Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Morning dx and thank you for your message.   With regards to your comment about them not needing to produce the deed, the additional directions ordered by the judge included 'a copy of any assignment o the debt or agreement relied upon'  so that is why I thought that point was relevant?
    • Sorry for the long post but I don't want to miss out any relevant information: My wife bought a car from Trade Centre UK and have been having nothing but trouble with it. Unfortunately we paid of the finance used to buy the car as we weren't expecting this much trouble with the car as we we though we would have protection as buying from a dealer. We are wondering if we can still reject the vehicle since the finance plan has been paid off. Timeline is as follows: 13/12/2023 -15/12/2023 Bought car from Trade Centre UK for £10548 £2000 deposit paid on credit card on 13/12/2023 £8548 on finance from Moneybarn (arranged through Trade Centre UK). picked up car on 15/12/2023 Also bought lifetime warranty for £50/month 25/12/2023 Engine Management Light comes on. The AA called out and diagnosed the following error codes: P0133 - Lambda sensor (bank 1, sensor 1) Oxygen Sensor. Error Message : Slow reaction. Error sporadic P0135 - Lambda sensor heat. circ.(bank1,sensor1) Oxygen Sensor. Error Message : Component defective Due to it being Christmas took a few days to get through to them but they booked me in for 28/12/2023 to run their own diagnostics. 28/12/2023 Took car in to Trade Centre so could check the car – They agreed it was the Oxygen Sensor and Booked me in for repair on 30/01/2024. I was told they had no earlier slots, and I would be fine to carry on driving car when I said I was afraid of problem worse. During diagnosing the problem, they reset the Engine Management Light. During drive home light comes back on. 29/12/2023 - 29/01/2024 I carry on driving the car but closer to the date, engine goes to reduced power every now and again – not being a mechanic I presumed that this was due to above fault. 20/01/2024 Not expecting any more problems paid off the finance on the car using personal loan from bank with lower interest rate. 30/01/2024 Trade Centre replace to O2 sensor (They also take it on a roughly 60mile road trip which seems a bit excessive to me – I can’t prove this as something prompted me take a picture of milage when I handed car in but I forgot take one on collection – only remembered next day.) 06/02/2024 Engine goes in reduced power mode again and engine management light comes on – Thinking the Trade centre’s 28 day warranty period was over I booked the car the into local garage for the next day to get problem fixed under the lifetime warranty package. Fault seems to clear after engine was switched off. 07/02/2024 In the Morning, I take it to local garage who say as the light gone off – the warranty company is unlikely to cover the cost of the repair or diagnostics and recommend I contact them when the light comes back on. In the evening the light comes back on and luckily I manage to get it back to the garage just before it shuts for the day. 08/02/2024 The Garage sends me a diagnostics video showing a lot error codes been picked up by their diagnostics machine including codes for Oxygen sensor and Nox Sensors, Accelerator pedal and several more. Video also shows EGR Hose not connected to the intake manifold properly, they believed this was confusing the onboard system as it is unlikely this many sensors would trigger at same the time but they couldn’t be certain until they repaired the hose. 13/02/2024 Finally get the car back as it took a while to get approval and payment for the repairs from the Warranty company. Garage told me to keep an eye the car as errors had cleared with the hose but couldn’t 100% certain that’s what caused the problem. 06/03/2024 Engine management light comes on again. Fed up I go into Trade Centre as I was just around the corner when it happened and asked them how to reject the car or have the problem fixed. They insist that as it’s over 28 days I need to get the car fixed under the warranty package I purchased and they could no longer fix the car as it was over 28 days. When I tried telling them it appeared to be the same or related problem they said they couldn’t help as I hadn’t contacted them earlier. I asked them if they were willing to connect the car to the diagnostics machine and tell me what the problem was, as a goodwill gesture, which he agreed to do and took the car to the back He came back around 30 minutes later and said they took a look at the sensor they replaced previously and there was nothing wrong with it and engine management light went off when they removed the sensor to check it. When I asked what the error code he couldn’t give me an exact fault but the said it one of the problems I told him earlier (Accelerator pedal). I have this visit audio recorded on my phone – I informed the reps I was recording several times. As the light wasn’t on, local garage couldn’t book me for a repair under warranty. 07/03/2024 Light came on so managed to book back into local garage for the 12/03/2024 Whilst waiting to take car into garage, I borrowed a OBD sensor and scanned for errors on the car. This showed the following errors: P11BE – Manufacturer specific code (Google showed this to be NOX sensor) P0133 - Oxygen (Lambda) Sensor B1 S1: Response too Slow 12/03/2024 Took car to local garage and the confirmed the above errors. This leads me to believe that either Trade Centre UK reps lied and just reset the light or just didn’t check properly (Obviously I am unable to prove this) 22/03/2024 Finally got the car back as according to garage, the warranty company took a long to time to pay for the repairs 28/04/2024 Engine management Light has come back on. Using the borrowed OBD scanner I am getting the following codes: P0133 - Oxygen (Lambda) Sensor B1 S1: Response too Slow P2138 - Accelerator Position Sensors (G79) / (G185): Implausible Correlation I have not yet booked into a garage as I wanted to see what my rights are in terms of rejecting the car as to me the faults seem related. I can’t keep using taxi or train to get to work every time the car goes into the garage as it is getting very expensive. Am I right in thinking that they have used up their chance to repair when they conducted the repair end of January or when they refused to repair it in February ? If I am still able to reject the vehicle could you point to any sample letters or emails I can use. Thankyou for your advice on my next steps.
    • Ok noted about the screenshot uploads. In terms of screwing up I had one previous ticket that defaulted and ended up in a CCJ from Southend airport because for some reason during COVID I didn't receive their claim form just a notice of default. This hospital ticket was the 2nd ticket that went to CCJ due to a lack of knowledge of the process. Maybe it's easier just to pay them in future I'm thinking though, I don't get them very often anyway
    • Car maker takes a hit from weakening demand and price war in the world's largest electric vehicle market.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Speeding in a Van over 2 Tonnes


