFT side (thats if they can persuade the banks to realise their over pricing charges and reduce them to a more realistic cost)

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]If you think my post was helpful, please feel free to click my scales

 

 

A prudent question is one-half of wisdom.

 

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...