Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • My ex blamed me for her not paying her bills she says I controlled her money. So I have been told I need to pay them as it was my fault. She has not paid the bills where she lives now which was my house. I'm not allowed contact with her and again she is blaming me. As in this type of case it is victim led so no matter what stupid thing she says she is believed. It is for me to prove otherwise.
    • No SAR yet but they have confirmed via email that they have everything and will supply it by this month end.    When you say the FOS considered it a personal loan due to personal guarantee who is the FOS? Financial Ombudsman?  But then that doesn’t make sense as they haven’t been involved yet.    Santander in their final response to my original complaint did not agree to it. They turned my complaint down and specified that the selling dealership had agreed to treat it as personal for settlement purposes.    I guess they could not agree to it as then they would be guilty of miss selling but they gave me what I wanted by saying I would not get treated as a business customer in regards to finance charges.    Awful bank to deal with. Will never touch them again. 
    • Background I am in dispute with Clerical Medical over, amongst other things, statements that I haven't received. They didn't resolve my complaint in time so invited me to complain to the FOS, which I did The FOS investigator in his findings has written that  Clerical Medical have mow provided all missing statements apart from two. One of these is for the policy year 2021 - 2022, which they say is unavailable due to a system migration. I have twice asked the FOS investigator for a copy of his screen shot to try and resolve this discrepancy but they have ignored me so today I submitted a subject access request. I said I was primarily interested in the screen shot but I also asked for everything they held against the complaint reference number. The response I got from firstly the Data Protection Operations Senior Coordinator, then secondly the investigator was that  The investigator expanded on this and said I'll wait the 40 days and see what they come back with then make a decision on next steps at that point, but I want to make sure I've got my facts in the right order before I start arguing with them. They seem to be saying that my SAR doesn't cover the screen shot because it isn't personal data but I disagree. I have a reference number that identifies my complaint and therefore indirectly identifies me. I think that means everything that is held against that reference number, including the screen shot, is my personal data and is in scope of my SAR (subject to exemptions). Who is right?
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
    • You sure it's a Section 48 notice? Section 48 notice is just telling you who your landlord is. Have they sold and they're just telling you who your new landlord is or is it an actual eviction notice? Might be best scanning it up just in case here.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cook V SPML


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6299 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Everyone,

 

I have a quick question?

 

I used to have a mortgage with Southern Pacific which thankfully we moved from early this year.

 

However, now I am no longer a customer or have an account with Southern Pacific can I still re-claim the charges?

 

and if so, can I re-claim the charges made simply for us moving from them, even though we were out of out initial tie in with them - they still charged us £500 :mad:

 

thanks

Joanne

14/06/06 Data Protection Act Sent to SPML

28/06/06 - Info / statements received from SPML

2/8/06 Pre Lim to SPML for £324.72

16/8/06 LBA to SPML

28/9/06 filed MCOL

defence filing date extended to 22/12/06

28/12/06 copy of defence received from sch

16/01/07 AQ filed with court

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes you can. I am in the process of settling a claim with them under which they will be paying me back all of my uncleared transactions and arrears management charges- some £1,500 in total including interest and costs.

 

I was quite lucky in that I had a complete list of charges but I made a DPA request anyway to obtain a schedule of manual interventions. To be fair they were efficient in responding to my letters requesting charges. However, I would recommend sending the DPA request (plus the £10 cheque) by recorded delivery as they were a bit tricksy in how they responded to mine. I only received it after we has agreed to settle!

 

SPML hit their customers with a baffling array of charges. I only attacked on the narrow front mentioned above and I steered well clear of anything that could be contrued as a service. I am not even sure about the uncleared transaction charges but I think I could have argued successfully on this point.

 

The claim reached the stage of a scheduled hearing. The defence was filed by Glenisters who seem to do a lot of work for SPML. It was detailed and dealt with the work done to manage an account in arrears and how they deal with bounced payments. It was more detailed than other defences I've seen. In my day they charged £65 a month at the end of each month the account was in arrears and the defence justified this on the basis that they had to do work each month. Looking at the DPA-supplied manual interventions, it's clear that this isn't the case although it's worth remembering that a mortgage company is likely to do more work in dealing with an account in arrears than with an overdraft. Nevertheless I did manage this account badly and if their standard of record keeping hasn't improved then I would imagine other customers find a similar pattern.