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5956 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All

 

Im after a little advice, I got caught out by speeding in a van over 2 tonnes, its a company vehicle, I was doing 58 in a 60mph zone, when my transports manager phoned me to tell me I was told everyone knew, he later phoned me back and retracted that statement after speaking to several other employees who also didnt know that the Ford connect was classed as a light goods vehicle and subject to 50mph on A roads.

 

I would like to know if they (my company) have a duty to incorporate into company handbook, memo or any other form of communication to there employees that such restrictions apply.

 

Thanks

 

A very disgruntled I.T Engineer now with 3 points !!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would like to know if they (my company) have a duty to incorporate into company handbook, memo or any other form of communication to there employees that such restrictions apply.

 

Ummm, well. Quite frankly. No.

 

Your employer is not duty bound to inform you of every law applicable to your working day. I doubt "You shall not stab a fellow employee to death" forms part of section 6 of your contract, for example.

 

That said, are you sure the NIP has been served appropriately?

Link to post
Share on other sites

That said, are you sure the NIP has been served appropriately?

 

Hi Thanks for your feedback, not sure what you mean by above,

 

I am an I.T engineer our company leases vehicles through autolease, my transport manager phoned me to tell me about this ticket, when he said doing 58 in a 60mph i asked him what the hell he meant, it was then he told me about this law, a few days later i recieved my NIP in the post

 

My point is he assumed everyone new about this regulation, by asking other people he quickly realised how wrong he was, very few people knew

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately a lot of people get caught out by this when they rent a transit van. On a dual carriageway, it is restricted to 60mph.

 

I was stopped doing 82 in a 60 zone. Whilst the traffic officer was showing me the video in his car, someone blatted past him and his speed kit recorded a speed over 100mph. He let me off with a warning.

 

Check out the speed limit for vehicles other than cars. It makes interesting reading.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Your employee have a duty to carry out training before you use any equipment -this would include a car or a van.

 

That said, you have told them that you have a licence to drive specific types of vehicles, do you not have a copy of the highway code?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Having a licence to drive a particular class of vehicle deems you competent and duly trained to drive the said class.

 

An Employer does not have to give you training to drive a vehicle you already hold a full licence for. It is your sole duty to know the relevant laws concerning the vehicles you drive.

 

If it was an HGV then there are different rules as an operator, part of that is ensuring the driver is licensed and competent to drive.

If my comments have been helpful please click my scales

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately a lot of people get caught out by this when they rent a transit van. On a dual carriageway, it is restricted to 60mph...

 

...Check out the speed limit for vehicles other than cars. It makes interesting reading.

A link to emphasis what borisbeaver has said...

117-126: Control of the vehicle : Directgov - Travel and transport

 

 

...:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Having a licence to drive a particular class of vehicle deems you competent and duly trained to drive the said class.

 

An Employer does not have to give you training to drive a vehicle you already hold a full licence for. It is your sole duty to know the relevant laws concerning the vehicles you drive.

 

If it was an HGV then there are different rules as an operator, part of that is ensuring the driver is licensed and competent to drive.

 

Not correct - you will find that most truck and bus fleets will do type-specific training for each sort of vehicle (Scania. Volvo, Dennis, etc) even for people who have held the relevant licence for 20 years.

