Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi Sorry for the delay in getting back to you The email excuse and I do say excuse to add to your account and if court decide LL can't recoup costs will be removed is a joke. So I would Ask them: Ask them to provide you with the exact terms within your Tenancy Agreement that allows them to add these Court Fees to your Account before it has been decided in Court by a Judge. Until the above is answered you require these Court Fees to be removed from your Account (Note: I will all be down to your Tenancy Agreement so have a good look through it to see what if any fees they can add to your account in these circumstances)
    • Thank you for your responses. As requested, some more detail. Please forgive, I'm writing this on my phone which always makes for less than perfect grammar. My Dad tries but English not his 1st language, i'm born and bred in England, a qualified accountant and i often help him with his admin. On this occasion I helped my dad put in his renewal driving licence application around 6 weeks before expiry and with it the disclosure of his sleep apnoea. Once the licence expired I told him to get in touch with his GP, because the DVLA were offering only radio silence at that time (excuses of backlogs When I called to chase up). The GP charged £30 for an opinion letter on his ability to drive based on his medical history- at the time I didn't take a copy of the letter, but I am hoping this will be key evidence that we can rely on as to why s88 applies because in the GP opinion they saw no reason he couldn't drive i need to see the letter again as im going only on memory- we forwarded the letter in a chase up / complaint to the DVLA.  In December, everything went quiet RE the sleep apnoea (i presume his GP had given assurance) but the DVLA noticed there had been a 2nd medical issue in the past, when my father suffered a one off mini stroke 3 years prior. That condition had long been resolved via an operation (on his brain of all places, it was a scary time, but he came through unscathed) and he's never had an issue since. We were able to respond to that query very promptly (within the 14 days) and the next communication was the licence being granted 2 months later. DVLA have been very slow in responding every step of the way.  I realise by not disclosing the mini stroke at the time, and again on renewal (had I known I'd have encouraged it) he was potentially committing an offence, however that is not relevant to the current charge being levied, which is that he was unable to rely on s88 because of a current medical issue (not one that had been resolved). I could be wrong, I'm not a legal expert! The letter is a summons I believe because its a speeding offence (59 in a temp roadworks 50 limit on the A1, ironically whist driving up to visit me). We pleaded guilty to the speeding but not guilty to the s87.  DVLA always confirmed to me on the phone that the licence had not been revoked and that he "May" be able to continue to drive. They also confirmed in writing, but the letter explains the DVLA offer no opinion on the matter and that its up to the driver to seek legal advice. I'll take the advice to contact DVLA medical group. I'm going to contact the GP to make sure they received the SAR request for data, and make it clear we need to see a copy of the opinion letter. In terms of whether to continue to fight this, or to continue with the defence, do we have any idea of the potential consequences of either option? Thanks all
    • stopping payments until a DN arrives does not equal automatic sale to a DCA...if you resume payments after the DN.  
    • Sleep apnoea: used to require the condition  to be “completely” controlled Sometime before June 2013 DVLA changed it to "adequately" controlled. I have to disagree with MitM regarding the effect of informing DVLA and S.88 A diagnosis of sleep apnoea doesn't mean a licence wont be granted, and, indeed, here it was. If the father sought medical advice (did he?) : this is precisely where S.88 applies https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/64edcf3a13ae1500116e2f5d/inf1886-can-i-drive-while-my-application-is-with-dvla.pdf p.4 for “new medical condition” It is shakier ground if the opinion of a healthcare professional wasn’t sought. in that case it is on the driver to state they believed they met the medical standard to drive. However, the fact the licence was then later granted can be used to be persuasive that the driver’s belief they met the standard was correct. What was the other condition? And, just to confirm, at no point did DVLA say the licence was revoked / application refused? I’d be asking DVLA Drivers’ Medical Group why they believe S.88 doesn’t apply. S.88 only applies for the UK, incidentally. If your licence has expired and you meet the conditions for S.88 you can drive in the U.K., but not outside the U.K. 
    • So you think not pay until DN then pay something to the oc to delay selling to dcas?    then go from there? 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Charge on my house ***WON***


polly55
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5889 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Date xxx

 

REQUEST FOR INFORMATION UNDER PART 18 OF THE CIVIL PROCEDURE RULES

 

Dear Sirs

 

Account No: BLANK

County Court Claim No: BLANK

 

 

Regarding the above, please let me have;

  • A true copy of the executed credit agreement relating to this case and any terms and conditions that applied to the account at the time of default and at the time the account was opened.
  • True copies of any notice of assignment and/or default notice or enforcement and of any notice that you or the original creditor sent me, with a copy of any proof of postage that you hold

  • Details of any collection charge added to the account; specifically, the date it was levied, the amount of the charge, a detailed financial breakdown of how the charge was calculated, and what the charge covers.