 

I don't want to say any more about this at the moment as I don't have the cheque yet.

 

One other thing to mention is that SPML charge interest on a monthly basis. When I redeemed, they tried to charge me for the whole month. I complained at the time and they refunded me. To this day I remain amazed that they thought that they could charge interest on a loan after it had been paid back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Everyone,

 

 

and if so, can I re-claim the charges made simply for us moving from them, even though we were out of out initial tie in with them - they still charged us £500 :mad:

 

thanks

Joanne

 

How did they describe the £500?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Well just got out all my paperwork, gosh its confusing! :-|

 

Our mortgage ran from April 02 - Feb 06, and I dont seem to have anything for the first couple of years :???:

 

I too got charged the full months interest even though we completed on 16th of the month, so maybe I can claim this back too?

 

having checked our final balance, it actually looks like they removed the £500. but still the figures dont add up from what their final statement was and what was actually paid to them on completion, only around £50.

 

From what I have, it looks like it will only be for a smallish amount I have £175 in unpaid DD Fees, £50 fees for the plesaure of me having my own insurance and not theirs, and then around £174 of interest they charged my after my completion for the month.

 

I guess I need a full breakdown from them of all the costs they charged during my time with them??

14/06/06 Data Protection Act Sent to SPML

28/06/06 - Info / statements received from SPML

2/8/06 Pre Lim to SPML for £324.72

16/8/06 LBA to SPML

28/9/06 filed MCOL

defence filing date extended to 22/12/06

28/12/06 copy of defence received from sch

16/01/07 AQ filed with court

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Seminole,

 

How did you find out where to send you DPA to?

 

I have tried the search facility on the template thread, using both registered numbers I have for both Southern Pacific and also Capstone Mortgages (this is the co they transfered me to before we completed, although they have the same address ect but different 'registered addresses' and different registered numbers??

14/06/06 Data Protection Act Sent to SPML

28/06/06 - Info / statements received from SPML

2/8/06 Pre Lim to SPML for £324.72

16/8/06 LBA to SPML

28/9/06 filed MCOL

defence filing date extended to 22/12/06

28/12/06 copy of defence received from sch

16/01/07 AQ filed with court

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was pre Capstone so I'm not sure I'm afraid. I would send the DPA to whoever is mentioned as the lender on your mortgage.

 

I think you should be able to claim the extra interest. I did this in 2004 by simply saying that it seemed to be breach of unfair contract terms regulations. They tried to fob me off but I then made an empty threat of legal action and they rolled over.

 

You probably shouldn't try to recover insurance fees as I'm not aware of anyone who has successfully done this with anyone. The unpaid dd fees are worth pursuing but bear in mind that SPML is the recipient and not the payer of the funds. There are slightly different issues here to the charges made by a bank for failing to pay a transaction.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

After submitting my DPA request to SPML I have today received all my statements (well in advance of the 40 days given)

 

I have a couple of questions if anyone can help on whether I can claim these costs??

 

This mortgage originally started out with their own home insurance in place, after a couple of months I realised this rate was extortionate so I changed to my own insurance and they charged me £50 for the pleasure!

 

SPML also charged a fee of £25 per year if you take out your own home insurance as opposed to having their extortionate home insurance

 

My mortgage with SPML was an interest only one, which was paid in full on the 16th Feb 2006, but they charged me for the whole month - even though they were paid in full half way through the month - can I claim this interest back after the 16th Feb?? How can they charge interest on a fully paid up account?

 

They also have charged me £15 on the 2nd and 8th Feb 2006 (just prior to final payment been made) for 'Early Repayment Statement Fees'

 

I guess before I submit my first letter I want to be sure on everything and whether or not all these additional fees are 'claimable' ??

 

thanks

Joanne

14/06/06 Data Protection Act Sent to SPML

28/06/06 - Info / statements received from SPML

2/8/06 Pre Lim to SPML for £324.72

16/8/06 LBA to SPML

28/9/06 filed MCOL

defence filing date extended to 22/12/06

28/12/06 copy of defence received from sch

16/01/07 AQ filed with court

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I see there seems to be a few people now commenced claims against SPML, I still havent started this claim as yet, but now Ive sorted Halifax, going to look into this one, however, for those of you who have started your claim, I hope you dont mind me asking - I have a couple of questions if anyone can help on whether I can claim these costs??