 

I can assure you that it most certainly _is_ an employers duty to give training, and to keep a record that training has been given (under Heath & Safety at Work Act 1974, and other relevant legislation).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advisee is absolutely right that there is a very heavy duty of care on employers to provide training.

 

However, it is the driver who is responsible for the offence. The fact that the driver has not been trained will not make the speeding charge, etc. go away for the driver; it will simply open up a whole new set of charges for the employer (and possibly employee).

 

If the employee (driver) felt that his training was insufficient (ie he wasn't competent) then his duty under H&S is to refuse to drive the vehicle until adequately trained.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Having a licence to drive a particular class of vehicle deems you competent and duly trained to drive the said class.

 

An Employer does not have to give you training to drive a vehicle you already hold a full licence for. It is your sole duty to know the relevant laws concerning the vehicles you drive.

 

 

Not so. Even a hire car company should provide training to a customer as to the controls, etc. of a hire car before letting him/her drive away.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks to all the people that have posted, in short i have taken the points and paid the fine, my company refuse point blank to take any responsibilty although I have never had any training at all regarding my company vehicle which i have driven for the past 3 years, I wouold of taken the matter further, however im sure you understand that "by rocking the boat" im only making a rod for my own back, i,ll put this one, reluctantly down to experience.

 

On a further note for readers, since incurring this fine it has become very apparent that most car drivers(also licenced to drive my van) are not aware of the speed restrictions, i now travel at 50mph on A roads and 60 on dual carraigeways, i am forever being honked at, or obsene gestures made to me because of me holding up traffic, its makes me wonder how many other people have been caught out by this crazy little known legistration !!!!

 

Thanks again everyone

Link to post
Share on other sites

Type-specific training is done to teach new futures on a new truck, like when Mercedes brought out the EPS gearbox. This is so you do not invalidate a warranty.

I have been on these " type-specific training " and I’m one of the 20 year licence holders and have never been taught about speed limits etc on these, in the 15 years I drove HGV`s all I ever had was once yearly assessments.

This is about to change with the drivers CPC coming out in Sept 09 but Existing drivers who already hold a vocational licence on the 10th September 2009 are exempt from the initial CPC. This is known as "acquired rights".

Yes under H&S training needs to be done and having spoken too the intelligence officer at vosa in the midlands I can say positively that they and the courts do in fact consider it’s the drivers reasonability to know the relevant laws of the vehicle they drive.

Now the local HSE dept view is (I rang them knowing these things is my job), as long as the company checks the validly of the licence they do not have to provide training to drive, they would only have to provide training on the use of equipment IE: indicators, horn tipping gear etc.

They state that it is just as much the driver’s responsibility to say if he feels he or she is not competent to drive that class of vehicle and the company would be within its rights to assume that a full licence holder knows the relevant laws and is fully trained in its use.

Trying to say in a court of law or an EAT that the reason you were speeding is because you had no training will not wash at all.

  • Haha 1

If my comments have been helpful please click my scales

Link to post
Share on other sites

i now travel at 50mph on A roads and 60 on dual carraigeways, i am forever being honked at, or obsene gestures made to me because of me holding up traffic, its makes me wonder how many other people have been caught out by this crazy little known legistration !!!!

 

An HGV is limited to 40 mph on a single carriageway, where a car can do 60 mph.

 

I don't believe it to be crazy legistlation. Vans and trucks are more heavily loaded than cars and as a certain Engineering Officer once said "Ye canna change the laws of physics Cap'n". The heavier an object is and the faster it is going, the harder it is to stop it or alter its course (moments of inertia, etc.).

 

The fact that it is little known is purely down to the drivers of such vehicles not reading the highway code. etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

An employers duty is to ensure an employee is correctly trained to do the duty they are employed to do this does NOT mean they have to test or train them if they have a qualification from an approved body. If I got a job as a Dr I would not expect the Hospital to make me sit all my exams again as they didn't beleive I was qualified. By providing a driving licence you are saying you are competant to drive and know the laws regarding driving. If not it would be a farce with every proffesional driver claiming his boss didn't tell him he could not drive on the pavement, do 120mph on the motorway etc etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

An HGV is limited to 40 mph on a single carriageway, where a car can do 60 mph.

 

I don't believe it to be crazy legistlation. Vans and trucks are more heavily loaded than cars and as a certain Engineering Officer once said "Ye canna change the laws of physics Cap'n". The heavier an object is and the faster it is going, the harder it is to stop it or alter its course (moments of inertia, etc.).

 

The fact that it is little known is purely down to the drivers of such vehicles not reading the highway code. etc.

 

In general, where a car is 60 70 70 (single carriageway, dual, and motorway) a bus in 50 60 70, and a HGV 40 50 60 - less when towing a trailer.