  • Specific details of the fees/charges levied by any other agency in respect of this account and a detailed breakdown of said fees/charges and what each charge relates to and on what date said fees/charges were levied.
  • I look forward to your response.
     
    Yours faithfully

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 94
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Polly you're going to have to send an amendment to your request as you need to give them a date as to when to send you these documents by. The CPR doesn't define how many days are allowed, it only defines the time limits as what is reasonable. I would suggest 10 days. Please also read this http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt/108467-basic-introduction-consumer-credit.html

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry hjack, the references above to the S.A.R - (Subject Access Request), one says 40 days another says 14 and then there is mention of 10. Plus there is payment of £10 mentioned in some and not others, can someone explain ? Should section 22 be metioned as well

 

Found these on here: CPR - Parts and Practice Directions

 

PART 18 - FURTHER INFORMATION

 

PRACTICE DIRECTION – FURTHER INFORMATION - This Practice Direction supplements CPR Part 18

 

PART 22 - STATEMENTS OF TRUTH

 

PRACTICE DIRECTION – STATEMENTS OF TRUTH - THIS PRACTICE DIRECTION SUPPLEMENTS CPR PART 22

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's how he information is requested;

Subject Access request - 40 days and a tenner - under the Data Protection Act

Consumer Credit Agreement request - £1 and 12 days - under the Consumer Credit Act 1974

CPR request - free (reasonable time should be given) - Civil Procedure Rules

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hello

 

No reply yet from Weightmans or HFC regarding request and Royal Mail tracking can't tell me its been signed for yet. Should I send off another letter Special Delivery (sent last one recorded). Also, noticed in a letter from Weightmans when they first wrote that they refer to 'your agreement with HFC Bank' which of course I never had, the original agreement was with HSBC. HSBC did send me a notice of default in February 2007 but the next thing I knew Weightmans wrote to tell me they'd 'been instructed by HFC Bank Limited in relation to your account.' I know HSBC own HFC but it seems a bit iffy to me.

 

I'm putting together a letter for the court in my defence. The reason they give for wanting a charging order is that it will take too long to pay off at current rate. However, I've just increased my repayments to all my creditors by 150 pounds a month, but can't increase HFC because of the CCJ. They've also added 917 pounds in 'solicitors costs and admin' and 410 court costs for the county court proceeding which they initiated. Are they not creating the situation they're appealing against? Any help drafting this letter to the court would be greatly appreciated. I have the Application Notice scanned and the original Judgement if anyone could help.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

In addition to the above, looking back on my HSBC statements, I notice there are quite a few charges. Who do I send an SAR to HSBC, HFC or the solicitors. As I've already been county courted can I still claim the charges back? What should I do next. I'm in court on 11th Jan and am getting worried that i'm not going to be properly prepared. Help, anyone!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Royal Mail tracking can't tell me its been signed for yet.

Well it's reasonable to assume that they got your letter. Court documents are actually normally only sent by second class post so it's not something I would worry about.
I have the Application Notice scanned and the original Judgement if anyone could help.
If you could post it up removing personal info first that would be useful.
As I've already been county courted can I still claim the charges back?
Yes. This information should be given as part of your CPR request.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

polly, who the hell are you , youre really mad. or debtors have driven you up it.

 

Hello Polly,

 

Have you come back yet:D I have had a look at the documents that you posted up, but unfortunately they are too small to read.

 

Please don't despair, help will come, if it doesn't soon pm one of the mods, site helpers to have a look.

 

What do you need to know???? That is without reading all of the post that have been posted.

If any of my posts are helpful, please feel free to click my scales. All information is given as my opinion only, based on my own personal experiences. I have no legal training, but have educated myself in aspects of consumer legislation. My motto "NEVER GIVE IN, NEVER SURRENDER", THERE IS A WAR ON YOU KNOW

Link to post
Share on other sites

oh your a darling, such a relief to have a reply. Have i posted my documents in the wrong format?

 

Hello polly,

 

Now that sounds a more rational response:D I know how it feels to post and no-one responds:( We do get desperate and feel that we are on our own. You need to be a bit more forceful, start pm'ing for help.

 

Now regards your docs, I don't know what format you used, but a lot of peeps on the site use photobucket to post up docs. It is a free service on the internet. So if you type in photobucket in your browser and follow the instructions, hopefully, fingers crossed, you will be able to post up the docs and they will be readable. Even I managed it, so it is not that hard.

 

I will catch up tomorrow, as sleep is calling and I have to get up early.

If any of my posts are helpful, please feel free to click my scales. All information is given as my opinion only, based on my own personal experiences. I have no legal training, but have educated myself in aspects of consumer legislation. My motto "NEVER GIVE IN, NEVER SURRENDER", THERE IS A WAR ON YOU KNOW

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...