 

This mortgage originally started out with their own home insurance in place, after a couple of months I realised this rate was extortionate so I changed to my own insurance and they charged me £50 for the pleasure!

 

SPML also charged a fee of £25 per year if you take out your own home insurance as opposed to having their extortionate home insurance

 

My mortgage with SPML was an interest only one, which was paid in full on the 16th Feb 2006, but they charged me for the whole month - even though they were paid in full half way through the month - can I claim this interest back after the 16th Feb?? How can they charge interest on a fully paid up account?

 

I guess before I submit my first letter I want to be sure on everything and whether or not all these additional fees are 'claimable' ??

 

thanks

Joanne

14/06/06 Data Protection Act Sent to SPML

28/06/06 - Info / statements received from SPML

2/8/06 Pre Lim to SPML for £324.72

16/8/06 LBA to SPML

28/9/06 filed MCOL

defence filing date extended to 22/12/06

28/12/06 copy of defence received from sch

16/01/07 AQ filed with court

Link to post
Share on other sites

I see there seems to be a few people now commenced claims against SPML, I still havent started this claim as yet, but now Ive sorted Halifax, going to look into this one, however, for those of you who have started your claim, I hope you dont mind me asking - I have a couple of questions if anyone can help on whether I can claim these costs??

 

This mortgage originally started out with their own home insurance in place, after a couple of months I realised this rate was extortionate so I changed to my own insurance and they charged me £50 for the pleasure!

 

SPML also charged a fee of £25 per year if you take out your own home insurance as opposed to having their extortionate home insurance

 

My mortgage with SPML was an interest only one, which was paid in full on the 16th Feb 2006, but they charged me for the whole month - even though they were paid in full half way through the month - can I claim this interest back after the 16th Feb?? How can they charge interest on a fully paid up account?

 

I guess before I submit my first letter I want to be sure on everything and whether or not all these additional fees are 'claimable' ??

 

thanks

Joanne

 

Good news and bad news.

 

The bad news is that I think you're flogging a dead horse with the insurance issue, It doesn't look like a penalty. They are probably entitled to make a charge for checking your insurance to make sure that their interest in the property is protected.

 

The good news is that they have paid back the extra interest they take from you in the last month of the mortgage. They did this for me way before I found this forum just on the back of two letters. It really is a nasty little trick they play and I wonder how many people fall for something that is so manifestly unfair.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Well never heard anything from my Pre-Lim, so now sent my LBA to SPML

14/06/06 Data Protection Act Sent to SPML

28/06/06 - Info / statements received from SPML

2/8/06 Pre Lim to SPML for £324.72

16/8/06 LBA to SPML

28/9/06 filed MCOL

defence filing date extended to 22/12/06

28/12/06 copy of defence received from sch

16/01/07 AQ filed with court

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have now received a letter from SPML, looks like a basic letter really saying they now acknowledge receipt of my two letters and reference to my complaints

 

they state they have requested my file and will do a full investigation to my complaint. they aim to reply within 4 weeks, but state that the FSA allow them 8 weeks and they will make sure I receive a final reply within 8 weeks.

 

Is this their normal way of handling things?

 

As I have now issued them with all the letters, my next step is moneyclaim online which is due in under 2 weeks time now.

 

Should I just proceed with the moneyclaim as planned, or because they have now sent me this letter, do I have to give them more time to deal with it?

 

thanks

Joanne

14/06/06 Data Protection Act Sent to SPML

28/06/06 - Info / statements received from SPML

2/8/06 Pre Lim to SPML for £324.72

16/8/06 LBA to SPML

28/9/06 filed MCOL

defence filing date extended to 22/12/06

28/12/06 copy of defence received from sch

16/01/07 AQ filed with court

Link to post
Share on other sites

It would seem that ive had the same letter as you sent to me last week.

Ive sent SPML my prelim letter but not yet got to the LBA letter.

Ive been told 4-8 weeks also. I will be waiting the 14 days ive already stipulated plus an extra 7-10 days to give them a chance (i wouldnt do this if it wasnt a mortgage case!).