 

Everyone should take a look at Department for Children, Schools and Families or purchase the new book (about £2 I think).

 

Pat - if the next link is up-to-date, for a van/lorry under 7.5 tonnes it is actually 50 on a single carriageway road, only over 7.5 tonne when it becomes 40: http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/roadsafety/speedmanagement/speedknowyourlimits

Link to post
Share on other sites

A car towing a trailer or caravan has the same restrictions. It is 50 mph on A roads and 60 mph on dual carriageway and motorways and on a motorway you cannot use the outside or fast lane to ovetake. Big No No!

 

Only on an m/way with three or more lanes!

But what about a three lane dual carriageway that is not a motorway?

********************************************

Nothing in this post constitutes "advice" which I may not, in any event, be qualified to provide.

The only interpretation permitted on this post (or any others I may have made) is that this is what I would personally consider doing in the circumstances discussed. Each and every reader of this post or any other I may have made must take responsibility for forming their own view and making their own decision.

I receive an unwieldy number of private messages. I am happy to respond to messages posted on open forum but am unable to respond to private messages, seeking advice, when the substance of that message should properly be on the open forum.

Many thanks for your assistance and understanding on this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pat - if the next link is up-to-date, for a van/lorry under 7.5 tonnes it is actually 50 on a single carriageway road, only over 7.5 tonne when it becomes 40: http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/roadsafety/speedmanagement/speedknowyourlimits

 

 

Yep. What has changed is not the speed limits but the term HGV. It no longer applies, trucks are categorised differently. However, the old term HGV still sticks with many (of us) older motorists.

 

Sorry if it mis-led anybody

Link to post
Share on other sites

Only on an m/way with three or more lanes!

But what about a three lane dual carriageway that is not a motorway?

 

A dual carriageway is not a motorway.

 

A motorway is classed as a special road since differing laws apply on these.

 

Yes but it seems a bit odd if you can drive a car towing a trailer in lane 3 of a 3 lane dual carriageway but not in lane 3 of a 3 lane motorway!

 

Well it does to me!

********************************************

Nothing in this post constitutes "advice" which I may not, in any event, be qualified to provide.

The only interpretation permitted on this post (or any others I may have made) is that this is what I would personally consider doing in the circumstances discussed. Each and every reader of this post or any other I may have made must take responsibility for forming their own view and making their own decision.

I receive an unwieldy number of private messages. I am happy to respond to messages posted on open forum but am unable to respond to private messages, seeking advice, when the substance of that message should properly be on the open forum.

Many thanks for your assistance and understanding on this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes but it seems a bit odd if you can drive a car towing a trailer in lane 3 of a 3 lane dual carriageway but not in lane 3 of a 3 lane motorway!

 

Well it does to me!

 

What I found odd when living in Medway and commuting to London was that during the 50 mph fuel conservation speed limit in the '70s. I would exit the, then two lane, M2 at a legal 70 mph and have to slow to 50 mph for a three-lane dual carriageway, the A2

Link to post
Share on other sites

An HGV is limited to 40 mph on a single carriageway, where a car can do 60 mph.

 

I don't believe it to be crazy legistlation. Vans and trucks are more heavily loaded than cars and as a certain Engineering Officer once said "Ye canna change the laws of physics Cap'n". The heavier an object is and the faster it is going, the harder it is to stop it or alter its course (moments of inertia, etc.).

 

The fact that it is little known is purely down to the drivers of such vehicles not reading the highway code. etc.

 

I agree with you, however there has been talk and the haulage industry have been calling for the 40 limit to be raised.

 

When it was bought in, HGV`s breaks were bad...no very bad, break fade etc and they took some stopping. Now that’s not the case, an HGV is now fitted with disk breaks all round ( truck and trailer ) ABS, traction control etc and can in fact stop if not as quick as a car as damm near as makes no difference.

 

The limit has not stayed up with technology and only now causes frustration and in fact on many roads the police ask drivers to do 50 ( A9, A303 etc ) to keep the flow of traffic moving.In Europe the limit unless otherwise stated is 80 KPH ( 50 MPH ) in most states.

 

I would like to point out that, although the speed limit for HGV`s on a motorway is 60MPH they are mechanically restricted to 90 KMH ( 56 MPH ) and I personally think all vehicles should be restricted but that’s another story.

If my comments have been helpful please click my scales

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have never heard of or come across a 3 lane "dual" carriageway. Surely this is a contradiction.

However either way it is amazing how many people do not know about the speed regulations for towing on a motorway. I have been travelling at 60mph and idiots have overtaken me towing a trailer or caravan travelling at a minimum of 70mph. They are a danger to other road users and themselves in the vent that the trailer starts to snake.

As for vans at this speed it does not really bother me if driven safely.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...