Once their time is up i shall be sending my LBA.

Are you claiming erc?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Will be watching with great interest Joanne :)

 

I am going to start a claim against this company aswell as I had a mortgage with them for 3 years and they love the charges...

 

Mark :D

Halifax Current Account Claim £441

Statements Received 11/08/2006

Prelim Sent 21/08/2006

Standard letter Received 29/08/2006

LBA Sent 06/09/2006

Offer Received 20/09/2006

MCOL Issued 03/10/2006

Settled in full :) 07/10/2006

LLoyds Current Account Claim £773.27 inc interest

Statements Received 21/08/2006 Only half received :evil:

Prelim Sent

Barclays Current Account Claim £717.71 inc interest

Statements Received End of Aug postage not paid - lol

Prelim Sent 06/09/2006

LBA Sent 25/09/2006

Offer Received and Rejected 04/10/2006

Will be taking on Welcome Finance and Southern Pacific Mortgages Soon. :-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I was due to commence a court claim against SPML in early September, however, I know bad timing on my part as I never commenced the claim due to me going on holiday for two weeks at the time and didnt want to miss anything important whilst I was away or something that needed a response.

 

anyway, I have now returned and this morning received a letter from SPML basically outlining my complaints, saying they have now completed their investigations and found that they acted accordingly and in accordance with the terms and conditions of my mortgage account.

 

they say that the fees applied for returned DD were correctly applied as they were unable to collect payments.

 

they also say that the whole months interest charged when I closed the mortgage was correctly calculated as my account was charged interest on the 'monthly' basis.

 

in summary, they say all charges where applied to my account in accordance with my mortgage terms and conditions.

 

basically sod off!

 

where do I stand now? as they have now responded to my letters giving their so called reasons?

 

can I still persue this claim and file the court claim? Im guessing I would have to take out the bit where they have failed to respond to my letters? but is their something else I should put instead?

 

thanks for your help

Joanne

14/06/06 Data Protection Act Sent to SPML

28/06/06 - Info / statements received from SPML

2/8/06 Pre Lim to SPML for £324.72

16/8/06 LBA to SPML

28/9/06 filed MCOL

defence filing date extended to 22/12/06

28/12/06 copy of defence received from sch

16/01/07 AQ filed with court

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Well SPML have until Wed 18th Oct to file a defence, they havent acknowledged my claim as yet.

 

After searching for info on a 'judgement' could someone please clarify for me what will happen?

 

I know that I can enter the judgement sometime after midnight on the 18th, but before 9am, to ensure the court will deal with it the same day, SPML has then until 4pm that day to acknowledge.

 

Im guessing if this happens I will 'win' by default, but what happens after that?

 

are they 'ordered' to pay up by the court?

how long do they have to pay?

do I have to do anything else after the 'judgement'?

 

sorry for the questions, just not sure on what will happen on Wed if they dont acknowledge.

 

thanks

Joanne

14/06/06 Data Protection Act Sent to SPML

28/06/06 - Info / statements received from SPML

2/8/06 Pre Lim to SPML for £324.72

16/8/06 LBA to SPML

28/9/06 filed MCOL

defence filing date extended to 22/12/06

28/12/06 copy of defence received from sch

16/01/07 AQ filed with court

Link to post
Share on other sites

well you guessed it, they filed a defence in the last hour! so according to the courts they now have a further 14 days, taking them up until the 1st November.

 

However, I have today received a letter from their solicitors with the following content:- dated 19th Oct (day after the defence was filed)

 

We have just received the papers and in the circumstances so that we may fully investigate the matter and prepare a defence we shall be grateful if you will grant us an extension of time in which to serve the defence of 28 days.

 

The Civil Procedure Rules (part15.5) allow the parties to agree that the period for filing a defence be extended by up to 28 days. By our calculations our clients defence is due on the 1st November 2006 and we are seeking n extension until Wednesday 29 November 2006.

 

If you do not agree we will apply to the court for an extension and seek an order that you pay the costs of such an application. We trust this will not be necessary.

 

so I guess, what do I do now? can they do this?? they are seeking the 28 days after the first 28 days has expired!

 

do I have to go along with this and let them have the extension? as they state they will charge me the costs if I basically dont agree and let them have it??

 

has anyone ever had this also?

 

thanks for your help

14/06/06 Data Protection Act Sent to SPML

28/06/06 - Info / statements received from SPML

2/8/06 Pre Lim to SPML for £324.72

16/8/06 LBA to SPML

28/9/06 filed MCOL

defence filing date extended to 22/12/06

28/12/06 copy of defence received from sch

16/01/07 AQ filed with court

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi,

I have now received my AQ and need to get it back by the 17th Jan.

 

I have looked at the libary to see how to fill this is, all seems straight forward other than section 'G' which is the 'other information' bit?

 

do I just copy what is written in the libary templates section? or do I need to add/change anything?

 

the one in the libary refers to 'banks' and i wasnt sure if this was correct for us as this is a mortgage co?

 

any advice would really be appreciated as i dont want to mess this up now ive come this far.

 

thanks again and good luck to everyone

Joanne

14/06/06 Data Protection Act Sent to SPML

28/06/06 - Info / statements received from SPML

2/8/06 Pre Lim to SPML for £324.72

16/8/06 LBA to SPML

28/9/06 filed MCOL

defence filing date extended to 22/12/06

28/12/06 copy of defence received from sch

16/01/07 AQ filed with court

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have today filed my AQ, so I guess onto the next step.

 

I have a question, if anyone knows?

 

In the defence they have stated / denied that I have any entitlement to bring these proceedings alone and that my husband would be a necessary party to my claim.

 

It is something i never even thought about, as I only have my name on the claim and mortgage was a joint mortgage with my husband?

 

Joanne

14/06/06 Data Protection Act Sent to SPML

28/06/06 - Info / statements received from SPML

2/8/06 Pre Lim to SPML for £324.72

16/8/06 LBA to SPML

28/9/06 filed MCOL

defence filing date extended to 22/12/06

28/12/06 copy of defence received from sch

16/01/07 AQ filed with court

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Joanne,

This happened to me. Write to the court and request that they ammend your claim to include your husband's name and make sure that he signs it, of course. I think it costs £35 to do this (it was so long ago I can't remember).

All the best,

Paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Joanne,

 

Yeah, Paul is right - it's £35. Good luck!

Check out my thread soon about SPML - some interesting happenings since I was last on!

 

:)

--------------------------------------------------------------

HSBC

Settled in FULL on 8/8/06 - £3619.53

:D

CAPITAL ONE

Settled in Full on 6/9/06 - £84.76

:D

ABBEY NATIONAL (Old N&P Mortgage)

Settled In Full on 2/3/07 - £307.13

:D

SPML

*Court Case Withdrawn - family illness*

MORTGAGES PLC

*Court Case Withdrawn - family illness*

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI Guys,

thanks for your info, it is not too late?

 

I have today posted off the AQ, so do I wait to hear back from the courts now?

 

thanks so much

Joanne

14/06/06 Data Protection Act Sent to SPML

28/06/06 - Info / statements received from SPML

2/8/06 Pre Lim to SPML for £324.72

16/8/06 LBA to SPML

28/9/06 filed MCOL

defence filing date extended to 22/12/06

28/12/06 copy of defence received from sch

16/01/07 AQ filed with court

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, don't wait for the court, simply send the letter from your husband and a cheque for £35. Keep it simple. This is what I sent:

 

Claim Number: 6QZ75852

 

To whom it may concern,

 

I hold a joint mortgage account with Accord Mortgages with xxxx, account number xxxxxxxxxx. With reference to 10 (1) (b) of the Defendant

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry Joanne,

I did quick reply and there's a word limit. Here is the letter:

 

Claim Number: 6QZ75852

 

To whom it may concern,

 

I hold a joint mortgage account with Accord Mortgages with xxxxx, account number xxxxxxx. With reference to 10 (1) (b) of the Defendant’s defence, which is as follows:

 

The debit (and any payments made in respect of the debit) was to the joint account of the Claimant and xxxxx. In the circumstances any sums to be re-credited (if at all) to the account fall to be re-credited to both the Claimant and xxxxxx. It follows that the Claimant has no sufficient right to bring the present claim solely on her own behalf and in the absence of xxxxxx as a party to the proceedings.

 

I hereby request that I am made a party to the proceedings.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

 

 

xxxxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...